taxonID	type	description	language	source
4A73D56B65435A65FF67FC28FCABFA5D.taxon	discussion	Notes: — In his description of Boletus cinnabarinus, Jacquin (1776) confirmed that the name was based on a specimen collected by Francis Xavier Wulfen (1728 – 1805) in Carinthia, Austria, but did not reference a particular specimen or herbarium. Specimens are preferable to illustrations in the typification process as they permit more accurate and reliable identification of polymorphic taxa. However, we were unable to locate any material related to the name at the herbaria where Jacquin’s collection is deposited (W and WU), nor any material associated with accepted works (Fries 1821). Nevertheless, Jacquin (1776) provided a plate (Plate 304) of the type specimens, which is located in the Department of Archives and History of Science of the Natural History Museum in Vienna (Fig. 1 A), identified by him as Boletus cinnabarinus, and which we designate as a lectotype to stabilize the application of the name, in accordance with Articles 9.11, 9.12 and 9.13 of the ICN (Turland et al. 2018).	en	Gurgel, Rafaela Araújo F., Carvalho, Catarina S., Ishikawa, Noemia K., Cabral, Tiara S. (2023): Nomenclatural review and history of Pycnoporus (Polyporaceae): A widespread, bright-reddish genus in Basidiomycota. Phytotaxa 589 (3): 296-300, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.589.3.10, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.589.3.10
4A73D56B65435A65FF67FA57FFEFF804.taxon	discussion	Notes: — Bondartsev & Singer (1941) described Pycnoporus coccineus based on Polyporus coccineus Fr. the basionym. Fries (1851) published the name Po. coccineus, referencing a specimen collected from Motu Iti in the Marquesas Islands and citing “ legitimate Prof. Behm ”, and a specimen from Didrichsen (no. 34), but he did not indicate where the specimen was deposited, nor did he cite a type. Lloyd (1916) confirmed that the type specimen of Po. coccineus disappeared from Fries’ herbarium. We searched the herbaria in which Fries’ collections were deposited and located material at KEW. Lloyd (1916) cited material deposited at KEW, possibly the same material that we found, and referred to it as a “ cotype ” referring to Po. coccineus (see note 440), which may indicate the existence of more than one specimen. Thus, in accordance with Art. 9.12 (ICN, Turland et al. 2018), we designate the specimen deposited at KEW (K (M) 164023) as a lectotype of Pycnoporus coccineus (Fig. 1 B). The specimen information reports a collection by “ Prof. Behm. ”, which corroborates the protologue of Po. coccineus and was identified as “ Polypori coccinei ”.	en	Gurgel, Rafaela Araújo F., Carvalho, Catarina S., Ishikawa, Noemia K., Cabral, Tiara S. (2023): Nomenclatural review and history of Pycnoporus (Polyporaceae): A widespread, bright-reddish genus in Basidiomycota. Phytotaxa 589 (3): 296-300, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.589.3.10, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.589.3.10
4A73D56B65435A65FF67FD5DFC52FC08.taxon	type_taxon	– Type: Pycnoporus cinnabarinus (Jacq.: Fr.) P. Karsten (1881: 18) ≡ Boletus cinnabarinus Jacquin (1776: 2) ≡ Polyporus cinnabarinus (Jacq.) Fries (1821: 371), nom. sanct.	en	Gurgel, Rafaela Araújo F., Carvalho, Catarina S., Ishikawa, Noemia K., Cabral, Tiara S. (2023): Nomenclatural review and history of Pycnoporus (Polyporaceae): A widespread, bright-reddish genus in Basidiomycota. Phytotaxa 589 (3): 296-300, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.589.3.10, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.589.3.10
4A73D56B65435A65FF67FD5DFC52FC08.taxon	etymology	Etymology: — Not explained by Karsten. Named in relation to the small pores of the hymenophore. The name comes from the Greek “ pycnós ” which means compact, dense, very close together; and “ póros ” (from the Latin porus), with respect to pores, path, way.	en	Gurgel, Rafaela Araújo F., Carvalho, Catarina S., Ishikawa, Noemia K., Cabral, Tiara S. (2023): Nomenclatural review and history of Pycnoporus (Polyporaceae): A widespread, bright-reddish genus in Basidiomycota. Phytotaxa 589 (3): 296-300, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.589.3.10, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.589.3.10
4A73D56B65435A66FF67F82DFE79FF49.taxon	discussion	Notes: — When describing Trametes punicea, Fries (1851) indicated in the protologue that the specimen was collected by Didrik Ferdinand Didrichsen in Pulo Pinang, Malaysia. However, he did not indicate where the specimen was deposited. We located a single specimen associated with the information contained in Fries’ works at UPS (Fig. 1 C), where part of Fries’ collection is deposited, and we designate this specimen as a lectotype.	en	Gurgel, Rafaela Araújo F., Carvalho, Catarina S., Ishikawa, Noemia K., Cabral, Tiara S. (2023): Nomenclatural review and history of Pycnoporus (Polyporaceae): A widespread, bright-reddish genus in Basidiomycota. Phytotaxa 589 (3): 296-300, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.589.3.10, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.589.3.10
4A73D56B65405A66FF67FA9FFE05F9DA.taxon	discussion	Notes: — Linnaeus (1763) described Boletus sanguineus based on a specimen collected by Daniel Rolander (1723 – 1793) from Suriname, but he did not indicate where the type material was deposited. Moraes et al. (2014) confirmed that a specimen deposited at LINN (LINN, No. 1280.2) corresponds to the information on the protologue of B. sanguineus, and designated this specimen as a lectotype (LINN, No. 1280.2).	en	Gurgel, Rafaela Araújo F., Carvalho, Catarina S., Ishikawa, Noemia K., Cabral, Tiara S. (2023): Nomenclatural review and history of Pycnoporus (Polyporaceae): A widespread, bright-reddish genus in Basidiomycota. Phytotaxa 589 (3): 296-300, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.589.3.10, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.589.3.10
