taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
4758785E3775B85FAE7D0D6D473EFD72.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3710086/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3710086	Fig. 1. Clupeiform phylogenies pruned to only show major lineages estimated using concatenated Bayesian analysis of the mtDNA dataset (left) and nDNA dataset (right) in BEAST v.2.4.5. Red lines illustrate similarities and differences in the place- ment of major lineages by mtDNA versus nDNA. Time, in millions of years, is shown along the x-axis. Line drawings depict representative species from clupeiform lineages: Brevoortia tyrannus, Ilisha elongata, Dorosoma cepedianum, Etrumeus sadina, Clupea harengus, Pterengraulis atherinoides, Cetengraulis edentulus, Encrasicholina heteroloba, Stolephorus sp., Coilia dussumieri, Chirocentrus dorab, and Spratelloides gracilis (from top to bottom).	Fig. 1. Clupeiform phylogenies pruned to only show major lineages estimated using concatenated Bayesian analysis of the mtDNA dataset (left) and nDNA dataset (right) in BEAST v.2.4.5. Red lines illustrate similarities and differences in the place- ment of major lineages by mtDNA versus nDNA. Time, in millions of years, is shown along the x-axis. Line drawings depict representative species from clupeiform lineages: Brevoortia tyrannus, Ilisha elongata, Dorosoma cepedianum, Etrumeus sadina, Clupea harengus, Pterengraulis atherinoides, Cetengraulis edentulus, Encrasicholina heteroloba, Stolephorus sp., Coilia dussumieri, Chirocentrus dorab, and Spratelloides gracilis (from top to bottom).	2018-10-11	Bloom, Devin D.;Egan, Joshua P.		Zenodo	biologists	Bloom, Devin D.;Egan, Joshua P.			
4758785E3775B85FAE7D0D6D473EFD72.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3710088/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3710088	Fig. 2. Time-calibrated clupeoid phylogeny resulting from Bayesian analysis of the mtDNA dataset in BEAST v.2.4.5. Time, in millions of years, is shown along the x-axis. Node bars show the 95% highest posterior density interval of divergence time estimates.	Fig. 2. Time-calibrated clupeoid phylogeny resulting from Bayesian analysis of the mtDNA dataset in BEAST v.2.4.5. Time, in millions of years, is shown along the x-axis. Node bars show the 95% highest posterior density interval of divergence time estimates.	2018-10-11	Bloom, Devin D.;Egan, Joshua P.		Zenodo	biologists	Bloom, Devin D.;Egan, Joshua P.			
4758785E3775B85FAE7D0D6D473EFD72.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3710090/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3710090	Fig. 3. Time-calibrated clupeoid phylogeny resulting from Bayesian analysis of the nDNA dataset in BEAST v.2.4.5. Time, in millions of years, is shown along the x-axis. Node bars show the 95% highest posterior density interval of divergence time estimates.	Fig. 3. Time-calibrated clupeoid phylogeny resulting from Bayesian analysis of the nDNA dataset in BEAST v.2.4.5. Time, in millions of years, is shown along the x-axis. Node bars show the 95% highest posterior density interval of divergence time estimates.	2018-10-11	Bloom, Devin D.;Egan, Joshua P.		Zenodo	biologists	Bloom, Devin D.;Egan, Joshua P.			
4758785E3775B85FAE7D0D6D473EFD72.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3710092/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3710092	Fig. 4. Divergence time estimates for major clupeiform lineages estimated using nDNA and mtDNA separately by this study, mitochondrial genomes by Lavoué et al. (2013) and a combined mtDNA + nDNA dataset by Bloom, Lovejoy (2014). Time, in millions of years, is shown along the y-axis. Circles represent mean age estimates and whiskers delineate the 95% highest posterior density interval of divergence time estimates.	Fig. 4. Divergence time estimates for major clupeiform lineages estimated using nDNA and mtDNA separately by this study, mitochondrial genomes by Lavoué et al. (2013) and a combined mtDNA + nDNA dataset by Bloom, Lovejoy (2014). Time, in millions of years, is shown along the y-axis. Circles represent mean age estimates and whiskers delineate the 95% highest posterior density interval of divergence time estimates.	2018-10-11	Bloom, Devin D.;Egan, Joshua P.		Zenodo	biologists	Bloom, Devin D.;Egan, Joshua P.			
4758785E3775B85FAE7D0D6D473EFD72.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3710094/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3710094	Fig. 5. The left panel shows a phylogeny of Clupeiformes showing ancestral reconstructions of marine (red), freshwater (blue), anadromous (green) and catadromous (light blue) lineages from Bloom, Lovejoy (2014). The right panel shows lineage through time plots for select clades, which are indicated by grey bars.	Fig. 5. The left panel shows a phylogeny of Clupeiformes showing ancestral reconstructions of marine (red), freshwater (blue), anadromous (green) and catadromous (light blue) lineages from Bloom, Lovejoy (2014). The right panel shows lineage through time plots for select clades, which are indicated by grey bars.	2018-10-11	Bloom, Devin D.;Egan, Joshua P.		Zenodo	biologists	Bloom, Devin D.;Egan, Joshua P.			
