taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
3C7D8791512F793580AEB1C9FC5ED134.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/21362646/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21362646	FIG. 2.—Dorsal, ventral, and lateral views of the skull, and lateral view of the mandible of Ctenomys ibicuiensis new species holotype (TR 1065) from Manoel Viana municipality in Rio Grande do Sul in southern Brazil. Scale bar ¼ 10 mm.	FIG. 2.—Dorsal, ventral, and lateral views of the skull, and lateral view of the mandible of Ctenomys ibicuiensis new species holotype (TR 1065) from Manoel Viana municipality in Rio Grande do Sul in southern Brazil. Scale bar ¼ 10 mm.	2012-10-19	de Freitas, Thales R. O.;Fernandes, Fabiano A.;Fornel, Rodrigo;Roratto, Paula A.		Zenodo	biologists	de Freitas, Thales R. O.;Fernandes, Fabiano A.;Fornel, Rodrigo;Roratto, Paula A.			
3C7D8791512F793580AEB1C9FC5ED134.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/21362644/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21362644	FIG. 1.—Locality records of Ctenomys ibicuiensis, a new species from Manoel Viana and Maçambará municipalities, Rio Grande do Sul, southern Brazil. Points labeled L1–L6 correspond to localities listed in Table 1. Squares represent sites for C. torquatus and stars are locations with no records of tuco-tuco occurrence. Dashed lines are municipality borders.	FIG. 1.—Locality records of Ctenomys ibicuiensis, a new species from Manoel Viana and Maçambará municipalities, Rio Grande do Sul, southern Brazil. Points labeled L1–L6 correspond to localities listed in Table 1. Squares represent sites for C. torquatus and stars are locations with no records of tuco-tuco occurrence. Dashed lines are municipality borders.	2012-10-19	de Freitas, Thales R. O.;Fernandes, Fabiano A.;Fornel, Rodrigo;Roratto, Paula A.		Zenodo	biologists	de Freitas, Thales R. O.;Fernandes, Fabiano A.;Fornel, Rodrigo;Roratto, Paula A.			
3C7D8791512F793580AEB1C9FC5ED134.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/21362648/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21362648	FIG. 3.—Conventional Giemsa staining of Ctenomys ibicuiensis (female) from Manoel Viana, state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, showing 2n ¼ 50 and FNa ¼ 68 with 10 biarmed and 14 acrocentric pairs. Bar represents 10 µm.	FIG. 3.—Conventional Giemsa staining of Ctenomys ibicuiensis (female) from Manoel Viana, state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, showing 2n ¼ 50 and FNa ¼ 68 with 10 biarmed and 14 acrocentric pairs. Bar represents 10 µm.	2012-10-19	de Freitas, Thales R. O.;Fernandes, Fabiano A.;Fornel, Rodrigo;Roratto, Paula A.		Zenodo	biologists	de Freitas, Thales R. O.;Fernandes, Fabiano A.;Fornel, Rodrigo;Roratto, Paula A.			
3C7D8791512F793580AEB1C9FC5ED134.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/21362650/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21362650	FIG. 4.—Skull shape variation of Ctenomys ibicuiensis for A–D) dorsal, E–H) ventral, and I–L) lateral views, compared with species from the torquatus group. Shown are a plot of discriminant analyses with the first 2 axes (A, E, and I); frames of shape differences on the 1st axis (B, F, and J) and 2nd axis (C, G, and K); and indication of landmarks in dorsal, ventral, and lateral skull views of (D, H, and L, respectively). Frames represent extreme morphologies; the solid lines depict shape on the positive scores of discriminant axis, and the dotted lines on the negative ones. The percent of variance explained for each axis is given in parentheses.	FIG. 4.—Skull shape variation of Ctenomys ibicuiensis for A–D) dorsal, E–H) ventral, and I–L) lateral views, compared with species from the torquatus group. Shown are a plot of discriminant analyses with the first 2 axes (A, E, and I); frames of shape differences on the 1st axis (B, F, and J) and 2nd axis (C, G, and K); and indication of landmarks in dorsal, ventral, and lateral skull views of (D, H, and L, respectively). Frames represent extreme morphologies; the solid lines depict shape on the positive scores of discriminant axis, and the dotted lines on the negative ones. The percent of variance explained for each axis is given in parentheses.	2012-10-19	de Freitas, Thales R. O.;Fernandes, Fabiano A.;Fornel, Rodrigo;Roratto, Paula A.		Zenodo	biologists	de Freitas, Thales R. O.;Fernandes, Fabiano A.;Fornel, Rodrigo;Roratto, Paula A.			
3C7D8791512F793580AEB1C9FC5ED134.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/21362662/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21362662	FIG. 5.—Phenogram computed from the Mahalanobis distances among Ctenomys ibicuiensis and species from the torquatus group. The tree is made by the neighbor-joining method with branch lengths proportional to pooled morphological distances for dorsal, ventral, and lateral views of the skull.	FIG. 5.—Phenogram computed from the Mahalanobis distances among Ctenomys ibicuiensis and species from the torquatus group. The tree is made by the neighbor-joining method with branch lengths proportional to pooled morphological distances for dorsal, ventral, and lateral views of the skull.	2012-10-19	de Freitas, Thales R. O.;Fernandes, Fabiano A.;Fornel, Rodrigo;Roratto, Paula A.		Zenodo	biologists	de Freitas, Thales R. O.;Fernandes, Fabiano A.;Fornel, Rodrigo;Roratto, Paula A.			
3C7D8791512F793580AEB1C9FC5ED134.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/21362666/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21362666	FIG. 6.—Phylogenetic relationships of Ctenomys ibicuiensis. A) Network showing intraspecific relationships among the cytochrome-b haplotypes. Areas are proportional to frequencies, shading refers to sampling sites (codes in Table 1 and Fig. 1), crosshatches represent mutational steps, and black points represent medium vectors. B) Phylogenetic tree of the cytochrome-b gene from ctenomyid species resulting from Bayesian analysis in BEAST. The haplotypes of C. ibicuiensis are shown in boldface and are shaded gray. Haplotype labels follow Appendix I. Numbers in nodes indicate support from posterior probability, likelihood bootstrap (%), and parsimony bootstrap (%), respectively. Hyphens (-) indicate nodes with posterior probability <0.8 and bootstrap support <60%. Vertical bars and letters A–H correspond to species groups and D indicates the torquatus group.	FIG. 6.—Phylogenetic relationships of Ctenomys ibicuiensis. A) Network showing intraspecific relationships among the cytochrome-b haplotypes. Areas are proportional to frequencies, shading refers to sampling sites (codes in Table 1 and Fig. 1), crosshatches represent mutational steps, and black points represent medium vectors. B) Phylogenetic tree of the cytochrome-b gene from ctenomyid species resulting from Bayesian analysis in BEAST. The haplotypes of C. ibicuiensis are shown in boldface and are shaded gray. Haplotype labels follow Appendix I. Numbers in nodes indicate support from posterior probability, likelihood bootstrap (%), and parsimony bootstrap (%), respectively. Hyphens (-) indicate nodes with posterior probability <0.8 and bootstrap support <60%. Vertical bars and letters A–H correspond to species groups and D indicates the torquatus group.	2012-10-19	de Freitas, Thales R. O.;Fernandes, Fabiano A.;Fornel, Rodrigo;Roratto, Paula A.		Zenodo	biologists	de Freitas, Thales R. O.;Fernandes, Fabiano A.;Fornel, Rodrigo;Roratto, Paula A.			
