identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
92F4408378F55A9DBA1144AD2BE20D4C.text	92F4408378F55A9DBA1144AD2BE20D4C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Tinginotum bilineatum Zheng & Lu 2002	<div><p>Tinginotum bilineatum Zheng &amp; Lu, 2002</p><p>Figs 3, 4</p><p>Tinginotum bilineatum Zheng &amp; Lu, 2002: 503; Zheng et al. 2004: 585.</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>• 6 ♂♂ 11 ♀♀, Vietnam, Hue City, Phu Loc, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=107.8583&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=16.2281" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 107.8583/lat 16.2281)">Bach Ma National Park</a> (16.2281°N, 107.8583°E), 1250 m altitude, 6. ix. 2025, by light trap, Kim J. leg. [ZCDTU] .</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>Recognized by dorsum generally pale brown with dark and greenish brown markings; clypeus generally brown with two longitudinal dark stripes along lateral margins; antennae shorter than body; first antennal segment elongate, more than 3 × vertex width, mostly pale brown with lateral dark stripe; second antennal segment partially brown and dark brown, with distinctly dark brown extreme base and apical 1 / 5; labium reaching mid coxae; pronotum elongate, brown, with two pale longitudinal stripes medially and two short pale stripes near lateral margin, area between medial stripes brown, posterior margin pale brown; pronotal collar entirely pale brown; scutellum brown with large greenish brown spot medially, apices pale brown; hemelytra pale brown with dark markings; clavus mostly pale brown with dark markings; embolium with dark markings; cuneus semi-hyaline with dark markings at anterior and apical parts; fore and mid femora with dark apical bands; hind femur pale, with dark medial markings and dark apical bands; hind tibia brown with four distinct bands, narrow and nearly equal in length; left paramere strongly curved, shaft long, apex of shaft hook-shaped (Fig. 4 A – D); endosoma membranous with three long sclerites; primary sclerite and median sclerite long, apically tapered; apex of third lobal sclerite blunt (Fig. 4 F, G).</p><p>Description.</p><p>See Zheng and Lu (2002) for original description. Since the information on male and female genitalia was not included in the original description, we provide a description of both here. Male genitalia: Left paramere distinctly curved, covered with long setae except for shaft, shaft curved and long, weakly tapered, apex of shaft hook-shaped, sensory lobe weakly developed (Fig. 4 A – D); right paramere stout, shaft short, apex of shaft hook-shaped, outer margin covered with long setae (Fig. 4 E); endosoma membranous with three long sclerites; primary sclerite (pl) slightly curved subapically, apex sharp; median sclerite (ml) almost straight, tapered to apex, third sclerite (tl) slightly rounded, apex blunt (Fig. 4 F, G). Female genitalia: Genital chamber with parieto-vaginal rings (pvr) elongate oval, inner margin somewhat blunt, outer margins tapered, anterior margin of ring thick (Fig. 4 H); posterior wall with relatively simple interramal sclerite (irs) and interramal lobe (irl); irs not separated and broadened medially, narrowed from subapical regions to apex; irl broad, entirely covering irs and extending further, fused medially, gradually narrowed toward apex (Fig. 4 I).</p><p>Measurements.</p><p>Male (n = 4) / Female (n = 5) Body length, clypeus – apex of membrane: 5.05–5.21 / 5.01 – 5.40; head length, excluding collar: 0.37–0.44 / 0.37 – 0.41; head width, including compound eyes: 0.97–1.01 / 0.96 – 0.99; vertex width: 0.23–0.24 / 0.24 – 0.27; first antennal segment length: 0.81–0.89 / 0.79 – 0.86; second antennal segment length: 1.80–2.19 / 1.75 – 2.07; third antennal segment length: 1.09–1.21 / 0.99 – 1.20; fourth antennal segment length: 0.63–0.74 / 0.57 – 0.70; total antennal length: 4.43–5.03 / 4.19 – 4.67; mesial pronotal length in dorsal view: 1.07–1.15 / 1.08 – 1.16; posterior pronotal maximal width (straight): 1.53–1.60 / 1.55 – 1.63; anterior scutellar width: 0.84–0.87 / 0.85 – 0.91; mesial scutellar length: 0.76–0.77 / 0.71 – 0.77; claval commissure length: 0.85–0.86 / 0.84 – 0.89; maximal width across hemelytron: 0.87–0.91 / 0.89 – 0.91.</p><p>Plant association.</p><p>Unknown.</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>China, Vietnam (central) *.</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>As remarked above, previous studies on Tinginotum have hypothesized a possible relationship with Tinginotopsis (Yasunaga 2023; Yasunaga et al. 2023; Chérot et al. 2025). The two genera have been distinguished solely on the basis of a hump-like protuberance on the pronotum, with no other consistent differences known. In the present study, we found that Tinginotum bilineatum, although lacking such a protuberance, is morphologically and anatomically very similar to Tinginotopsis tuberculatus Eyles, 2000 (see Eyles 2000: figs 25, 26, 29) and also resembles Tinginotopsis camelus Poppius, 1915 and Tinginotopsis moifensis Carvalho, 1987 in the structure of the left paramere (see Carvalho 1987: figs 1, 3, 7). Because the paramere structure in Tinginotum is diverse and largely comparable to that of Tinginotopsis, this character has not been considered diagnostic. Nevertheless, the left paramere of Tinginotopsis (except for Tinginotopsis wauensis Carvalho, 1987) shows a consistent and distinctive configuration (left paramere three-dimensionally configured; basal part rising vertically, then abruptly bent at a right angle, forming an L-shaped outline in lateral view. From the apical end of this bend, the shaft curves smoothly and rounded inward, producing a U-shaped configuration in dorsal view). In our view, the combination of a Tinginotum - type pronotum and a Tinginotopsis - type left paramere in Tinginotum bilineatum provides additional morphological evidence supporting previous hypotheses that the generic limits between Tinginotum and Tinginotopsis are uncertain and that a comprehensive revision of these genera is required.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/92F4408378F55A9DBA1144AD2BE20D4C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Kim, Junggon;Chérot, Frédéric;Phan, Quoc Toan;Nguyen, Minh Ty;Nguyen, Ba Vu Lam;Jung, Sunghoon	Kim, Junggon, Chérot, Frédéric, Phan, Quoc Toan, Nguyen, Minh Ty, Nguyen, Ba Vu Lam, Jung, Sunghoon (2026): The genus Tinginotum Kirkaldy, 1902 (Hemiptera, Miridae, Mirinae) with description of a new species from Vietnam and additional notes on Southeast Asian materials. ZooKeys 1269: 237-263, DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1269.180930
EE8ADC103A6B59E793060F2DF85F6883.text	EE8ADC103A6B59E793060F2DF85F6883.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Tinginotum gracilicorne Poppius 1915	<div><p>Tinginotum gracilicorne Poppius, 1915</p><p>Fig. 8 A – C</p><p>Tinginotum gracilicorne Poppius, 1915: 57; Carvalho 1959: 267.</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>Further details on the specimen are available on the online portal of the holding institution (FMNH) at http://id.luomus.fi/GV.44282.</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>Philippines (Luzon).</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>The following characters may serve as diagnostic features of this species: clypeus mostly pale brown; antennae mostly dark brown with pale parts, long and slender; first segment partially pale and brown, basal half strongly swollen and yellowish, apical half brown; second segment mostly dark brown, 1 / 3 basal part, middle and apex pale, slightly more than twice as long as first antennal segment; labium reaching middle coxae; scutellum mostly brown, somewhat weakly punctate, more sparsely punctate than pronotum; femora pale with brown bands, one band medially and two bands apically; tibiae pale with brownish bands.</p><p>This species resembles T. formosanum and T. knowlesi in general body form and overall antennal color pattern but differs in having elongate antennae. It can be distinguished from T. formosanum by the color pattern of the second antennal segment, by the absence of dark tufts of setae on the pronotum, and by the relatively weaker punctation on the scutellum. From T. knowlesi, it differs in lacking stripes on the first antennal segment, in the coloration pattern of the second antennal segment, and in the absence of apical stripes on the femora and tibiae.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE8ADC103A6B59E793060F2DF85F6883	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Kim, Junggon;Chérot, Frédéric;Phan, Quoc Toan;Nguyen, Minh Ty;Nguyen, Ba Vu Lam;Jung, Sunghoon	Kim, Junggon, Chérot, Frédéric, Phan, Quoc Toan, Nguyen, Minh Ty, Nguyen, Ba Vu Lam, Jung, Sunghoon (2026): The genus Tinginotum Kirkaldy, 1902 (Hemiptera, Miridae, Mirinae) with description of a new species from Vietnam and additional notes on Southeast Asian materials. ZooKeys 1269: 237-263, DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1269.180930
A04674EB1E555621AABC27B4C1B33288.text	A04674EB1E555621AABC27B4C1B33288.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Tinginotum javanum Kirkaldy 1902	<div><p>Tinginotum javanum Kirkaldy, 1902</p><p>Fig. 8 D – F</p><p>Tinginotum javanum Kirkaldy, 1902: 263; Poppius 1911: 22; Carvalho 1952: 93; 1959: 268.</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>• 1 ♂, Indonesia, Borneo, South Kalimatan, Loksados (7 km NE), 22. ix. 1997, Jakl S. leg. (FC n ° 11556) [ISNB]. Further details on the specimen are available on the online portal of the holding institution (FMNH) at https://kotka.luomus.fi/view?uri=luomus:GL.10496 .</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>Indonesia (Borneo, Java), Sri Lanka (Carvalho 1959).</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>This species is the type species of the genus Tinginotum . In the original description, it was described together with the generic description of Tinginotum, and therefore its species-level description is relatively simple. Although only a few morphological characters can be examined from images of the type specimen, the coloration pattern of the antennae, the relative proportions of the antennal segments (second segment twice as long as the third, which is slightly longer than the first, with the three apical segments slender), and the mostly pale brown clypeus may be considered diagnostic for this species.</p><p>This species resembles T. formosanum; however, T. formosanum possesses distinct clusters of dark setae on the pronotum, whereas such a feature is neither mentioned in the original description of this species nor observable in the type specimen. According to Poppius (1915), it can be distinguished by the proportions of the antennal segments and by the relatively weak punctation on the scutellum, but because the type specimen of T. javanum is in poor condition, reliable comparison is difficult, and additional material will be needed to confirm these characters.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A04674EB1E555621AABC27B4C1B33288	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Kim, Junggon;Chérot, Frédéric;Phan, Quoc Toan;Nguyen, Minh Ty;Nguyen, Ba Vu Lam;Jung, Sunghoon	Kim, Junggon, Chérot, Frédéric, Phan, Quoc Toan, Nguyen, Minh Ty, Nguyen, Ba Vu Lam, Jung, Sunghoon (2026): The genus Tinginotum Kirkaldy, 1902 (Hemiptera, Miridae, Mirinae) with description of a new species from Vietnam and additional notes on Southeast Asian materials. ZooKeys 1269: 237-263, DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1269.180930
8CA2101AFB3E5C74B0109AD8CE49F8DC.text	8CA2101AFB3E5C74B0109AD8CE49F8DC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Tinginotum Kirkaldy 1902	<div><p>Genus Tinginotum Kirkaldy, 1902</p><p>Tinginotum Kirkaldy 1902: 263. Type species: Tinginotum javanum Kirkaldy, 1902 . Odhiambo 1960: 465; Carvalho 1987: 169; Yasunaga 1999: 39; Eyles 2000: 111; Zheng et al. 2004: 720; Chérot et al. 2025: 243.</p><p>Hermotinus Distant, 1904: 462 (syn. by Carvalho 1952: 93). Type species: Hermotinus signatus Distant, 1904 .</p><p>Nesodaphne Kirkaldy, 1908: 380 (syn. by Carvalho 1987: 166). Type species: Nesodaphne knowlesi Kirkaldy, 1908 .</p><p>Eutinginotum Cheesman, 1926: 266 (syn. by Cheesman 1927: 157). Type species: Eutinginotum raiateae Cheesman, 1926 (= Nesodaphne knowlesi Kirkaldy, 1908).</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>(summarized and adapted from Chérot et al. 2025). Elongate-oval, relatively small to medium-sized (total length 3.2–6.8) plant bugs, dorsally yellowish, orange, brown and reddish-brown or greenish with silvery pruinose areas on hemelytra, sometimes fuzzy or almost totally absent; dorsum with vestiture composed of several types of setae, predominant dorsal setae rounded in cross section, elongate, relatively stiff, suberect to erect, sometimes in tufts, golden, silvery or dark brown to black, in addition some species with tufts of recumbent, white setae arising from pale spots; head short, declivous; vertex carinate, finely sulcate or without sulcus; maxillary plate not tuberculate; first antennal segment relatively thick and generally elongate, widened sub-basally and apically; second antennal segment elongate, almost cylindrical; labium reaching meso- or metacoxae; pronotal collar longer than first antennal segment maximal width; pronotum devoid of lateral carina, almost trapezoidal, humeral angles rounded, lateral margins almost straight to slightly concave, posterior margin almost straight to convex; callosities reduced, medially separated and reaching pronotal lateral margins; punctation of pronotal disk clear and generally deep; disk medially devoid of hump; mesoscutum covered or almost covered; scutellum slightly swollen, with smaller and shallower punctation than that in pronotum; hemelytral punctation reduced, a line of shallow but relatively wide punctures present along claval suture and R + M vein; membrane and cuneus slightly deflexed; metatibial spines present; endosoma with three main lobes, sometimes with two elongate, apically pointed sclerites, a ctenoidal process and a sclerite associated with secondary gonopore; parieto-vaginal rings relatively small, rounded, distinctly separated, devoid of additional sclerite; anterior, latero-inner and frequently latero-outer margins convex, posterior margin concave to almost straight, without sclerite between rings; posterior wall elongate, with a wide dorsal structure; sigmoid process complex but reduced or apparently absent; inter-ramal sclerites wide, totally separated medially; inter-ramal lobes wide, covering in dorsal view almost 2 / 3 of inter-ramal sclerites or more; lateral lobes missing.</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>Several genera that are morphologically very similar to Tinginotum, including Argenis Distant, 1904, Tinginotopsis Poppius, 1915, and Diognetus Distant, 1904, have been regarded as closely related by previous authors (Yasunaga 2023; Yasunaga et al. 2023; Chérot et al. 2025). Recent taxonomic changes, such as the transfer of a species formerly placed in Tinginotum to Argenis (Yasunaga 2023), indicate that the delimitation of generic boundaries within this group is still under discussion. As currently understood, Argenis can be distinguished from Tinginotum mainly by the tuberculate maxillary plate (see Chérot et al. (2025) for details for Argenis). Tinginotopsis is highly similar to Tinginotum in most morphological characters and differs mainly in the presence of a pronotal protuberance, which has led to differing interpretations of their generic status (Eyles 2000; Yasunaga 2023; Yasunaga et al. 2023; Chérot et al. 2025).</p><p>Tinginotum is geographically widespread and morphologically diverse, yet it can be recognized based on the above diagnosis. This genus was recovered as monophyletic in a phylogenetic study (Kim and Jung 2019), and subsequent molecular analyses further suggested a close relationship between Tinginotum and Tinginotopsis (Namyatova et al. 2021) . However, as both studies were conducted with taxon sampling appropriate to their respective study scopes, the monophyly of Tinginotum and the boundaries between these two genera as well as relationships with other similar groups remain unclear. Therefore, further analyses incorporating broader taxon sampling would be helpful.</p><p>Key to the Tinginotum species in Vietnam</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8CA2101AFB3E5C74B0109AD8CE49F8DC	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Kim, Junggon;Chérot, Frédéric;Phan, Quoc Toan;Nguyen, Minh Ty;Nguyen, Ba Vu Lam;Jung, Sunghoon	Kim, Junggon, Chérot, Frédéric, Phan, Quoc Toan, Nguyen, Minh Ty, Nguyen, Ba Vu Lam, Jung, Sunghoon (2026): The genus Tinginotum Kirkaldy, 1902 (Hemiptera, Miridae, Mirinae) with description of a new species from Vietnam and additional notes on Southeast Asian materials. ZooKeys 1269: 237-263, DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1269.180930
7C987FB437AE555BBEAC94D7498BBA3E.text	7C987FB437AE555BBEAC94D7498BBA3E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Tinginotum kirkaldyi Poppius 1914	<div><p>Tinginotum kirkaldyi Poppius, 1914</p><p>Fig. 9 A – D</p><p>Tinginotum kirkaldyi Poppius, 1914: 117; Carvalho 1959: 268.</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>Further details on the specimen are available on the online portal of the holding institution (FMNH) at http://id.luomus.fi/GV.44279.</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>Indonesia (Java).</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>The following characters may serve as diagnostic features of this species: clypeus entirely dark brown; antennae mostly dark brown, clearly shorter than body; first segment mostly pale brown with dark ring basally; second segment mostly dark brown, darkened toward apex, slightly&gt; 3 × as long as first antennal segment length; labium reaching middle coxae; scutellum flat, punctate to degree similar to that of pronotum; cuneus largely with reddish markings; tibiae pale with brownish bands.</p><p>This species is similar to T. perlatum but can be distinguished by the presence of a distinct dark band on the hind tibia and by the broadly developed red marking on the cuneus. It also resembles the Australian species T. minutum, but differs in having the first antennal segment generally pale brown with a dark basal ring and the second antennal segment mostly dark brown, becoming darker toward the apex.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7C987FB437AE555BBEAC94D7498BBA3E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Kim, Junggon;Chérot, Frédéric;Phan, Quoc Toan;Nguyen, Minh Ty;Nguyen, Ba Vu Lam;Jung, Sunghoon	Kim, Junggon, Chérot, Frédéric, Phan, Quoc Toan, Nguyen, Minh Ty, Nguyen, Ba Vu Lam, Jung, Sunghoon (2026): The genus Tinginotum Kirkaldy, 1902 (Hemiptera, Miridae, Mirinae) with description of a new species from Vietnam and additional notes on Southeast Asian materials. ZooKeys 1269: 237-263, DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1269.180930
168B793C63195DCBA1ABC4A937B30BC2.text	168B793C63195DCBA1ABC4A937B30BC2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Tinginotum knowlesi (Kirkaldy 1908)	<div><p>Tinginotum knowlesi (Kirkaldy, 1908)</p><p>Fig. 5</p><p>Nesodaphne knowlesi Kirkaldy, 1908: 381; Carvalho and Wallerstein 1976: 688.</p><p>Tinginotum papuanum Poppius, 1915: 56 (syn. by Carvalho 1987: 174).</p><p>Tinginotum cretaceum Poppius, 1915: 58 (syn. by Carvalho 1987: 174).</p><p>Eutinginotum raiateae Cheesman, 1926: 267 (syn. by Carvalho 1987: 174).</p><p>Nesodaphne marianensis Usinger, 1946: 66; Carvalho 1956: 96 (syn. by Carvalho 1987: 174).</p><p>Tinginotum knowlesi Carvalho, 1987: 174; Eyles 2000: 115; Chérot et al. 2017: 112; Chérot 2018: 90; Kim et al. 2025: 562; Chérot et al. 2025: 245.</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>• 1 ♀, Vietnam, Hue City, Phu Loc, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=107.8583&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=16.2281" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 107.8583/lat 16.2281)">Bach Ma National Park</a> (16.2281°N, 107.8583°E), 1250 m altitude, 6. ix. 2025, by light trap, Kim J. leg. [ZCDTU] ; • 1 ♂, 4 ♀♀, 1?, Cambodia, Siam Reap Province, Angkor, Preah Khan Temple, 20-27. i. 2005, Var I. leg. (FC n ° s 11547, 11549, 11551, 11553-11555) [ISNB] ; • 1 ♀, Cambodia, Siam Reap Province, Angkor, Preah Khan Temple, 21-27. ii. 2006, Var I. leg. (FC n ° 11550) [ISNB] ; • 1 ♂, Cambodia, Siam Reap Province, Angkor, Thom, 26. v. 2003, Smets &amp; Grootaert leg. (FC n ° 11548) [ISNB] ; • 1 ♀, Cambodia, Siam Reap Province, Angkor, Preah Khan Temple, 24. i- 21. ii. 2006, Yothin O. leg. (FC n ° 11552) [ISNB] .</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>Recognized by dorsum greyish brown with brown markings; clypeus mostly pale brown, concolorous with mandibular and maxillary plates; antennae shorter than body; first antennal segment relatively short, subequal to 2 × vertex width, pale brown with lateral dark stripe; second antennal segment mostly dark brown except for pale base, middle part and apex; third segment mostly dark brown except for pale extreme apex; labium reaching mid coxae; pronotum somewhat elongate, mostly greyish brown with faint dark markings; scutellum mostly brown, with pale longitudinal line and apex; hemelytra greyish with large brown markings; clavus mostly dark brown with pale small markings; embolium broad; femur pale with dark stripes apically; tibiae pale brown with dark bands and with lateral stripes; tarsus mostly dark brown.</p><p>Description.</p><p>See Carvalho (1987) for the most detailed description. As the morphological characters have been well documented except for the female genitalia (Carvalho 1987; Chérot et al. 2025), we describe the female genitalia herein: parieto-vaginal rings (pvr) elongate oval, inner margin somewhat blunt, outer margins tapered, anterior and outer margins thick (Fig. 5 G); posterior wall with relatively simple interramal sclerite (irs) and interramal lobe (irl); irs generally narrow and broader medially, separated, curved at lateral margin; irl broad, entirely covering irs and extending further, separated and gradually narrowed medially; sigmoid process elongate (Fig. 5 H).</p><p>Measurements.</p><p>Female (n = 1) body length, clypeus – apex of membrane: 4.22; head length, excluding collar: 0.35; head width, including compound eyes: 0.92; vertex width: 0.31; first antennal segment length: 0.60; second antennal segment length: 1.57; third antennal segment length: 0.92; fourth antennal segment length: 0.67; total antennal length: 3.76; mesial pronotal length in dorsal view: 0.91; posterior pronotal maximal width (straight): 1.46; anterior scutellar width: 0.79; mesial scutellar length: 0.68; claval commissure length: 0.76; maximal width across hemelytron: 0.87.</p><p>Plant association.</p><p>Artocarpus altilis, A. incisa ( Moraceae), Tobacco-leaves ( Solanaceae) (Carvalho and Wallerstein 1976; Eyles 2000).</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>Cambodia *, Caroline Islands, Fiji, Guam, Mariana Islands, New Guinea, New Zealand, Society Islands, Vietnam.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/168B793C63195DCBA1ABC4A937B30BC2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Kim, Junggon;Chérot, Frédéric;Phan, Quoc Toan;Nguyen, Minh Ty;Nguyen, Ba Vu Lam;Jung, Sunghoon	Kim, Junggon, Chérot, Frédéric, Phan, Quoc Toan, Nguyen, Minh Ty, Nguyen, Ba Vu Lam, Jung, Sunghoon (2026): The genus Tinginotum Kirkaldy, 1902 (Hemiptera, Miridae, Mirinae) with description of a new species from Vietnam and additional notes on Southeast Asian materials. ZooKeys 1269: 237-263, DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1269.180930
59AAE3AFFAC852FE80C97923BAE75FFB.text	59AAE3AFFAC852FE80C97923BAE75FFB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Tinginotum linhi Kim, Cherot & Jung 2026	<div><p>Tinginotum linhi Kim, Chérot &amp; Jung sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 1, 2</p><p>Type material.</p><p>Holotype: • 1 ♂, Vietnam, Hue City, Phu Loc, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=107.8631&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=16.1942" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 107.8631/lat 16.1942)">Bach Ma National Park</a> (16.1942°N, 107.8631°E), 1356 m altitude, 16. xi. 2024, on Pinus kesiya Royle ex Gordon, 1858, Kim J. leg. [ZCDTU] ; paratypes: • 1 ♂ 1 ♀, same location as holotype, 1250 m altitude, 6. ix. 2025, by light trap, Kim J. leg. [ZCDTU] .</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>Recognized by dorsum brown to dark brown; clypeus brown, concolorous with frons; antennae shorter than body; first antennal segment short, cylindrical, medially weakly narrowed, slightly shorter than 1 / 2 head width (including eyes); second antennal segment partially brown to dark brown, distinctly dark brown at extreme base and apical 1 / 3; third segment mostly dark brown except for pale extreme apex; labium slightly exceeding mid coxae; first labial segment mostly pale brown with darker spot; pronotum wide, mostly dark brown, posterior margin pale brown; scutellum mostly dark brown, with pale apex; hemelytra brown with large dark brown markings, appearing overall dark brown; embolium narrow; cuneus semi-hyaline, inner and anterior margins tinged with red; hind femur partially pale to dark brown, basal 1 / 3 pale, apical 2 / 3 with dark markings; hind tibia brown with four distinct bands subequal in length; left paramere curved or arched with a basal lobe, shaft short, T-shaped, apex of shaft straight, lower shaft part bifurcate (Fig. 2 A, B); endosoma membranous with three sclerites; primary sclerite curved, longer than others, its apex broadened; median sclerite curved, tapered to apex; third lobal sclerite broad with narrow rod-shaped appendages (Fig. 2 E – G).</p><p>Description.</p><p>Male: Coloration: body varying from brown to fuscous, bearing markings darker than body coloration, partially tinged with red. Head: vertex partially pale brown to brown with a pair of pale spots near eyes, mostly dark brown in dark specimens; frons brown, entirely dark brown in dark individuals; clypeus mostly brown, almost concolorous with frons, comparable in tone to the darkest area of mandibular plate, mostly dark brown in dark individual; mandibular plate paler, dark brown in dark specimens; maxillary plate mostly pale brown; antennae partially brown to dark brown; first segment brown, base and inner lateral margin dark brown, base, inner lateral margin and ventral part dark brown in dark specimens; second segment pale brown to dark brown, base and apical 1 / 3 part dark brown, apex pale brown; third and fourth segments entirely dark brown except for pale apex of third segment; labium partially pale to dark brown; first segment pale brown with darker spot subapically, mostly brown with darker spot subapically in dark specimens; third segment pale brown, basally dark brown, basally dark brown in dark specimens; fourth segment dark brown. Thorax: pronotum brown with dark markings and pale brown posterior margin, mostly dark brown with pale posterior margin in dark specimens; propleuron, mesepisternum, mesepimeron and metepimeron brown, mostly dark brown in dark specimens; scent efferent system pale brown and brown; scutellum mostly dark brown, longitudinal medial pale band and pale apex, mostly dark brown with pale apex in dark specimens; hemelytra brown with large dark markings in medial part and with small pale spots in general; corium generally brown with darker marking medially and posteriorly, and minute pale spots scattered irregularly, with lower density of spots in central area, making the darker spots relatively larger; clavus mostly dark brown with few tiny pale scattered spots; embolium subhyaline with irregularly distributed reddish markings, with dark markings tinged with red in dark specimens; cuneus generally subhyaline with dark markings on inner and posterior areas, tinged with red at inner and outer margins, small area tinged with red medially; legs pale brown with dark markings and bands; fore and mid femora with dark markings medially and two bands apically; hind femora with dark markings at 2 / 3 apical part, basal 1 / 3 pale; tibiae pale with four dark bands, two bands at base and apex, two bands at middle, bands nearly equal in length, with first band slightly shorter at base; all tarsi partially brown to dark brown; first and third tarsal segments dark brown. Abdomen: greenish brown. Surface and vestiture: body dull, densely covered with three types of setae; two types long and erect, golden or dark in color, and a third type consisting of short, recumbent white tufts originating from pale spots; pronotum and scutellum punctate, scutellum weakly punctate; hemelytra impunctate, except for row of punctures along claval vein, row along R + M, and row along costal vein.</p><p>Structure: body elongate, length 4.57–4.76. Head: mostly hypognathous, 2.5 × as wide as long; vertex 0.88 × as wide as single compound eye width; antennae generally linear, with varying thickness, shorter than body length; first segment cylindrical, twice as thick as second segment, 1.53 × as long as vertex width, 0.28 × as long as second segment; second segment 1.15 × as long as combined third and fourth segments length; third segment 1.29 × as long as fourth segment; proportion of first to fourth antennal segments 0.49: 1.74: 0.85: 0.66; labium slightly exceeding mid coxae. Thorax: pronotum trapezoid, elevated laterally, dorsal longitudinal length 0.55 × as long as basal maximal width, 0.77 × pronotal height in lateral view, lateral margin weakly constricted near calli, posterior margin broadly convex, weakly sinuate medially; calli weakly swollen; pronotal collar broad, broader than first antennal segment maximal diameter; scutellum swollen, width subequal to length, subequal to claval commissure; exposed part of mesoscutum narrow; lateral margins of hemelytra rounded; cuneal outer margin 0.31 × as long as embolial margin; fore leg with second tarsomere short; mid and hind legs with first tarsomere short, third tarsomere longest. Abdomen: tapering to apex, almost reaching to apex of cuneus. Genitalia: left paramere weakly curved, shaft short, T-shaped, apex of shaft straight, downward part bifurcate, body long, sensory lobe weakly developed, covered with tufts of setae (Fig. 2 A, B); right paramere short, stout, apex of shaft beak-like (Fig. 2 C, D); endosoma membranous with three sclerites; primary sclerite (pl) curved, longest, its apex broadened; median sclerite (ml) curved, tapered to apex, shortest; third lobal sclerite (tl) broad, associated to secondary gonopore, with narrow rod-shaped appendages (Fig. 2 E – G).</p><p>Female: Coloration: as in male except for second antennal segment brown and dark brown with small pale spot in dorsal side. Surface and vestiture: as in male. Structure: as in male, except for larger body, length 4.96 mm, and slightly longer third antennal segment, length 0.96 mm. Genitalia: genital chamber with parieto-vaginal rings (pvr) elongate oval, inner margin rounded, outer margin somewhat concave with two tapered apices (Fig. 2 H); posterior wall with relatively simple interramal sclerite (irs) and interramal lobe (irl); irs narrow, separated medially, narrowed from subapical regions to apex; irl broad and wide, entirely covering irs and extending further, separated medially, but closed each other (Fig. 2 I).</p><p>Measurements.</p><p>Male (n = 2) / Female (n = 1). Body length, clypeus – apex of membrane: 4.57–4.76 / 4.96; head length, excluding collar: 0.41–0.42 / 0.41; head width, including compound eyes: 1.03–1.08 / 1.10; vertex width: 0.31–0.33 / 0.39; first antennal segment length: 0.48–0.50 / 0.49; second antennal segment length: 1.70–1.78 / 1.70; third antennal segment length: 0.85 × 0.86 / 0.96; fourth antennal segment length: 0.65–0.67 / missing; total antennal length: 3.66–3.81 / 3.15 (first – third); mesial pronotal length in dorsal view: 0.85–0.88 / 0.95; posterior pronotal maximal width (straight): 1.51–1.61 / 1.75; anterior scutellar width: 0.81–0.86 / 0.98; mesial scutellar length: 0.82–0.87 / 0.87; claval commissure length: 0.84–0.85 / 0.95; maximal width across hemelytron: 0.86–0.96 / 0.99.</p><p>Etymology.</p><p>The specific epithet is named linhi, honoring Dr. Nguyen Vu Linh, Director of Bach Ma National Park, for his support and dedication to wildlife conservation in Vietnam. The name is a noun in the genitive case.</p><p>Plant association.</p><p>Pinus kesiya Royle ex Gordon, 1858 ( Pinaceae).</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>Vietnam (central).</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>Tinginotum linhi sp. nov. can be easily distinguished from several superficially similar species of the genus by the following character states:</p><p>Compound eyes relatively large vs small, their width inferior to vertex width [e. g., T. galleni (Poppius, 1912); T. vescum Odhiambo, 1960];</p><p>First antennal segment relatively short vs relatively long proportionally to head width [e. g., T. bilineatum Zheng &amp; Lu, 2002; T. knowlesi (Kirkaldy, 1908); T. grandis Carvalho, 1987];</p><p>First antennal segment slightly vs distinctly swollen at the basal and / or apical portions [e. g., T. javanum Kirkaldy, 1902; T. gracilicorne Poppius, 1915];</p><p>Second antennal segment mostly pale brown and apical 1 / 3 part dark brown vs mostly dark brown [e. g., T. signatum (Distant, 1904); T. bipuncticolle Poppius, 1912; T. villosulum (Distant, 1913); T. formosanum Poppius, 1915; T. pini Kulik, 1965];</p><p>Labium reaching slightly beyond mid coxae vs extending apex of hind coxae or reaching abdomen [e. g., T. zebrinum Odhiambo, 1960; T. rostratum Kerzhner, 1972];</p><p>Shaft of the left paramere being hook-shaped [e. g., T. floraensis Carvalho, 1987; T. rubrovenosus Carvalho, 1987; T. befui Yasunaga, 1999].</p><p>Among the remaining species, this new species is similar to T. minutum Eyles, 2000 from Australia and New Zealand, but can be distinguished by the following character states:</p><p>Base of first antennal segment dark brown in dorsal view (vs basal half of first segment totally dark brown);</p><p>1 / 3 apical part of second antennal segment dark brown (vs apex of second segment dark brown);</p><p>Clypeus brown, concolorous to frons (vs clypeus dark brown, not concolorous to frons);</p><p>All tibiae brown with distinct dark bands (vs all tibiae without distinct dark band);</p><p>Left paramere faintly curved (vs left paramere distinctly curved); sensory lobe of left paramere weakly developed (vs sensory lobe strongly developed) (see Eyles (2000) for original description with illustrations).</p><p>Tinginotum linhi sp. nov. is also similar to T. perlatum Linnavuori, 1961 (Figs 6, 7), but can be distinguished by the following character states:</p><p>Second antennal segment distinctly bicolored without gradation, 1 / 3 apical part of second antennal segment dark brown (vs second segment gradually darkened or almost unicolorous);</p><p>Clypeus brown, concolorous to frons (vs clypeus entirely dark brown, not concolorous to frons);</p><p>Pronotum mostly dark brown without pale longitudinal line or markings (vs pronotum with pale longitudinal hourglass-shaped marking, sometimes almost erased);</p><p>Hind tibiae brown with four distinct dark bands (vs hind tibiae brown with dark tiny small spots);</p><p>Left paramere faintly curved (vs left paramere distinctly curved); shaft T-shaped (vs shaft hook-shaped); sensory lobe of left paramere weakly developed (vs sensory lobe strongly developed);</p><p>Primary endosomal sclerite slightly longer than median sclerite (vs primary sclerite much longer than median sclerite).</p><p>The new species also resembles T. kirkaldyi from Java (Fig. 9 A – D), but differs by the same three diagnostic character states (a – c) noted above for distinguishing it from T. perlatum .</p><p>Finally, Tinginotum linhi sp. nov. can be distinguished from T. virescens Poppius, 1914 from Java and Papua New Guinea (Fig. 9 E – G), by:</p><p>Body mostly brownish coloration (vs body greenish brown);</p><p>Second antennal segment distinctly bicolored without gradation, 1 / 3 apical part of second antennal segment dark brown (vs second almost unicolorous);</p><p>Pronotum mostly dark brown without pale longitudinal line or markings (vs pronotum with pale longitudinal hourglass-shaped marking);</p><p>Embolium with markings (vs embolium unicolorous, without markings);</p><p>Cuneus with dark marking at apex (cuneus without dark marking apically); and</p><p>All tibiae brown with distinct dark bands (vs all tibiae without distinct dark band).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/59AAE3AFFAC852FE80C97923BAE75FFB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Kim, Junggon;Chérot, Frédéric;Phan, Quoc Toan;Nguyen, Minh Ty;Nguyen, Ba Vu Lam;Jung, Sunghoon	Kim, Junggon, Chérot, Frédéric, Phan, Quoc Toan, Nguyen, Minh Ty, Nguyen, Ba Vu Lam, Jung, Sunghoon (2026): The genus Tinginotum Kirkaldy, 1902 (Hemiptera, Miridae, Mirinae) with description of a new species from Vietnam and additional notes on Southeast Asian materials. ZooKeys 1269: 237-263, DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1269.180930
5E059B92B12552AD8089DE317F900191.text	5E059B92B12552AD8089DE317F900191.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Tinginotum perlatum Linnavuori 1961	<div><p>Tinginotum perlatum Linnavuori, 1961</p><p>Figs 6, 7</p><p>Tinginotum perlatum Linnavuori, 1961: 155; Yasunaga 1999: 44; Zheng and Lu 2002: 505; Zheng et al. 2004: 587; Oh et al. 2018: 482; Yasunaga 2023: 58; Yasunaga et al. 2023: 38.</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>• 13 ♂♂ 17 ♀♀, Korea, Jeju-do (Is.), Seogwipo-si, Jungmun-dong, 20. ix. 2014, Kim J. leg., by light trap [CNU] ; • 1 ♂, Korea, Jeju-do (Is.), Seogwipo-si, Donnaeko, 3. ix. 2015, Kim J. leg. [CNU] ; • 1 ♂ 2 ♀♀, Korea, Jeollanam-do, Wando-gun, Gunoe-myeon, Daemun-ri, 18. viii. 2015, Kim J. leg., by light trap [CNU] ; • 1 ♂, Indonesia, Sumatra, North Sumatra, Berastagi, near Sibayak, 20-26. iv. 1998, 1500 m., Kabourk Vit. Leg. (FC n ° 7447) ; • 2 ♀♀, Indonesia, Sumatra, North Sumatra, Berastagi, 02-04. iv. 1998, 1500-2000 m., Kabourk Vit. Leg. (FC n ° s 7444-7445) [Coll. Magnien] ; • 2 ♀♀, Indonesia, Sumatra, North Sumatra, Kedah env., 19. iv. 1998, 1500–2000 m., Kabourk Vit. Leg. (FC n ° s 7446, 7748) ; • 3 ♂♂, Philippines, Mindanao Is., Mt. Kitanglad Range, Mt. Kitanglad, 12-14. xi. 2018, Roca-Cusachs M. &amp; Mohagan A. leg. [ZCDTU] ; 1 ♂, • 5 ♀♀, Philippines, Luzon, Benguet Province, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=120.6&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=16.4167" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 120.6/lat 16.4167)">Baguio</a>, 16.4167°N, 120.6000°E, 07-19. iv. 2014, Constant J., Bresseel, J. &amp; Co leg. (FC n ° s 11541-11546) [ISNB] ; • 1 ♀, Vietnam, Vinh Puc Province, Tam Dao, 17-21. v. 1990, Pacholatko P. leg. (FC n ° 1191) [NHMW] .</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>Recognized by dorsum brown with reddish areas (Fig. 6 A, B, D – H), sometimes tending towards relatively homogenous yellowish, pinkish, and reddish-brown in females; vertex and frons yellowish-brown to brown; clypeus dark brown to almost black, shining, at least on ventral third, contrasting with mandibular and maxillary plates; antennae shorter than body; first antennal segment relatively short, yellowish-brown to dark brown, second antennal segment yellowish brown to dark brown, apex darker, extreme apex pale yellow; third and fourth antennal segments mostly dark brown; pronotum somewhat elongate, with mostly chocolate brown to reddish-brown fuzzy markings behind eyes, a medial longitudinal area generally paler, at least basally; anterior area to humeral angles frequently darker; posterior margin narrowly yellowish; scutellum mostly brown, frequently with pale longitudinal line and apex; hemelytra chocolate brown to orange-brown with reddish or pinkish markings and partly coalescent greyish or silvery spots, faint, faded or even absent in some females; embolium and a part of exocorium sometimes yellowish; cuneus tinged with red; membrane greyish-brown, veins reddish; legs pale brown, metafemora reddish brown apically; metatibial spines yellowish-brown; tarsi yellowish-brown, apex of third segment black.</p><p>Description.</p><p>See Linnavuori (1961) for most detailed description. As the morphological characters have been well documented except for the female genitalia, we describe the female genitalia here: parieto-vaginal rings (pvr) elongate oval, latero-outer and latero-inner margins difficult to separate from anterior and posterior margins, pointed; anterior margins thick, convex, angled, posterior margin convex (Fig. 7 J); posterior wall with relatively simple interramal sclerite (irs) and interramal lobe (irl); irs nearly equally narrow, separated, curved at lateral margin; irl broad, entirely covering irs and extending further, separated from outer margin weakly sinuate; sigmoid process short (Fig. 7 K).</p><p>Measurements.</p><p>Male (n = 1) / female (n = 2) from Luzon, Philippines. Body length, clypeus – apex of membrane: 4.10 / 6.70–6.80; head length, excluding collar: 0.25 / 0.50–0.50; head width, including compound eyes: 0.95 / 1.30–1.33; vertex width: 0.25 / 0.50–0.50; first antennal segment length: 0.45 / 0.60–0.60; second antennal segment length: 1.55 / 2.10–2.20; third antennal segment length: 0.70 / 1.15–1.25; fourth antennal segment length: 0.60 / 0.85–0.90; total antennal length: 3.30 / 4.70–4.95; mesial pronotal length in dorsal view: 0.75 / 1.00–1.15; posterior pronotal maximal width (straight): 1.40 / 2.05–2.20; anterior scutellar width: 0.70 / 1.10–1.10; mesial scutellar length: 0.60 / 1.00–1.05; maximal width across hemelytron: 0.8 / 1.12–1.19.</p><p>Male (n = 3) from Mindanao, Philippines. Body length, clypeus – apex of membrane: 4.14–4.52; head length, excluding collar: 0.30–0.32; head width, including compound eyes: 0.99–1.02; vertex width: 0.24–0.26; first antennal segment length: 0.51–0.59; second antennal segment length: 1.64–1.77; third antennal segment length: 0.87 / missing; fourth antennal segment length: missing; mesial pronotal length in dorsal view: 0.74–0.95; posterior pronotal maximal width (straight): 1.40–1.58; anterior scutellar width: 0.69–0.79; mesial scutellar length: 0.70–0.71; claval commissure length: 0.79–0.84; maximal width across hemelytron: 0.76–0.83.</p><p>Male (n = 1) / Female (n = 3) from Korea. Body length, clypeus – apex of membrane: 4.77 / 5.01–5.10; head length, excluding collar: 0.28 / 0.38–0.39; head width, including compound eyes: 0.94 / 1.02–1.04; vertex width: 0.38 / 0.35–0.37; first antennal segment length: 0.61 / 0.61–0.68; second antennal segment length: 1.81 / 1.51–1.70; third antennal segment length: 0.71 / 0.77–0.81; fourth antennal segment length: 0.59 / 0.60–0.64; total antennal length: 3.72 / 3.56–3.83; mesial pronotal length in dorsal view: 0.77 / 0.87–0.89; posterior pronotal maximal width (straight): 1.49 / 1.64–1.69; anterior scutellar width: 0.74 / 0.90–0.91; mesial scutellar length: 0.77 / 0.81–0.83; claval commissure length: 0.94 / 0.90–0.96; maximal width across hemelytron: 0.89 / 0.96–1.04.</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>Until now, only Tinginotum gracilicorne Poppius, 1915 (Fig. 8 A – C) has been recorded from the Philippines (Schuh 2002–2013). The Philippine specimens of Tinginotum we have examined can be easily distinguished from T. gracilicorne, particularly by the antennal length. Morphologically, we were unable to find any significant differences between these Philippine specimens and T. perlatum from Korea and the type locality, Japan.</p><p>The only noticeable difference in males is found in the coloration of the cuneus. Based on direct examination of more than 100 individuals from Korea and analysis of pictures of some Japanese specimens (in Yasunaga 2001: fig. 311 A; Yasunaga 2023: fig. 213 and Yasunaga et al. 2023: fig. 24 G), the cuneus of East-Palaearctic populations is generally subhyaline, with only the inner margin tinged with red, as indicated in the original description of T. perlatum (Linnavuori, 1961) . In contrast, in the Philippine specimens, the cuneus is largely tinged with red. Interestingly, dorsal coloration within series of specimens from Luzon and Sumatra seems relatively variable, particularly in females (Fig. 6 D, E), their pattern being faded, whereas it is very close to that of the males on a female from Vietnam (Fig. 6 F). No differences were observed in the male genitalia, except for slight differences in the degree of development of the apex of shaft and the sensory lobe of the left paramere and shaft of the right paramere (Fig. 7 A – F).</p><p>Although the morphology of the endosoma is very similar in many Tinginotum species, based on the available evidence, including general morphology as well as male and female genital structures, we tentatively identify specimens from Indonesia and the Philippines as T. perlatum, a species recorded from both countries and from Vietnam for the first time. Further studies are required to confirm whether these populations are truly conspecific and whether T. perlatum is effectively a very widely distributed species. In addition, although this species was originally recorded from the Palaearctic Region, its apparently broader distribution raises the possibility that it may be conspecific with taxa previously described from tropical regions. Accordingly, future studies based on broader geographic sampling, including material from the type locality, will be necessary to clarify its taxonomic status.</p><p>Plant association.</p><p>Two coniferous and one fern have been cited in the literature as possible associated plants: Juniperus chinensis ( Cupressaceae), Microlepia strigosa ( Polypodiaceae), Pinus luchensis ( Pinaceae) (Yasunaga 1999). More recently, T. perlatum has been reported to utilize male strobili of Cryptomeria japonica ( Cupressaceae) as a food resource, and its feeding activity has been associated with increased mortality of male strobili and reduced pollen production (Muro 2025).</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>China, Indonesia (Sumatra) *, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Philippines (Luzon, Mindanao) *, Vietnam (northern; Vinh Phuc) *.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5E059B92B12552AD8089DE317F900191	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Kim, Junggon;Chérot, Frédéric;Phan, Quoc Toan;Nguyen, Minh Ty;Nguyen, Ba Vu Lam;Jung, Sunghoon	Kim, Junggon, Chérot, Frédéric, Phan, Quoc Toan, Nguyen, Minh Ty, Nguyen, Ba Vu Lam, Jung, Sunghoon (2026): The genus Tinginotum Kirkaldy, 1902 (Hemiptera, Miridae, Mirinae) with description of a new species from Vietnam and additional notes on Southeast Asian materials. ZooKeys 1269: 237-263, DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1269.180930
D1D4C897396E5B5782B1FA81D207C46A.text	D1D4C897396E5B5782B1FA81D207C46A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Tinginotum virescens Poppius 1914	<div><p>Tinginotum virescens Poppius, 1914</p><p>Fig. 9 E – G</p><p>Tinginotum virescens Poppius, 1914: 118; Carvalho 1959: 268.</p><p>Tinginotum kandanensis Carvalho, 1987: 172 (syn. by Yasunaga 1999).</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>Further details on the specimen are available on the online portal of the holding institution (FMNH) at http://id.luomus.fi/GV.44280.</p><p>Distribution.</p><p>Indonesia (Java), Papua New Guinea.</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>This species resembles T. kirkaldyi and T. perlatum in general body form and pronotal pattern but can be distinguished by its fading coloration (greenish brown body in original description), smaller body size, generally pale-brown clypeus, the absence of markings on the embolium, and the brown coloration on the central part of the cuneus.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D1D4C897396E5B5782B1FA81D207C46A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Kim, Junggon;Chérot, Frédéric;Phan, Quoc Toan;Nguyen, Minh Ty;Nguyen, Ba Vu Lam;Jung, Sunghoon	Kim, Junggon, Chérot, Frédéric, Phan, Quoc Toan, Nguyen, Minh Ty, Nguyen, Ba Vu Lam, Jung, Sunghoon (2026): The genus Tinginotum Kirkaldy, 1902 (Hemiptera, Miridae, Mirinae) with description of a new species from Vietnam and additional notes on Southeast Asian materials. ZooKeys 1269: 237-263, DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1269.180930
