taxonID	type	description	language	source
316987B70B69FFE0FF8EFA7BFD3AF79F.taxon	description	Lespedeza	en	Adema, F. (2019): Notes on Malesian Fabaceae (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae) 18. The genus Lespedeza. Blumea 64 (3): 272-274, DOI: 10.3767/blumea.2019.64.03.07, URL: https://doi.org/10.3767/blumea.2019.64.03.07
316987B70B69FFE0FF8EFA7BFD3AF79F.taxon	description	Notes — 1. Root nodules were observed in several species (Allen & Allen 1981). 2. Phlebosporium was accidentally spelled ‘ Phlebosprium ’ in Junghuhn (1845). Hasskarl (1847) and Taubert (1894, in the synonymy of sect. Campylotropis) used ‘ Phlebosporum ’.	en	Adema, F. (2019): Notes on Malesian Fabaceae (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae) 18. The genus Lespedeza. Blumea 64 (3): 272-274, DOI: 10.3767/blumea.2019.64.03.07, URL: https://doi.org/10.3767/blumea.2019.64.03.07
316987B70B69FFE0FCC1FBB1FBDCF9F2.taxon	description	Lespedeza junghuhniana Bakh. f. (1961) 134; Backer & Bakh. f. (1964) 613. — Phlebosporium cytisoides Jungh. (1845) 346; Hassk. (1847) 508. — Lespedeza cytisoides (Jungh.) Benth. (1852) 230, nom. superfl., non Bertol. (1851: 278). — Campylotropis cytisoides (Jungh.) Miq. (1855) 229, t. 4, f. a; Iokawa & H. Ohashi (2002 a) 210. — Type: Junghuhn 77 (n. v.), Java. Notes — 1. When Phlebosporium cytisoides was placed by Bentham (1852) in Lespedeza the name Lespedeza cytisoides Bertol. (1851) already existed. A new name was required. Bakhuizen van den Brink Jr. (1961) proposed to replace it by Lespedeza junghuhniana. 2. Iokawa & Ohashi (2002 a) gave Campylotropis virgata Miq. as a synonym of Lespedeza junghuhniana. However, the specimens described by Miquel are different in several characters. Miquel’s specimens belong to Lespedeza cyrtobotrya Miq. (see Excluded species).	en	Adema, F. (2019): Notes on Malesian Fabaceae (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae) 18. The genus Lespedeza. Blumea 64 (3): 272-274, DOI: 10.3767/blumea.2019.64.03.07, URL: https://doi.org/10.3767/blumea.2019.64.03.07
316987B70B69FFE3FCC1F97BFE24FE8C.taxon	description	Campylotropis virgata Miq. (1855) 230, nom. superfl., non Lespedeza virgata DC. (1825). — Lectotype (here designated): Anon. s. n. (lecto L 0898007), Java. Notes — 1. The name Campylotropis virgata was based by Miquel on a specimen he originally named Lespedeza virgata. A specimen with this name is present in L (L 0898007). This specimen was according to the label collected in Java. An exactly similar specimen (L. 2052882) bears the name Campylotropis virgata. This specimen was according to the label collected in Java, Hortus Bogoriensis. Probably the first specimen was also collected in the botanical garden of Bogor. The first specimen was selected as lectotype of Campylotropis virgata. The species is a Japanese endemic. 2. Within Lespedeza the combination Lespedeza virgata (1825) already existed, which makes Miquel’s name (1855) superfluous, and his (1867) heterotypous synonym L. cyrtobotrya has to be used instead.	en	Adema, F. (2019): Notes on Malesian Fabaceae (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae) 18. The genus Lespedeza. Blumea 64 (3): 272-274, DOI: 10.3767/blumea.2019.64.03.07, URL: https://doi.org/10.3767/blumea.2019.64.03.07
