taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
CE1F66FF990856F8AB88F558268ED5E9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1645788	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.132188107.figure2	Figure 2. Basidiomata of Resupinatus angulatus, R. latemarginatus, R. sinoapplicatus, and R. sinuosus. a, b. R. angulatus, Dai 37973, holotype; c, d. R. latemarginatus, Dai 37377, holotype; e, f. R. sinoapplicatus, Dai 37311, holotype; g, h. R. sinuosus, 38306, holotype. Scale bars: 1 cm (a, c, e, g); 1 mm (b, d, f, h).	Figure 2. Basidiomata of Resupinatus angulatus, R. latemarginatus, R. sinoapplicatus, and R. sinuosus. a, b. R. angulatus, Dai 37973, holotype; c, d. R. latemarginatus, Dai 37377, holotype; e, f. R. sinoapplicatus, Dai 37311, holotype; g, h. R. sinuosus, 38306, holotype. Scale bars: 1 cm (a, c, e, g); 1 mm (b, d, f, h).	2026-05-15	Zhuang, Lei;Guan, Qian-Xin;Dai, Yu-Cheng;Yuan, Yuan;Zhao, Heng		Zenodo	biologists	Zhuang, Lei;Guan, Qian-Xin;Dai, Yu-Cheng;Yuan, Yuan;Zhao, Heng			
CE1F66FF990856F8AB88F558268ED5E9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1645789	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.132188107.figure3	Figure 3. Microscopic structures of Resupinatus angulatus (holotype, Dai 37973). a – f. Basidia and basidioles; g – i. Cystidioles; j. Basidiospores; k. Generative hyphae; l. Subicular hyphae. Scale bars: 10 µm (a – l).	Figure 3. Microscopic structures of Resupinatus angulatus (holotype, Dai 37973). a – f. Basidia and basidioles; g – i. Cystidioles; j. Basidiospores; k. Generative hyphae; l. Subicular hyphae. Scale bars: 10 µm (a – l).	2026-05-15	Zhuang, Lei;Guan, Qian-Xin;Dai, Yu-Cheng;Yuan, Yuan;Zhao, Heng		Zenodo	biologists	Zhuang, Lei;Guan, Qian-Xin;Dai, Yu-Cheng;Yuan, Yuan;Zhao, Heng			
CE1F66FF990856F8AB88F558268ED5E9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1645787	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.132188107.figure1	Figure 1. The Bayesian inference (BI) phylogeny of Resupinatus inferred from combined ITS and nLSU sequences, with Hohenbuehelia flabelliformis and H. lageniformis designated as outgroup taxa. Maximum likelihood (ML) bootstrap support values (BS ≥ 50 %) and BI posterior probabilities (BPP ≥ 0.9) are indicated on the corresponding branches, while BS ≥ 70 % and BPP ≥ 0.95 were considered significantly supported. The newly described species, Resupinatus angulatus, R. latemarginatus, R. sinoapplicatus, and R. sinuosus, are shown in bold. The scale bar (bottom) denotes the number of substitutions per site.	Figure 1. The Bayesian inference (BI) phylogeny of Resupinatus inferred from combined ITS and nLSU sequences, with Hohenbuehelia flabelliformis and H. lageniformis designated as outgroup taxa. Maximum likelihood (ML) bootstrap support values (BS ≥ 50 %) and BI posterior probabilities (BPP ≥ 0.9) are indicated on the corresponding branches, while BS ≥ 70 % and BPP ≥ 0.95 were considered significantly supported. The newly described species, Resupinatus angulatus, R. latemarginatus, R. sinoapplicatus, and R. sinuosus, are shown in bold. The scale bar (bottom) denotes the number of substitutions per site.	2026-05-15	Zhuang, Lei;Guan, Qian-Xin;Dai, Yu-Cheng;Yuan, Yuan;Zhao, Heng		Zenodo	biologists	Zhuang, Lei;Guan, Qian-Xin;Dai, Yu-Cheng;Yuan, Yuan;Zhao, Heng			
E4731BD9708A55DCA32526BF4C0F6F1A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1645788	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.132188107.figure2	Figure 2. Basidiomata of Resupinatus angulatus, R. latemarginatus, R. sinoapplicatus, and R. sinuosus. a, b. R. angulatus, Dai 37973, holotype; c, d. R. latemarginatus, Dai 37377, holotype; e, f. R. sinoapplicatus, Dai 37311, holotype; g, h. R. sinuosus, 38306, holotype. Scale bars: 1 cm (a, c, e, g); 1 mm (b, d, f, h).	Figure 2. Basidiomata of Resupinatus angulatus, R. latemarginatus, R. sinoapplicatus, and R. sinuosus. a, b. R. angulatus, Dai 37973, holotype; c, d. R. latemarginatus, Dai 37377, holotype; e, f. R. sinoapplicatus, Dai 37311, holotype; g, h. R. sinuosus, 38306, holotype. Scale bars: 1 cm (a, c, e, g); 1 mm (b, d, f, h).	2026-05-15	Zhuang, Lei;Guan, Qian-Xin;Dai, Yu-Cheng;Yuan, Yuan;Zhao, Heng		Zenodo	biologists	Zhuang, Lei;Guan, Qian-Xin;Dai, Yu-Cheng;Yuan, Yuan;Zhao, Heng			
E4731BD9708A55DCA32526BF4C0F6F1A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1645790	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.132188107.figure4	Figure 4. Microscopic structures of Resupinatus latemarginatus (holotype, Dai 37377). a – f. Basidia and basidioles; g – j. Cystidioles; k. Basidiospores; l. Generative hyphae; m. Subicular hyphae. Scale bars: 10 µm (a – m).	Figure 4. Microscopic structures of Resupinatus latemarginatus (holotype, Dai 37377). a – f. Basidia and basidioles; g – j. Cystidioles; k. Basidiospores; l. Generative hyphae; m. Subicular hyphae. Scale bars: 10 µm (a – m).	2026-05-15	Zhuang, Lei;Guan, Qian-Xin;Dai, Yu-Cheng;Yuan, Yuan;Zhao, Heng		Zenodo	biologists	Zhuang, Lei;Guan, Qian-Xin;Dai, Yu-Cheng;Yuan, Yuan;Zhao, Heng			
E4731BD9708A55DCA32526BF4C0F6F1A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1645787	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.132188107.figure1	Figure 1. The Bayesian inference (BI) phylogeny of Resupinatus inferred from combined ITS and nLSU sequences, with Hohenbuehelia flabelliformis and H. lageniformis designated as outgroup taxa. Maximum likelihood (ML) bootstrap support values (BS ≥ 50 %) and BI posterior probabilities (BPP ≥ 0.9) are indicated on the corresponding branches, while BS ≥ 70 % and BPP ≥ 0.95 were considered significantly supported. The newly described species, Resupinatus angulatus, R. latemarginatus, R. sinoapplicatus, and R. sinuosus, are shown in bold. The scale bar (bottom) denotes the number of substitutions per site.	Figure 1. The Bayesian inference (BI) phylogeny of Resupinatus inferred from combined ITS and nLSU sequences, with Hohenbuehelia flabelliformis and H. lageniformis designated as outgroup taxa. Maximum likelihood (ML) bootstrap support values (BS ≥ 50 %) and BI posterior probabilities (BPP ≥ 0.9) are indicated on the corresponding branches, while BS ≥ 70 % and BPP ≥ 0.95 were considered significantly supported. The newly described species, Resupinatus angulatus, R. latemarginatus, R. sinoapplicatus, and R. sinuosus, are shown in bold. The scale bar (bottom) denotes the number of substitutions per site.	2026-05-15	Zhuang, Lei;Guan, Qian-Xin;Dai, Yu-Cheng;Yuan, Yuan;Zhao, Heng		Zenodo	biologists	Zhuang, Lei;Guan, Qian-Xin;Dai, Yu-Cheng;Yuan, Yuan;Zhao, Heng			
45FFA4E5A89557AB9DA8C37DF23C68A1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1645788	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.132188107.figure2	Figure 2. Basidiomata of Resupinatus angulatus, R. latemarginatus, R. sinoapplicatus, and R. sinuosus. a, b. R. angulatus, Dai 37973, holotype; c, d. R. latemarginatus, Dai 37377, holotype; e, f. R. sinoapplicatus, Dai 37311, holotype; g, h. R. sinuosus, 38306, holotype. Scale bars: 1 cm (a, c, e, g); 1 mm (b, d, f, h).	Figure 2. Basidiomata of Resupinatus angulatus, R. latemarginatus, R. sinoapplicatus, and R. sinuosus. a, b. R. angulatus, Dai 37973, holotype; c, d. R. latemarginatus, Dai 37377, holotype; e, f. R. sinoapplicatus, Dai 37311, holotype; g, h. R. sinuosus, 38306, holotype. Scale bars: 1 cm (a, c, e, g); 1 mm (b, d, f, h).	2026-05-15	Zhuang, Lei;Guan, Qian-Xin;Dai, Yu-Cheng;Yuan, Yuan;Zhao, Heng		Zenodo	biologists	Zhuang, Lei;Guan, Qian-Xin;Dai, Yu-Cheng;Yuan, Yuan;Zhao, Heng			
45FFA4E5A89557AB9DA8C37DF23C68A1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1645791	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.132188107.figure5	Figure 5. Microscopic structures of Resupinatus sinoapplicatus (holotype, Dai 37311). a. A section of hymenium; b – d. Basidia and basidioles; e – g. Cheilocystidia; h, i. Pleurocystidia; j. Generative hyphae; k. Basidiospores. Scale bars: 10 µm (a – k).	Figure 5. Microscopic structures of Resupinatus sinoapplicatus (holotype, Dai 37311). a. A section of hymenium; b – d. Basidia and basidioles; e – g. Cheilocystidia; h, i. Pleurocystidia; j. Generative hyphae; k. Basidiospores. Scale bars: 10 µm (a – k).	2026-05-15	Zhuang, Lei;Guan, Qian-Xin;Dai, Yu-Cheng;Yuan, Yuan;Zhao, Heng		Zenodo	biologists	Zhuang, Lei;Guan, Qian-Xin;Dai, Yu-Cheng;Yuan, Yuan;Zhao, Heng			
45FFA4E5A89557AB9DA8C37DF23C68A1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1645787	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.132188107.figure1	Figure 1. The Bayesian inference (BI) phylogeny of Resupinatus inferred from combined ITS and nLSU sequences, with Hohenbuehelia flabelliformis and H. lageniformis designated as outgroup taxa. Maximum likelihood (ML) bootstrap support values (BS ≥ 50 %) and BI posterior probabilities (BPP ≥ 0.9) are indicated on the corresponding branches, while BS ≥ 70 % and BPP ≥ 0.95 were considered significantly supported. The newly described species, Resupinatus angulatus, R. latemarginatus, R. sinoapplicatus, and R. sinuosus, are shown in bold. The scale bar (bottom) denotes the number of substitutions per site.	Figure 1. The Bayesian inference (BI) phylogeny of Resupinatus inferred from combined ITS and nLSU sequences, with Hohenbuehelia flabelliformis and H. lageniformis designated as outgroup taxa. Maximum likelihood (ML) bootstrap support values (BS ≥ 50 %) and BI posterior probabilities (BPP ≥ 0.9) are indicated on the corresponding branches, while BS ≥ 70 % and BPP ≥ 0.95 were considered significantly supported. The newly described species, Resupinatus angulatus, R. latemarginatus, R. sinoapplicatus, and R. sinuosus, are shown in bold. The scale bar (bottom) denotes the number of substitutions per site.	2026-05-15	Zhuang, Lei;Guan, Qian-Xin;Dai, Yu-Cheng;Yuan, Yuan;Zhao, Heng		Zenodo	biologists	Zhuang, Lei;Guan, Qian-Xin;Dai, Yu-Cheng;Yuan, Yuan;Zhao, Heng			
AA35EEAA1D6255519F49F732372088EC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1645788	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.132188107.figure2	Figure 2. Basidiomata of Resupinatus angulatus, R. latemarginatus, R. sinoapplicatus, and R. sinuosus. a, b. R. angulatus, Dai 37973, holotype; c, d. R. latemarginatus, Dai 37377, holotype; e, f. R. sinoapplicatus, Dai 37311, holotype; g, h. R. sinuosus, 38306, holotype. Scale bars: 1 cm (a, c, e, g); 1 mm (b, d, f, h).	Figure 2. Basidiomata of Resupinatus angulatus, R. latemarginatus, R. sinoapplicatus, and R. sinuosus. a, b. R. angulatus, Dai 37973, holotype; c, d. R. latemarginatus, Dai 37377, holotype; e, f. R. sinoapplicatus, Dai 37311, holotype; g, h. R. sinuosus, 38306, holotype. Scale bars: 1 cm (a, c, e, g); 1 mm (b, d, f, h).	2026-05-15	Zhuang, Lei;Guan, Qian-Xin;Dai, Yu-Cheng;Yuan, Yuan;Zhao, Heng		Zenodo	biologists	Zhuang, Lei;Guan, Qian-Xin;Dai, Yu-Cheng;Yuan, Yuan;Zhao, Heng			
AA35EEAA1D6255519F49F732372088EC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1645792	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.132188107.figure6	Figure 6. Microscopic structures of Resupinatus sinuosus (holotype, Dai 38306). a. A section of hymenium; b, c. Basidia; d – h. Cystidioles; i. Basidiospores; j. Generative hyphae; k. Subicular hyphae. Scale bars: 10 µm (a – k).	Figure 6. Microscopic structures of Resupinatus sinuosus (holotype, Dai 38306). a. A section of hymenium; b, c. Basidia; d – h. Cystidioles; i. Basidiospores; j. Generative hyphae; k. Subicular hyphae. Scale bars: 10 µm (a – k).	2026-05-15	Zhuang, Lei;Guan, Qian-Xin;Dai, Yu-Cheng;Yuan, Yuan;Zhao, Heng		Zenodo	biologists	Zhuang, Lei;Guan, Qian-Xin;Dai, Yu-Cheng;Yuan, Yuan;Zhao, Heng			
AA35EEAA1D6255519F49F732372088EC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1645787	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.132188107.figure1	Figure 1. The Bayesian inference (BI) phylogeny of Resupinatus inferred from combined ITS and nLSU sequences, with Hohenbuehelia flabelliformis and H. lageniformis designated as outgroup taxa. Maximum likelihood (ML) bootstrap support values (BS ≥ 50 %) and BI posterior probabilities (BPP ≥ 0.9) are indicated on the corresponding branches, while BS ≥ 70 % and BPP ≥ 0.95 were considered significantly supported. The newly described species, Resupinatus angulatus, R. latemarginatus, R. sinoapplicatus, and R. sinuosus, are shown in bold. The scale bar (bottom) denotes the number of substitutions per site.	Figure 1. The Bayesian inference (BI) phylogeny of Resupinatus inferred from combined ITS and nLSU sequences, with Hohenbuehelia flabelliformis and H. lageniformis designated as outgroup taxa. Maximum likelihood (ML) bootstrap support values (BS ≥ 50 %) and BI posterior probabilities (BPP ≥ 0.9) are indicated on the corresponding branches, while BS ≥ 70 % and BPP ≥ 0.95 were considered significantly supported. The newly described species, Resupinatus angulatus, R. latemarginatus, R. sinoapplicatus, and R. sinuosus, are shown in bold. The scale bar (bottom) denotes the number of substitutions per site.	2026-05-15	Zhuang, Lei;Guan, Qian-Xin;Dai, Yu-Cheng;Yuan, Yuan;Zhao, Heng		Zenodo	biologists	Zhuang, Lei;Guan, Qian-Xin;Dai, Yu-Cheng;Yuan, Yuan;Zhao, Heng			
