taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
8A3394D9CC7458DB988B82D347099668.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1573466	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.130.183564.figure7	Figure 7. Barriopsis archontophoenicis (HKAS 151750, a new host record) on dead branch of clarisia racemosa. a. Natural host substrate; b. Appearance of ascostroma on the host substrate; c, d. A section through an ascoma; e. Peridium; f. Pseudoparaphyses; g – i. Asci; j – m. Ascospores; n. A germinated ascospore; o, p. Colony on PDA (o. Upper; p. Lower views). Scale bars: 200 μm (b, c); 100 μm (d); 20 μm (g – i, n); 10 μm (e, f, j – m).	Figure 7. Barriopsis archontophoenicis (HKAS 151750, a new host record) on dead branch of clarisia racemosa. a. Natural host substrate; b. Appearance of ascostroma on the host substrate; c, d. A section through an ascoma; e. Peridium; f. Pseudoparaphyses; g – i. Asci; j – m. Ascospores; n. A germinated ascospore; o, p. Colony on PDA (o. Upper; p. Lower views). Scale bars: 200 μm (b, c); 100 μm (d); 20 μm (g – i, n); 10 μm (e, f, j – m).	2026-03-30	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Liu, Jianwei;Yan, Zhuyue;Yang, Shimei;Yuan, Jing;Shi, Xiaofei;Wan, Shanping;Dai, Dongqin;Senanayake, Indunil C.;Yu, Fuqiang		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Liu, Jianwei;Yan, Zhuyue;Yang, Shimei;Yuan, Jing;Shi, Xiaofei;Wan, Shanping;Dai, Dongqin;Senanayake, Indunil C.;Yu, Fuqiang			
8A3394D9CC7458DB988B82D347099668.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1573461	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.130.183564.figure2	Figure 2. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on combined dataset of SSU, LSU, ITS and tef 1 - α. The tree is rooted to Lasiodiplodia crassispora (CBS 118741) and L. avicenniae (CMW 41467). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 65 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented as blue and type strains are in bold.	Figure 2. Phylogram generated from ML analysis based on combined dataset of SSU, LSU, ITS and tef 1 - α. The tree is rooted to Lasiodiplodia crassispora (CBS 118741) and L. avicenniae (CMW 41467). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 65 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented as blue and type strains are in bold.	2026-03-30	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Liu, Jianwei;Yan, Zhuyue;Yang, Shimei;Yuan, Jing;Shi, Xiaofei;Wan, Shanping;Dai, Dongqin;Senanayake, Indunil C.;Yu, Fuqiang		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Liu, Jianwei;Yan, Zhuyue;Yang, Shimei;Yuan, Jing;Shi, Xiaofei;Wan, Shanping;Dai, Dongqin;Senanayake, Indunil C.;Yu, Fuqiang			
1885092063575170838E875E16C0B893.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1573465	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.130.183564.figure6	Figure 6. Dothiorella camelliae (HKAS 151751, a new host record) on dead branch of Macaranga peltata. a. Natural host substrate; b, c. Appearance of ascostromata on host; d. A section through ascostromata; e. A cross section of an ascoma; f. Peridium; g. Pseudoparaphyses; h – m. Asci; n – q. Ascospores; r. A germinated ascospore; s, t. Colony on PDA (s. Upper; t. Lower views). Scale bars: 2 mm (b); 500 μm (c); 200 μm (d); 50 μm (e); 20 μm (h – m, r); 10 μm (f, g, n – q).	Figure 6. Dothiorella camelliae (HKAS 151751, a new host record) on dead branch of Macaranga peltata. a. Natural host substrate; b, c. Appearance of ascostromata on host; d. A section through ascostromata; e. A cross section of an ascoma; f. Peridium; g. Pseudoparaphyses; h – m. Asci; n – q. Ascospores; r. A germinated ascospore; s, t. Colony on PDA (s. Upper; t. Lower views). Scale bars: 2 mm (b); 500 μm (c); 200 μm (d); 50 μm (e); 20 μm (h – m, r); 10 μm (f, g, n – q).	2026-03-30	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Liu, Jianwei;Yan, Zhuyue;Yang, Shimei;Yuan, Jing;Shi, Xiaofei;Wan, Shanping;Dai, Dongqin;Senanayake, Indunil C.;Yu, Fuqiang		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Liu, Jianwei;Yan, Zhuyue;Yang, Shimei;Yuan, Jing;Shi, Xiaofei;Wan, Shanping;Dai, Dongqin;Senanayake, Indunil C.;Yu, Fuqiang			
1885092063575170838E875E16C0B893.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1573460	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.130.183564.figure1	Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree generated from ML analysis based on combined dataset of LSU, ITS, tef 1 - α and β-tubulin. The tree is rooted to Neofusicoccum luteum (CMW 4165 and CBS 562.26). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 65 % and Posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented as blue and type strains are in bold.	Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree generated from ML analysis based on combined dataset of LSU, ITS, tef 1 - α and β-tubulin. The tree is rooted to Neofusicoccum luteum (CMW 4165 and CBS 562.26). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 65 % and Posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented as blue and type strains are in bold.	2026-03-30	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Liu, Jianwei;Yan, Zhuyue;Yang, Shimei;Yuan, Jing;Shi, Xiaofei;Wan, Shanping;Dai, Dongqin;Senanayake, Indunil C.;Yu, Fuqiang		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Liu, Jianwei;Yan, Zhuyue;Yang, Shimei;Yuan, Jing;Shi, Xiaofei;Wan, Shanping;Dai, Dongqin;Senanayake, Indunil C.;Yu, Fuqiang			
5E17FAFB35C35A958F29CE0A5AEBD945.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1573462	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.130.183564.figure3	Figure 3. Dothiorella fusiformis (HKAS 151748, Holotype, sexual morph) on dead twig of Thalictrum sp. a. Natural host substrate; b, c. Appearance of ascostromata on the host; d, e. A section through an ascoma; f. Peridium; g. Pseudoparaphyses; h – l. Asci; m – q. Ascospores; r. A germinated ascospore; s, t. Colony on PDA (s. Upper; t. Lower views). Scale bars: 1 mm (b); 500 μm (c); 200 μm (d); 100 μm (e); 20 μm (f, h – l); 10 μm (g, r); 5 μm (m – q).	Figure 3. Dothiorella fusiformis (HKAS 151748, Holotype, sexual morph) on dead twig of Thalictrum sp. a. Natural host substrate; b, c. Appearance of ascostromata on the host; d, e. A section through an ascoma; f. Peridium; g. Pseudoparaphyses; h – l. Asci; m – q. Ascospores; r. A germinated ascospore; s, t. Colony on PDA (s. Upper; t. Lower views). Scale bars: 1 mm (b); 500 μm (c); 200 μm (d); 100 μm (e); 20 μm (f, h – l); 10 μm (g, r); 5 μm (m – q).	2026-03-30	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Liu, Jianwei;Yan, Zhuyue;Yang, Shimei;Yuan, Jing;Shi, Xiaofei;Wan, Shanping;Dai, Dongqin;Senanayake, Indunil C.;Yu, Fuqiang		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Liu, Jianwei;Yan, Zhuyue;Yang, Shimei;Yuan, Jing;Shi, Xiaofei;Wan, Shanping;Dai, Dongqin;Senanayake, Indunil C.;Yu, Fuqiang			
5E17FAFB35C35A958F29CE0A5AEBD945.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1573463	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.130.183564.figure4	Figure 4. Dothiorella fusiformis (HKAS 151752, asexual morph) on dead twig of Thalictrum sp. a. Natural host substrate; b, c. Conidiomata on the host surface; d. A vertical section through conidioma; e. Peridium of conidioma; f – l. Conidia attached to conidiogenous cells; m – t. Conidia; u. Germinated conidia; v, w. Colony on PDA (v. Upper; w. Lower views). Scale bars: 1 mm (b); 200 μm (c); 100 μm (d); 20 μm (e); 10 μm (f – u).	Figure 4. Dothiorella fusiformis (HKAS 151752, asexual morph) on dead twig of Thalictrum sp. a. Natural host substrate; b, c. Conidiomata on the host surface; d. A vertical section through conidioma; e. Peridium of conidioma; f – l. Conidia attached to conidiogenous cells; m – t. Conidia; u. Germinated conidia; v, w. Colony on PDA (v. Upper; w. Lower views). Scale bars: 1 mm (b); 200 μm (c); 100 μm (d); 20 μm (e); 10 μm (f – u).	2026-03-30	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Liu, Jianwei;Yan, Zhuyue;Yang, Shimei;Yuan, Jing;Shi, Xiaofei;Wan, Shanping;Dai, Dongqin;Senanayake, Indunil C.;Yu, Fuqiang		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Liu, Jianwei;Yan, Zhuyue;Yang, Shimei;Yuan, Jing;Shi, Xiaofei;Wan, Shanping;Dai, Dongqin;Senanayake, Indunil C.;Yu, Fuqiang			
5E17FAFB35C35A958F29CE0A5AEBD945.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1573460	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.130.183564.figure1	Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree generated from ML analysis based on combined dataset of LSU, ITS, tef 1 - α and β-tubulin. The tree is rooted to Neofusicoccum luteum (CMW 4165 and CBS 562.26). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 65 % and Posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented as blue and type strains are in bold.	Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree generated from ML analysis based on combined dataset of LSU, ITS, tef 1 - α and β-tubulin. The tree is rooted to Neofusicoccum luteum (CMW 4165 and CBS 562.26). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 65 % and Posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented as blue and type strains are in bold.	2026-03-30	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Liu, Jianwei;Yan, Zhuyue;Yang, Shimei;Yuan, Jing;Shi, Xiaofei;Wan, Shanping;Dai, Dongqin;Senanayake, Indunil C.;Yu, Fuqiang		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Liu, Jianwei;Yan, Zhuyue;Yang, Shimei;Yuan, Jing;Shi, Xiaofei;Wan, Shanping;Dai, Dongqin;Senanayake, Indunil C.;Yu, Fuqiang			
E7A9495886855CDD961C5D84E96DFC1F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1573464	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.130.183564.figure5	Figure 5. Dothiorella swieteniae (HKAS 151749, holotype) on dead branches of Swietenia macrophylla. a. Natural host substrate; b, c. Conidiomata on the host surface; d, e. A vertical section through conidioma; f. Peridium of conidioma; g – k. Conidia attached to conidiogenous cells; l – o. Conidia; p. A germinated conidium; q, r. Colony on PDA (q. Upper; r. Lower views). Scale bars: 1 mm (b); 500 μm (c); 100 μm (d); 50 μm (e); 10 μm (f – p).	Figure 5. Dothiorella swieteniae (HKAS 151749, holotype) on dead branches of Swietenia macrophylla. a. Natural host substrate; b, c. Conidiomata on the host surface; d, e. A vertical section through conidioma; f. Peridium of conidioma; g – k. Conidia attached to conidiogenous cells; l – o. Conidia; p. A germinated conidium; q, r. Colony on PDA (q. Upper; r. Lower views). Scale bars: 1 mm (b); 500 μm (c); 100 μm (d); 50 μm (e); 10 μm (f – p).	2026-03-30	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Liu, Jianwei;Yan, Zhuyue;Yang, Shimei;Yuan, Jing;Shi, Xiaofei;Wan, Shanping;Dai, Dongqin;Senanayake, Indunil C.;Yu, Fuqiang		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Liu, Jianwei;Yan, Zhuyue;Yang, Shimei;Yuan, Jing;Shi, Xiaofei;Wan, Shanping;Dai, Dongqin;Senanayake, Indunil C.;Yu, Fuqiang			
E7A9495886855CDD961C5D84E96DFC1F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1573460	https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.130.183564.figure1	Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree generated from ML analysis based on combined dataset of LSU, ITS, tef 1 - α and β-tubulin. The tree is rooted to Neofusicoccum luteum (CMW 4165 and CBS 562.26). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 65 % and Posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented as blue and type strains are in bold.	Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree generated from ML analysis based on combined dataset of LSU, ITS, tef 1 - α and β-tubulin. The tree is rooted to Neofusicoccum luteum (CMW 4165 and CBS 562.26). Bootstrap support values for ML ≥ 65 % and Posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are noted at the nodes. Strain numbers are noted after the species names. Strains isolated in this study are represented as blue and type strains are in bold.	2026-03-30	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Liu, Jianwei;Yan, Zhuyue;Yang, Shimei;Yuan, Jing;Shi, Xiaofei;Wan, Shanping;Dai, Dongqin;Senanayake, Indunil C.;Yu, Fuqiang		Zenodo	biologists	Rathnayaka, Achala R.;Liu, Jianwei;Yan, Zhuyue;Yang, Shimei;Yuan, Jing;Shi, Xiaofei;Wan, Shanping;Dai, Dongqin;Senanayake, Indunil C.;Yu, Fuqiang			
