taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03B387F4DF34FFDF4B98FC3E8013FE0E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16967208/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16967208	Fig. 1. Tintinnopsis fimbriata from a Bouin’s fluid-fixed sample. A, C-E, Lateral views of the loricae, arrowheads marking boundary between the collar and the bowl, arrows indicating the borderline between the bowl and the posterior process; B, Optical section of the middle of the cell inside the lorica, arrow showing the closing apparatus and arrowhead indicating the estimated attachment point on the inner surface of lorica. The same scale is applied for comparison of size variation(A, B; C-E). Scale bars:A, C=30 μm.	Fig. 1. Tintinnopsis fimbriata from a Bouin’s fluid-fixed sample. A, C-E, Lateral views of the loricae, arrowheads marking boundary between the collar and the bowl, arrows indicating the borderline between the bowl and the posterior process; B, Optical section of the middle of the cell inside the lorica, arrow showing the closing apparatus and arrowhead indicating the estimated attachment point on the inner surface of lorica. The same scale is applied for comparison of size variation(A, B; C-E). Scale bars:A, C=30 μm.	2025-12-31	Jung, Ji Hye Moon and Jae-Ho		Zenodo	biologists	Jung, Ji Hye Moon and Jae-Ho			
03B387F4DF34FFDF4B98FC3E8013FE0E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16967212/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16967212	Fig. 2. Tintinnopsis fimbriata, isolated from a Bouin’s fluid-fixed sample, under a scanning electron microscope. A-C, Lateral views of the loricae; D-F, Anterior and posterior ends of the loricae, arrow indicating the attachment point between the inner surface of the collar and the closing apparatus.The closing apparatus was constructed by finer particles than those on the lorica (D). The same scale is applied for comparison of size variation(A-C; E, F). Scale bars:A=30 μm, D=20 μm, E=10 μm.	Fig. 2. Tintinnopsis fimbriata, isolated from a Bouin’s fluid-fixed sample, under a scanning electron microscope. A-C, Lateral views of the loricae; D-F, Anterior and posterior ends of the loricae, arrow indicating the attachment point between the inner surface of the collar and the closing apparatus.The closing apparatus was constructed by finer particles than those on the lorica (D). The same scale is applied for comparison of size variation(A-C; E, F). Scale bars:A=30 μm, D=20 μm, E=10 μm.	2025-12-31	Jung, Ji Hye Moon and Jae-Ho		Zenodo	biologists	Jung, Ji Hye Moon and Jae-Ho			
03B387F4DF34FFDF4B98FC3E8013FE0E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16967218/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16967218	Fig. 5. Bayesian inference(BI) tree based on SSU rDNA sequences, showing the phylogenetic position of Tintinnopsis fimbriata and T. uruguayensis. Newly obtained sequences are in bold. GenBank accession numbers follow species names. Numbers at the nodes represent the Bayesian inference (BI) posterior probabilities and the maximum likelihood (ML) bootstrap values (solid circles=full supporting values). Dashes indicate posterior probabilities<0.5, bootstrap values<50%, or different topologies in BI and ML phylogenies. The scale bar represents three nucleotide substitutions per 100 nucleotides.	Fig. 5. Bayesian inference(BI) tree based on SSU rDNA sequences, showing the phylogenetic position of Tintinnopsis fimbriata and T. uruguayensis. Newly obtained sequences are in bold. GenBank accession numbers follow species names. Numbers at the nodes represent the Bayesian inference (BI) posterior probabilities and the maximum likelihood (ML) bootstrap values (solid circles=full supporting values). Dashes indicate posterior probabilities<0.5, bootstrap values<50%, or different topologies in BI and ML phylogenies. The scale bar represents three nucleotide substitutions per 100 nucleotides.	2025-12-31	Jung, Ji Hye Moon and Jae-Ho		Zenodo	biologists	Jung, Ji Hye Moon and Jae-Ho			
03B387F4DF34FFDF4B98FC3E8013FE0E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16967220/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16967220	Fig. 6. Morphological differences between Tintinnopsis fimbriata and T. uruguayensis. A, Box plots showing differences in collar opening diameter; B, Box plots showing differences in the ratio of lorica length to collar opening diameter.	Fig. 6. Morphological differences between Tintinnopsis fimbriata and T. uruguayensis. A, Box plots showing differences in collar opening diameter; B, Box plots showing differences in the ratio of lorica length to collar opening diameter.	2025-12-31	Jung, Ji Hye Moon and Jae-Ho		Zenodo	biologists	Jung, Ji Hye Moon and Jae-Ho			
03B387F4DF33FFD2484FFE6387ACFB76.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16967214/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16967214	Fig. 3. Tintinnopsis uruguayensis from a Bouin’s fluid-fixed sample. A, C-G, Lateral views of the loricae; B, Optical section of the middle of the cell inside the lorica, arrow showing the closure of the closing apparatus. The same scale is applied for comparison of size variation (A, B; C-E; F, G). Scale bars:A, C, F=30 μm.	Fig. 3. Tintinnopsis uruguayensis from a Bouin’s fluid-fixed sample. A, C-G, Lateral views of the loricae; B, Optical section of the middle of the cell inside the lorica, arrow showing the closure of the closing apparatus. The same scale is applied for comparison of size variation (A, B; C-E; F, G). Scale bars:A, C, F=30 μm.	2025-12-31	Jung, Ji Hye Moon and Jae-Ho		Zenodo	biologists	Jung, Ji Hye Moon and Jae-Ho			
03B387F4DF33FFD2484FFE6387ACFB76.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16967216/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16967216	Fig. 4. Tintinnopsis uruguayensis, isolated from a Bouin’s fluid-fixed sample, under a scanning electron microscope.A-C, Lateral views of the loricae; D, E, Anterior ends of the loricae, arrowhead indicating the closure of the closing apparatus, arrow showing the possibility of the presence of an agglutinated lorica sac; F, Posterior end of the posterior process; G, Smooth inner surface of the closing appartus. The same scale is applied for comparison of size variation(A-C). Scale bars: A=30μm, D=20μm, E=5 μm, F=2 μm, G =1 μm.	Fig. 4. Tintinnopsis uruguayensis, isolated from a Bouin’s fluid-fixed sample, under a scanning electron microscope.A-C, Lateral views of the loricae; D, E, Anterior ends of the loricae, arrowhead indicating the closure of the closing apparatus, arrow showing the possibility of the presence of an agglutinated lorica sac; F, Posterior end of the posterior process; G, Smooth inner surface of the closing appartus. The same scale is applied for comparison of size variation(A-C). Scale bars: A=30μm, D=20μm, E=5 μm, F=2 μm, G =1 μm.	2025-12-31	Jung, Ji Hye Moon and Jae-Ho		Zenodo	biologists	Jung, Ji Hye Moon and Jae-Ho			
03B387F4DF33FFD2484FFE6387ACFB76.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16967218/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16967218	Fig. 5. Bayesian inference(BI) tree based on SSU rDNA sequences, showing the phylogenetic position of Tintinnopsis fimbriata and T. uruguayensis. Newly obtained sequences are in bold. GenBank accession numbers follow species names. Numbers at the nodes represent the Bayesian inference (BI) posterior probabilities and the maximum likelihood (ML) bootstrap values (solid circles=full supporting values). Dashes indicate posterior probabilities<0.5, bootstrap values<50%, or different topologies in BI and ML phylogenies. The scale bar represents three nucleotide substitutions per 100 nucleotides.	Fig. 5. Bayesian inference(BI) tree based on SSU rDNA sequences, showing the phylogenetic position of Tintinnopsis fimbriata and T. uruguayensis. Newly obtained sequences are in bold. GenBank accession numbers follow species names. Numbers at the nodes represent the Bayesian inference (BI) posterior probabilities and the maximum likelihood (ML) bootstrap values (solid circles=full supporting values). Dashes indicate posterior probabilities<0.5, bootstrap values<50%, or different topologies in BI and ML phylogenies. The scale bar represents three nucleotide substitutions per 100 nucleotides.	2025-12-31	Jung, Ji Hye Moon and Jae-Ho		Zenodo	biologists	Jung, Ji Hye Moon and Jae-Ho			
