identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03A15E179447E964FF18FC65B7B009CE.text	03A15E179447E964FF18FC65B7B009CE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Adelidae Bruand 1851	<div><p>Family Adelidae Bruand</p><p>The family Adelidae includes five genera and almost 450 described species and is distributed worldwide except Antarctica and New Zealand; more than 300 species are known from Eastern Hemisphere (van Nieukerken et al. 2011; Hirowatari et al. 2012, 2024; Kozlov 2013, 2016a, 2016c, 2020, 2023a, 2023b, 2024a, 2024b; Agassiz &amp; Kozlov 2015; Korb 2016; Bryner &amp; Huemer 2019; Koo &amp; Cho 2022; Sun et al. 2022; Davis &amp; Medeiros 2023; Ko et al. 2023; Liao et al. 2023; Sun &amp; Li 2023; Ko et al. 2025). In Russia, 63 species from four genera are distributed, of which 39 species are distributed in the European part, which is a third less than in Europe. 37 species from four genera inhabit the Russian Far East, which is comparable to the number of species known from Japan, and slightly more than half of the species recorded in China (Kozlov 2016b, 2024c; Liao et al. 2023; Hirowatari et al. 2024).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A15E179447E964FF18FC65B7B009CE	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Tarasova, Anastasiia A.;Ponomarenko, Margarita G.	Tarasova, Anastasiia A., Ponomarenko, Margarita G. (2025): New data on Microlepidoptera (Lepidoptera: Micropterigidae, Adelidae, Glyphipterigidae, and Yponomeutidae) from the Far East of Russia. Zootaxa 5715 (1): 456-475, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.40, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.40
03A15E179447E964FF18FAD5B0340AB2.text	03A15E179447E964FF18FAD5B0340AB2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cauchas Zeller 1839	<div><p>Genus Cauchas Zeller</p><p>Type species. Tinea fibulella ([Denis &amp; Schiffermüller], 1775), by subsequent designation by Fletcher (1929).</p><p>Distribution. Palaearctic: Europe; Russia (European part, south of West Siberia, Far East); West (Turkey, Armenia) and Central (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan) Asia; Nearctic: Canada, USA (Nielsen &amp; Johansson 1980; Kozlov 1994, 1997, 2024c; Kuprijanov 1994; Korb 2016; Bryner 2020; Davis &amp; Medeiros 2023).</p><p>Remarks. The world fauna of the genus includes 32 species, half of which are distributed in the Old World with the greatest species diversity in Europe (nine species), and the other half are found in the New World, where the Cauchas spp. inhabit the North America. The fauna of Russia includes seven species, three species of which known from European part only ( Cauchas florella (Staudinger), C. leucocerella (Scopoli), C. rufifrontella (Treitschke)), two species reach the south of West Siberia ( C. fibulella ([Denis &amp; Schiffermüller]), C. rufimitrella (Scopoli)), one species was described from Altai Republic and so far known only from this locality ( C. mikkolai Kozlov) and one species ( C. breviantennella Nielsen &amp; Johansson) has been reported from arctic (Murmanskaya oblast’ and Yamalo- Nenetskii Avtomnyi Okrug) and subarctic (Magadanskaya oblast’) geographic zones. The species of the genus Cauchas so far remain unknown from East Asia and south of the Russian Far East, thus the new species is the first one described from this territory.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A15E179447E964FF18FAD5B0340AB2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Tarasova, Anastasiia A.;Ponomarenko, Margarita G.	Tarasova, Anastasiia A., Ponomarenko, Margarita G. (2025): New data on Microlepidoptera (Lepidoptera: Micropterigidae, Adelidae, Glyphipterigidae, and Yponomeutidae) from the Far East of Russia. Zootaxa 5715 (1): 456-475, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.40, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.40
03A15E179444E967FF18FF78B60308B9.text	03A15E179444E967FF18FF78B60308B9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cauchas storozhenkoi Tarasova & Ponomarenko 2025	<div><p>Cauchas storozhenkoi Tarasova &amp; Ponomarenko, sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs 1, 11–13, 18–21)</p><p>Type material. Holotype: ♂, Russia, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=132.03334&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=43.24917" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 132.03334/lat 43.24917)">Primorskii Krai</a>, Vladivostok, 1 km NNW of “Sputnik” railway station, 43°14’57” N, 132°02’00” E, 19.vii 2021 (leg. M. Ponomarenko), GS 345 MP, FSCB.</p><p>Diagnosis. The new species is similar to C. florella, C. rufifrontella, and C. terskella Kuprijanov by unpatterned forewing. It is also similar to C. terskella and C. fibulella by the male genitalia with relatively large socii, length of which exceeds half of the uncus width, W-shaped plate of transtilla and large anterior part of juxta. The new species differs by the monochrome wings without metallic shine, by the valva smoothly tapering towards apex, and juxta with rectangular shade-shaped anterior part in the male genitalia.</p><p>Description. Adult, male. Head covered with raised yellow and brown elongated hair-like scales (Fig. 11). Antennal scape dark brown, flagellum dark brown basally and lighter distally, with ventral ciliation (Fig. 12); antennal sockets well separated. Eyes small, frontoclypeus broad, interocular index (vd/md) 0.47 (Fig. 13). Maxillar palpi rudimentary. Labial palpus dark brown with elongated hair-like scales on ventral margin; weakly curved upwards, first segment 3/5 of second segment length, third segment 1.6 times longer than second one.</p><p>Thorax dark brown. Wingspan 10.5 mm, forewing length 4.5 mm. Tegula and forewing brownish gold, the latter without pattern and metallic shine; fringe concolorous with them basally and lighter distally (Fig. 1). Hindwing greyish brown, fringe slightly darker. In hindwing veins M 1 and M 2 separated basally. Fore- and midlegs greyish brown; hindlegs with femur dark brown dorsally and greyish brown ventrally, tibia and tarsus light greyish brown; hind tibia with long hair-like scales.</p><p>Genitalia (Figs 18–21). Tegumen short, fused with rudimentary uncus. Socius bean-shaped and relatively long, exceeds half of uncus width. Vinculum wide, in ventral part two times longer than valva, with rounded anterior part, joined with tegumen dorso-laterally. Valva broad basally, smoothly tapering towards rounded apex. Transtilla consists of two curved band-like sclerites arising from dorso-basal valval angles and fused into W-shaped plate with rounded sublateral lobes and medial process elongated caudally and pointed at apex (Fig. 19). Aedeagus 2.5 times longer than valva, tubular, narrowed at basal 1/4 and at near 3/5 of its length, with ventral more or less trapezoid plate at the base; its apical part with two asymmetric lobes, both with more or less long spines: left lobes slightly shorter and more sclerotised, its base forms latero-ventral side of aedeagus apical part; right lobe longer, semisclerotised, its base forms dorso-lateral side of aedeagus apical part (Fig. 21). Anellus with large spines in distal part and granulated in proximal part; juxta with rectangular shade-shaped anterior part bearing single left thorn (Fig. 20).</p><p>Female. Unknown.</p><p>Host plant. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. Russia (south of the Far East: Primorskii Krai).</p><p>Etymology. The species is named after Dr. Sergei Yuryevich Storozhenko, a famous entomologist who made a great contribution to the study of orthopteroid insects. A noun in the genitive case.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A15E179444E967FF18FF78B60308B9	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Tarasova, Anastasiia A.;Ponomarenko, Margarita G.	Tarasova, Anastasiia A., Ponomarenko, Margarita G. (2025): New data on Microlepidoptera (Lepidoptera: Micropterigidae, Adelidae, Glyphipterigidae, and Yponomeutidae) from the Far East of Russia. Zootaxa 5715 (1): 456-475, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.40, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.40
03A15E179444E967FF18F9D8B0380A55.text	03A15E179444E967FF18F9D8B0380A55.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Yponomeutidae Stephens 1829	<div><p>Family Yponomeutidae Stephens</p><p>The world fauna of the family Yponomeutidae numbers 340 species from 30 genera and 4/5 of the generic diversity and almost half of all known species are in the Palaearctic region (Huemer &amp; Mutanen 2015; Lewis &amp; Sohn 2015; Cepeda 2016, 2018; Sohn 2016, 2018, 2021, 2023; Agassiz 2019, 2020; Lou et al. 2019; Na et al. 2019; Liu &amp; Wang 2023a, 2023b; Lu et al. 2023; Ponomarenko &amp; Beljaev 2023; Ruiz-Galvan &amp; Sohn 2023; Ponomarenko &amp; Sinev 2024c; Tokár et al. 2024; Tarasova &amp; Ponomarenko 2025). The fauna of Russia includes 70 species from 15 genera, most of which, 41 species from 11 genera, inhabit the Far East (Ponomarenko 2016; Ponomarenko &amp; Sinev 2024b, Tarasova &amp; Ponomarenko 2025).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A15E179444E967FF18F9D8B0380A55	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Tarasova, Anastasiia A.;Ponomarenko, Margarita G.	Tarasova, Anastasiia A., Ponomarenko, Margarita G. (2025): New data on Microlepidoptera (Lepidoptera: Micropterigidae, Adelidae, Glyphipterigidae, and Yponomeutidae) from the Far East of Russia. Zootaxa 5715 (1): 456-475, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.40, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.40
03A15E179445E966FF18FD3CB69C0BFA.text	03A15E179445E966FF18FD3CB69C0BFA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Kessleria fasciapennella (Stainton 1849)	<div><p>Kessleria fasciapennella (Stainton, 1849)</p><p>(Figs 2, 14, 28, 29)</p><p>Material examined. 2 ♀♀, Russia, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=131.21333&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=42.588333" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 131.21333/lat 42.588333)">Primorskii Krai</a>, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=131.21333&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=42.588333" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 131.21333/lat 42.588333)">Khasanskii district</a>, Gamov Peninsula, 27 km SW of Slavyanka, Srednyaya Inlet, 42°35’18” N, 131°12’48” E, 25.vii 1997 (leg. M. Ponomarenko), GS 344 AT, FSCB .</p><p>Diagnosis. This species is similar to K. saxifragae (Stainton) by pattern of forewing and female genitalia with transverse sclerotisation in sternal area of 8 th segment formed by extended ventral arms of apophyses anteriores, antrum with sclerotised ring and corpus bursae without signum. It differs by narrower transverse sclerotisation in sternal part of 8 th segment, a ratio of sclerotisation length to its width is 0.2, by smaller and flattened setaceous lobes of postvaginal plate and shorter granular part of ductus bursae, which does not exceed 1/5 of total ductus length in the female genitalia (Figs 28, 29). The related species possesses wider transverse sclerotisation in sternal part of 8 th segment, a ratio of length of this sclerotisation to its width is 0.6, larger and rounded setaceous lobes of postvaginal plate and ductus bursae with continuous granular sculpture in the female genitalia.</p><p>Remarks. The specimens collected in the south of the Russian Far East differ from European specimens by relatively smaller size (wingspan 12.7 mm), groundcolour of forewing beige, wing pattern without a distinct dark brown oblique stripe extending, which in European moths extends from about 1/4 of the dorsal margin to about 2/5 of the costal margin, and without stripe from 1/3 wing length to apex. Instead of these stripes there are scattered dark brown scales located exactly in the same place; forewing with four rows of black dots running from near base: five dots in subcostal row to 1/3 of wing length, nine ones in radial row to 2/3 wing length, six-seven ones in submedian row and ten ones in subdorsal row both to a little beyond middle of wing (Fig. 2). In the female genitalia, Far Eastern specimens differ by a relatively longer unbranched part of apophyses anteriores, which is 1.2 times longer than the posterior branch (Fig. 28). According to the photographs, the European specimens of K. fasciapennella have distinct oblique stripe on the forewings and shorter unbranched part of apophyses anteriores, which is only 0.7 of posterior branch length (Huemer &amp; Tarmann 1991: figs 52, 53, 237). The exception is the specimen from Komi Republic (Huemer &amp; Tarmann 1991: fig. 54), which also lacks an oblique stripe on the forewing, and its wing pattern is similar to that of specimens from the south of the Far East.</p><p>Distribution. Europe; Russia (N, NW and NE of European part, south of West Siberia, Irkutskaya Oblast’, south of Far East: Primorskii Krai, first record).</p><p>Host plant. Parnassia palustris L. ( Celastraceae) in Europe (Huemer &amp; Tarmann 1991).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A15E179445E966FF18FD3CB69C0BFA	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Tarasova, Anastasiia A.;Ponomarenko, Margarita G.	Tarasova, Anastasiia A., Ponomarenko, Margarita G. (2025): New data on Microlepidoptera (Lepidoptera: Micropterigidae, Adelidae, Glyphipterigidae, and Yponomeutidae) from the Far East of Russia. Zootaxa 5715 (1): 456-475, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.40, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.40
03A15E179445E966FF18FF78B6040FA1.text	03A15E179445E966FF18FF78B6040FA1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Kessleria Nowicki 1864	<div><p>Genus Kessleria Nowicki</p><p>Type species. Kessleria zimmermannii Nowicki, 1864, by monotypy.</p><p>Distribution. Palaearctic region: Europe; Russia (European part, North Caucasus, south of West Siberia, Irkutskaya Oblast’, Zabaikalskii Krai [Transbaikalia], Primorskii Krai, first record); Japan (Honshu, Kyushu); Oriental region: China (Hunan, Zhejiang, Yunnan, Taiwan); Japan (Ryukyu); India (Assam, Mumbai, Punjab); Nearctic region: Canada; USA; Australasian region: New Guinea; New Zealand (Friese 1960; Moriuti 1977, 1981; Huemer &amp; Tarmann 1991, 1993; Lewis &amp; Sohn 2015; Huemer &amp; Mutanen 2015; Ponomarenko &amp; Sinev 2024b).</p><p>Remarks. The genus Kessleria Nowicki includes 35 species (Huemer &amp; Mutanen 2015; Lewis &amp; Sohn 2015), most of which are Palaearctic: more than 2/3 species are distributed in Europe, and two species are known from Japan. Six species have been recorded in the Oriental region and two more from the Australasian region. In Russia, only five species have been indicated, all of which have fragmented or narrow local ranges (Ponomarenko &amp; Sinev 2024b). In Russia the easternmost locality where Kessleria spp. are known is the Zabaikalskii Krai [Transbaikalia]. Before this study, this genus was not recorded in the fauna of the Russian Far East.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A15E179445E966FF18FF78B6040FA1	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Tarasova, Anastasiia A.;Ponomarenko, Margarita G.	Tarasova, Anastasiia A., Ponomarenko, Margarita G. (2025): New data on Microlepidoptera (Lepidoptera: Micropterigidae, Adelidae, Glyphipterigidae, and Yponomeutidae) from the Far East of Russia. Zootaxa 5715 (1): 456-475, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.40, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.40
03A15E179445E960FF18F8C4B1C60A56.text	03A15E179445E960FF18F8C4B1C60A56.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Metanomeuta Meyrick	<div><p>Genus Metanomeuta Meyrick</p><p>Type species. Metanomeuta fulvicrinis Meyrick, 1935, by subsequent designation by Friese (1962).</p><p>Distribution. Russia (south of Far East: Primorskii Krai), first record; South Korea; China (Henan, Sichuan, Hubei, Anhui, Zhejiang, Jiangxi, Hunan, Guizhou, Fujian, Guangxi); Japan (Honshu, Shikoku, Kyushu) (Moriuti 1977; Jin &amp; Wang 2008; Lewis &amp; Sohn 2015).</p><p>Remarks. Genus Metanomeuta was described for two species, M. fulvicrinis and M. zonoceros Meyrick, 1935 based on a series of specimens from H. Höne collection. The M. fulvicrinis was collected in two localities of Central and East China: Tienmushan (Zhejiang Province) and Hoengshan (Hunan Province), and M. zonoceros was collected in Hoengshan only (Meyrick 1935).</p><p>Meyrick in the preface for his paper indicated that he “indebted to the great generosity of Prince Aristide Caradja and H. Höne for permission to retain 58 type-specimens” in his collection in British Museum, and only “the co-types and para-types of those when such exist, are deposited in their collections. 29 type-specimens remained in the coll. Caradja, which I especially indicate” (Meyrick 1935: 45). Meyrick, describing new taxa, indicated that the type series of M. fulvicrinis includes five specimens and the type series of M. zonoceros includes three specimens. Friese (1962), examining the specimens from the Caradja’s collection (National Museum of Natural History “Grigore Antipa”, Bucharest, Romania), indicated totally 15 specimens belonging to both species, synonymising them, and 11 specimens of them associated with M. fulvicrinis . He did not indicate whether he had the specimens studied by Meyrick and mentioned in his descriptions of each species. It is not clear from work by Friese whether the specimen he designated as the lectotype was originally one of the few syntypes with which Meyrick worked. The number of specimens listed by Friese (1962) is twice the number of the type series.</p><p>According to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature if specimens were not mentioned in the description, they are not syntypes and specimen which was not originally among syntypes and later designed as lectotype lost its status (ICZN 1999: Arts 74.2, 72.4.1). Moreover, if the specimens from the National Museum of Natural History “Grigore Antipa” were not originally part of the syntype series, they are not also paralectotypes, as erroneously claimed by Friese (1962) and Moriuti (1977).</p><p>Lewis &amp; Sohn (2015) statement that “prior to Clarke (1965), Friese (1962) had designated a lectotype of fulvicrinis, as reported by Popescu-Gorj (1992), invalidating Clarke’s designation” is erroneous, since all the discussed specimens in the Caradja’s collection, examined by Friese, in number much more than it was included in the type series, and cannot be syntypes (at least, that part which exceeds the number of probable syntypes). Furthermore, Popescu-Gorj could not validate designation of the lectotype for fulvicrinis by Friese, because he indicated different locality for the Friese’s lectotype of M. fulvicrinis: “West Tien-Mu-shan (1600 m)” (Popescu-Gorj 1992: 152), whereas “ China, Prov. Hunan, Hoeng-Shan (900 m)” in Friese (1962: 323). Based on the above, the type locality of the species is also undefined, since it is determined by the place of lectotype origin (ICZN 1999: Art. 76.2).</p><p>Clarke designated lectotypes for M. fulvicrinis and M. zonoceros later (Clarke 1965), without mention of the Friese’s designation. However, just this designation may be valid, as it fully complies with the requirements of ICZN (1999), since at least part of true syntypes of M. fulvicrinis and M. zonoceros undoubtedly are stored in the NHM, and since Meyrick did not indicate that he passed the type(s) of these species to the Caradja’s collection.</p><p>Thus, the questions about priority of lectotype designation for M. fulvicrinis and M. zonoceros, and about the type locality for the first of them are open until the location of the true syntypes of M. fulvicrinis and M. zonoceros is established and whether the true syntypes are designated as lectotypes of these species by Friese (1962).</p><p>Metanomeuta fulvicrinis was designed as a type species of the genus Metanomeuta by Friese (1962), who was a first reviser (ICZN 1999: Art. 24.2.1). He also proposed to treat M. zonoceros as junior synonym of M. fulvicrinis . Later Clarke (1965), designating lectotypes for both species, illustrated them and confirmed their synonymy.</p><p>Despite of large similarity in the male genitalia, M. fulvicrinis differs from M. zonoceros by larger size, more arched costa of forewing and different ratio of length and maximal width of forewing: the last species has narrower forewing. Besides, according to original descriptions M. fulvicrinis without distinct wing pattern and these species collected in different months: M. fulvicrinis in May-July and October, and M. zonoceros in July-August.</p><p>Jin and Wang (2008), studying numerous specimens collected in China and associated with M. fulvicrinis, showed the variation in shape and pattern of forewing (in the original description forewing without pattern), variation in shape of gnathos and valva, in width of sacculus in the male genitalia and variation in shape of antevaginal and postvaginal plates in the female genitalia. The genus was monotypic until Jin and Wang described two more species: M. spinisparsula Jin &amp; Wang, 2008 and M. yuexiensis Jin &amp; Wang, 2008 . Thus, currently the genus includes three species. The generic composition and status of described taxa within this genus need to be revised not only by morphological comparison but also molecular study.</p><p>Considering the great morphological diversity in the current interpretation of M. fulvicrinis, which may be a complex of related species, the specimen from the southern Russian Far East is tentatively identified as M. fulvicrinis, which is first recorded in Russia as well as the genus Metanomeuta Meyrick.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A15E179445E960FF18F8C4B1C60A56	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Tarasova, Anastasiia A.;Ponomarenko, Margarita G.	Tarasova, Anastasiia A., Ponomarenko, Margarita G. (2025): New data on Microlepidoptera (Lepidoptera: Micropterigidae, Adelidae, Glyphipterigidae, and Yponomeutidae) from the Far East of Russia. Zootaxa 5715 (1): 456-475, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.40, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.40
03A15E179440E963FF18FF78B71F0EEE.text	03A15E179440E963FF18FF78B71F0EEE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Metanomeuta fulvicrinis Meyrick 1935	<div><p>Metanomeuta fulvicrinis Meyrick, 1935</p><p>(Figs 3, 15, 22–25)</p><p>Material examined. 1 ♂, Russia, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=132.15721&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=43.695557" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 132.15721/lat 43.695557)">Primorskii Krai</a>, Ussuriiskii district, 20 km SE of Ussuriisk, Gornotajezhnoe village, 43°41’44” N, 132°09’26” E, 05.vii 1995, (leg. M. Ponomarenko), GS 343 AT, FSCB .</p><p>Diagnosis. M. fulvicrinis is similar to M. yuexiensis and M. spinisparsula in the male genitalia by relatively wide socius tapering towards pointed apex, which is curved ventrally and bearing small thorn, valva wide in basal part, sacculus as sclerotised thorned plate and aedeagus with cornuti as spines packed in bunches. M. fulvicrinis differs from related species by male genitalia with socius wider in basal part and smoothly tapering towards the pointed apex, valva with large ventro-basal lobe rounded at apex and with sacculus bearing strong thorns on the relatively wide band-like sclerotisation, and aedeagus sinuous in basal 2/3 and curved at distal 1/3, with spiny cornuti packed into two bunches, about 1/5 of aedeagus length (Figs 22–25).</p><p>Comparative morphological notes. Generally, specimen collected in the Russian Far East and identified as M. fulvicrinis Meyrick, is similar to related species by characters of external morphology. However, its wingspan 12.5 mm, which is corresponding to smaller parameters of wingspan indicated for M. fulvicrinis from China and similar to that in M. yuexiensis . Labial palpus lighter, first segment light brown, second and third segments greyish brown on outer side and lighter on inner side (Fig. 15). Tegulae and thorax brown, that lighter than in related species. Forewing greyish brown, with indistinct lightened spots: large one beyond basal 1/3 on dorsal half and smaller ones at 4/5 of costal margin and at apex (Fig. 3), that is similar to forewing illustrated for lectotype of M. zonoceros in Clarke (1965: plate 173, fig. 2) and for some specimens collected in China and identified as M. fulvicrinis .</p><p>Host plant. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. Russia (south of Far East: Primorskii Krai), first record; South Korea; China (Henan, Sichuan, Anhui, Hubei, Zhejiang, Jiangxi, Hunan, Guizhou, Fujian, Guangxi); Japan (Honshu, Shikoku, Kyushu).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A15E179440E963FF18FF78B71F0EEE	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Tarasova, Anastasiia A.;Ponomarenko, Margarita G.	Tarasova, Anastasiia A., Ponomarenko, Margarita G. (2025): New data on Microlepidoptera (Lepidoptera: Micropterigidae, Adelidae, Glyphipterigidae, and Yponomeutidae) from the Far East of Russia. Zootaxa 5715 (1): 456-475, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.40, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.40
03A15E179440E963FF18FBF4B6A108E5.text	03A15E179440E963FF18FBF4B6A108E5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Micropterigidae Herrich-Schaffer	<div><p>Family Micropterigidae Herrich-Schäffer</p><p>The family Micropterigidae comprises 25 genera and more than 170 species (van Nieukerken 2011; Davis &amp; Landry 2012; Zeller &amp; Huemer 2015; Zeller-Lukashort et al. 2013; Gibbs 2014; Zeller et al. 2016; Ngô-Muller et al. 2020; Zhang et al. 2020; Han et al. 2024) with the highest generic diversity in East Asian region of North Hemisphere (Hashimoto 2006), where seven genera were recognized, and in Australasian region of South Hemisphere, where this family is represented by six genera(Gibbs2010, 2014).In the Palaearctic, the largest number of genera is represented in Japan, where, in addition to Micropterix Hübner four genera more ( Paramartyria Issiki, Issikiomartyria Hashimoto, Kurokopteryx Hashimoto and Neomicropteryx Issiki) are known, currently including 17 species (Hashimoto 2013). In Europe micropterigid moths are represented by the type genus only which includes more than 50 species with greatest species diversity in the Mediterranean region (Zeller &amp; Huemer 2015, Lepiforum 2025). In Russia, only the genus Micropterix is represented, but its species diversity is four times less than in Europe.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A15E179440E963FF18FBF4B6A108E5	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Tarasova, Anastasiia A.;Ponomarenko, Margarita G.	Tarasova, Anastasiia A., Ponomarenko, Margarita G. (2025): New data on Microlepidoptera (Lepidoptera: Micropterigidae, Adelidae, Glyphipterigidae, and Yponomeutidae) from the Far East of Russia. Zootaxa 5715 (1): 456-475, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.40, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.40
03A15E179440E962FF18F9FCB0A30CAE.text	03A15E179440E962FF18F9FCB0A30CAE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Micropterix Hubner 1825	<div><p>Genus Micropterix Hübner</p><p>Type species. Tinea podevinella Hübner, [1813], by subsequent designation by Meyrick (1912).</p><p>Distribution. Palaearctic region: Europe; Russia (European part, south of West and East Siberia, Far East); North Africa; West (Lebanon, Syria, Israel) and Central (Turkmenistan) Asia, Japan (Hokkaido, Honshu); Indomalayan region: Northeast and East India (Heath 1986, 1996; Ponomarenko &amp; Beljaev 2000; Corley 2007; Zeller-Lukashort et al. 2007; Zeller-Lukashort et al. 2009; Lees et al. 2010; Hashimoto 2013; Zeller et al. 2016; Das &amp; Singh 2022; Sinev &amp; Kozlov 2024; Lepiforum 2025).</p><p>Remarks. World fauna of the genus Micropterix Hübner includes 80 extant and 2 extinct species, and the greatest biodiversity the genus reaches in South Europe (Staudinger 1879 –1880; Kuznetsov 1960; Zaguljaev 1983, 1987, 1993; Heath 1986; Kurz et al. 1997; Ponomarenko &amp; Beljaev 2000; Hashimoto 2006; Corley 2007; Zeller-Lukashort et al. 2007; Zeller-Lukashort et al. 2009; Kurz &amp; Kurz 2010; Lees et al. 2010; Zeller &amp; Huemer 2015; Zeller et al. 2016; Das &amp; Singh 2022; Sinev &amp; Kozlov 2024). To date 11 species of the genus are known in the fauna of Russia, the European part and North Caucasus. Of these, only M. aureatella (Scopoli) has a large range, extending from Europe through Western and Eastern Siberia with disjunctions to East Asia, including the south of the Russian Far East. The second species, M. sikhotealinensis Ponomarenko &amp; Beljaev, is known so far only from the south of the Far East. It was described on the base of three specimens, all males, collected in mountain coniferous forest in the southern part of the Sikhote-Alin Range (Primorskii Krai). Until now, the morphology of female was unknown. Processing of dry specimens in the collection of FSCB allowed to find female of this species, the morphology of which is described below.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A15E179440E962FF18F9FCB0A30CAE	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Tarasova, Anastasiia A.;Ponomarenko, Margarita G.	Tarasova, Anastasiia A., Ponomarenko, Margarita G. (2025): New data on Microlepidoptera (Lepidoptera: Micropterigidae, Adelidae, Glyphipterigidae, and Yponomeutidae) from the Far East of Russia. Zootaxa 5715 (1): 456-475, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.40, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.40
03A15E179441E96CFF18FE34B163082A.text	03A15E179441E96CFF18FE34B163082A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Micropterix sikhotealinensis Ponomarenko & Beljaev 2000	<div><p>Micropterix sikhotealinensis Ponomarenko &amp; Beljaev, 2000</p><p>(Figs 5, 6, 9, 10, 17, 26, 27, 30, 33, 34)</p><p>Material examined. Type material. Holotype, 1 ♂, Russia, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=134.06694&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=43.56333" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 134.06694/lat 43.56333)">Primorskii Krai</a>, Chuguevskii district, 16 km SSE Yasnoe village, Sister stream, 1000 m a.s.l., 43°33’48” N, 134°04’01” E, 17.vi 1998 (leg. E. Beljaev), GS 350 MP . Paratypes: 1 ♂, same locality, date and collector; 1 ♂, Russia, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=134.11278&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=43.601387" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 134.11278/lat 43.601387)">Primorskii Krai</a>, 16 km SE Yasnoe village, valley of Ussuri river, 43°36’05” N, 134°06’46” E, 20.vi 1998 (leg. E. Beljaev), GS 351 MP , all in FSCB.</p><p>Additional material. 1 ♀, Russia, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=133.5825&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=43.552223" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 133.5825/lat 43.552223)">Primorskii Krai</a>, 30 km NW Lazo, Lazovskii pass, 896 m a.s.l., 43°33’08” N, 133°34’57” E, 11.vii 2001 (leg. M. Ponomarenko), GS 346 MP, FSCB .</p><p>Diagnosis. M. sikhotealinensis is similar to M. aureatella (Scopoli, 1763) by cucullus curved dorsally almost at a right angle and significantly expanded in the distal part, by dorsal and lateral processes having similar shape and position on annulus in the male genitalia. It differs by a forewing with an inverted groundcolour and pattern of forewing (Figs 5, 6, 9, 10). It can be also distinguished by dorsal process of annulus, which wider basally, proximal part of valva with longer inflated part, which about 3/5 of total valval length in the male genitalia (Fig. 26). M. aureatella has dorsal process of annulus narrower basally and proximal part of valva with shorter inflated part, about half of total valval length in the male genitalia. In the female genitalia, M. sikhotealinensis differs from the related species by narrower sternal sclerotisation of 9 th segment, split in two more or less equal lobes, with smoothly sloped lateral edge in the female genitalia (Figs 30, 33, 34).</p><p>Adult. Wingspan 9.1–9.5 (♂) and 8.9 mm (♀); length of forewing 4.2–4.5 (♂) and 4.1 mm (♀) (Figs 5, 6). Head with raised brown hair-like scales (Fig. 17). Antenna brown and monochromatic. Thorax and tegula dark brown, covered by iridescent violet and bronze scales. Forewing golden-yellow with violet two transverse fasciae at 1/8 and 1/3 of wing length, and one costal spot at half of wing length, two indistinct spots formed by accumulated iridescent violet scales before tornus and at the end of cell; fringe brown. Hindwing brown, slightly darker distally, with iridescent violet and bronze shine; fringe brown (Figs 5, 6).</p><p>Comparative morphological notes. The forewing of M. sikhotealinensis has golden groundcolour and pattern formed by violet two transverse fasciae at 1/8 and 1/3 and one small costal spot at half of wing length (Figs 5, 6, 9, 10). M. aureatella has violet groundcolour and two golden fasciae at 1/3 and about half of wing length and more or less costal spot sometimes almost reaches dorsal edge of wing (Figs 7, 8). In the male genitalia both species differ by width of basal part of dorsal process of annulus: M. sikhotealinensis has wider dorsal process compared to that in M. aureatella . The subspecies M. aureatella shikotanica Kozlov described from the Far East of Russia has not only narrower dorsal process of annulus but smaller and shorter one than that in the nominotypical subspecies. The inflated proximal part of valva in this subspecies about half of total valval length (after Kozlov 1988: fig. 2), which corresponds to that in European M. aureatella illustrated by Zeller-Lukashort et al. (2007), but longer than in M. aureatella from Japan (Hashimoto 2006). M. sikhotealinensis has longest inflated proximal part of valva, exceeding half of total valval length (Fig. 26). Females of M. aureatella from Europe and Japan, and M. sikhotealinensis from the Russian Far East have different shape of sternal sclerotisation of 9 th segment. M. sikhotealinensis has shorter (along to longitudinal body axis) sclerotisation split in two more or less equal lobes (Figs 33, 34), European M. aureatella with longer sclerotisation split in two lobes different in size (Figs 35, 36), Japanese specimen of the same species with slightly longer sclerotisation than in European one and without distinct split (Figs 37, 38).</p><p>Host plant. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. Russia (south of Far East: Primorskii Krai).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A15E179441E96CFF18FE34B163082A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Tarasova, Anastasiia A.;Ponomarenko, Margarita G.	Tarasova, Anastasiia A., Ponomarenko, Margarita G. (2025): New data on Microlepidoptera (Lepidoptera: Micropterigidae, Adelidae, Glyphipterigidae, and Yponomeutidae) from the Far East of Russia. Zootaxa 5715 (1): 456-475, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.40, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.40
03A15E17944FE96CFF18FAB1B0D60A6A.text	03A15E17944FE96CFF18FAB1B0D60A6A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Glyphipterigidae Stainton 1854	<div><p>Family Glyphipterigidae Stainton</p><p>The family of Sedge moths ( Glyphipterigidae) includes about 400 species from 25 genera, of which more than 20 genera are monotypical and about three-fourth of species are included into subcosmopolitan genus Glyphipterix (Heppner 1982, 1985; Arita 1979, 1983, 1985, 1987, 1995; Diakonoff 1986; Dugdale 1988; Mey 1991; Arita &amp; Heppner 1992; Edwards 1996; Dugdale et al. 1999; Arita &amp; Owada 2006; Liu &amp; Li 2014; Sohn &amp; Heppner 2015; Pohl &amp; Nanz 2023). The greatest generic diversity of the glyphipterigid moths is in the Neotropical region, where 11 genera were described, and most species richness is in the Indomalayan and Australian-New Zealand regions with a slight difference in quantity. The taxonomic diversity in the North Hemisphere is much lower: 48 species from three genera are recorded in the Palaearctic and 41 species from five genera are known in the Nearctic (Heppner 1982; Arita 1995; Diakonoff 1986; Dugdale 1988; Mey 1991; Arita &amp; Owada 2006; Liu &amp; Li 2014; Sohn &amp; Heppner 2015; Ponomarenko 2016; Pohl &amp; Nanz 2023; Jeong et al. 2024; Ponomarenko &amp; Sinev 2024a). 23 species from three genera were registered for the fauna of Russia and more than half of them are distributed in the Far East (Ponomarenko 2016; Ponomarenko &amp; Sinev 2024a).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A15E17944FE96CFF18FAB1B0D60A6A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Tarasova, Anastasiia A.;Ponomarenko, Margarita G.	Tarasova, Anastasiia A., Ponomarenko, Margarita G. (2025): New data on Microlepidoptera (Lepidoptera: Micropterigidae, Adelidae, Glyphipterigidae, and Yponomeutidae) from the Far East of Russia. Zootaxa 5715 (1): 456-475, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.40, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.40
03A15E17944CE96FFF18FF78B6220F1A.text	03A15E17944CE96FFF18FF78B6220F1A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Glyphipterix Hubner 1825	<div><p>Genus Glyphipterix Hübner</p><p>Type species. Tinea bergstraesserella Fabricius, 1781, by subsequent designation by ICZN (1986).</p><p>Distribution. Subcosmopolitan, except for the Arctic and Antarctica (Heppner 1982, 1985; Arita 1983, 1985, 1987, 1995; Diakonoff 1986; Dugdale 1988; Mey 1991; Arita &amp; Heppner 1992; Edwards 1996; Dugdale et al. 1999; Arita &amp; Owada 2006; Liu &amp; Li 2014; Sohn &amp; Heppner 2015; Pohl &amp; Nanz 2023).</p><p>Remarks. The world fauna includes more than 310 species belonging to the genus Glyphipterix Hübner (Heppner 1982, 1985; Arita 1979, 1983, 1985, 1995; Arita &amp; Owada 2006; Liu &amp; Li 2014; Sohn &amp; Heppner 2015; Pohl &amp; Nanz 2023) and only 21 species are recorded in Russia. Of these, 13 species inhabit the Far East (Ponomarenko 2016; Ponomarenko &amp; Sinev 2024a). Processing of the dry specimens collected in the south of the Far East made it possible to identify the female of species Glyphipterix maritima Diakonoff, 1979, for which only the male was known until now (Diakonoff 1986), the female morphology is described below.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A15E17944CE96FFF18FF78B6220F1A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Tarasova, Anastasiia A.;Ponomarenko, Margarita G.	Tarasova, Anastasiia A., Ponomarenko, Margarita G. (2025): New data on Microlepidoptera (Lepidoptera: Micropterigidae, Adelidae, Glyphipterigidae, and Yponomeutidae) from the Far East of Russia. Zootaxa 5715 (1): 456-475, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.40, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.40
03A15E17944CE96FFF18FD60B1630A9E.text	03A15E17944CE96FFF18FD60B1630A9E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Glyphipterix maritima Diakonoff 1979	<div><p>Glyphipterix maritima Diakonoff, 1979</p><p>(Figs 4, 16, 31, 32)</p><p>Material examined. 1 ♀, Russia, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=137.05972&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=46.029167" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 137.05972/lat 46.029167)">Primorskii Krai</a>, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=137.05972&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=46.029167" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 137.05972/lat 46.029167)">Terneiskii district</a>, 50 km W of Maximovka village, upper Maximovka river, at the issue of Bolshaya Lugovaya river, 530 m a.s.l., 46°01’45” N, 137°03’35” E, 09.vii 1998 (leg. E. Beljaev), GS 347 MP ; 1 ♀, Russia, Primorskii Krai, Chuguevskii district, 31 km SE of Chuguevka village, Verkhneussuriiskii station of FSCB , 590 m a.s.l., 44°22’07” N, 134°12’10” E, 20.vii 2018 (leg. M. Ponomarenko), GS 348 MP; 1 ♀, Russia, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=134.23889&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=43.600277" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 134.23889/lat 43.600277)">Primorskii Krai</a>, Chuguevskii district, 24.5 km SE of Yasnoe village, 630 m a.s.l., 43°36’01” N, 134°14’20” E, 12.vii.2010 (leg. M. Ponomarenko), all in FSCB .</p><p>Diagnosis. G. maritima is closely related to G. gaudialis Diakonoff &amp;Arita, 1976, by similar pattern of forewing, general morphology of the male genitalia, also by setaceous rounded lobes of postvaginal plate and large funnel-shaped antrum in the female genitalia. It can be differed by narrower forewing at whole, forewing with pale yellow transverse band at 1/5 of length, which narrower overall and especially constricted in dorsal half (Fig. 4). It differs by valva somewhat longer than aedeagus, vinculum with ventrolateral angles ventrally and relatively longer saccus, about half of aedeagus length in the male genitalia. Also, it is distinguished by setaceous lobes of postvaginal plate directed medially, antrum with large triangular notch on dorsal side and small thorns in its bottom arranged in ring with two lateral aggregations, narrow and long ductus bursae, approximately equal to corpus bursae in length and by corpus bursae more or less oval, without signa in the female genitalia (Figs 31, 32).</p><p>The related species G. gaudialis has broader forewing, which with yellow transverse band wider overall and not constricted in dorsal half. Its male genitalia with valva shorter than aedeagus, vinculum with rounded ventrolateral angles and relatively shorter saccus, 3.8 times shorter than aedeagus length in the male genitalia. Its female genitalia with lobes of postvaginal plate slightly flattened on apex and directed caudally, antrum without large notch on dorsal side, ductus bursae short, about 1/13 of corpus bursae length and corpus bursae elongated oval, with neck and two signa.</p><p>Adult, female. Wingspan 11.2 mm, forewing length 5 mm. The appearance of female corresponding to that of male described by Diakonoff (1979). The only differences in light yellow spot at 2/3 of dorsum: in female this spot Y-shaped, namely deeply emarginated similar to that in G. gaudialis, illustrated by Diakonoff (1986) (Figs 4, 16).</p><p>Female genitalia. Ovipositor relatively short, membrane between 9 th and 8 th abdominal segments about 1/3 of papillae anales length. Segment 8 th with sclerotised posterior margin. Apophysis posterioris slightly shorter than apophysis anterioris; each apophysis posterioris expanding into oval basal sclerotised plate distally, apophysis anterioris curved inwards in basal half. Setaceous lobes of postvaginal plate spaced and with rounded apex directed medially. Ostium large, rounded. Antrum sclerotised, funnel-shaped, with large triangular notch on dorsal side, and with ring of mainly singly located small thorns near bottom, some of which collected in 2 small lateral groups. Ductus bursae very thin, membranous, wrinkled in posterior part, almost equal to corpus bursae in length. Corpus bursae membranous, oval, without signa (Figs 31, 32).</p><p>Host plant. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. Russia (south of Far East: Primorskii Krai).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A15E17944CE96FFF18FD60B1630A9E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Tarasova, Anastasiia A.;Ponomarenko, Margarita G.	Tarasova, Anastasiia A., Ponomarenko, Margarita G. (2025): New data on Microlepidoptera (Lepidoptera: Micropterigidae, Adelidae, Glyphipterigidae, and Yponomeutidae) from the Far East of Russia. Zootaxa 5715 (1): 456-475, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.40, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5715.1.40
