identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03A20553FF939359FF403F74FEDAFA3B.text	03A20553FF939359FF403F74FEDAFA3B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Coriophagus bulbosus Hui & Hazra. 2025	<div><p>Coriophagus bulbosus Hui &amp; Hazra. sp. nov.</p><p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: B49C0ACC-81C3-402E-8D62-F599C76C477D</p><p>GenBank Accession Number of holotype. PQ846630</p><p>Material examined. Holotype male, India, West Bengal, Darjeeling, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=88.24333&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=26.836666" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 88.24333/lat 26.836666)">Dudhia</a> (26°50.2' N, 88°14.6' E), 26.10.2024, open light trap, Coll. A. Mondal.</p><p>Diagnosis. The ensemble of traits listed below sets the adult male of the genus Coriophagus apart from the previously described species: detached vein R 2 is of the same width as R 3, and is half as long as R 3; R 4 and R 5 are not clearly differentiated, and appear to be a single, long vein; flattened trapezoidal tarsomere I of the forelegs; ninth abdominal sternite having a spherical outgrowth on its edge from where the aedeagus arises.</p><p>Etymology. The specific epithet “bulbosus ” refers to the Latinised term describing the spherical outgrowth located at the margin of the ninth abdominal sternite.</p><p>Description of adult male (n=1) (Fig. 1)</p><p>Total length 2.91 mm (from tip of frons to caudal margin of tergite X); length of metathorax 1.25 mm; width of metathorax at scutellum 0.33 mm; length of antenna 0.7 mm (Figure 1).</p><p>Colour. Eyes dark red, head, and abdominal segments light brown, hind wings translucent with brown veins, metathorax dark brown, legs brown with end of tarsomeres pale white.</p><p>Head (Figs. 2A, 3A). Transverse, wider than metathorax; length 0.36 mm, width 0.75 mm. Eyes separated by 0.3 mm. Eyes protruding with 14–16 dorsal and 10–13 ventral ommatidia. Interommatidial space conspicuously pubescent. Head very well sclerotised, antefrons not prominent, rather depressed. Postfrons quadrilateral in shape. Sclerite next to eyes rectangular, and extending up to middle of each eye. In ventral view, mouth field sclerite as well as anterior opening of digestive tract clearly visible. Sclerite of postmentum rectangular strip-like in appearance.</p><p>Antennae (Figs. 2B, 3B). Antennae originating from sides of antefrons with numerous hemispherical chemoreceptors, seven-segmented with a broad, flat flabellum on each antennomeres III–VI; scapus (antennomere I) 0.1 mm long, cylindrical in shape; pedicellus (antennomere II) 0.04 mm in length, tiny, urn-shaped, wider at middle than base or apex; antennomere III 0.5 mm long, bearing longest flabellum; antennomere IV 0.44 mm long; antennomeres V and VI both 0.42 mm long; antennomere VII 0.41 mm long; antennomere III longest and antennomere VII broadest. Scapus and pedicellus with no sensory pits while antennomeres III–VII having numerous sensory pits of nearly identical size.</p><p>Mandibles (Figs. 2C, 3C). 0.09 mm long, strongly sclerotised, conical in shape and not crossing each other.</p><p>Maxillae (Figs. 2D, 3D). Two-segmented, with corpus 0.02 mm long and palp 0.08 mm long; palp attached to apex of maxillary base, of same width that of base and almost four times as long as base, covered with long hairs and numerous small sensory pits.</p><p>Thorax.Pro- and mesothorax uniformly sclerotised,with no apparent features useful for diagnostic differentiation. Prothorax band-like, narrower than interocular distance of 0.3 mm. Mesothorax wider than prothorax, rectangular in shape, connected to metathorax by a pale brown membranous region. Metathorax (Figs. 2E, 3E) markedly enlarged and heavily sclerotised than preceding thoracic segments. Prescutum 0.31 mm long and 0.21 mm wide, nearly triangular; antero-lateral margins well separated from scuti at both sides; postero-lateral margin not well defined. Scutum 0.32 mm long, 0.14 mm wide, rhomboid in shape, not well defined along inner margins. Scutellum broadly pentagonal, 0.2 mm in length and 0.33 mm in width. Postlumbium 0.05 mm long and 0.27 mm wide, slightly less sclerotised than rest of parts of metathorax, trapezoidal in shape with both anterior and posterior margin straight. Postnotum 0.58 mm long and 0.36 mm wide, ‘U’ shaped with rounded posterior margin.</p><p>Reduced mesothoracic wings (Fig. 2G, 3F). 0.48 mm long.Apical part globular with 0.09 mm width, basal stalk much narrower, almost half width of apical part, 0.04 mm.</p><p>Hind wings (Fig. 2H, 3G). Broad, fan-shaped, spanning 1.75 mm from base to middle of radial sector and 1.82 mm from base to edge of subcostal margin. C+Sc united, dark brown, 1.03 mm long, reaching a little more than half of wing length. R 1 vein 1 mm long, basally attached to R 4 vein, having some isolated dark spots along apical 1/3 rd length. Area between Sc and R 1 pigmented, pigmentation getting darker from apical 1/3 rd region of both veins, extending beyond their apices along wing margin, to some distance creating a leaf-like shape. R 2 vein detached, 0.52 mm long, somewhat curved, slightly broader than detached R 3 vein. R 3 vein 1.04 mm long, twice length of R 2, distal 3/4th portion forming a broad downward curvature. R 4 straight, basally unified with R 1, 1.01 mm in length, having a darkly pigmented patch on its apex. R 4 and R 5 appear confluent with no clear separation. Nonetheless, a faint, depigmented region at mid-length indicating a possible boundary. Based on this, R 5 vein detached, 0.68 mm long, having a slight upward curvature, terminating close by wing margin. MA 1.4 mm long arising below base of R 4 and diverged, ending near wing margin. CuA 1.2 mm long running parallel to MA but slightly shorter in length than MA, CuP vein 0.87 mm in length, lying close to anal margin, darkly pigmented with undulating margin, almost as broad as R 2 vein.</p><p>Legs (Figs. 2H–J, 3J–L). Coxae of fore- and midlegs enlarged and flat. Inner margin of trochanterofemur of fore and midlegs and trochanter of hindlegs bearing hairs. Coxae of metathoracic legs fused with the metathoracic sclerites and hence metathoracic legs divided into trochanter, tibia and tarsus (Kinzelbach 1971). Tarsi threesegmented, devoid of any claws. Basitarsus (tarsomere I) of forelegs enlarged, subtrapezoidal with rounded edges. Tarsomere II of all three pair of legs inserted in middle of dorsal surface of tarsomere I; tarsomeres II and III of all three pair of legs paddle-shaped with adhesive microtrichia (Pohl &amp; Beutel 2004). Tarsomere I of mid and hind legs with a pale sensory spot and distally terminating into an acute projection forming an auxillary claw (Kinzelbach 1971; Kathirithamby 1989).</p><p>Measurements of several parts of legs as follows: forelegs—coxa 0.24 mm long, trochanterofemur 0.3 mm, tibia 0.3 mm, tarsomere I 0.08 mm, tarsomeres II and III 0.14 mm each; midlegs—coxa 0.3 mm, trochanterofemur 0.41 mm, tibia 0.44 mm. tarsomere I 0.13 mm, tarsomere II 0.15 mm, tarsomere III 0.15 mm; hindlegs—trochanter 0.17 mm, femur 0.4 mm, tibia 0.48 mm, tarsomere I 0.12 mm, tarsomere II 0.15 mm, tarsomere III 0.15 mm.</p><p>Abdomen (Figs. 2K, 3I). Ten-segmented, somewhat tapered towards posterior end. Sclerotised only at dorsal tergites and ventral sternites. Sclerotisation of tergites increasing gradually towards aedeagus, but ventral sternites nearly uniformly sclerotised throughout abdominal segments. First segment covered with postnotum of metathorax. Genital capsule i.e., abdominal segment IX strongly sclerotised, ovate shape; proctiger i.e., abdominal segment X minute in size bearing a spherical outgrowth on its edge from which aedeagus arises.</p><p>Aedeagus (Figs. 2K, 3H). 0.14 mm long, hook-like, arcuately curved anteriorly, evenly tapering to apex, dorsal hook, and ventral prong prominent. Dorsal hook longer than ventral prong. Dorsal hook 0.05 mm long, with an acuminate tip and forming an acute angle of 40º with shaft; ventral prong 0.02 mm long, forming an obtuse angle of 130º with shaft. Angles of projection of dorsal hook and ventral prong with shaft of aedeagus giving distal margin a sinuate, arched semblance.</p><p>Female. Unknown.</p><p>Host. Unknown.</p><p>Remarks. Coriophagus bulbosus Hui &amp; Hazra, sp. nov. belongs to the genus Coriophagus owing to the presence of robust head sclerites, distinct frontal and epistomal sutures, sclerotised mandibles, the distal end of fore tibia spatulate with enlarged foretarsomere I (Kinzelbach 1971; Kathirithamby 1989, 1992). The following combination of attributes confirms that Coriophagus bulbosus is a novel member of the genus Coriophagus: i. trapezoidal foretarsomere I, with rounded edges, ii. detached vein R 2 is of same breadth of R 3, iii. R 2 is half as long as R 3, iv. R 4 and R 5 not clearly demarcated, and appears to be a long, single vein, and v. proctiger having a spherical excrescence on its edge from where the aedeagus appears.</p><p>The antennae of the newly described species conform to the general morphology observed in all previously described congeners. The wing venation of the newly described species somewhat resembles C. rieki, C. hansoni, and C. latimanus but differs in the shape of foretarsomere I, proctiger and aedeagus; shape of the aedeagus is similar to that of C. adebratti, and C. medleri, but differs from them in the shape of foretarsomere I and relative length of maxillary palp and base.</p><p>Two other Coriophagus species have already been described from India, in addition to the recently discovered species. The following are some notable differences between the newly described species and the previously recognised species from India —</p><p>• in C. calcaneus Roy &amp; Hazra, 2016 mandibles overlap, base of the maxilla i.e. corpus is longer than the maxillary palp, width of the R 2 detached vein is much greater than that of R 3, aedeagus is devoid of ventral prong; while in C. bulbosus mandibles do not overlap with each other, maxillary palp is about two times longer than base, R 2 detached vein is not significantly wider than R 3, and aedeagus possesses both dorsal hook and ventral prong.</p><p>• in C. chaudhuri Hui &amp; Hazra, 2023 width of the R 2 detached vein is much greater than that of R 3, foretarsomere I oval shaped, maxillary palp slender, more than two times longer than the base with pointed tip, while in C. bulbosus R 2 detached vein is not significantly wider than R 3, foretarsomere I trapezoidal in shape, and maxillary palp clubbed with blunt apex.</p><p>• The newly described species differs from other Oriental species of the genus Coriophagus i.e. C. adebratti and C. borneoensis in the shape of foretarsomere I, relative length of maxillary palp and base, and edifice of metathoracic sclerites.</p><p>Combination of characters provided in the diagnosis validates C. bulbosus as a new member of the genus Coriophagus .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A20553FF939359FF403F74FEDAFA3B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Hui, Poulami;Hazra, Niladri	Hui, Poulami, Hazra, Niladri (2025): Integrative taxonomy of Coriophagus bulbosus sp. nov. (Strepsiptera: Halictophagidae) with a tentative phylogeny of the species and first report of a stylopised mango leafhopper, Idioscopus nitidulus (Walker, 1870) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) from India. Zootaxa 5717 (1): 66-84, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5717.1.4, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5717.1.4
03A20553FF98935AFF403DE0FA76FC45.text	03A20553FF98935AFF403DE0FA76FC45.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Coriophagus Kinzelbach 1971	<div><p>A key to males of the genus Coriophagus Kinzelbach, 1971 (Male) [after Hui et al. 2023]</p><p>1. Total length 2.5 mm or less than 2.5 mm .................................................................. 2</p><p>- Total length greater than 2.5 mm ......................................................................... 7</p><p>2(1). Posterior margin of postlumbium straight..................... C. monteithi Kathirithamby, 1992 (Australasia: Australia)</p><p>- Posterior margin of postlumbium sinuate.................................................................. 3</p><p>3(2). Detached vein R 2 slender, longer than R 3 ........... C. maai Kifune &amp; Hirashima, 1989 (Australasia: Papua New Guinea)</p><p>- Detached vein R 2 broad, shorter than R 3 ................................................................... 4</p><p>4(3). Detached vein R 3 touching R 4 ..................................... C. chaudhuri Hui &amp; Hazra, 2023 (Orient: India)</p><p>- Detached vein R 3 not touching R 4 ........................................................................ 5</p><p>5(4). Detached vein R 2 meets anterolateral margin of hind wing................. C. jennyae Kogan, 2012 (Neotropics: Brazil)</p><p>- Detached vein R 2 does not meet anterolateral margin of hind wing.............................................. 6</p><p>6(5). Fore femur lacking apical expansion, atypical for genus............ C. tigrilepus Zheng, Mu &amp; Liu, 2025 (Orient: China)</p><p>- Fore femur with apical expansion typical for genus.................. C. casui Cowley, 1984 (Australasia: New Zealand)</p><p>7(1). Apex of maxillary palp pointed.......................................................................... 8</p><p>- Apex of maxillary palp blunt............................................................................ 9</p><p>8(7). Flabellum of antennomere III broader than rest of flabella............ C. adebratti Kathirithamby, 1993 (Orient: Malaysia)</p><p>- Flabellum of antennomere III as broad as rest of flabella........ C. medleri Luna de Carvalho, 1972b (Afrotopics: Nigeria)</p><p>9(7). Number of ommatidia in each eye 25 or less............................................................... 10</p><p>- Number of ommatidia in each eye greater than 25.......................................................... 15</p><p>10(9). Mandibles shorter than maxillae........................................................................ 12</p><p>- Mandibles longer than maxillae........................................................................ 13</p><p>11(10). Proctiger having a bulbous outgrowth on its edge, from where aedeagus arises; foretarsomere I trapezoidal with rounded margin................................................................. C. bulbosus sp. nov. (Orient: India)</p><p>- Proctiger without any outgrowth; foretarsomere I not trapezoidal in shape....................................... 12</p><p>12(11). Total length less than 3.00 mm; eyes with around 15 ommatidia; R 2 vein broader than R 3 vein; length of dorsal hook of aedeagus longer than that of ventral prong; foretarsomere I somewhat spindle shaped................................................................................................. C. zanzibarae (Bohart, 1962) (Afrotropics: Tanzania)</p><p>- Total length greater than 3.00 mm; eyes with around 22 ommatidia; R 2 vein as broad as R 3 vein; length of dorsal hook of aedeagus shorter than that of ventral prong; foretarsomere I round shaped...................................................................................................... C. hansoni Cook, 2019 (Neotropics: Costa Rica)</p><p>13(10). Total length less than 3.00 mm; number of ommatidia less than 20 per eye; R 2 vein 1/3rd length of R 3; posterior margin of poslumbium sinuate............................................. C. calcaneus Roy &amp; Hazra, 2016 (Orient: India)</p><p>- Total length greater than 3.00 mm; number of ommatidia more than 20 per eye; length of R 2 vein greater than 1/3rd of R 3 vein; posterior margin of postlumbium straight................................................................. 14</p><p>14(13). Eyes with around 25 ommatidia; postnotum with pointed tip; R 2 vein half as long as R 3; tip of postnotum pointed................................................................ C. borneoensis Kathirithamby, 1993 (Orient: Malaysia)</p><p>- Eyes with around 20 ommatidia; postnotum with rounded tip; R 2 vein 2/3rd length of R 3; tip of postnotum rounded................................................ C. gressittorum Kifune &amp; Hirashima, 1989 (Australasia: Solomon Islands)</p><p>15(9). Total length greater than 4.00 mm; prescutum straight; postnotum with rounded tip.............................................................................................. C. rieki Kinzelbach, 1971 (Australasia: Australia)</p><p>- Total length less than 4.00 mm; prescutum sinuate; postnotum with pointed tip................................... 16</p><p>16(15). Eyes with around 50 ommatidia; anterior part of scutellum pointed; postlumbium moderately narrow at middle.............................................................. C. lockerbiensis Kathirithamby, 1992 (Australasia: Australia)</p><p>- Eyes with around 40 ommatidia; anterior part of scutellum rounded; postlumbium uniformly very narrow................................................................... C. latimanus Luna de Carvalho, 1972a (Afrotropics: Angola)</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A20553FF98935AFF403DE0FA76FC45	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Hui, Poulami;Hazra, Niladri	Hui, Poulami, Hazra, Niladri (2025): Integrative taxonomy of Coriophagus bulbosus sp. nov. (Strepsiptera: Halictophagidae) with a tentative phylogeny of the species and first report of a stylopised mango leafhopper, Idioscopus nitidulus (Walker, 1870) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) from India. Zootaxa 5717 (1): 66-84, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5717.1.4, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5717.1.4
03A20553FF9A935DFF403C12FBFFF8A3.text	03A20553FF9A935DFF403C12FBFFF8A3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Coriophagus chaudhuri Hui, Mukherjee & Hazra 2023	<div><p>New Host Record for Coriophagus chaudhuri Hui, Mukherjee &amp; Hazra, 2023</p><p>Coriophagus chaudhuri was first reported in 2023 from Jamtara (23.84° N, 86.88° E), Jharkhand, India. Later, it was reported from the adjoining Gir Interpretation Zone (Devalia Park) (21.16°N, 70.49°E), Junagadh, Gujarat on 17.02.2024 along with its host insect. Four adult males of C. chaudhuri and two stylopised homopteran hosts were collected with the aid of an open UV light trap (Figs. 5A–D).</p><p>The following attributes, as well as DNA barcoding of the host insect (Accession No. PV147374), have led to the confirmation of the host as male Idioscopus nitidulus (Walker, 1870) ( Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Idiocerinae): white oblique mark at the base and obscure white mark at the apex of clavus of fore wings, scutellum with two basal black triangular spots and a median spot between them along with two small irregular spots on each side, face dark brown with irregular white markings (Fletcher &amp; Dangerfield 2002; Gnaneswaran et al. 2007; Srinivasa et al. 2017; Viraktamath 1989) (Fig. 5A).</p><p>It is a major pest of mango ( Mangifera indica L. ( Anacardiaceae)), also known as the “King of Fruits” and found throughout India and in many other countries in South and South-East Asia, like Myanmar, South China, Sri Lanka, Thailand, the Philippines, etc. The host insect was found in a mango orchard cultivating the “Gir Kesar” variety. Idioscopus nitidulus ( Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), alongside some other major mango pests such as I. clypealis (Lethierry) and Amritodus atkinsoni (Lethierry) have been recorded to cause up to 100% losses at every stage of mango cultivation, from the emergence of new flush to flowering and fruit setting phase (Bana et al. 2016; Rahman &amp; Kuldeep 2007). They feed on new leaves and flowers of mango, causing wilting and flower drop which in turn reduces fruit yield (Viraktamath 1989). Both nymphs and adult hoppers have been seen sucking cell sap from tender leaves, delicate shoots, inflorescences or panicles, and the rachis of young fruit, inhibiting flower development and resulting in the premature drop of fruits. They also excrete a large amount of honeydew, which promotes the proliferation of a fungus, Meliola mangiferae (Earle) ( Meliolales: Meliolaceae), a black sooty mould, that impacts the leaves’ ability to perform photosynthesis and market quality of the fruits (Varghese &amp; Kamala Jayanthi 2001).</p><p>There are several natural enemies of the mango hopper Idioscopus nitidulus that have been reported from India as well as other countries of South East Asia to date.Eleven species of spiders ( Araneae), a coccinellid beetle Menochilus sexmaculatus (Fabricius, 1781) ( Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), two species of green lacewings Chrysopa lacciperda and Mallada boninensis ( Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) have been reported to act as natural predators of the nymph and adult of the said mango hopper (Dalvi et al. 1992; Fasih &amp; Srivastava 1990). Several hymenopteran parasitoids also act as natural enemies of I. nitidulus . For examples, Aprostocetus spp. ( Eulophidae) and Gonatocerus spp. and Polynema spp. ( Mymaridae) have been reported to parasitise eggs of I. nitidulus . (Fasih &amp; Srivastava 1990). Prior to this study, Soe et al. (2014) reported Idioscopus niveosparsus (Lethierry) (= I. nitidulus) as host of Callipharixenos philippines (female) and Halictophagus fulmeki (male monoparasitism, super- and multiparasitism). Although Soe et al. described the Cicadellid host as I. niveosparsus, it was synonymised with I. nitidulus by Maldonado Capriles in 1973 ( I. nitidulus Walker, 1870 being senior synonym and I. niveosparsus Lethierry, 1889 becoming junior synonym). Viraktamath (1989) subsequently reiterated this synonymy, establishing consensus in the taxonomic literature. This is the first report of a Cicadellidae host (Homoptera) of the genus Coriophagus Kinzelbach. Before this study, hosts of four Coriophagus species have been documented: three belonging to the suborder Heteroptera (Order: Hemiptera) (Cook, 2019) and one to Homoptera (Quintos-Andrade 2024). Coriophagus zanzibarae (Bohart, 1962) has been reported to stylopise Pseudotheraptus wayi Brown, a leaf-footed bug in the family Coreidae, which is a coconut pest in East Africa (Bohart 1962). Kinzelbach reported Coriophagus rieki to stylopise Poecilometis strigatus (Westwood, 1807), a shield bug of the family Pentatomidae from Australia and Coriophagus solomonensis (reported only as females) to stylopise a Pentatomid bug from Solomon Islands (Kinzelbach 1971). Coriophagus casui, one of the two Strepsiptera species reported from New Zealand, has recently been found to parasitise an endemic genus of Delphacid plant hoppers in New Zealand, Novothymbris notata Knight, 1974 .</p><p>Upon dissecting the Cicadellid host insect, it was found to be parasitised by a male Strepsipteran pupa which was not sclerotised and confined within a puparium (Figs. 5E–F). However, the stylopising Strepsiptera appeared to be a member of the genus Coriophagus due to the spatulated distal end of the fore tibia and enlarged foretarsomere I. Furthermore, four adult males of Coriophagus chaudhuri had been found in the same spot on the same day so the specimen was assumed to b e C. chaudhuri .</p><p>The sample was sent for COI sequencing to confirm the identification of the Strepsiptera specimen, and the results (NCBI Accession No. PV077780) are similar to the one that we had previously deposited into the GenBank database for C. chaudhuri with accession number OQ282516.</p><p>Description of cephalotheca of Coriophagus chaudhuri Hui, Mukherjee &amp; Hazra, 2023 (Figure 6 A–B)</p><p>Only one third of the puparium protrudes from the host and only that protruded part is strongly sclerotised. The part of the puparium, residing inside the host's abdomen, is weakly sclerotised. Upon dissection, the cephalotheca was found to rupture at a preformed suture between the head and prothorax (Fig. 6a–b). The following structures can be identified on it (Kinzelbach 1971, Benda et al. 2022):</p><p>• In frontal view, the structure is rounded to subelliptical, with the width exceeding the length; in lateral view, the apex appears uniformly rounded. The compound eyes present as prominent, darkly sclerotised areas contrasting sharply with the surrounding pale integument.</p><p>• Antennae present as somewhat elevated, pale pigment spots.</p><p>• Mandibles appear as elevated triangular areas which are more strongly sclerotised than the rest of the cephalotheca, between them, the mouth-field sclerite is seen, which is also triangular.</p><p>• Maxillae can be visualised as oblong, scarcely pigmented, two-segmented appendages, located just below the mandibles.</p><p>• Besides these, sclerites delineating clypeus and labrum are also visible.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A20553FF9A935DFF403C12FBFFF8A3	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Hui, Poulami;Hazra, Niladri	Hui, Poulami, Hazra, Niladri (2025): Integrative taxonomy of Coriophagus bulbosus sp. nov. (Strepsiptera: Halictophagidae) with a tentative phylogeny of the species and first report of a stylopised mango leafhopper, Idioscopus nitidulus (Walker, 1870) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) from India. Zootaxa 5717 (1): 66-84, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5717.1.4, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5717.1.4
