taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
039987FFD9247D22FF2BF896FD3AF815.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15563870/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15563870	FIGURE 1. Habitus of holotypes. A. Cymothales bouvieri van der Weele, 1907, female (MNHN). B. Cymothales mirabilis Gerstaecker, 1894, female (ZIMG).	FIGURE 1. Habitus of holotypes. A. Cymothales bouvieri van der Weele, 1907, female (MNHN). B. Cymothales mirabilis Gerstaecker, 1894, female (ZIMG).	2025-05-30	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue		Zenodo	biologists	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue			
039987FFD9247D22FF2BF896FD3AF815.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15563874/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15563874	FIGURE 2. Habitus of the Cymothales spp. A. Cymothales bouvieri van der Weele, 1907, male, Bekily (Madagascar). B. C. manselli sp. nov., holotype male, Ellisras (South Africa).	FIGURE 2. Habitus of the Cymothales spp. A. Cymothales bouvieri van der Weele, 1907, male, Bekily (Madagascar). B. C. manselli sp. nov., holotype male, Ellisras (South Africa).	2025-05-30	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue		Zenodo	biologists	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue			
039987FFD9247D22FF2BF896FD3AF815.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15563876/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15563876	FIGURE 3. Cymothales bouvieri van der Weele, 1907, Bekily (Madagascar). A. Habitus; B. head, frontal view; C. head and thorax, dorsal view; male terminalia: D. lateral view; E. ventral view; female terminalia: F. lateral view; G. ventral view; male genitalia: H. ventral view; I. anteroventral view; J. caudal view; K. lateral view; L. dorsal view.	FIGURE 3. Cymothales bouvieri van der Weele, 1907, Bekily (Madagascar). A. Habitus; B. head, frontal view; C. head and thorax, dorsal view; male terminalia: D. lateral view; E. ventral view; female terminalia: F. lateral view; G. ventral view; male genitalia: H. ventral view; I. anteroventral view; J. caudal view; K. lateral view; L. dorsal view.	2025-05-30	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue		Zenodo	biologists	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue			
039987FFD9247D22FF2BF896FD3AF815.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15563882/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15563882	FIGURE 5. Comparison of frontal head, the differences are mainly in the vertical shape and the markings on the clypeus. A–C. Cymothales manselli sp. nov. A. Holotype, Ellisras (South Africa). B. Paratype, Otjiwarongo (Namibia). C. Paratype, Bitata (Ethiopia). D–L: C. bouvieri van der Weele, 1907. D. Holotype, Cote Est (Madagascar). E. Grande Comoros. F–L. Bekily (Madagascar).	FIGURE 5. Comparison of frontal head, the differences are mainly in the vertical shape and the markings on the clypeus. A–C. Cymothales manselli sp. nov. A. Holotype, Ellisras (South Africa). B. Paratype, Otjiwarongo (Namibia). C. Paratype, Bitata (Ethiopia). D–L: C. bouvieri van der Weele, 1907. D. Holotype, Cote Est (Madagascar). E. Grande Comoros. F–L. Bekily (Madagascar).	2025-05-30	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue		Zenodo	biologists	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue			
039987FFD9247D22FF2BF896FD3AF815.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15563886/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15563886	FIGURE 6. Comparison of dorsal head, the differences are mainly in markings on posterior side of vertical ridge. A–C. Cymothales manselli sp. nov. A. Holotype, Ellisras (South Africa). B. Paratype, Otjiwarongo (Namibia). C. Paratype, Bitata (Ethiopia). D–I: C. bouvieri van der Weele, 1907. D. Holotype, Cote Est (Madagascar). E. Grande Comoros. F–I. Bekily (Madagascar).	FIGURE 6. Comparison of dorsal head, the differences are mainly in markings on posterior side of vertical ridge. A–C. Cymothales manselli sp. nov. A. Holotype, Ellisras (South Africa). B. Paratype, Otjiwarongo (Namibia). C. Paratype, Bitata (Ethiopia). D–I: C. bouvieri van der Weele, 1907. D. Holotype, Cote Est (Madagascar). E. Grande Comoros. F–I. Bekily (Madagascar).	2025-05-30	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue		Zenodo	biologists	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue			
039987FFD9247D22FF2BF896FD3AF815.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15563889/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15563889	FIGURE 7. Comparison of wings, the differences are indicated with arrows. A–C. Cymothales manselli sp. nov. A. Holotype, Ellisras (South Africa). B. Paratype, Otjiwarongo (Namibia). C. Paratype, Bitata (Ethiopia). D–L: C. bouvieri van der Weele, 1907. D. Holotype, Cote Est (Madagascar). E. Grande Comoros. F–I. Bekily (Madagascar).	FIGURE 7. Comparison of wings, the differences are indicated with arrows. A–C. Cymothales manselli sp. nov. A. Holotype, Ellisras (South Africa). B. Paratype, Otjiwarongo (Namibia). C. Paratype, Bitata (Ethiopia). D–L: C. bouvieri van der Weele, 1907. D. Holotype, Cote Est (Madagascar). E. Grande Comoros. F–I. Bekily (Madagascar).	2025-05-30	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue		Zenodo	biologists	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue			
039987FFD9247D22FF2BF896FD3AF815.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15563891/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15563891	FIGURE 8. Comparison of male ventral genitalia, the differences are mainly in the shape of gonocoxites 9. A–B. Cymothales manselli sp. nov. A. Holotype, Ellisras (South Africa). B. Paratype, Bitata (Ethiopia). C–F. C. bouvieri van der Weele, 1907. (c–f) Bekily (Madagascar).	FIGURE 8. Comparison of male ventral genitalia, the differences are mainly in the shape of gonocoxites 9. A–B. Cymothales manselli sp. nov. A. Holotype, Ellisras (South Africa). B. Paratype, Bitata (Ethiopia). C–F. C. bouvieri van der Weele, 1907. (c–f) Bekily (Madagascar).	2025-05-30	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue		Zenodo	biologists	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue			
039987FFD9247D22FF2BF896FD3AF815.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15563895/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15563895	FIGURE 10. Distribution map of Cymothales bouvieri van der Weele, 1907 and Cymothales manselli sp. nov.	FIGURE 10. Distribution map of Cymothales bouvieri van der Weele, 1907 and Cymothales manselli sp. nov.	2025-05-30	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue		Zenodo	biologists	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue			
039987FFD9247D22FF2BF896FD3AF815.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15563878/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15563878	FIGURE 4. Cymothales manselli sp. nov.A–E,H–L. Holotype male,Ellisras (SouthAfrica).F–G. Paratypefemale,Otjiwarongo (Namibia). A. Habitus; B. head, frontal view; C. head and thorax, dorsal view; male terminalia: D. lateral view; E. ventral view; female terminalia: F. lateral view; G. ventral view; male genitalia: H. ventral view; I. anteroventral view; J. caudal view; K. lateral view; L. dorsal view.	FIGURE 4. Cymothales manselli sp. nov.A–E,H–L. Holotype male,Ellisras (SouthAfrica).F–G. Paratypefemale,Otjiwarongo (Namibia). A. Habitus; B. head, frontal view; C. head and thorax, dorsal view; male terminalia: D. lateral view; E. ventral view; female terminalia: F. lateral view; G. ventral view; male genitalia: H. ventral view; I. anteroventral view; J. caudal view; K. lateral view; L. dorsal view.	2025-05-30	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue		Zenodo	biologists	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue			
039987FFD9237D2AFF2BFF45FDD9FF1D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15563874/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15563874	FIGURE 2. Habitus of the Cymothales spp. A. Cymothales bouvieri van der Weele, 1907, male, Bekily (Madagascar). B. C. manselli sp. nov., holotype male, Ellisras (South Africa).	FIGURE 2. Habitus of the Cymothales spp. A. Cymothales bouvieri van der Weele, 1907, male, Bekily (Madagascar). B. C. manselli sp. nov., holotype male, Ellisras (South Africa).	2025-05-30	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue		Zenodo	biologists	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue			
039987FFD9237D2AFF2BFF45FDD9FF1D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15563878/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15563878	FIGURE 4. Cymothales manselli sp. nov.A–E,H–L. Holotype male,Ellisras (SouthAfrica).F–G. Paratypefemale,Otjiwarongo (Namibia). A. Habitus; B. head, frontal view; C. head and thorax, dorsal view; male terminalia: D. lateral view; E. ventral view; female terminalia: F. lateral view; G. ventral view; male genitalia: H. ventral view; I. anteroventral view; J. caudal view; K. lateral view; L. dorsal view.	FIGURE 4. Cymothales manselli sp. nov.A–E,H–L. Holotype male,Ellisras (SouthAfrica).F–G. Paratypefemale,Otjiwarongo (Namibia). A. Habitus; B. head, frontal view; C. head and thorax, dorsal view; male terminalia: D. lateral view; E. ventral view; female terminalia: F. lateral view; G. ventral view; male genitalia: H. ventral view; I. anteroventral view; J. caudal view; K. lateral view; L. dorsal view.	2025-05-30	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue		Zenodo	biologists	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue			
039987FFD9237D2AFF2BFF45FDD9FF1D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15563882/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15563882	FIGURE 5. Comparison of frontal head, the differences are mainly in the vertical shape and the markings on the clypeus. A–C. Cymothales manselli sp. nov. A. Holotype, Ellisras (South Africa). B. Paratype, Otjiwarongo (Namibia). C. Paratype, Bitata (Ethiopia). D–L: C. bouvieri van der Weele, 1907. D. Holotype, Cote Est (Madagascar). E. Grande Comoros. F–L. Bekily (Madagascar).	FIGURE 5. Comparison of frontal head, the differences are mainly in the vertical shape and the markings on the clypeus. A–C. Cymothales manselli sp. nov. A. Holotype, Ellisras (South Africa). B. Paratype, Otjiwarongo (Namibia). C. Paratype, Bitata (Ethiopia). D–L: C. bouvieri van der Weele, 1907. D. Holotype, Cote Est (Madagascar). E. Grande Comoros. F–L. Bekily (Madagascar).	2025-05-30	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue		Zenodo	biologists	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue			
039987FFD9237D2AFF2BFF45FDD9FF1D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15563886/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15563886	FIGURE 6. Comparison of dorsal head, the differences are mainly in markings on posterior side of vertical ridge. A–C. Cymothales manselli sp. nov. A. Holotype, Ellisras (South Africa). B. Paratype, Otjiwarongo (Namibia). C. Paratype, Bitata (Ethiopia). D–I: C. bouvieri van der Weele, 1907. D. Holotype, Cote Est (Madagascar). E. Grande Comoros. F–I. Bekily (Madagascar).	FIGURE 6. Comparison of dorsal head, the differences are mainly in markings on posterior side of vertical ridge. A–C. Cymothales manselli sp. nov. A. Holotype, Ellisras (South Africa). B. Paratype, Otjiwarongo (Namibia). C. Paratype, Bitata (Ethiopia). D–I: C. bouvieri van der Weele, 1907. D. Holotype, Cote Est (Madagascar). E. Grande Comoros. F–I. Bekily (Madagascar).	2025-05-30	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue		Zenodo	biologists	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue			
039987FFD9237D2AFF2BFF45FDD9FF1D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15563889/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15563889	FIGURE 7. Comparison of wings, the differences are indicated with arrows. A–C. Cymothales manselli sp. nov. A. Holotype, Ellisras (South Africa). B. Paratype, Otjiwarongo (Namibia). C. Paratype, Bitata (Ethiopia). D–L: C. bouvieri van der Weele, 1907. D. Holotype, Cote Est (Madagascar). E. Grande Comoros. F–I. Bekily (Madagascar).	FIGURE 7. Comparison of wings, the differences are indicated with arrows. A–C. Cymothales manselli sp. nov. A. Holotype, Ellisras (South Africa). B. Paratype, Otjiwarongo (Namibia). C. Paratype, Bitata (Ethiopia). D–L: C. bouvieri van der Weele, 1907. D. Holotype, Cote Est (Madagascar). E. Grande Comoros. F–I. Bekily (Madagascar).	2025-05-30	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue		Zenodo	biologists	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue			
039987FFD9237D2AFF2BFF45FDD9FF1D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15563891/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15563891	FIGURE 8. Comparison of male ventral genitalia, the differences are mainly in the shape of gonocoxites 9. A–B. Cymothales manselli sp. nov. A. Holotype, Ellisras (South Africa). B. Paratype, Bitata (Ethiopia). C–F. C. bouvieri van der Weele, 1907. (c–f) Bekily (Madagascar).	FIGURE 8. Comparison of male ventral genitalia, the differences are mainly in the shape of gonocoxites 9. A–B. Cymothales manselli sp. nov. A. Holotype, Ellisras (South Africa). B. Paratype, Bitata (Ethiopia). C–F. C. bouvieri van der Weele, 1907. (c–f) Bekily (Madagascar).	2025-05-30	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue		Zenodo	biologists	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue			
039987FFD9237D2AFF2BFF45FDD9FF1D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15563893/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15563893	FIGURE 9. Living adult of Cymothales manselli sp. nov., paratype female, Kamanjab (Namibia). (Photo by Ye Liu)	FIGURE 9. Living adult of Cymothales manselli sp. nov., paratype female, Kamanjab (Namibia). (Photo by Ye Liu)	2025-05-30	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue		Zenodo	biologists	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue			
039987FFD9237D2AFF2BFF45FDD9FF1D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15563870/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15563870	FIGURE 1. Habitus of holotypes. A. Cymothales bouvieri van der Weele, 1907, female (MNHN). B. Cymothales mirabilis Gerstaecker, 1894, female (ZIMG).	FIGURE 1. Habitus of holotypes. A. Cymothales bouvieri van der Weele, 1907, female (MNHN). B. Cymothales mirabilis Gerstaecker, 1894, female (ZIMG).	2025-05-30	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue		Zenodo	biologists	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue			
039987FFD9237D2AFF2BFF45FDD9FF1D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15563895/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15563895	FIGURE 10. Distribution map of Cymothales bouvieri van der Weele, 1907 and Cymothales manselli sp. nov.	FIGURE 10. Distribution map of Cymothales bouvieri van der Weele, 1907 and Cymothales manselli sp. nov.	2025-05-30	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue		Zenodo	biologists	Zheng, Yuchen;Aspöck, Ulrike;Aspöck, Horst;Liu, Xingyue			
