taxonID	type	description	language	source
039587ACFFDCD532FF34903727FCDAB9.taxon	description	(Figs 1 – 106)	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): What does the morphology tell us about it? Completing the reverse taxonomy of Pericharini Grishin, 2019 (Hesperiinae). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 101-117, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.1, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.1
039587ACFFDCD532FF34903727FCDAB9.taxon	type_taxon	Type genus Perichares Scudder, 1872, designated by Grishin (29 - III- 2019).	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): What does the morphology tell us about it? Completing the reverse taxonomy of Pericharini Grishin, 2019 (Hesperiinae). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 101-117, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.1, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.1
039587ACFFDCD532FF34903727FCDAB9.taxon	description	Description Head: antenna longer than the half-length of the forewing; nudum, 11 – 19 segments. Labial palpus, in dorsal view, quadrantic; third segment rounded and shorter (Figs 61 – 66) than the second segment, this robust. Eye predominantly red. Eyelash usually present in Orphe, Oenides vulpina, Oz ozias, Perichares butus, P. colenda, P. forbesi, P. manu, and P. metallica. Thorax: mesotibia with or without spines, with a pair of apical spurs; metatibia with or without spines, with two pair of spurs; last tarsomere of all legs with a pair of long setae. Remarkable sexual dimorphism in wing pattern, except in Perichares metallica (Fig. 51 – 52). Male DFW usually with stigma continuous or discontinuous (absent in Lycas argentea and L. devanes, Perichares colenda, P. forbesi and P. metallica); when present, in CuA 1 – CuA 2 (P. seneca), or between CuA 1 and 2 A; usually narrow or broad half-moon-shaped (Figs 67 – 71), or (<) - shaped as in P. saptine (Fig. 72), or two tiny rounded pieces as in P. romeroi (Fig. 73). Male usually without hyaline spot below CuA 2, except in Oz ozias, O. sebastiani, Perichares forbesi, P. metallica, and P. saptine; present in female, except in Orphe vatinius and Pseudorphe pyrex. FW discal cell longer than the half of the wing; upper half of discal cell distally more projected than lower half; recurring vein M present in discal cell (Figs 74 – 81); origin of M 2 nearer to M 3 than M 1; dcs usually present; distance between origins of CuA 1 – CuA 2 wider than between origins of M 3 – CuA 1 in male and female, except in species of Orses, P. haworthiana, and P. manu where the distance between CuA 1 – CuA 2 is narrower than origin of M 3 – CuA 1 in male, and the opposite in female (Figs 80 – 81). Abdomen: male genitalia with harpe usually spined dorso-distally (Fig. 82 – 84, 86 – 87), except in Lycas (Fig. 85), Pseudorphe (Warren et al. 2015), and the following species / subspecies of Perichares: P. chima, P. deceptus deceptus, P. furcata, P. lotus, and P. romeroi. Female genitalia with lamella antevaginalis comprised of a median projection covering the opening to the ostium bursae (Fig. 88 – 89, 92 – 94), except in Lycas (Fig. 90), Oenides (Fig. 91), and Perichares manu.	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): What does the morphology tell us about it? Completing the reverse taxonomy of Pericharini Grishin, 2019 (Hesperiinae). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 101-117, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.1, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.1
039587ACFFDCD532FF34903727FCDAB9.taxon	distribution	Distribution Neotropical.	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): What does the morphology tell us about it? Completing the reverse taxonomy of Pericharini Grishin, 2019 (Hesperiinae). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 101-117, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.1, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.1
039587ACFFD8D53CFF34952B27FCDAF5.taxon	description	(Figs 1 – 6, 66 – 67, 74 – 75, 82, 88 – 89, 95 – 100) Pericharini (Orphina) Grishin, 2022, in Zhang et al., 2022. Insecta Mundi 921: 98, 105: type genus: Orphe Godman, 1901.	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): What does the morphology tell us about it? Completing the reverse taxonomy of Pericharini Grishin, 2019 (Hesperiinae). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 101-117, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.1, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.1
039587ACFFD8D53CFF34952B27FCDAF5.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis FW with hyaline spot in M 2 – M 3 (Figs 95 – 96). Recurring M vein nearer base of CuA 1 than M 3. Male stigma between CuA 1 and 2 A, continuous in species of Orphe, or discontinuous in Pseudorphe pyrex (Warren et al. 2015). Mesotibia and metatibia not spined. Male genitalia (Figs 97 – 100) with the tegumen projected over uncus; anterior projection of saccus longer than the tegumen + uncus, except in O. gerasa; valva with well-developed ampulla; mid sacculus without setae (in Pseudorphe two setae are disposed in the inner margin of sacculus); aedeagus with cornutus.	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): What does the morphology tell us about it? Completing the reverse taxonomy of Pericharini Grishin, 2019 (Hesperiinae). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 101-117, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.1, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.1
039587ACFFD6D53EFF34953027FCDA12.taxon	description	(Figs 7 – 60, 61 – 65, 68 – 73, 76 – 81, 83 – 87, 90 – 94, 101 – 106)	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): What does the morphology tell us about it? Completing the reverse taxonomy of Pericharini Grishin, 2019 (Hesperiinae). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 101-117, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.1, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.1
039587ACFFD6D53EFF34953027FCDA12.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. FW without hyaline spot in M 2 – M 3 (Figs 101 – 102); recurring M vein usually nearer the base of M 3 than CuA 1, with some exceptions (Oenides, Oz, and part of Perichares). Male stigma continuous in Oenides, Orses, and part of Perichares, or discontinuous in Lycas, Oz, and part of Perichares. Mesotibia and metatibia usually spined, sometimes not spined in both tibiae, or only spined in mesotibia. Male genitalia (Figs 103 – 106) with tegumen not projected over uncus (except in P. manu); anterior projection of saccus shorter than tegumen + uncus; valva with poor-developed ampulla; mid sacculus with several setae; aedeagus without cornutus (only present in P. haworthiana).	en	Suênia-Bastos, Ayane, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, Casagrande, Mirna Martins (2025): What does the morphology tell us about it? Completing the reverse taxonomy of Pericharini Grishin, 2019 (Hesperiinae). Zootaxa 5604 (2): 101-117, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.1, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5604.2.1
