taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
038987809427345AFE0DFADB3D17FD7E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16896223/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16896223	Figure 1. Maximum Likelihood tree based on 1106 bp of the mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA gene fragments, showing phylogenetic relationships of the two new species to their closest relatives among Gephyromantis. Support values at nodes are ML likelihood bootstrap values and BI posterior probabilities. Gephyromantis granulatus was used as outgroup (removed for better graphical representation). Inset photos show representative individuals of the target species, size of the pictures roughly to scale.	Figure 1. Maximum Likelihood tree based on 1106 bp of the mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA gene fragments, showing phylogenetic relationships of the two new species to their closest relatives among Gephyromantis. Support values at nodes are ML likelihood bootstrap values and BI posterior probabilities. Gephyromantis granulatus was used as outgroup (removed for better graphical representation). Inset photos show representative individuals of the target species, size of the pictures roughly to scale.	2018-06-04	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana		Zenodo	biologists	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana			
038987809427345AFE0DFADB3D17FD7E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16896225/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16896225	Figure 2. Comparative oscillograms of parts of call series of some representative of the G. tandroka complex in the subgenus Duboimantis. The figure shows the typical pattern of multi-note calls in Gephyromantis (Duboimantis) saturnini sp. nov. vs. G. (D.) tandroka and G. (D.) grosjeani sp. nov. The recording of G. tandroka from 2005 (taken from Vences et al. 2006) is of a chorus of multiple specimens; for visualization, the amplitude of calls of other specimens was strongly reduced to highlight the calls of the specimens closest to the microphone.	Figure 2. Comparative oscillograms of parts of call series of some representative of the G. tandroka complex in the subgenus Duboimantis. The figure shows the typical pattern of multi-note calls in Gephyromantis (Duboimantis) saturnini sp. nov. vs. G. (D.) tandroka and G. (D.) grosjeani sp. nov. The recording of G. tandroka from 2005 (taken from Vences et al. 2006) is of a chorus of multiple specimens; for visualization, the amplitude of calls of other specimens was strongly reduced to highlight the calls of the specimens closest to the microphone.	2018-06-04	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana		Zenodo	biologists	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana			
038987809427345AFE0DFADB3D17FD7E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16896227/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16896227	Figure 3. Comparative spectrograms and oscillograms of calls of some representatives of the G. tandroka complex in the subgenus Duboimantis.	Figure 3. Comparative spectrograms and oscillograms of calls of some representatives of the G. tandroka complex in the subgenus Duboimantis.	2018-06-04	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana		Zenodo	biologists	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana			
038987809427345AFE0DFADB3D17FD7E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16896233/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16896233	Figure 4. Type series of Gephyromantis saturnini sp. nov. in dorsolateral, dorsal and ventral view. Scale bars indicate 5 mm. Femoral gland granules (FGG): ZSM 61/2016, 15 left/16 right, ZSM 62/2016, 10/9, UADBA-A 61674, 13/10.	Figure 4. Type series of Gephyromantis saturnini sp. nov. in dorsolateral, dorsal and ventral view. Scale bars indicate 5 mm. Femoral gland granules (FGG): ZSM 61/2016, 15 left/16 right, ZSM 62/2016, 10/9, UADBA-A 61674, 13/10.	2018-06-04	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana		Zenodo	biologists	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana			
038987809427345AFE0DFADB3D17FD7E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16896235/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16896235	Figure 5. Holotypes of Gephyromantis (Duboimantis) saturnini sp. nov. (ZSM 61/2016) and G. (D.) grosjeani sp. nov. (ZSM 1554/2012) in dorsal (left) and ventral (right) view.	Figure 5. Holotypes of Gephyromantis (Duboimantis) saturnini sp. nov. (ZSM 61/2016) and G. (D.) grosjeani sp. nov. (ZSM 1554/2012) in dorsal (left) and ventral (right) view.	2018-06-04	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana		Zenodo	biologists	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana			
038987809427345AFE0DFADB3D17FD7E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16896237/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16896237	Figure 6. Femoral glands of male specimens of Gephyromantis tandroka ZSM 321/2005 (FGZC 2812), femoral gland granules (FGG) 24 left/21 right (above), G. saturnini sp. nov. Holotype ZSM 61/2016 (MSZC 123), FGG 16/15 (middle) and G. grosjeani sp. nov. (unidentified UADBA specimen), FGG, 41/34 (below). Note the much more distinct glands in the latter species.	Figure 6. Femoral glands of male specimens of Gephyromantis tandroka ZSM 321/2005 (FGZC 2812), femoral gland granules (FGG) 24 left/21 right (above), G. saturnini sp. nov. Holotype ZSM 61/2016 (MSZC 123), FGG 16/15 (middle) and G. grosjeani sp. nov. (unidentified UADBA specimen), FGG, 41/34 (below). Note the much more distinct glands in the latter species.	2018-06-04	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana		Zenodo	biologists	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana			
038987809427345AFE0DFADB3D17FD7E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16896239/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16896239	Figure 7. Heads of Gephyromantis (Duboimantis) saturnini sp. nov. and G. (D.) grosjeani sp. nov. in dorsal view compared to G. (D.) tandroka. Arrows indicate the interocular tubercles, which appear less expressed especially in G. (D.) saturnini sp. nov. than in G. (D.) tandroka.	Figure 7. Heads of Gephyromantis (Duboimantis) saturnini sp. nov. and G. (D.) grosjeani sp. nov. in dorsal view compared to G. (D.) tandroka. Arrows indicate the interocular tubercles, which appear less expressed especially in G. (D.) saturnini sp. nov. than in G. (D.) tandroka.	2018-06-04	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana		Zenodo	biologists	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana			
0389878094323443FE30FF1A38AAFC12.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16896223/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16896223	Figure 1. Maximum Likelihood tree based on 1106 bp of the mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA gene fragments, showing phylogenetic relationships of the two new species to their closest relatives among Gephyromantis. Support values at nodes are ML likelihood bootstrap values and BI posterior probabilities. Gephyromantis granulatus was used as outgroup (removed for better graphical representation). Inset photos show representative individuals of the target species, size of the pictures roughly to scale.	Figure 1. Maximum Likelihood tree based on 1106 bp of the mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA gene fragments, showing phylogenetic relationships of the two new species to their closest relatives among Gephyromantis. Support values at nodes are ML likelihood bootstrap values and BI posterior probabilities. Gephyromantis granulatus was used as outgroup (removed for better graphical representation). Inset photos show representative individuals of the target species, size of the pictures roughly to scale.	2018-06-04	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana		Zenodo	biologists	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana			
0389878094323443FE30FF1A38AAFC12.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16896225/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16896225	Figure 2. Comparative oscillograms of parts of call series of some representative of the G. tandroka complex in the subgenus Duboimantis. The figure shows the typical pattern of multi-note calls in Gephyromantis (Duboimantis) saturnini sp. nov. vs. G. (D.) tandroka and G. (D.) grosjeani sp. nov. The recording of G. tandroka from 2005 (taken from Vences et al. 2006) is of a chorus of multiple specimens; for visualization, the amplitude of calls of other specimens was strongly reduced to highlight the calls of the specimens closest to the microphone.	Figure 2. Comparative oscillograms of parts of call series of some representative of the G. tandroka complex in the subgenus Duboimantis. The figure shows the typical pattern of multi-note calls in Gephyromantis (Duboimantis) saturnini sp. nov. vs. G. (D.) tandroka and G. (D.) grosjeani sp. nov. The recording of G. tandroka from 2005 (taken from Vences et al. 2006) is of a chorus of multiple specimens; for visualization, the amplitude of calls of other specimens was strongly reduced to highlight the calls of the specimens closest to the microphone.	2018-06-04	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana		Zenodo	biologists	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana			
0389878094323443FE30FF1A38AAFC12.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16896227/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16896227	Figure 3. Comparative spectrograms and oscillograms of calls of some representatives of the G. tandroka complex in the subgenus Duboimantis.	Figure 3. Comparative spectrograms and oscillograms of calls of some representatives of the G. tandroka complex in the subgenus Duboimantis.	2018-06-04	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana		Zenodo	biologists	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana			
0389878094323443FE30FF1A38AAFC12.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16896235/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16896235	Figure 5. Holotypes of Gephyromantis (Duboimantis) saturnini sp. nov. (ZSM 61/2016) and G. (D.) grosjeani sp. nov. (ZSM 1554/2012) in dorsal (left) and ventral (right) view.	Figure 5. Holotypes of Gephyromantis (Duboimantis) saturnini sp. nov. (ZSM 61/2016) and G. (D.) grosjeani sp. nov. (ZSM 1554/2012) in dorsal (left) and ventral (right) view.	2018-06-04	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana		Zenodo	biologists	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana			
0389878094323443FE30FF1A38AAFC12.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16896237/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16896237	Figure 6. Femoral glands of male specimens of Gephyromantis tandroka ZSM 321/2005 (FGZC 2812), femoral gland granules (FGG) 24 left/21 right (above), G. saturnini sp. nov. Holotype ZSM 61/2016 (MSZC 123), FGG 16/15 (middle) and G. grosjeani sp. nov. (unidentified UADBA specimen), FGG, 41/34 (below). Note the much more distinct glands in the latter species.	Figure 6. Femoral glands of male specimens of Gephyromantis tandroka ZSM 321/2005 (FGZC 2812), femoral gland granules (FGG) 24 left/21 right (above), G. saturnini sp. nov. Holotype ZSM 61/2016 (MSZC 123), FGG 16/15 (middle) and G. grosjeani sp. nov. (unidentified UADBA specimen), FGG, 41/34 (below). Note the much more distinct glands in the latter species.	2018-06-04	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana		Zenodo	biologists	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana			
0389878094323443FE30FF1A38AAFC12.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16896239/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16896239	Figure 7. Heads of Gephyromantis (Duboimantis) saturnini sp. nov. and G. (D.) grosjeani sp. nov. in dorsal view compared to G. (D.) tandroka. Arrows indicate the interocular tubercles, which appear less expressed especially in G. (D.) saturnini sp. nov. than in G. (D.) tandroka.	Figure 7. Heads of Gephyromantis (Duboimantis) saturnini sp. nov. and G. (D.) grosjeani sp. nov. in dorsal view compared to G. (D.) tandroka. Arrows indicate the interocular tubercles, which appear less expressed especially in G. (D.) saturnini sp. nov. than in G. (D.) tandroka.	2018-06-04	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana		Zenodo	biologists	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana			
0389878094323443FE30FF1A38AAFC12.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16896241/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16896241	Figure 8. A calling male specimen of Gephyromantis (Duboimantis) grosjeani sp. nov. (specimen unidentified). Note the clearly bilobed subgular vocal sacs.	Figure 8. A calling male specimen of Gephyromantis (Duboimantis) grosjeani sp. nov. (specimen unidentified). Note the clearly bilobed subgular vocal sacs.	2018-06-04	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana		Zenodo	biologists	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana			
0389878094323443FE30FF1A38AAFC12.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16896243/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16896243	Figure 9. Photos in life of four specimens of Gephyromantis (Duboimantis) grosjeani sp. nov. from Sorata. (a–f) unidentified males (UADBA-A specimens) with femoral gland granule (FGG) numbers of (b) 41 left/34 right, (d) 31/34 and (f) 25/27; (g–h) female ZSM 1552/2012 (FGZC 3693).	Figure 9. Photos in life of four specimens of Gephyromantis (Duboimantis) grosjeani sp. nov. from Sorata. (a–f) unidentified males (UADBA-A specimens) with femoral gland granule (FGG) numbers of (b) 41 left/34 right, (d) 31/34 and (f) 25/27; (g–h) female ZSM 1552/2012 (FGZC 3693).	2018-06-04	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana		Zenodo	biologists	D., Mark;Mihaja, Fanomezana			
