taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
038887E6D810670133C5B97C0B65FEBD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16797585/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16797585	Figs 4–12. Araloselachus vorax (Le Hon, 1871). – Figs 4–6. Anterior tooth, V.69.1059. – Fig. 4. Lingual view. – Fig. 5. Mesial view. – Fig. 6. Labial view. – Figs 7–9. Anterior tooth, V.61.915. – Fig. 7. Lingual view. – Fig. 8. Mesial view. – Fig. 9. Labial view. – Figs 10–12. Upper lateral tooth, V.62.396. – Fig. 10. Lingual view. – Fig. 11. Distal view. – Fig. 12. Labial view. – Figs 13–15. cf. Carcharias crassidens (Agassiz, 1838), V.69.1092. – Fig. 13. Lingual view. – Fig. 14. Profile view. – Fig. 15. Labial view. Scale bars: 10 mm	Figs 4–12. Araloselachus vorax (Le Hon, 1871). – Figs 4–6. Anterior tooth, V.69.1059. – Fig. 4. Lingual view. – Fig. 5. Mesial view. – Fig. 6. Labial view. – Figs 7–9. Anterior tooth, V.61.915. – Fig. 7. Lingual view. – Fig. 8. Mesial view. – Fig. 9. Labial view. – Figs 10–12. Upper lateral tooth, V.62.396. – Fig. 10. Lingual view. – Fig. 11. Distal view. – Fig. 12. Labial view. – Figs 13–15. cf. Carcharias crassidens (Agassiz, 1838), V.69.1092. – Fig. 13. Lingual view. – Fig. 14. Profile view. – Fig. 15. Labial view. Scale bars: 10 mm	2019-12-31	Szabó, Márton		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, Márton			
038887E6D812670B3305B8050E2EFDC2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16797587/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16797587	Fig. 16. Carchariidae indet. or Odontaspididae indet. partial dentition, VER 2020.69.1. Scale bar: 20 mm	Fig. 16. Carchariidae indet. or Odontaspididae indet. partial dentition, VER 2020.69.1. Scale bar: 20 mm	2019-12-31	Szabó, Márton		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, Márton			
038887E6D812670B3305B8050E2EFDC2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16797590/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16797590	Figs. 17–25. Teeth in specimen VER 2020.69.1. – Fig. 17. Lower anterior (parasymphyseal) tooth in lingual aspect. – Fig. 18.?Upper anterior tooth in labial aspect. – Fig. 19.?Lower anterior tooth in labial aspect. – Fig. 20.?Upper anterior tooth in labial aspect. – Figs 21–22. Upper intermediate tooth in labial aspect. – Fig. 23. Upper lateral tooth in lingual aspect. – Fig. 24. Upper lateral tooth in lingual aspect. – Fig. 25. Lower lateral teeth in labial aspect. Scale bars: 2 mm	Figs. 17–25. Teeth in specimen VER 2020.69.1. – Fig. 17. Lower anterior (parasymphyseal) tooth in lingual aspect. – Fig. 18.?Upper anterior tooth in labial aspect. – Fig. 19.?Lower anterior tooth in labial aspect. – Fig. 20.?Upper anterior tooth in labial aspect. – Figs 21–22. Upper intermediate tooth in labial aspect. – Fig. 23. Upper lateral tooth in lingual aspect. – Fig. 24. Upper lateral tooth in lingual aspect. – Fig. 25. Lower lateral teeth in labial aspect. Scale bars: 2 mm	2019-12-31	Szabó, Márton		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, Márton			
038887E6D812670B3305B8050E2EFDC2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16797592/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16797592	Fig. 26. Areas I–III of specimen VER 2020.69.1. from where placoid scales were isolated. – Figs 27–28. VER 2020.70.1. – Fig. 27. Apical view. – Fig. 28. Profile view. – Figs 29–30. VER 2020.71.1. – Fig. 29. Apical view. – Fig. 30. Profile view. – Figs 31–32. VER 2020.72.1. – Fig. 31. Apical view. – Fig. 32. Profile view. – Figs 33–34. VER 2020.73.1. – Fig. 33. Apical view. – Fig. 34. Profile view. – Figs 35–36. VER 2020.74.1. – Fig. 35. Apical view. – Fig. 36. Profile view. – Figs 37–38. VER 2020.75.1. – Fig. 37. Apical view. – Fig. 38. Profile view. – Figs 39–40. VER 2020.76.1. – Fig. 39. Apical view. – Fig. 40. Profile view. – Figs 41–42. VER 2020.77.1. – Fig. 41. Apical view. – Fig. 42. Profile view. – Figs 43–44. VER 2020.78.1. – Fig. 43. Apical view. – Fig. 44. Profile view. – Figs 45–46. VER 2020.79.1. – Fig. 45. Apical view. – Fig. 46. Profile view. – Figs 47–48. VER 2020.80.1. – Figs 49–50. VER 2020.81.1. – Fig. 49. Apical view. – Fig. 50. Profile view. – Figs 51–52. VER 2020.82.1. – Fig. 51. Apical view. – Fig. 52. Profile view. – Figs 53–54. VER 2020.83.1. – Fig. 53. Apical view. – Fig. 54. Profile view. – Figs 55–56. VER 2020.84.1. – Fig. 55. Apical view. – Fig. 56. Profile view.– Figs 57–58. VER 2020.85.1.– Fig. 57. Apical view. – Fig. 58. Profile view. Placoid scales of Morphotype 1: Figs 27–36, 49, 50; Morphotype 2: Figs 37–46; Morphotype 3: Figs 47, 48, 51–56; Morphotype 4: Figs 57, 58. Scale bars: 26: 5 cm; 27–46, 49–58: 200 Μm; 47: 1 mm; 48: 250 Μm	Fig. 26. Areas I–III of specimen VER 2020.69.1. from where placoid scales were isolated. – Figs 27–28. VER 2020.70.1. – Fig. 27. Apical view. – Fig. 28. Profile view. – Figs 29–30. VER 2020.71.1. – Fig. 29. Apical view. – Fig. 30. Profile view. – Figs 31–32. VER 2020.72.1. – Fig. 31. Apical view. – Fig. 32. Profile view. – Figs 33–34. VER 2020.73.1. – Fig. 33. Apical view. – Fig. 34. Profile view. – Figs 35–36. VER 2020.74.1. – Fig. 35. Apical view. – Fig. 36. Profile view. – Figs 37–38. VER 2020.75.1. – Fig. 37. Apical view. – Fig. 38. Profile view. – Figs 39–40. VER 2020.76.1. – Fig. 39. Apical view. – Fig. 40. Profile view. – Figs 41–42. VER 2020.77.1. – Fig. 41. Apical view. – Fig. 42. Profile view. – Figs 43–44. VER 2020.78.1. – Fig. 43. Apical view. – Fig. 44. Profile view. – Figs 45–46. VER 2020.79.1. – Fig. 45. Apical view. – Fig. 46. Profile view. – Figs 47–48. VER 2020.80.1. – Figs 49–50. VER 2020.81.1. – Fig. 49. Apical view. – Fig. 50. Profile view. – Figs 51–52. VER 2020.82.1. – Fig. 51. Apical view. – Fig. 52. Profile view. – Figs 53–54. VER 2020.83.1. – Fig. 53. Apical view. – Fig. 54. Profile view. – Figs 55–56. VER 2020.84.1. – Fig. 55. Apical view. – Fig. 56. Profile view.– Figs 57–58. VER 2020.85.1.– Fig. 57. Apical view. – Fig. 58. Profile view. Placoid scales of Morphotype 1: Figs 27–36, 49, 50; Morphotype 2: Figs 37–46; Morphotype 3: Figs 47, 48, 51–56; Morphotype 4: Figs 57, 58. Scale bars: 26: 5 cm; 27–46, 49–58: 200 Μm; 47: 1 mm; 48: 250 Μm	2019-12-31	Szabó, Márton		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, Márton			
038887E6D812670B3305B8050E2EFDC2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16797596/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16797596	Figs 59–61. Close-up of VER 2020.69.1. between areas I and III, where large portions of the suggested fossilized cartilage tissue is exposed. – Figs 62–65. Scanning electron microscopic pictures of isolated pieces of the suggested fossilized cartilage tissue. – Fig. 62. VER 2020.86.1. – Fig. 63. VER 2020.88.1. – Fig. 64. VER 2020.89.1. – Fig. 65. VER 2020.90.1. Scale bars: 59–61: 2 mm; 62, 63: 200 Μm; 64: 100 Μm; 65: 250 Μm	Figs 59–61. Close-up of VER 2020.69.1. between areas I and III, where large portions of the suggested fossilized cartilage tissue is exposed. – Figs 62–65. Scanning electron microscopic pictures of isolated pieces of the suggested fossilized cartilage tissue. – Fig. 62. VER 2020.86.1. – Fig. 63. VER 2020.88.1. – Fig. 64. VER 2020.89.1. – Fig. 65. VER 2020.90.1. Scale bars: 59–61: 2 mm; 62, 63: 200 Μm; 64: 100 Μm; 65: 250 Μm	2019-12-31	Szabó, Márton		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, Márton			
038887E6D818670B33ECBFFF0B0BF9DB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16797598/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16797598	Figs 66–71. Cosmopolitodus hastalis (Agassiz, 1838). – Fig. 66. Upper anterior tooth, V.69.1010, lingual view. – Fig. 67. Upper anterolateral tooth, V.61.1280, lingual view. – Figs 68–69. Upper lateral tooth, V.62.399. – Fig. 68. Labial view. – Fig. 69. Close-up of the mesial crown edge of the same specimen. – Fig. 70. Lower anterior tooth, V.69.1038, lingual view. – Fig. 71. Lower anterior tooth, V.69.306, lingual view. – Fig. 72. Isurus oxyrinchus (Agassiz, 1843),?lower anterior tooth, V.61.915, labial view. Scale bars: 10 mm	Figs 66–71. Cosmopolitodus hastalis (Agassiz, 1838). – Fig. 66. Upper anterior tooth, V.69.1010, lingual view. – Fig. 67. Upper anterolateral tooth, V.61.1280, lingual view. – Figs 68–69. Upper lateral tooth, V.62.399. – Fig. 68. Labial view. – Fig. 69. Close-up of the mesial crown edge of the same specimen. – Fig. 70. Lower anterior tooth, V.69.1038, lingual view. – Fig. 71. Lower anterior tooth, V.69.306, lingual view. – Fig. 72. Isurus oxyrinchus (Agassiz, 1843),?lower anterior tooth, V.61.915, labial view. Scale bars: 10 mm	2019-12-31	Szabó, Márton		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, Márton			
038887E6D81A6717332DB8E00B70FD70.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16797603/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16797603	Figs 73–78. Otodus (Megaselachus) megalodon (Agassiz, 1835), upper anterior tooth, V.60.1741. – Fig. 73. Labial view. – Fig. 74. Profile view. – Figs 75–78. Close-up of the mesial and distal crown bases, showing the pathological deformity. – Figs 75–76. Labial view. – Figs 77–78. Profile view. Scale bars: Figs 73–74: 10 cm; Figs 75–78: 10 mm	Figs 73–78. Otodus (Megaselachus) megalodon (Agassiz, 1835), upper anterior tooth, V.60.1741. – Fig. 73. Labial view. – Fig. 74. Profile view. – Figs 75–78. Close-up of the mesial and distal crown bases, showing the pathological deformity. – Figs 75–76. Labial view. – Figs 77–78. Profile view. Scale bars: Figs 73–74: 10 cm; Figs 75–78: 10 mm	2019-12-31	Szabó, Márton		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, Márton			
038887E6D804671733D9BE910E17FAC7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16797605/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16797605	Figs 79–80. Hemipristis serra Agassiz, 1835. – Fig. 79. Upper tooth, V.62.405, labial view. – Fig. 80. Upper tooth, V.61.937, labial view. – Figs 81–85. Galeocerdo aduncus (Agassiz, 1835). – Figs 81–82. V.61.924.– Fig. 81. Lingual view. – Fig. 82. Labial view. – Fig. 83. V.69.1096, labial view. – Fig. 84. V.61.924, labial view. – Fig. 85. V.69.1096, labial view. – Figs 86–89. Carcharhinus priscus (Agassiz, 1843). – Fig. 86. Upper tooth, V.61.1279, lingual view. – Fig. 87. Upper tooth, V.69.883, labial view. – Fig. 88. Lower tooth, V.61.926, labial view. – Fig. 89. Lower tooth, V.61.941, labial view. – Figs 90–91. Carcharhinidae indet., vertebra, V.63.478. – Fig. 90. Articular view. – Fig. 91. Dorsal view. Scale bars: Figs 79–85, 90–91: 10 mm; Figs 86–89: 5 mm	Figs 79–80. Hemipristis serra Agassiz, 1835. – Fig. 79. Upper tooth, V.62.405, labial view. – Fig. 80. Upper tooth, V.61.937, labial view. – Figs 81–85. Galeocerdo aduncus (Agassiz, 1835). – Figs 81–82. V.61.924.– Fig. 81. Lingual view. – Fig. 82. Labial view. – Fig. 83. V.69.1096, labial view. – Fig. 84. V.61.924, labial view. – Fig. 85. V.69.1096, labial view. – Figs 86–89. Carcharhinus priscus (Agassiz, 1843). – Fig. 86. Upper tooth, V.61.1279, lingual view. – Fig. 87. Upper tooth, V.69.883, labial view. – Fig. 88. Lower tooth, V.61.926, labial view. – Fig. 89. Lower tooth, V.61.941, labial view. – Figs 90–91. Carcharhinidae indet., vertebra, V.63.478. – Fig. 90. Articular view. – Fig. 91. Dorsal view. Scale bars: Figs 79–85, 90–91: 10 mm; Figs 86–89: 5 mm	2019-12-31	Szabó, Márton		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, Márton			
038887E6D807671333B2BF3F0FEEFE57.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16797609/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16797609	Figs 92–95. Aetobatus arcuatus (Agassiz, 1843). – Figs 92–93. Lower tooth, V.63.671. – Fig. 92. Apical view. – Fig. 93. Basal view. – Fig. 94. Lower tooth, V.61.913, apical view. – Fig. 95. Three associable teeth of a lower tooth plate, V.61.936,?basal view. Scale bars: 10 mm	Figs 92–95. Aetobatus arcuatus (Agassiz, 1843). – Figs 92–93. Lower tooth, V.63.671. – Fig. 92. Apical view. – Fig. 93. Basal view. – Fig. 94. Lower tooth, V.61.913, apical view. – Fig. 95. Three associable teeth of a lower tooth plate, V.61.936,?basal view. Scale bars: 10 mm	2019-12-31	Szabó, Márton		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, Márton			
