taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03FB87AAFFDFFFD2CF79FF6D9E9EFEEE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16906430/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16906430	FIG. 1. Holotype of Boechera austromontana.	FIG. 1. Holotype of Boechera austromontana.	2022-07-15	Windham, Michael D.;Pryer, Kathleen M.;Allphin, Loreen		Zenodo	biologists	Windham, Michael D.;Pryer, Kathleen M.;Allphin, Loreen			
03FB87AAFFDFFFD2CF79FF6D9E9EFEEE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16906432/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16906432	FIG. 2. Morphological comparisons of Boechera austromontana (left column) and B. grahamii (right column). (A–B) Orientation of lower fruiting pedicels relative to rachises; scale bars = 2 mm. (C–D) Pubescence on abaxial surfaces of lower leaves; scale bars = 0.5 mm; arrows in C identify malplghiaceous trichomes. (E–F) Stem and proximal portion of middle cauline leaves showing pubescence on abaxial surfaces;scale bars = 1 mm. (G–H) Sepal pubescence;scale bars = 0.5 mm;circle in H highlights location of trichomes.	FIG. 2. Morphological comparisons of Boechera austromontana (left column) and B. grahamii (right column). (A–B) Orientation of lower fruiting pedicels relative to rachises; scale bars = 2 mm. (C–D) Pubescence on abaxial surfaces of lower leaves; scale bars = 0.5 mm; arrows in C identify malplghiaceous trichomes. (E–F) Stem and proximal portion of middle cauline leaves showing pubescence on abaxial surfaces;scale bars = 1 mm. (G–H) Sepal pubescence;scale bars = 0.5 mm;circle in H highlights location of trichomes.	2022-07-15	Windham, Michael D.;Pryer, Kathleen M.;Allphin, Loreen		Zenodo	biologists	Windham, Michael D.;Pryer, Kathleen M.;Allphin, Loreen			
03FB87AAFFDFFFD2CF79FF6D9E9EFEEE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16906435/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16906435	FIG. 3.Holotype of Boechera pseudoconsanguinea.	FIG. 3.Holotype of Boechera pseudoconsanguinea.	2022-07-15	Windham, Michael D.;Pryer, Kathleen M.;Allphin, Loreen		Zenodo	biologists	Windham, Michael D.;Pryer, Kathleen M.;Allphin, Loreen			
03FB87AAFFDFFFD2CF79FF6D9E9EFEEE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16906437/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16906437	FIG. 4. Morphological comparisons of Boechera pseudoconsanguinea (left column) and B. consanguinea (right column). (A–B) Orientation of lower fruiting pedicels relative torachises;scale bars= 2 mm.(C–D) Lowerleaf dentition;scale bars =2 mm.(E–F) Sepal lengthand pubescence;scalebars = 1 mm.(G–H) Distal portion of lower fruiting pedicels documenting trichome density;scale bars = 1 mm.	FIG. 4. Morphological comparisons of Boechera pseudoconsanguinea (left column) and B. consanguinea (right column). (A–B) Orientation of lower fruiting pedicels relative torachises;scale bars= 2 mm.(C–D) Lowerleaf dentition;scale bars =2 mm.(E–F) Sepal lengthand pubescence;scalebars = 1 mm.(G–H) Distal portion of lower fruiting pedicels documenting trichome density;scale bars = 1 mm.	2022-07-15	Windham, Michael D.;Pryer, Kathleen M.;Allphin, Loreen		Zenodo	biologists	Windham, Michael D.;Pryer, Kathleen M.;Allphin, Loreen			
03FB87AAFFDFFFD2CF79FF6D9E9EFEEE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16906439/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16906439	FIG. 5.Holotype of Boechera quadrangulensis.	FIG. 5.Holotype of Boechera quadrangulensis.	2022-07-15	Windham, Michael D.;Pryer, Kathleen M.;Allphin, Loreen		Zenodo	biologists	Windham, Michael D.;Pryer, Kathleen M.;Allphin, Loreen			
03FB87AAFFDFFFD2CF79FF6D9E9EFEEE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16906441/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16906441	FIG. 6. Morphological comparisons of Boechera quadrangulensis (left column) and B.duchesnensis (right column).(A–B) Individual flowers at full anthesis; scale bars = 1 mm. (C–D) Immature fruits highlighting ovule arrangements and trichome abundance/persistence; arrows in C identify few remaining trichomes on B.quadrangulensisfruit;scalebars = 0.5 mm.(E–F) Distal portionof middle caulineleaves emphasizing densityof trichomes on abaxial surfaces;scale bars =1 mm.(G–H) Infructescences showing mature fruit orientation;G from DUKE holotype of Boechera quadrangulensis, H from RM isotype of Arabis pulchra var.duchesnensis; scale bars = 2 cm.	FIG. 6. Morphological comparisons of Boechera quadrangulensis (left column) and B.duchesnensis (right column).(A–B) Individual flowers at full anthesis; scale bars = 1 mm. (C–D) Immature fruits highlighting ovule arrangements and trichome abundance/persistence; arrows in C identify few remaining trichomes on B.quadrangulensisfruit;scalebars = 0.5 mm.(E–F) Distal portionof middle caulineleaves emphasizing densityof trichomes on abaxial surfaces;scale bars =1 mm.(G–H) Infructescences showing mature fruit orientation;G from DUKE holotype of Boechera quadrangulensis, H from RM isotype of Arabis pulchra var.duchesnensis; scale bars = 2 cm.	2022-07-15	Windham, Michael D.;Pryer, Kathleen M.;Allphin, Loreen		Zenodo	biologists	Windham, Michael D.;Pryer, Kathleen M.;Allphin, Loreen			
