taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03F20554FFFD4A4BFF554789FF71FDB7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16652251/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16652251	Fig. 5. Comparison of the habitus and shape of the aedeagus (frontal and lateral view) of the three related taxa: A – Carabus bessarabicus bessarabicus, B – C. b. concretus, C – C. b. tangra.	Fig. 5. Comparison of the habitus and shape of the aedeagus (frontal and lateral view) of the three related taxa: A – Carabus bessarabicus bessarabicus, B – C. b. concretus, C – C. b. tangra.	2025-03-10	Teofilova, Teodora;Rapuzzi, Ivan;Kodzhabashev, Nikolay		Zenodo	biologists	Teofilova, Teodora;Rapuzzi, Ivan;Kodzhabashev, Nikolay			
03F20554FFFD4A4BFF554789FF71FDB7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16652245/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16652245	Fig. 2. Main body size measurements (on the first female collected near the top of the Chepan Planina Mt., source: Teofilova & Kodzhabashev 2022): LP – length of the pro- notum, WP – width of the pronotum, LE – length of the elytra, WE – width of the elytra, LT – total body length.	Fig. 2. Main body size measurements (on the first female collected near the top of the Chepan Planina Mt., source: Teofilova & Kodzhabashev 2022): LP – length of the pro- notum, WP – width of the pronotum, LE – length of the elytra, WE – width of the elytra, LT – total body length.	2025-03-10	Teofilova, Teodora;Rapuzzi, Ivan;Kodzhabashev, Nikolay		Zenodo	biologists	Teofilova, Teodora;Rapuzzi, Ivan;Kodzhabashev, Nikolay			
03F20554FFFD4A4BFF554789FF71FDB7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16652247/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16652247	Fig. 3. Left (A), frontal (B) and right (C) position of the aedeagus of Carabus bessarabicus tangra n. ssp. from Site I, collected in the period 22.VIII–19.XI.2022.	Fig. 3. Left (A), frontal (B) and right (C) position of the aedeagus of Carabus bessarabicus tangra n. ssp. from Site I, collected in the period 22.VIII–19.XI.2022.	2025-03-10	Teofilova, Teodora;Rapuzzi, Ivan;Kodzhabashev, Nikolay		Zenodo	biologists	Teofilova, Teodora;Rapuzzi, Ivan;Kodzhabashev, Nikolay			
03F20554FFFD4A4BFF554789FF71FDB7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16652249/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16652249	Fig. 4. Left (upper row) and right (lower row) position of the endophallus of three specimens of Carabus bessarabicus tangra n. ssp. (scale bar = 1 mm): A and C– from Site I, collected in the period 22.VIII–19.XI.2022; B – from Site III, collected in the period 17.VII–10.IX.2023.	Fig. 4. Left (upper row) and right (lower row) position of the endophallus of three specimens of Carabus bessarabicus tangra n. ssp. (scale bar = 1 mm): A and C– from Site I, collected in the period 22.VIII–19.XI.2022; B – from Site III, collected in the period 17.VII–10.IX.2023.	2025-03-10	Teofilova, Teodora;Rapuzzi, Ivan;Kodzhabashev, Nikolay		Zenodo	biologists	Teofilova, Teodora;Rapuzzi, Ivan;Kodzhabashev, Nikolay			
03F20554FFF84A49FF074444FAD7F814.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16652251/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16652251	Fig. 5. Comparison of the habitus and shape of the aedeagus (frontal and lateral view) of the three related taxa: A – Carabus bessarabicus bessarabicus, B – C. b. concretus, C – C. b. tangra.	Fig. 5. Comparison of the habitus and shape of the aedeagus (frontal and lateral view) of the three related taxa: A – Carabus bessarabicus bessarabicus, B – C. b. concretus, C – C. b. tangra.	2025-03-10	Teofilova, Teodora;Rapuzzi, Ivan;Kodzhabashev, Nikolay		Zenodo	biologists	Teofilova, Teodora;Rapuzzi, Ivan;Kodzhabashev, Nikolay			
