taxonID	type	description	language	source
03E887D5FFBA785EFF52FE5A0825144F.taxon	discussion	Remarks. This tribe consists of 24 species in six genera distributed in South-East Asia and India, namely Gerenia Stål, 1878, Anacranae Miller, 1934, Striatosedulia Ingrisch, 1989, Bibractella Storozhenko, 2002, Leosedulia Storozhenko, 2009, and Anasedulia Dawwueng, Storozhenko et Asanok, 2015 (Stål, 1878; Miller, 1934, Ingrisch, 1989; Storozhenko, 2002, 2009; Dawwueng et al., 2015; Tan et al., 2016, 2017; Cigliano et al., 2025). Members of this tribe are characterized by follow combination of features: Male medium-sized for subfamily; female larger and more robust. Head considerably shorter than pronotum. Frontal ridge almost parallel-sided and distinctly narrower than width of vertex between eyes. Eyes large, oval; vertical diameter of eye 2 – 2.2 times in male and 1.5 – 1.7 times in female as long as subocular furrow. Foveolae absent. Antennae filiform, 20 – 25 - segmented. Pronotum long, crossed by three transverse furrows; prozona considerably longer than metazona; lateral carinae usually absent (well defined in Bibractella); median carina distinct but low (or vestigial in Anacranae). Prosternal spine straight, conical, with obtuse apex. Mesosternal lophi broad, widely separated. Tegmina abbreviated, touching each other in rest position, or lateral, scale-like; rare, in males of Gerenia dorsale (Walker, 1870), G. intermedia Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1893 and G. selangorensis Miller, 1935 from India, Myanmar and Malaysia respectively, tegmina and hind wings far surpassing apex of hind femora. Hind wings usually abbreviated or absent. Hind femora stout with upper keel serrated; lower lophi of hind knees with broadly rounded apex. Hind tibiae with 6 – 9 outer dorsal spines and 8 – 11 inner dorsal spines; outer apical dorsal spine absent. Hind tarsi short, not longer than half of hind tibiae; third segment distinctly shorter than two others together; arolium large, almost reaching apex of claws. Tympanum large, oval. Furculae on posterior margin of the male tenth tergite present or rare vestigial. Male cerci conical (in Gerenia and Anacranae) or elongated, compressed and gently incurved, in apical third suddenly narrowed (other genera). Female cerci conical with obtuse or pointed apex. Ovipositor short or rare elongated. Male genitalia: epiphallus bridge-like, ancorae present; lophi of epipallus triangle or broadly rounded; the apical valves of penis and cingular valves long; basal valves of penis connected with apical ones by flexure.	en	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Storozhenko, Sergey Yu., Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2025): Review of the genus Anacranae Miller, 1934 (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Catantopinae). Zootaxa 5632 (2): 364-376, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9
03E887D5FFBA785DFF52FA02099112C7.taxon	materials_examined	Type species: Anacranae nuda Miller, 1934, by original designation.	en	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Storozhenko, Sergey Yu., Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2025): Review of the genus Anacranae Miller, 1934 (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Catantopinae). Zootaxa 5632 (2): 364-376, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9
03E887D5FFBA785DFF52FA02099112C7.taxon	diagnosis	Differential diagnosis. Anacranae belongs to the group of Gereniini genera with scale-like tegmina which not touching each other in rest position; therefore, it easy recognizable from the genus Gerenia which characterized by tegmina touching each other in rest position and almost reaching or surpassing apex of abdomen. In the genus Bibractella median and lateral carinae of the pronotum are well defined and tegmina are very short, reaching hind margin of mesonotum only (in Anacranae median and lateral carinae of the pronotum absent and tegmina reaching the apex of 2 nd abdominal tergite). In the genera Sedulia and Leosedulia median carina of the pronotum distinct; tegmina with large and shining black spot in central part of tegmen; ovipositor short, ventral valves with large tooth near base (in Anacranae median carina of the pronotum absent, tegmina scale-like without shiny black spot, and ovipositor with elongated valves, lower side of ventral valves smooth). The genus Striatosedulia differs from Anacranae by well defined median carina of the pronotum, by a row of parallel veinlets in costal field of tegmen, and by male subgenital plate terminating in two obtuse lateral lobes (in Anacranae costal field without veinlets and male subgenital plate with obtuse apex). Anasedulia is easy recognizable from Anacranae by follow combination of characters: posterior margin of pronotum angularly rounded; median carina of pronotum distinct; tegmina with shining black spot and the costal field of tegmen broad with irregular veinlets; male subgenital plate with a pair of unusually long lateral lophi covered by long hair-like setae; ovipositor short, hook-like (in Anacranae posterior margin of pronotum broadly rounded or almost straight, tegmina without shining spot, costal field narrow, male subgenital plate conical without lateral lobes, and ovipositor with elongated valves). Moreover, the males of Anacranae differ from all representatives of Gereniini in enlarged paraprocts with distinct process of different shape on its lateral side, while in other genera paraprocts not modified. Composition. Genus consists of four species from Thailand and Vietnam (Cigliano et al., 2025). One new species is described in this work.	en	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Storozhenko, Sergey Yu., Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2025): Review of the genus Anacranae Miller, 1934 (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Catantopinae). Zootaxa 5632 (2): 364-376, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9
03E887D5FFB9785BFF52FBDC0F5411CF.taxon	description	(Figs. 1 A – Q, 6 A – D)	en	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Storozhenko, Sergey Yu., Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2025): Review of the genus Anacranae Miller, 1934 (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Catantopinae). Zootaxa 5632 (2): 364-376, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9
03E887D5FFB9785BFF52FBDC0F5411CF.taxon	materials_examined	Type material examined. Thailand: Nakhon Ratchasima Province, environments of National Park “ Khao Yai ”, h ~ 500 – 1000 m, 26. X – 4. XI 2000, male (holotype) and female (paratype), leg. A. V. Gorochov & L. Anisyutkin (ZISP). Other material examined. Thailand: Ratchaburi Province, Suan Phueng District, Khao Krajom “ View Point ”, h ~ 800 – 900 m, 20. I 2021, 2 females, coll. P. Dawwrueng (RIM); Thailand: Ratchaburi Province, Suan Phueng District, Khao Krajom, Grassland around Pha Pok Dam, h ~ 300 – 400 m, 11. V 2022, 1 male, 1 female, coll. P. Dawwrueng (RIM); Thailand: Chiang Rai Province, Mae Fah Luang District, Doi Tung, 1000 – 1250 m., 17. III 2022, 2 males, coll. P. Dawwrueng (RIM).	en	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Storozhenko, Sergey Yu., Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2025): Review of the genus Anacranae Miller, 1934 (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Catantopinae). Zootaxa 5632 (2): 364-376, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9
03E887D5FFB9785BFF52FBDC0F5411CF.taxon	discussion	Remarks. We examined all additional specimens of this species from Ratchaburi and Chiang Rai Provinces. We found they matched with the morphological characters of holotype and paratype. By the coloration of antennae, shape and coloration of tegmina, coloration of all legs, mesosternal and metasternal lobes, shape of epiproct and presence of the lateral shorted spine of paraproct of male, the male genitalia complex (Figs. 1 A – Q), shape of female subgenital plate and ovipositor, as well as presence of two rows of thin hairs on female 7 th abdominal sternite only. The coloration of male antennae is variable: type locality specimens (northeastern Thailand) showed the male antennae with basal third light brown, their apical segments are black, but specimens from Ratchaburi Province (western Thailand) showed the basal half yellowish brown and apical half dark brown or black (Figs. 1 A – B, Fig. 6 A), and specimens from Chiang Rai Province (northern Thailand) showed the antennae with apical third dark brown, their basal segments are yellowish brown (Figs. 6 C – D). Measurement. (length in mm). Body: males 17.4 – 20.5, females 17.7 – 23.5; antenna: males 15.3 – 22.2, females 7.6 – 13.6; pronotum: males 3.1 – 3.6, females 3.7 – 4.5; tegmen: males 2.3 – 3.2, females 2.8 – 3.9; hind femur: males 11.2 – 12.8, females 11.8 – 13.9.	en	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Storozhenko, Sergey Yu., Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2025): Review of the genus Anacranae Miller, 1934 (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Catantopinae). Zootaxa 5632 (2): 364-376, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9
03E887D5FFB9785BFF52FBDC0F5411CF.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Thailand (Nakhon Ratchasima, Ratchaburi and Chiang Rai Provinces). Here this species is recorded from western and northern Thailand for the first time.	en	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Storozhenko, Sergey Yu., Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2025): Review of the genus Anacranae Miller, 1934 (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Catantopinae). Zootaxa 5632 (2): 364-376, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9
03E887D5FFBF785BFF52FE830EE213D8.taxon	description	(Figs. 2 A – L)	en	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Storozhenko, Sergey Yu., Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2025): Review of the genus Anacranae Miller, 1934 (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Catantopinae). Zootaxa 5632 (2): 364-376, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9
03E887D5FFBF785BFF52FE830EE213D8.taxon	materials_examined	Type material examined. Vietnam: Gia Lai Province, 20 km N Kannak, Buon Luoi, 24 – 30. IV 1995, male (holotype) and female (paratype), leg. A. V. Gorochov (ZISP).	en	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Storozhenko, Sergey Yu., Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2025): Review of the genus Anacranae Miller, 1934 (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Catantopinae). Zootaxa 5632 (2): 364-376, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9
03E887D5FFBF785BFF52FE830EE213D8.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The complete description of this species was given by Storozhenko (2002). This species is rather small for the genus (length of body: ♂ 17.5, ♀ 21.5 mm, pronotum ♂ 3.2, ♀ 4.3 mm, tegmen ♂ 4.1, ♀ 4.8 mm, hind femur ♂ 11, ♀ 12.5 mm).	en	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Storozhenko, Sergey Yu., Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2025): Review of the genus Anacranae Miller, 1934 (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Catantopinae). Zootaxa 5632 (2): 364-376, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9
03E887D5FFBF785BFF52FE830EE213D8.taxon	distribution	Distribution. South Vietnam (Gia Lai Province).	en	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Storozhenko, Sergey Yu., Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2025): Review of the genus Anacranae Miller, 1934 (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Catantopinae). Zootaxa 5632 (2): 364-376, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9
03E887D5FFBE785AFF52FF330E9610FF.taxon	description	(Figs. 3 A – E)	en	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Storozhenko, Sergey Yu., Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2025): Review of the genus Anacranae Miller, 1934 (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Catantopinae). Zootaxa 5632 (2): 364-376, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9
03E887D5FFBE785AFF52FF330E9610FF.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The complete description of this species was given by Miller (1934) and Willemse (1957).	en	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Storozhenko, Sergey Yu., Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2025): Review of the genus Anacranae Miller, 1934 (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Catantopinae). Zootaxa 5632 (2): 364-376, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9
03E887D5FFBE785AFF52FF330E9610FF.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Malaysia. Species is known from Hulu Langat District in the southeastern corner of Selangor, between Kuala Lumpur and Negeri Sembilan.	en	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Storozhenko, Sergey Yu., Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2025): Review of the genus Anacranae Miller, 1934 (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Catantopinae). Zootaxa 5632 (2): 364-376, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9
03E887D5FFBE7858FF52F9E10D1A166B.taxon	description	(Figs. 4 A – Q, 6 E – F)	en	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Storozhenko, Sergey Yu., Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2025): Review of the genus Anacranae Miller, 1934 (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Catantopinae). Zootaxa 5632 (2): 364-376, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9
03E887D5FFBE7858FF52F9E10D1A166B.taxon	materials_examined	Type material examined. Vietnam: Gia Lai Province, 20 km N Kannak, Buon Luoi, 1 – 10. IV 1995, female (holotype), leg A. V. Gorochov (ZISP). Other material examined. Thailand: Chantaburi Province, Pong Namron District, Near Klong Tani, 300 – 350 m, 21. VI 2020, 3 males, 2 females, coll. P. Dawwrueng (RIM); Thailand: Ratchaburi Province, Suan Phueng District, Khao Krajom, 850 – 900 m, 22. V 2022, 2 males, 2 females, coll. P. Dawwrueng (RIM).	en	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Storozhenko, Sergey Yu., Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2025): Review of the genus Anacranae Miller, 1934 (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Catantopinae). Zootaxa 5632 (2): 364-376, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9
03E887D5FFBE7858FF52F9E10D1A166B.taxon	description	Description of male (hitherto unknown). Body slender, small to medium-sized for the genus. Head as long as the pronotum (Figs. 4 A – B). Frons and genae coarsely punctured (Fig. 4 E); vertex and occiput smooth. Face in profile reclinate (Fig. 4 A). Frontal ridge distinct to median ocellus, deeply sulcated between the antennae, slightly narrowed near median ocellus (Fig. 4 E). Vertex between eyes narrower than maximal width of frontal ridge. Fastigium of vertex rather long; foveolae present (Fig. 4 B). Eyes almost spherical. Antennae 22 - segmented, beyond the base of hind femora. Pronotum punctured, crossed by three transverse furrows and one short transverse furrow between the first and the third furrows, pronotum strongly constricted at the fourth furrows (Figs. 4 A – B); median and lateral carinae absent; prozona 2.5 – 3.0 times as long as metazona; anterior margin of pronotum almost straight; posterior margin of pronotum nearly truncated with shallow excise on the middle (Fig. 4 B). Prosternal spine slightly flattened basally narrowing into a conical and pointed apex. Mesosternal lobes with internal margin concave, mesosternal interspace as broad as mesosternal lobe; metasternal lobes fused (Fig. 4 F). Tegmina lateral, not touching each other in dorsal view, slightly beyond the apex of 2 nd abdominal tergite, 2.5 – 2.8 times as long as wide; apex of tegmen rounded (Figs. 4 A – B). Hind wings narrower than tegmina, covered under tegmina completely. Hind femora slender, 4.8 – 5.1 times as long as their maximal width; dorsal margin smooth; ventral genicular lobes without spine (Fig. 4 A). Hind tibiae with 6 outer and 7 (8) inner dorsal spines; outer apical dorsal spine absent. Hind tarsi distinctly long, as long as the half of hind tibiae; third segment (without claws) slightly longer basitarsus; arolium large, surpassing apex of claws. Tympanum rather large, oval, covered by tegmina. 7 th and 8 th abdominal sternites with two subparallel rows of hairs. 10 th abdominal tergite with triangular furculae on posterior margin; supra-anal plate trapezoid with shallow median groove and a pair of small conical tubercles, longer than its width near base, with obtuse triangular apex (Fig. 4 G); its surface slightly concave near the base. Paraprocts with small and rather thin process on its lateral side, pointed laterad in dorsal view (Fig. 4 G) and pointed upward in lateral view (Fig. 4 H). Cerci slightly beyond the supra-anal plate, conical, with obtuse pointed apex, 2.7 – 3.0 times as long as their width near base (Figs. 4 G – H). Subgenital plate long. Epiphallus bridge-shaped; bridge narrowed and not divided; ancorae large, triangular; anterior projections slightly shorter than ancorae (Fig. 4 L); posterior projections elongated into a narrow process (Fig. 4 L); lophi of epiphallus rather small, triangular (Figs. 4 L – M); oval sclerites very large. Cingulum sclerotized, consisting of almost straight and slightly concave near the apex of apodemes (Fig. 4 J); rami narrow (Figs. 4 I – K); zygoma straight, covering the arch of cingulum (Fig. 4 J). Valves of cingulum long, divided, parallel-side, apically widened and lobed shape, apex obtuse rounded (Figs. 4 J – K). Apical valves of penis long with rounded apex, almost as long as cingular valves (Fig. 4 I); basal and apical penis valves connected by flexure. Body and abdomen yellowish green when alive (Fig. 6 E), but fade to yellowish brown after preservation (Figs. 4 A – B). Dorsal side of head black with oblique white banded beside along the eyes; frons yellowish green (Fig. 4 E), genae yellowish green with white oblique horizontal stripe (Fig. 4 A); postocular narrowed stripe black continued to the edge of its head; mandibles yellow with brown apex (Fig. 4 E). Basal third of antennae bluish grey, rest part black except two last segments bluish white (Fig. 6 E). Disc of pronotum yellowish green; lateral lobes dark green with two white spots (Figs. 4 A – B). Tegmina black with light stripe along median line (Fig. 4 B). Fore and mid femora yellowish green; fore and mid tibia green; fore and mid tarsi bluish green. Hind femur yellowish green with two large green spots, the first one near the basal part darker than the second near apical part, these spots present on both outer and inner side (Figs. 4 A – B); dorsal genicular lobe black but ventral lobe white. Hind tibia blue with black and pale base; dorsal spines with black apex. Hind tarsi blue (Figs. 4 A – B). Supra-anal plate green; cerci light brown basal half and bluish green apical half; subgenital plate yellowish green (Figs. 4 A – B). Measurements (length in mm). Body: males 15.9 – 19.2, females 20.2 – 23.3; antenna: males 14.3 – 18.3, females 9.3 – 13.7; pronotum: males 2.8 – 3.3, females 3.3 – 4.5; tegmen: males 2.2 – 2.8, females 2.3 – 3.4; hind femur: males 10.0 – 11.3, females 12.0 – 12.9.	en	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Storozhenko, Sergey Yu., Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2025): Review of the genus Anacranae Miller, 1934 (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Catantopinae). Zootaxa 5632 (2): 364-376, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9
03E887D5FFBE7858FF52F9E10D1A166B.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The females from Thailand are conspecific with holotype of A. vietnamensis from Vietnam. In Chantaburi and Ratchaburi, both males and females were found which allows us to describe hitherto unknown males. Moreover, we also showed the live coloration of this species for the first time.	en	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Storozhenko, Sergey Yu., Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2025): Review of the genus Anacranae Miller, 1934 (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Catantopinae). Zootaxa 5632 (2): 364-376, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9
03E887D5FFBE7858FF52F9E10D1A166B.taxon	distribution	Distribution. South Vietnam (Gia Lai Province) and Thailand (new record, Chantaburi and Ratchaburi Provinces).	en	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Storozhenko, Sergey Yu., Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2025): Review of the genus Anacranae Miller, 1934 (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Catantopinae). Zootaxa 5632 (2): 364-376, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9
03E887D5FFB37854FF52FF330ED81327.taxon	description	(Figs. 5 A – R, 6 G – H)	en	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Storozhenko, Sergey Yu., Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2025): Review of the genus Anacranae Miller, 1934 (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Catantopinae). Zootaxa 5632 (2): 364-376, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9
03E887D5FFB37854FF52FF330ED81327.taxon	materials_examined	Type material. Holotype — male, Thailand: Chiang Rai Province, Mae Fah Luang District, Doi Tung, h ~ 900 – 1000 m, 17. III 2022, coll. P. Dawwrueng (AUP- 02036). Paratypes — 1 female, the same locality and date with holotype, coll. P. Dawwrueng (AUP- 02037); 1 female, the same locality and date with holotype, coll. P. Dawwrueng (RIM).	en	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Storozhenko, Sergey Yu., Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2025): Review of the genus Anacranae Miller, 1934 (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Catantopinae). Zootaxa 5632 (2): 364-376, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9
03E887D5FFB37854FF52FF330ED81327.taxon	description	Description. Holotype. Body slender, rather small for the genus. Head slightly shorter than the pronotum (Figs. 5 A – B). Frons and genae coarsely punctured (Fig. 5 F); vertex and occiput punctured except median part smooth. Face in profile reclinate (Fig. 5 A). Frontal ridge distinct to median ocellus, deeply sulcated between the antennae, slightly narrowed near median ocellus (Fig. 5 F). Vertex between eyes slightly broader than maximal width of frontal ridge. Fastigium of vertex rather long; foveolae present (Fig. 5 B). Eyes large, almost spherical. Antennae lost apical part. Pronotum punctured, crossed by three transverse furrows and one short transverse furrow between the first and the third furrows, pronotum constrict at the median half in dorsal view (Figs. 5 A – B); median and lateral carinae absent; prozona 2.5 times as long as metazona; anterior margin of pronotum broadly rounded; posterior margin of pronotum nearly truncated with shallow excise on the middle (Fig. 5 B). Prosternal spine slightly flattened basally narrowing into a conical and pointed apex. Mesosternal lobes with internal margin concave, mesosternal interspace narrower than mesosternal lobe; metasternal lobes fused (Fig. 5 G). Tegmina lateral, not touching each other in dorsal view, reaching the apex of 2 nd abdominal tergite, 2.1 times as long as wide; apex of tegmen broadly rounded (Figs. 5 A – B). Hind wings narrower than tegmina, covered under tegmina completely. Hind femora slender, 5.0 times as long as their maximal width; dorsal margin finely serrate; ventral genicular lobes without spine (Fig. 5 C). Hind tibiae with 6 (7) outer and 8 (9) inner dorsal spines; outer apical dorsal spine absent. Hind tarsi distinctly long, almost reaching the half of hind tibiae; third segment (without claws) slightly longer basitarsus; arolium large, surpassing apex of claws. Tympanum rather large, oval, covered by tegmina. 7 th and 8 th abdominal sternites with two subparallel rows of hairs. 10 th abdominal tergite with long conical furculae on posterior margin, bent to each other in apical part; supra-anal plate trapezoid with shallow median groove, distinctly constricted in the median half by the lateral carinae raised to small tubercles, longer than its width near base, with obtuse rounded apex, longer than width near base (Fig. 5 H). Paraprocts broad with obtuse pointed apex in lateral view, lateral side form a small tubercle (Fig. 5 H). Cerci slightly beyond the supra-anal plate, conical, with obtuse pointed apex, 2.9 times as long as their width near base (Figs. 5 H – I). Subgenital plate long with shallowed excision on median part (Fig. 5 H). Epiphallus bridge-shaped; bridge broad and not divided (Fig. 5 M); ancorae large, obtuse triangular; anterior projections absent (Fig. 5 M); posterior projections short, forming into a narrow process (Fig. 5 M); lophi of epiphallus small, broadly rounded (Figs. 5 M – N); oval sclerites very large. Cingulum sclerotised, consisting of almost straight apodemes (Fig. 5 H); rami slightly broad (Figs. 5 J – L); zygoma straight, covering the arch of cingulum (Fig. 5 H). Valves of cingulum long, divided, parallel-side, median part slightly widened, apically narrowed and bent upward, apex subacute (Figs. 5 J – L). Apical valves of penis long, divided, widened and lobed-like in median part, narrowed apically, almost as long as cingular valves (Fig. 5 J); basal and apical penis valves connected by flexure. Head and pronotum brownish grey; abdomen brown when alive (Fig. 6 G), but fade to yellowish brown after preservation (Figs. 5 A – B). Dorsal side of head dark brown; frons and genae dark brown (Fig. 5 A); mandibles yellowish brown with brown apex (Fig. 5 F). Antennae yellowish brown (Figs. 5 A – B). Disc of pronotum and lateral lobes dark brown uniformly (Figs. 5 A – B). Tegmina light brown (Fig. 5 B). Fore and mid legs yellowish green. Hind femur yellowish brown with three black spots along the upper keel from basal to median part, and two indicting brownish spots near the apex (Figs. 5 A – B); dorsal and ventral genicular lobes brown. Hind tibia green; dorsal spines with black apex. Hind tarsi light brown (Figs. 5 A – B). 1 st and 2 nd abdominal tergites dark brown with large blackish spot on the median line between the apical part of 1 st tergite and basal part of 2 nd tergite, rest tergites brown. Supra-anal plate and paraprocts brown with dark brown small tubercles on dorsal surface of supra-anal plate; cerci light brown with brown banded near the middle; subgenital plate brown (Figs. 5 A – B). Female. Similar to male, but distinctly larger and bulge body. Head slightly shorter than the pronotum (Figs. 5 D – E). Frons and genae coarsely punctured; vertex and occiput punctured except median part smooth. Face in profile reclinate (Fig. 5 D). Frontal ridge distinct to median ocellus, deeply sulcated between the antennae, slightly narrowed near median ocellus. Vertex between eyes slightly broader than maximal width of frontal ridge. Fastigium of vertex rather long; foveolae present (Fig. 5 D). Eyes large, almost spherical. Antennae 23 - segmented. Pronotum punctured, crossed by three transverse furrows and one short transverse furrows between the first and the third furrows, pronotum constrict at the median half in dorsal view (Figs. 5 D – E); median and lateral carinae absent; prozona 2.5 – 2.6 times as long as metazona; anterior margin of pronotum subtruncate; posterior margin of pronotum nearly truncate with shallow excise on the middle (Fig. 5 E). Prosternal spine flattened from basal part to the median part, and narrowing into a conical and obtuse rounded apex. Mesosternal lobes with internal margin concave, mesosternal interspace narrower than mesosternal lobe; metasternal lobes fused (Fig. 5 O). Tegmina lateral, not touching each other in dorsal view, reaching the apex of 2 nd abdominal tergite, 1.7 – 1.9 times as long as wide; apex of tegmen broadly rounded (Figs. 5 D – E). Hind femora slender, 4.4 times as long as their maximal width; dorsal margin finely serrate; ventral genicular lobes without spine (Fig. 5 D). Hind tibiae with 6 outer and 8 inner dorsal spines; outer apical dorsal spine absent. Hind tarsi distinctly long, almost reach the half of hind tibiae; third segment (without claws) slightly longer basitarsus; arolium large, surpassing apex of claws. Tympanum rather large, oval, covered by tegmina. 6 th and 7 th abdominal sternites with two subparallel rows of hairs. 10 th abdominal tergite with paired of small lobes on posterior margin; supra-anal triangular with shallow median groove, longer than width near base (Fig. 5 P). Cerci slightly beyond the supra-anal plate, conical, with obtuse rounded apex, 2.3 – 2.5 times as long as their width near base (Figs. 5 Q – R). Subgenital plate 1.6 – 1.7 times longer than wide, apical part triangular with acute apex (Fig. 5 R). Ovipositor short, dorsal valves thicker and longer than ventral valves, both valves smooth margins, dorsal valves slightly curved upward, but ventral valves almost straight (Figs. 5 Q – R). When alive (Fig. 6 H), head with greyish dorsally, yellowish stripe behind the eyes longitudinal and continue to the pronotum; frons and genae brown; postocular grey. Antennae light brown with darker near apical part. Disc of pronotum dark brown and separated from lateral lobe of pronotum by the broad yellowish stripe that connect from the stripe behind the eyes, lateral lobe with blackish upper half and yellowish brown with scattered dark brown spots on lower half; blackish spots along both anterior margin and posterior margin of pronotum. This coloration could be faded after preservation and hard to see in dried specimens (Figs. 5 D – E). Tegmina light brown. Fore and mid femur light brown with small blackish spots; fore and mid tibia brown with small blackish spots. Hind femur with the same coloration and spots presented on the male, but inner side orange brown. Hind tibia brown, dorsal spines with black apex. All tarsi light brown. Abdominal tergites brown with small black spots on the posterior margins except 10 th abdominal tergite. Supra-anal plate and paraprocts brown; cerci light brown. Sternites and subgenital plate light brown. Ovipositor light brown (Figs. 5 D – E). Measurements (length in mm). Body: male 17.1, females 20.8 – 22.1; antenna: male with apical part broken, females 10.7 – 13.5; pronotum: male 3.2, females 4.4 – 4.6; tegmen: male 2.5, females 3.6 – 4.2; hind femur: male 10.4, females 13.2 – 14.6.	en	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Storozhenko, Sergey Yu., Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2025): Review of the genus Anacranae Miller, 1934 (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Catantopinae). Zootaxa 5632 (2): 364-376, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9
03E887D5FFB37854FF52FF330ED81327.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. The new species is easily distinguished from congeners by follows combination of features: the coloration (dark brown to yellowish brown), the shape of tegmina (widened); furculae on 10 th abdominal tergite of male (distinctly long); shape of male supra-anal plate (lateral margin distinctly constricted and form a small tubercles); male paraprocts (with small rounded tubercles); genital complex (long and bent upward valves of cingulum, blunt shape of epiphallus); female abdominal sternites (two row of hairs presented of 6 th and 7 th rows sternites); and female subgenital plate (triangular with acute apex).	en	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Storozhenko, Sergey Yu., Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2025): Review of the genus Anacranae Miller, 1934 (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Catantopinae). Zootaxa 5632 (2): 364-376, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9
03E887D5FFB37854FF52FF330ED81327.taxon	etymology	Etymology. The specific epithet from the Latin word “ maculatus ” which gave the meaning “ spot ” for the presented of blackish spots on the hind femur in both sexes and on abdominal tergites in female.	en	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Storozhenko, Sergey Yu., Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2025): Review of the genus Anacranae Miller, 1934 (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Catantopinae). Zootaxa 5632 (2): 364-376, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9
03E887D5FFB37854FF52FF330ED81327.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Thailand (Chiang Rai Province).	en	Dawwrueng, Pattarawich, Storozhenko, Sergey Yu., Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon (2025): Review of the genus Anacranae Miller, 1934 (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Catantopinae). Zootaxa 5632 (2): 364-376, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5632.2.9
