identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03EF1F5CC957FFCC6CA852DDFC0A13CB.text	03EF1F5CC957FFCC6CA852DDFC0A13CB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Piaya cayana subsp. cayana (LINNAEUS 1766)	<div><p>Piaya cayana cayana (Linnaeus, 1766)</p><p>(Figs 1; 2)</p><p>SPECIMENS. — MLC.2011.0.1433 (Fig. 1A) and MLC.2011.0.1434 (Fig. 2A).</p><p>INSCRIPTIONS UNDER THE PEDESTAL OF MLC.2011.0.1433 (Fig. 1B). — “Cuculus / Cayanus, Lin[naeus]. Lath[am]. / Coccyzus macrourus / Vieillot / Coucou piaye Buff[on]. pl[anche]. enl[uminée]. 211 / Cuculus cayanensis . Briss[on] / Cayenne, donné à mon / père par m. de / Buffon”.</p><p>INSCRIPTIONS UNDER THE PEDESTAL OF MLC.2011.0.1434 (Fig. 2B). — “Coccyzus / macrourus, Vieill[ot]. / Coulicou piaye, Vieill[ot]. / Coucou piaye, pl[anche]. en[luminée]. 211. / Cuculus cayanus Lath[am]. / Coua … Tem[minck]. / de Cayenne / donné à mon père / par m. de / Buffon”.</p><p>PLANCHE ENLUMINÉE. — No. 211 (Cahier No. 9, 1767) “Coucou, de Cayenne”.</p><p>HNO (BUFFON &amp; GUÉNEAU DE MONTBEILLARD 1779: 414). — “Le Coucou piaye”.</p><p>ORNITHOLOGIE (BRISSON 1760: 122, PLATE VIII, FIG. 2). — “Le Coucou de Cayenne”.</p><p>COMMENTS. — These specimens do not match the bird depicted in plate 211 and were likely collected in the late 1770s or 1780s. Mauduyt (1783: 637) mentions a variety of the Coucou de Cayenne, which Brisson called the ‘Petit Coucou de Cayenne’, now Piaya melanogaster (Vieillot, 1817), noting that this variety is much rarer, given the few specimens brought back to France compared to those of the Coucou de Cayenne. This suggests that by 1783, Piaya cayana was a common species imported into France, which may explain why there are two ‘Buffon’ specimens of this species in the Baillon Collection.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF1F5CC957FFCC6CA852DDFC0A13CB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Gouraud, Christophe	Gouraud, Christophe (2026): Buffon’s specimens in the Baillon ornithological collection (La Châtre, France) and their potential connection with Martinet’s Planches enluminées. Zoosystema 48 (13): 335-360, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema-2026v48a13
03EF1F5CC954FFCA6FE5537EFC4513CB.text	03EF1F5CC954FFCA6FE5537EFC4513CB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Sula leucogaster subsp. leucogaster (Boddaert 1783)	<div><p>Sula leucogaster leucogaster (Boddaert, 1783)</p><p>(Fig. 3)</p><p>SPECIMEN. — MLC.2010.0.60.</p><p>INSCRIPTIONS UNDER THE PEDESTAL (Fig. 3B). — “ Sula communis / fou commun, Buff[on]. / fou proprement dit, Morus sula, Vieill [ot]. / Pelecanus sula Lath [am]. &amp; Gme[lin]; / de Cayenne, donné par le Museum”.</p><p>PLANCHE ENLUMINÉE (Fig. 4). — No. 973 (Cahier No. 41, October 1779) “Le Fou, de Cayenne».</p><p>HNO (BUFFON &amp; GUÉNEAU DE MONTBEILLARD 1781: 374). — “Le Petit Fou”.</p><p>ORNITHOLOGIE (BRISSON 1759 - 1762). — Not mentioned.</p><p>COMMENTS. — The inscriptions under the pedestal of this specimen do not indicate a direct link between Buffon and Baillon but simply state that the bird was donated by the MNHN. The specimen has its plumage identical to that of the bird depicted in plate 973 (i.e., adult), and the provenance (Cayenne) matches with both HNO and the plate. As we have seen, by the late 18th century and into at least the first decade of the following century, the MNHN had parted with a large number of old specimens. Therefore, it is entirely possible that this specimen dates from the Buffon era. It could have been the bird used by Martinet and, consequently, may be the holotype of Pelecanus leucogaster Boddaert, 1783 .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF1F5CC954FFCA6FE5537EFC4513CB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Gouraud, Christophe	Gouraud, Christophe (2026): Buffon’s specimens in the Baillon ornithological collection (La Châtre, France) and their potential connection with Martinet’s Planches enluminées. Zoosystema 48 (13): 335-360, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema-2026v48a13
03EF1F5CC952FFC86FF952BEFECD130E.text	03EF1F5CC952FFC86FF952BEFECD130E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ixobrychus exilis subsp. erythromelas (Vieillot 1817)	<div><p>Ixobrychus exilis erythromelas (Vieillot, 1817)</p><p>(Fig. 5)</p><p>SPECIMEN. — MLC.2010.0.124.</p><p>INSCRIPTIONS UNDER THE PEDESTAL (Fig. 5B). — “ Ardea exilis, Wils [on] = Wagler. / ardea erithromelas, Vieill[ot]. / heron Rouge et noir, azara / Cayenne / donné à mon père par m. de Buffon / En 1778.”.</p><p>PLANCHE ENLUMINÉE. — No plate.</p><p>HNO (BUFFON &amp; GUÉNEAU DE MONTBEILLARD 1780: 402). — “Le Crabier Pourpré”?</p><p>ORNITHOLOGIE (Brisson 1762a: 418). — “Le Héron Pourpré du Mexique ”?</p><p>COMMENTS. — This specimen is the only one among the ‘Buffon’ specimens for which a date is mentioned (i.e., 1778). The bird was therefore collected before December 31, 1778. Buffon and Guéneau de Montbeillard only treat herons in volume VII, published in 1780, two years after this specimen was sent to Emmanuel Baillon. None of the Ardeidae Leach, 1820 depicted in the Planches enluminées correspond to this specimen. The closest description found in HNO is that of the Crabier Pourpré and that of the Héron Pourpré du Mexique in Brisson’s Ornithologie, although the provenance does not match the Baillon specimen. Sharpe &amp; Ogilvie-Grant (1898: 231) also question the correspondence of the birds described by Buffon and Guéneau de Montbeillard, as well as Brisson, with Ixobrychus exilis (Gmelin, 1789) .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF1F5CC952FFC86FF952BEFECD130E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Gouraud, Christophe	Gouraud, Christophe (2026): Buffon’s specimens in the Baillon ornithological collection (La Châtre, France) and their potential connection with Martinet’s Planches enluminées. Zoosystema 48 (13): 335-360, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema-2026v48a13
03EF1F5CC951FFC86E33531EFC0113CB.text	03EF1F5CC951FFC86E33531EFC0113CB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Capito niger (STATIUS MuLLER 1776)	<div><p>Capito niger (Statius Müller, 1776)</p><p>(Fig. 6)</p><p>SPECIMEN. — MLC.2011.0.1257.</p><p>INSCRIPTIONS UNDER THE PEDESTAL (Fig. 6B). — “Barbion / gorge Rouge / Micropogon / cayanensis, Tem [minck] / Bucco cayanensis Lath [am] / Cayenne / m. de Buffon”.</p><p>PLANCHE ENLUMINÉE. — No. 206 fig. 1 (Cahier No. 9, 1767) “Barbu, de Cayenne”.</p><p>HNO (BUFFON &amp; GUÉNEAU DE MONTBEILLARD 1780: 96). — “Le Tamatia à tÊte &amp; gorge rouges”.</p><p>ORNITHOLOGIE (Brisson 1760: 95, PLATE VII, FIG. 1). — “Le Barbu de Cayenne”.</p><p>COMMENTS. — The resemblance of this specimen (male) with plate 206, fig. 1 (male) is not striking (with differences such as the beak shape, among others). This specimen was most likely collected after 1770.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF1F5CC951FFC86E33531EFC0113CB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Gouraud, Christophe	Gouraud, Christophe (2026): Buffon’s specimens in the Baillon ornithological collection (La Châtre, France) and their potential connection with Martinet’s Planches enluminées. Zoosystema 48 (13): 335-360, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema-2026v48a13
03EF1F5CC950FFD66F9C53EFFC4013CB.text	03EF1F5CC950FFD66F9C53EFFC4013CB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Campephilus rubricollis subsp. rubricollis (Boddaert 1783)	<div><p>Campephilus rubricollis rubricollis (Boddaert, 1783)</p><p>(Fig. 7)</p><p>SPECIMEN. — MLC.2011.0.1323.</p><p>INSCRIPTIONS UNDER THE PEDESTAL (Fig. 7B). — “Pic à cou roug[e] / Buff[on]. Vieill[ot]. / picus Rubricollis, Lath [am] / Wagler. / femelle / de Cayenne, donnée à mon / père m. de / Buffon”.</p><p>PLANCHE ENLUMINÉE (Fig. 8). — No. 612 (Cahier No. 26, 1773- 1774) “Grand Pic hupé à tÊte rouge, de Cayenne”.</p><p>HNO (BUFFON &amp; GUÉNEAU DE MONTBEILLARD 1780: 53). — “Le Pic à cou rouge”.</p><p>ORNITHOLOGIE (BRISSON 1759 - 1762). — Not mentioned.</p><p>COMMENTS. — By its posture, the crested appearance of the crown, the position of the wings and tail, the colours, and the sex, this specimen (female) is very close to the bird depicted on plate 612 (female). It could therefore have been the bird used by Martinet and, consequently, be a syntype of Picus rubricollis Boddaert, 1783 . A type series is here justified because Boddaert also refers to the Red-necked Woodpecker of Latham (1782: 558), who himself not only refers to Buffon and Guéneau de Montbeillard’s text and plate 612, but also to a specimen from the Leverian Museum (said to also come from Cayenne).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF1F5CC950FFD66F9C53EFFC4013CB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Gouraud, Christophe	Gouraud, Christophe (2026): Buffon’s specimens in the Baillon ornithological collection (La Châtre, France) and their potential connection with Martinet’s Planches enluminées. Zoosystema 48 (13): 335-360, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema-2026v48a13
03EF1F5CC94EFFD46FE3537EFC7E13C6.text	03EF1F5CC94EFFD46FE3537EFC7E13C6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Piculus flavigula subsp. flavigula (Boddaert 1783)	<div><p>Piculus flavigula flavigula (Boddaert, 1783)</p><p>(Fig. 9)</p><p>SPECIMEN. — MLC.2011.0.1301.</p><p>INSCRIPTIONS UNDER THE PEDESTAL (Fig. 9B). — “ Picus / icterocephalus. / Wagler. / Male / de Cayenne, donné / par le Museum”.</p><p>PLANCHE ENLUMINÉE (Fig. 10). — No. 784 (Cahier No. 33, 1777) “Pic à gorge jaune, de Cayenne”.</p><p>HNO (BUFFON &amp; GUÉNEAU DE MONTBEILLARD 1780: 37). — “Le Petit Pic à gorge jaune”.</p><p>ORNITHOLOGIE (Brisson 1759 - 1762). — Not mentioned.</p><p>COMMENTS. — The inscriptions under the pedestal of this specimen do not mention a direct link between Buffon and Baillon but simply state that the bird was donated by the MNHN. However, the sex (male) and the provenance (Cayenne) align with the plate, and the posture of the specimen is very similar to that of the bird depicted on plate 784: both are looking up and to the right. As we have seen, by the end of the 18th century and at least into the first decade of the following century, the MNHN had parted with a large number of old specimens. Therefore, it is entirely possible that this specimen dates from the Buffon era and that it was used by Martinet. As a result, it could well be the holotype of Picus flavigula Boddaert, 1783 . Boddaert also refers to the yellow-headed Woodpecker of Latham (1782: 595), but Latham refers to Buffon and Guéneau de Montbeillard’s text and plate 784, hence no type series involved here, but a single specimen.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF1F5CC94EFFD46FE3537EFC7E13C6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Gouraud, Christophe	Gouraud, Christophe (2026): Buffon’s specimens in the Baillon ornithological collection (La Châtre, France) and their potential connection with Martinet’s Planches enluminées. Zoosystema 48 (13): 335-360, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema-2026v48a13
03EF1F5CC94CFFD26FEB52BEFE0012FC.text	03EF1F5CC94CFFD26FEB52BEFE0012FC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Falco femoralis subsp. femoralis Temminck 1822	<div><p>Falco femoralis femoralis Temminck, 1822</p><p>(Fig. 11)</p><p>SPECIMEN. — MLC.2011.0.749.</p><p>INSCRIPTIONS UNDER THE PEDESTAL (Fig. 11B). — “faucon orangé. / f[aucon]. a poitrine orangée, Vieill[ot] / hobreau orangé, Sonnini / Falco aurantius, Lath [am]. / faucon à culotte orange / Rousse. Falco / femoralis, Temm [inck]. pl[anche]. 343 / de Cayenne / donné à mon père / par m. de Buffon”.</p><p>PLANCHE ENLUMINÉE. — No plate.</p><p>HNO (BUFFON &amp; GUÉNEAU DE MONTBEILLARD 1771 - 1783). — Not mentioned.</p><p>ORNITHOLOGIE (BRISSON 1759 - 1762). — Not mentioned.</p><p>COMMENTS. — This species was only described in 1822, which supports the idea that neither Brisson nor Buffon and Guéneau de Montbeillard had any specimens at their disposal. In Buffon’s case, diurnal birds of prey are treated as early as the first volume, published in 1771. It is highly likely that the first specimen of this species did not reach Buffon’s hands until after the publication of the HNO volume dealing with diurnal raptors, i.e., the very first volume, which was published in 1771 (though, as we have seen, the text was ready in 1770).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF1F5CC94CFFD26FEB52BEFE0012FC	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Gouraud, Christophe	Gouraud, Christophe (2026): Buffon’s specimens in the Baillon ornithological collection (La Châtre, France) and their potential connection with Martinet’s Planches enluminées. Zoosystema 48 (13): 335-360, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema-2026v48a13
03EF1F5CC94BFFD26F9A537DFC6113CA.text	03EF1F5CC94BFFD26F9A537DFC6113CA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Brotogeris chrysoptera subsp. chrysoptera (Linnaeus 1766)	<div><p>Brotogeris chrysoptera chrysoptera (Linnaeus, 1766)</p><p>(Fig. 12)</p><p>SPECIMEN. — MLC.2011.0.1197.</p><p>INSCRIPTIONS UNDER THE PEDESTAL (Fig. 12B). — “Perruche / aux ailes d’or / Buff[on]. / Psittacus chrysop- / -terus, Lath[am]. / donné à mon père / par m. de / Buffon”.</p><p>PLANCHE ENLUMINÉE. — No plate.</p><p>HNO (BUFFON &amp; GUÉNEAU DE MONTBEILLARD 1779: 170). — “La Perruche aux ailes d’or”.</p><p>ORNITHOLOGIE (Brisson 1762b: 130). — “La Petite Perruche aux ailes d’or”.</p><p>COMMENTS. — Both Brisson and Buffon &amp; Guéneau de Montbeillard based their descriptions on La Perrique aux Ailes d’Or (Golden-winged Parrakeet) of Edwards (1760: 177), which suggests that neither of them had a specimen available when preparing their respective works. The Baillon specimen was most likely collected after 1779.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF1F5CC94BFFD26F9A537DFC6113CA	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Gouraud, Christophe	Gouraud, Christophe (2026): Buffon’s specimens in the Baillon ornithological collection (La Châtre, France) and their potential connection with Martinet’s Planches enluminées. Zoosystema 48 (13): 335-360, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema-2026v48a13
03EF1F5CC94AFFD16FC952BEFE1E13CA.text	03EF1F5CC94AFFD16FC952BEFE1E13CA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Rupicola peruvianus (LATHAM 1790)	<div><p>Rupicola peruvianus (Latham, 1790)</p><p>(Fig. 13)</p><p>SPECIMEN. — MLC.2011.0.170.</p><p>INSCRIPTIONS UNDER THE BASE (Fig. 13B) [written in a handwritting different from that of Baillon son]. — “Gallus ferus / Upupa americana / pipra Péruviana . (Linné) / Coq de Roche du Pérou. / mâle / donné à M. Baillon / par Mr. de Buffon”.</p><p>PLANCHE ENLUMINÉE (Fig. 14). — No. 745 (Cahier No. 32, 1776- 1777) “Coq-de-roche, du Perou ”.</p><p>HNO (BUFFON &amp; GUÉNEAU DE MONTBEILLARD 1778: 437). — “Le Coq de Roche du Pérou ”.</p><p>ORNITHOLOGIE (BRISSON 1759 - 1762). — Not mentioned.</p><p>COMMENTS. — This specimen (male) and the bird depicted on plate 745 (male) – holotype of Pipra peruviana Latham, 1790 – are quite similar.However, according to Mauduyt de la Varenne (1783: 622), the bird used by Martinet for the drawing of plate 745 was sent to him by Pedro Franco Dávila, then director of the Natural History Museum of Madrid, to be prepared with the intention of being exhibited in the galleries of the Madrid museum. After being mounted by Mauduyt de la Varenne, the bird would have been studied by Martinet before being sent back to Madrid. If this is the case, the Baillon specimen cannot be the bird depicted on plate 745. The Madrid collections do not currently have any pre-1800 specimens (Steinheimer 2005), with the possible exception of Struthio camelus eggs (Josephina Barreiro Rodríguez in litt. November 17, 2022), and no bird from the Dávila collection seems to have survived (Roselaar 2003). In 1767, Dávila’s ornithological collection was poor (only a few specimens) and did not include any Rupicola (Dávila 1767: 490-491) . Since plate 745 was only published ten years later, it can be assumed that Dávila acquired this species between 1767 and 1776. Unverifiable but not excluded,Dávila could have sent several specimens to Mauduyt de la Varenne, so that he could keep one or two as a token of appreciation and send the rest, mounted, back to Spain. Assuming that the Baillon specimen is not the bird depicted by Martinet, which indeed seems to be the case, it is reasonable to think that it was collected after the publication of the Planche enluminée and the accompanying text, i.e., after 1778. A collect during Charles-Nicolas-Sigisbert Sonnini de Manoncourt’s (1751-1812) expedition to western French Guiana, up to the Rio Negro, in 1773-1774 seems unlikely, especially since this exploration does not appear to have gone far enough west to encounter this species. Likewise, a collection by Joseph de Jussieu (1704-1779) during his long stay in Peru and Ecuador is excluded, as he left this country in October 1770, having lost his collections (Judde 2005: 74). Among the possible origins of the Baillon specimen is the trip to Peru by French naturalist Joseph Dombey (1742- 1794), along with Spanish Hipólito Ruiz López (1754-1816) and José Antonio Pavón (1754-1840), between 1777 and 1785. These travelers explored regions to the east of Lima where this cotinga could have been collected or purchased at a local market, either in Tarma between May 1779 and January 1780, or in Huánuco between April 1780 and March 1781 (Lang 1985). Although this expedition was primarily focused on botany (Pinault Sørensen 2005: 51), it cannot be excluded that some animals, including brightly colored birds such as a male Rupicola peruvianus, were acquired to be brought back to France. Finally, since Dávila held his position as director of the Madrid Natural History Museum until his death in 1786, it cannot be ruled out that he received specimens from Peru between 1778 and 1786 and sent a few examples to his former colleagues in Paris.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF1F5CC94AFFD16FC952BEFE1E13CA	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Gouraud, Christophe	Gouraud, Christophe (2026): Buffon’s specimens in the Baillon ornithological collection (La Châtre, France) and their potential connection with Martinet’s Planches enluminées. Zoosystema 48 (13): 335-360, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema-2026v48a13
03EF1F5CC948FFDE6C47511CFEE11671.text	03EF1F5CC948FFDE6C47511CFEE11671.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Icterus cayanensis subsp. cayanensis (Linnaeus 1766)	<div><p>Icterus cayanensis cayanensis (Linnaeus, 1766)</p><p>(Fig. 15)</p><p>SPECIMEN. — MLC.2011.0.2111.</p><p>INSCRIPTIONS UNDER THE BASE (Fig. 15B) (torn label). — “[Psarocolius] / [Ch]rysopterus, Wagler / [X] cayennensis Lath[am] / Cayenne, donné / à mon père par / M. de Buffon”.</p><p>PLANCHE ENLUMINÉE. — No. 535 fig. 2 (Cahier No. 23, July 1772) “Carouge de l’Isle St. Thomas”.</p><p>HNO (BUFFON &amp; GUÉNEAU DE MONTBEILLARD 1775: 248 in the text). — “Le carouge de l’isle St. Thomas”.</p><p>ORNITHOLOGIE (BRISSON 1759 B: 123, PLATE IX FIG. 2). — “Le Carouge de Cayenne”.</p><p>COMMENTS. — This specimen and the one depicted by Martinet do not resemble each other, and their provenances are different (Cayenne for the Baillon specimen vs Saint Thomas for the bird on plate 535 fig. 2). Its posture is quite similar to the figure in Brisson, but a pre-1760 collection is, here, quite unlikely.</p><p>REMARK</p><p>As we have seen, certain factors can make it difficult (if not impossible) to link for certainty a specimen as a model for a Planche enluminée. Therefore, the conclusions drawn from comparing a Planche enluminée with a ‘Buffon’ specimen – hence a potential type (ICZN 1999: Art. 12.2.7) – must be made with caution. In reality, only a handwritten note from Buffon or from his contemporaries, accompanying a specimen and stating that it is the bird used for the depiction on the plate, would allow us to assert with (almost) certainty that this specimen is indeed the one used as the model for the Planche enluminée.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF1F5CC948FFDE6C47511CFEE11671	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Gouraud, Christophe	Gouraud, Christophe (2026): Buffon’s specimens in the Baillon ornithological collection (La Châtre, France) and their potential connection with Martinet’s Planches enluminées. Zoosystema 48 (13): 335-360, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema-2026v48a13
