identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03D087DF991FFF8EFE22FC01FD136075.text	03D087DF991FFF8EFE22FC01FD136075.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Anatoliacampa pax Sendra & Mehrafrooz 2026	<div><p>Anatoliacampa pax Sendra &amp; Mehrafrooz sp. nov.</p><p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 2F134DDB-AFE1-4B24-AB32-E1926A8AE2E2</p><p>Figs 1F, 2–7, 10, Table 1–2</p><p>Diagnosis</p><p>Body robust, length 4−6 mm; epicuticle is smooth; 32–38 antennomeres; cupuliform organ with about 10 complex olfactory chemoreceptors compounded by a central column surrounded by a spiral fold of 5–6 turns; pronotum with 1+1 ma, 2+2−4+4 la 1−4, 2+2 lp 2, 3 macrosetae; mesonotum with 1+1 ma, 2+2 la 2−3, 2+2 lp 2−3, 1+1 mp and 1+1 ma, 1+1 la, 2+2 lp 2−3, 1+1 mp long macrosetae; metathoracic legs reach the eighth abdominal segment; tibia is 1.1–1.3 times as long as the femur or tarsus; femora II–III have 3 long dorsal macrosetae; tibia II–III with 3−2 ventral macrosetae; calcars with long barbs almost all over; end part of the tarsus has two dorsal and one lateral long robust pubescens setae; claws are similar in size, both with large lateral crests; lateral processes have a basal laminar boarder that narrows along the distal half and all borders prolongated in long fringes; 1+1 post1 macrosetae on I–III urotergites, 1+1 la 1, 3+3 post1–3 macrosetae on IV urotergite, 1+1 la 1, 5+5 post 1−5 macrosetae on V urotergite; 2+2−3+3 la 1−3, 5+5 post 1−5 macrosetae on VI−VII urotergites, 7+7−8+8 post macrosetae on VIII urotergites and 11+11 post macrosetae on IX abdominal segment; urosternite I with 10+10−13+13 well-barbed macrosetae; urosternites II–VII with 7+7 macrosetae, urosternite VIII with 2+2 macrosetae; the stylus setae are well barbed with almost complete thin barbs; female urosternite I with subcylindrical appendages, each with 26 glandular a 1 setae and male with larger subcylindrical appendages with up to 34 glandular setae a 1.</p><p>Etymology</p><p>The specific epithet ‘ pax ’ is a Latin noun meaning ‘peace’. It is used here as a noun in apposition and does not change to agree in gender with the genus name. The name is intended as a symbolic tribute to peace, reflecting a personal aspiration for harmony in both nature and society; and a relevant desire in these times of war in the area studied.</p><p>Type material</p><p>Holotype IRAN • ♀; Moghan Cave, Moghan village, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=59.368332&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=36.116386" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 59.368332/lat 36.116386)">Mashhad City</a>, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=59.368332&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=36.116386" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 59.368332/lat 36.116386)">Razavi Khorasan Province</a>; 36°06ʹ59ʺ N, 59°22ʹ06ʺ E; 2193 m a.s.l.; 29 Jul. 2024; Mahmood Mehrafrooz Mayvan leg.; ZMFUM-MoAn101IR.</p><p>Paratypes IRAN • 1 ♂; Moghan Cave, Moghan village, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=59.368332&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=36.116386" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 59.368332/lat 36.116386)">Mashhad City</a>, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=59.368332&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=36.116386" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 59.368332/lat 36.116386)">Razavi Khorasan province</a>; 36°06ʹ59ʺ N, 59°22ʹ06ʺ E; 2193 m a.s.l.; 29 Jul. 2024; Mahmood Mehrafrooz Mayvan leg; ZMFUM-MoAn104IR . • 1 ♂; same collection data as for holotype; ZMFUM-MoAn102IR • 1 ♂; same collection data as for holotype; ZMFUM-MoAn103IR . • 1 ♂; same collection data as for holotype; MUVHN-ZE6928 • 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; MUVHN-ZE6976 • 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; MCNB-2025-7270 • 1 ♂; same collection data as for holotype; MCNB-2025-7271 • 1 ♂ same collection data as for holotype; UPJŠ-01-25 • ♂ same collection data as for holotype; UPJŠ-02-25 .</p><p>Other studied material</p><p>IRAN • 2 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀; Moghan Cave, Moghan village, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=59.368332&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=36.116386" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 59.368332/lat 36.116386)">Mashhad City</a>, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=59.368332&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=36.116386" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 59.368332/lat 36.116386)">Razavi Khorasan Province</a>, 36°06ʹ59ʺ N, 59°22ʹ06ʺ E, 2193 m a.s.l.; 29 Jul. 2024; Mahmood Mehrafrooz Mayvan leg. ; AS coll. Used for scanning electron microscopy.</p><p>Taxa description</p><p>BODY. Body length 4−5 mm in males, 5.1−6 mm in females, and 3.1 mm in a juvenile (Fig. 1F). The epicuticle is smooth even under high magnifications (Fig. 4 A−C); body robust and covered by clothing setae with thin barbs along half to one-third distal portion.</p><p>HEAD. Antennae have 32–38 antennomeres in intact adult antennae, and 28 antennomeres in a female juvenile; antennae ~0.88−0.80 times as long as the body’s length, with medial antennomeres 1.5 times as long as wide and apical antennomere more than two times as long as wide. Two types of gouge sensilla and glandular setae cover the last antennomere: numerous long and slim gouge sensilla, scarce large and thick gouge sensilla, and an apical whorl of glandular setae around the cupuliform organ (Fig. 2 C−D). The cupuliform organ occupies ¹⁄ 11 of total length in the last antennomere and has about 10 complex olfactory chemoreceptors compounded by a central column surrounded by a spiral fold of five to six turns (Fig. 2 A−B). The distal and central antennomeres have three whorls of slightly barbed macrosetae, in addition to smooth, thin setae. They also have a distal whorl of 12−14 long, slim gouge sensilla (38– 50 µm long) (Fig. 2 E−F). The proximal antennomeres have typical trichobothria, plus a small bacilliform sensillum on the third antennomere in ventral position. The frontal process has a slightly protrusion with one distal smooth macroseta, plus three shorter macrosetae with a few distal barbs; the three-insertion line macrosetae and x macrosetae bear a few distal barbs, and their length ratios are: a/i/p/x 43/49/41/62, respectively, in the holotype; occiput of the dorsal head with 3+3 ma, la, lp macrosetae bears a few distal barbs. The labial palps are large and suboval with large coniform latero-external sensillum, two guard setae, up to fourteen setae on anterior border, and up to 100 neuroglandular setae in the holotype.</p><p>THORAX. Thoracic macroseta distribution: pronotum with 1+1 ma, 2+2−4+4 la 1–4, 2+2 lp 2−3 macrosetae; mesonotum with 1+1 ma, 2+2 la 2−3, 2+2 lp 2−3, 1+1 mp and 1+1 ma, 1+1 la, 2+2 lp 2−3, 1+1 mp long macrosetae (Figs 3, 4 A−C). All macrosetae are long and with thin barbs along ⅔ of their basal length; marginal setae are thin and barbed along two-thirds of the distal portion and double the length of the clothing setae. The legs are slightly elongated, and the metathoracic legs reach the eighth abdominal segment. The tibia is 1.1−1.3 times as long as the femur or tarsus. Femora II–III have 3 long dorsal macrosetae, 2 in a few specimens (femora I with 2 dorsal macrosetae); tibia II−III with 3–2 ventral macrosetae (Fig. 5 A−B, D). The calcars have long barbs almost all over (Fig. 5C). The tarsus has two ventral rows of ventral setae with barbs on medial portion setae and a few setiform sensilla; the end part of the tarsus has two dorsal and one lateral long robust pubescens setae (Fig. 6 A−D). The claws are similar in size, both with large lateral crests. Lateral processes have a basal laminar boarder that narrows along the distal half and all borders prolongated in long fringes (Fig. 6 A−D).</p><p>ABDOMEN. Distribution of abdominal macrosetae on tergites: 1+1 post 1 macrosetae on I–III urotergites, 1+1 la 1, 3+3 post 1-3 macrosetae on IV urotergite, 1+1 la 1, 5+5 post 1–5 macrosetae on V urotergite; 2+2– 3+3 la 1–3, 5+5 post 1-5 macrosetae on VI –VII urotergites, 7+7−8+8 post macrosetae on VIII urotergites and 11+11 post macrosetae on IX abdominal segment (Fig. 7 A−D). All tergal abdominal macrosetae are long and well-differentiated with thin barbs along most of their length (Fig. 7 A−D). Urosternite I with 10+10−13+13 well-barbed macrosetae (Fig. 4d), urosternites II–VII with 7+7 macrosetae (Fig. 4E), urosternite VIII with 2+2 macrosetae; urosternal macrosetae barbed with thin barbs almost from the base to two-thirds. The stylus setae is well barbed with almost complete thin barbs. (Fig. 4F).</p><p>Two completed cerci with six (paratype ♂ 04) and seven (holotype) primary articles slightly longer from proximal to distal, one in addition to a basal article divided into three secondary articles, both slightly longer than the body length, 1.2 for the paratype ♂ 04 and 1.1 for holotype; primary article bears 6−12 whorls of long macrosetae with thin barbs along distal ⅓, one distal whorl of smooth setae, and one apical whorl of thin setae with thin barbs along distal ⅓.</p><p>SECONDARY SEX CHARACTERS. Female urosternite I with subcylindrical appendages, each bearing up to 26 glandular a 1 setae in a distal field. Male with larger subcylindrical appendages than the female, each bearing up to 34 glandular setae a 1 (Fig. 4D).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D087DF991FFF8EFE22FC01FD136075	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Sendra, Alberto;Mayvan, Mahmood Mehrafrooz;Selfa, Jesus;Jiménez-Valverde, Alberto;Kováč, Ľubomír	Sendra, Alberto, Mayvan, Mahmood Mehrafrooz, Selfa, Jesus, Jiménez-Valverde, Alberto, Kováč, Ľubomír (2026): A new species of an interesting cave-adapted dipluran (Diplura, Campodeidae, Plusiocampinae) from the Kopet Dagh Mountains in Iran. European Journal of Taxonomy 1034: 85-102, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2026.1034.3159, URL: https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/3159/14063
03D087DF9917FF89FF77FAE9FAAB60BB.text	03D087DF9917FF89FF77FAE9FAAB60BB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Plusiocampinae Plact 1957	<div><p>Taxonomical key of genera of Plusiocampinae (Fig. 8)</p><p>1. Pretarsal claws with lateral crests...................................................................................................... 2</p><p>– Pretarsus claws without lateral crests .............................................................................................. 14</p><p>2. Pretarsal lateral processes setiform.................................................................................................... 3</p><p>– Pretarsal lateral processes laminar..................................................................................................... 5</p><p>– Pretarsal lateral processes absent......................................................... Plutocampa Chevrizov, 1978</p><p>3. Pretarsal lateral setiform with barbs covered almost completely the whole surface....................... 12</p><p>– Pretarsal lateral process setiform and smooth ................................................................................... 4</p><p>4. 4+4 macrosetae on urosternites II–VII, 1+1 macrosetae on urosternite VIII ...................................... .................................... Condeicampa Ferguson, 1996 and Plusiocampa (?) sinensis Silvestri, 1931</p><p>– No less than 5+5 macrosetae on urosternites II–VII and 2+2 macrosetae on urosternite VIII ......................................................................................................... Plusiocampa Silvestri, 1912</p><p>5. Pretarsal lateral processes laminar with barbs or micro-barbs .......................................................... 6</p><p>– Pretarsal lateral processes laminar cut into fringes.......................................................................... 10</p><p>6. Laminar pretarsal lateral processes with barbs.................................................................................. 7</p><p>– Laminar pretarsal lateral processes with micro-bars with the appearance of pubescent surface .......................................................................................... Hubeicampa Sendra &amp; Lips, 2021</p><p>7. All nota with 2+2 lateral posterior macrosetae.................................................................................. 8</p><p>– Only pronotum with 1+1 lateral posterior macrosetae ............ Paratachycampa Wygodzinsky, 1944</p><p>8. Broad laminar pretarsal processes with abrupt narrowing in distal portion ........................................ .................................................................................................................. Patrizicampa Condé, 1955</p><p>– Broad laminar pretarsal processes with abrupt narrowing in distal portion ...................................... 9</p><p>9. Broad laminar pretarsal processes with square ending............................... Cestocampa Condé, 1955</p><p>– Broad laminar pretarsal processes gradual narrowing............................. Vandelicampa Condé, 1955</p><p>10. One dorsal macrosetae on femora, lateral posterior notal macrosetae on meso. and metanotum absent .......................................................................................................... Simlacampa Condé, 1956</p><p>– Two or three dorsal macrosetae on femora, at least 2+2 lateral posterior macrosetae on meso and metanotum ........................................................................................................................................11</p><p>11. Sternite VIII with 1+1 macrosetae; basal portion of claws covered with spiniform formations ...................................................................................... Anisuracampa Xie &amp; Yang, 1991</p><p>– Sternite VIII with 2+2-3+3 macrosetae; without spiniform formation on basal portion of claws ........................................................................... Anatoliacampa Sendra, Tusun &amp; Satar, 2022</p><p>12. Macrosetae macrosetae on meso. and metanotum absent; one dorsal macroseta on femora ................................................................................................... Cycladiacampa Sendra, 2020</p><p>– Macrosetae on meso. and metanotum present; two to five dorsal macrosetae on femora............... 13</p><p>13. Urosternite VIII with 1+1 macrosetae, two dorsal macrosetae on femora ................................................................. Whittencampa Sendra &amp; Deharveng, 2020</p><p>– Urosternite VIII with 2+2 macrosetae; five dorsal macrosetae on femora .......................................... ............................................................................................................. Hystrichocampa Condé, 1948</p><p>14. Claws simple; pretarsal lateral processes absent, medial-intermediate and lateral-intermediate macrosetae on mesonotum and metanotum present ............................... Silvestricampa Condé, 1950</p><p>– Claws with sharp side-shoot; pretarsal lateral processes laminar, medial posterior macrosetae on mesonotum and metanotum absent ..................................... Turkmenocampa Sendra &amp; Stoev, 2017</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D087DF9917FF89FF77FAE9FAAB60BB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Sendra, Alberto;Mayvan, Mahmood Mehrafrooz;Selfa, Jesus;Jiménez-Valverde, Alberto;Kováč, Ľubomír	Sendra, Alberto, Mayvan, Mahmood Mehrafrooz, Selfa, Jesus, Jiménez-Valverde, Alberto, Kováč, Ľubomír (2026): A new species of an interesting cave-adapted dipluran (Diplura, Campodeidae, Plusiocampinae) from the Kopet Dagh Mountains in Iran. European Journal of Taxonomy 1034: 85-102, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2026.1034.3159, URL: https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/3159/14063
