taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03CB2F623A10FFD99CBCF5BA5E40B222.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16718802/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16718802	FIGURE 1. Photos of Hedysarum marashicum from the field a—Habitat, b–c—habitus, d—inflorescence.	FIGURE 1. Photos of Hedysarum marashicum from the field a—Habitat, b–c—habitus, d—inflorescence.	2025-06-04	Ertuğrul, Tuğba;Fişne, Ahter;Ateş, Mevlüde Alev;Bağ, Ecem		Zenodo	biologists	Ertuğrul, Tuğba;Fişne, Ahter;Ateş, Mevlüde Alev;Bağ, Ecem			
03CB2F623A10FFD99CBCF5BA5E40B222.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16718808/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16718808	FIGURE 2. a—Hedysarum marashicum T. Ertuğrul & E. Bağ (holotype), b—H. erythroleucum Schott & Kotschy ex Boiss (T. Ertuğrul 2771).	FIGURE 2. a—Hedysarum marashicum T. Ertuğrul & E. Bağ (holotype), b—H. erythroleucum Schott & Kotschy ex Boiss (T. Ertuğrul 2771).	2025-06-04	Ertuğrul, Tuğba;Fişne, Ahter;Ateş, Mevlüde Alev;Bağ, Ecem		Zenodo	biologists	Ertuğrul, Tuğba;Fişne, Ahter;Ateş, Mevlüde Alev;Bağ, Ecem			
03CB2F623A10FFD99CBCF5BA5E40B222.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16718814/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16718814	FIGURE 3. A—Hedysarum marashicum, B—H. erythroleucum. a—lower surface of leaflets, b—upper surface of leaflets, c—bract, d—bracteol, e—calyx, f—standard, g—wing, h—keel, i—stamen, j—ovary, k—pods.	FIGURE 3. A—Hedysarum marashicum, B—H. erythroleucum. a—lower surface of leaflets, b—upper surface of leaflets, c—bract, d—bracteol, e—calyx, f—standard, g—wing, h—keel, i—stamen, j—ovary, k—pods.	2025-06-04	Ertuğrul, Tuğba;Fişne, Ahter;Ateş, Mevlüde Alev;Bağ, Ecem		Zenodo	biologists	Ertuğrul, Tuğba;Fişne, Ahter;Ateş, Mevlüde Alev;Bağ, Ecem			
03CB2F623A10FFD99CBCF5BA5E40B222.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16718818/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16718818	FIGURE 5. Pollen grains SEM micrographs of Hedysarum marashicum (a—d) and H. erythroleucum (e—h) a,e—polar view, b,f—exine ornamentation, c,g—equatorial view, d,h—exine ornamentation.	FIGURE 5. Pollen grains SEM micrographs of Hedysarum marashicum (a—d) and H. erythroleucum (e—h) a,e—polar view, b,f—exine ornamentation, c,g—equatorial view, d,h—exine ornamentation.	2025-06-04	Ertuğrul, Tuğba;Fişne, Ahter;Ateş, Mevlüde Alev;Bağ, Ecem		Zenodo	biologists	Ertuğrul, Tuğba;Fişne, Ahter;Ateş, Mevlüde Alev;Bağ, Ecem			
03CB2F623A10FFD99CBCF5BA5E40B222.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16718820/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16718820	FIGURE 6. Fruit and seed SEM micrographs of Hedysarum marashicum a—pod, b—indumentum, c—seed, d—seed-surface details.	FIGURE 6. Fruit and seed SEM micrographs of Hedysarum marashicum a—pod, b—indumentum, c—seed, d—seed-surface details.	2025-06-04	Ertuğrul, Tuğba;Fişne, Ahter;Ateş, Mevlüde Alev;Bağ, Ecem		Zenodo	biologists	Ertuğrul, Tuğba;Fişne, Ahter;Ateş, Mevlüde Alev;Bağ, Ecem			
03CB2F623A10FFD99CBCF5BA5E40B222.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16718824/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16718824	FIGURE 7. The evolutionary history obtained from the ITS gene region was inferred utilizing the Maximum Likelihood method and Bayesian approaches using the Jukes-Cantor model. The tree is rendered to scale, with branch lengths quantified by the number of substitutions per site. The outcomes of the ML analysis, along by subsequent optimization (bootstrap values from 1000 repeats) and posterior probabilities (PP) above one, are presented adjacent to the nodes and separated by slashes (bootstrap values under 50 are marked with *).	FIGURE 7. The evolutionary history obtained from the ITS gene region was inferred utilizing the Maximum Likelihood method and Bayesian approaches using the Jukes-Cantor model. The tree is rendered to scale, with branch lengths quantified by the number of substitutions per site. The outcomes of the ML analysis, along by subsequent optimization (bootstrap values from 1000 repeats) and posterior probabilities (PP) above one, are presented adjacent to the nodes and separated by slashes (bootstrap values under 50 are marked with *).	2025-06-04	Ertuğrul, Tuğba;Fişne, Ahter;Ateş, Mevlüde Alev;Bağ, Ecem		Zenodo	biologists	Ertuğrul, Tuğba;Fişne, Ahter;Ateş, Mevlüde Alev;Bağ, Ecem			
03CB2F623A10FFD99CBCF5BA5E40B222.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16718828/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16718828	FIGURE 8. The evolutionary history obtained from the trn L-F gene region was inferred utilizing the Maximum Likelihood method and Bayesian approaches using the Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano model. The tree is rendered to scale, with branch lengths quantified by the number of substitutions per site.The outcomes of the ML analysis, along by subsequent optimization (bootstrap values from 1000 repeats) and posterior probabilities (PP) above one, are presented adjacent to the nodes and separated by slashes (bootstrap values under 50 are marked with *).	FIGURE 8. The evolutionary history obtained from the trn L-F gene region was inferred utilizing the Maximum Likelihood method and Bayesian approaches using the Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano model. The tree is rendered to scale, with branch lengths quantified by the number of substitutions per site.The outcomes of the ML analysis, along by subsequent optimization (bootstrap values from 1000 repeats) and posterior probabilities (PP) above one, are presented adjacent to the nodes and separated by slashes (bootstrap values under 50 are marked with *).	2025-06-04	Ertuğrul, Tuğba;Fişne, Ahter;Ateş, Mevlüde Alev;Bağ, Ecem		Zenodo	biologists	Ertuğrul, Tuğba;Fişne, Ahter;Ateş, Mevlüde Alev;Bağ, Ecem			
