Agrophogonus Hoffman, 2005
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.675 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:88FFA67B-C2DE-43C6-ACB1-44EDCF119EBA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4332911 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/000EF212-FF92-4A15-FDEC-FCF6BB3EFABB |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Agrophogonus Hoffman, 2005 |
status |
|
Genus Agrophogonus Hoffman, 2005 View in CoL
Diagnosis (after Hoffman 2005, modified)
Small to medium-sized (length 20–40 mm) gomphodesmids. Four apical sensory cones on antennae, pore formula: 5, 7, 9–19. Terga smooth. Legs 1–7 of males with large and conspicuous subonychial pads; coxae of 6 th pair conically produced; sternum of ring 6 with elongate, apically rounded process; sterna of several postgonopodal rings with indistinct transverse carinae (apparently absent in A. pusillokiellandi sp. nov.); no paxillus on sternum 15. Side of metazona smooth, pleurosternal carinae present. No torus evident.
Gonopod aperture oval, posterior rim elevated into triangular lobes immediately behind each gonocoxa, cut down to level of sternum medially. Gonopods relatively long and slender, coxae in contact medially, without projection over base of cannula; telepodite set against coxa at a right angle, prefemur slender, nearly straight, gradually narrowed distally, without basal excavation on either side. Nodus entirely endonodal, without trace of median process M, lateral process L present or absent; inner edge of nodus produced into three or four acute projections of varying shape; postnodal telepodite relatively short, curved laterad (longer and curved in a ¾ circle in A. hamulifer sp. nov.), distally either slender and acuminate or laminately flattened, rather abruptly flexed immediately beyond nodus; prostatic groove visible over most of its length in mesal aspect.
Included species
Agrophogonus mangalisa Hoffman, 2005 View in CoL (type species)
Agrophogonus hamulifer Olsen & Enghoff View in CoL sp. nov.
Agrophogonus harrisi (Verhoeff, 1941) View in CoL
Agrophogonus kiellandi Hoffman, 2005 View in CoL
Agrophogonus mwanihana Hoffman, 2005 View in CoL
Agrophogonus pusillokiellandi Olsen & Enghoff View in CoL sp. nov.
Agrophogonus tridens Hoffman, 2005 View in CoL
Distribution
Tanzania. Two of the previously described species are known from the Udzungwa Mts, viz., A. kiellandi and A. mwanihana .
Key to species of Agrophogonus View in CoL (modified after Hoffman 2005)
1. Postnodal telepodite short, flattened, laminate (as Fig. 19 View Fig )............................................................... 2
– Postnodal telepodite mostly longer, slender, evenly attenuate to apex (as Figs 18 View Fig , 21 View Fig ).................... 3
2. Nodus with four primary dentations ( Hoffman 2005: fig. 450), not deeply constricted at base ......... .................................................................................................................. A. harrisi (Verhoeff, 1941) View in CoL
– Nodus with three primary dentations ( Fig. 19 View Fig ; Hoffman 2005: fig. 449), basally with deep constriction ......................................................................................... A. mwanihana Hoffman, 2005 View in CoL
3. Nodal process A broad, apically tridentate; ectal nodal surface distinctly convex; processes B and C robust, subequal in size and shape ( Hoffman 2005: fig. 453)..................... A. tridens Hoffman, 2005 View in CoL
– Nodal process A acute and spiniform; ectal nodal surface flattened (in mesal aspect, Hoffman 2005: fig. 451).............................................................................................................................................. 4
4. Nodal process A with a small, bifid accessory process at base on lateral side ( Hoffman 2005: figs 456–457, see remark to A. mwanihana View in CoL , below) ............................. A. mangalisa Hoffman, 2005 View in CoL
– Nodal process A without an accessory basal process on lateral side ................................................. 5
5. Postnodal telepodite relatively short, curved abruptly dorsad, almost perpendicular to prefemoral region ................................................................................................................................................. 6
– Postnodal telepodite long, evenly curved dorsad, appearing hook-like ( Fig. 18 View Fig ) ............................... ............................................................................................... A. hamulifer Olsen & Enghoff View in CoL sp. nov.
6. Width 8.7 mm. Nodal process C very long, slender and curved ( Hoffman 2005: fig. 451) ................ ................................................................................................................. A. kiellandi Hoffman, 2005 View in CoL
– Width 4.1 mm ( Figs 19–20 View Fig View Fig ). Nodal process C shorter and less curved ( Fig. 21 View Fig )................................ ..................................................................................... A. pusillokiellandi Olsen & Enghoff View in CoL sp. nov.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Gomphodesminae |
Agrophogonus Hoffman, 2005
Olsen, Sissel Anna, Rosenmejer, Trine & Enghoff, Henrik 2020 |
Agrophogonus hamulifer Olsen & Enghoff
Olsen & Rosenmejer & Enghoff 2020 |
Agrophogonus pusillokiellandi Olsen & Enghoff
Olsen & Rosenmejer & Enghoff 2020 |
Agrophogonus mangalisa
Hoffman 2005 |
Agrophogonus kiellandi
Hoffman 2005 |
Agrophogonus mwanihana Hoffman, 2005
Hoffmann 2005 |
Agrophogonus tridens
Hoffman 2005 |