Prolachesilla casasolaoides, Arango, Stephania Sandoval, Obando, Ranulfo González & Aldrete, Alfonso Neri García, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4244.3.11 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:787B0CB6-9B19-4ED2-A069-D5DC5EF4D609 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6020796 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/002EF33D-FFF9-FF91-FF2C-9B8760F9FAC5 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Prolachesilla casasolaoides |
status |
sp. nov. |
Prolachesilla casasolaoides View in CoL n. sp. Male
( Figs 16–20 View FIGURES 16 – 20 )
Diagnosis. Differing from P. casasolai n. sp., in having the phallosome with one body of endophallic denticles and in having the external parameres shorter, broader, with spiny apices shorter, curved outwards ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 16 – 20 ). Arms of the aedeagal arch shorter than in P. casasolai ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 16 – 20 ); posterior border of the hypandrium similarly biconcave, but the postero-lateral corners are distinctly rounded ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 16 – 20 ). Clunial projection over the area of the epiproct wider and deeper than in P. casasolai ; projections over the area of the paraprocts larger than in P. casasolai ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 16 – 20 ). Differing from all the other species of Prolachesilla in the arrangement of the endophallic denticles and in the shape of the posterior border of the hypandrium.
Color. Body tawny brown, compound eyes black, legs pale brown, forewings pale yellow, hindwings hyaline, almost transparent ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 16 – 20 ). Tergal lobes of meso- and metathorax pale brown, abdomen creamy with pale brown subcuticular, transverse bands.
Morphology. As in diagnosis plus the following: Head vertex almost straight, slightly below the level of the upper borders of the compound eyes, these large, prominent ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 16 – 20 ). Forewing L/W: 2.53 ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 16 – 20 ). Forewing pterostigma elongate, wider distally, lp/wp: 3.09, without setae in the membrane. Areola postica triangular ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 16 – 20 ). Hindwing L/W: 2.89 ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 16 – 20 ). Hypandrium ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 16 – 20 ) and phallosome ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 16 – 20 ) as in diagnosis ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 16 – 20 ). Paraprocts ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 16 – 20 ), oval; sensory fields with 15 trichobothria on basal rosettes. Epiproct ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 16 – 20 ), almost trapeziform, slightly rounded posteriorly, setae as illustrated.
Measurements (in microns). FW: 2625, HW: 2025, F: 625, T: 1025, t1: 400, t2: 125, ctt1: 22, Mx 4: 160, f1: 560, f2: 440, f3: 340, f4: 270, f5: 170, f6: 150, f7: 140, f8: 140, f9: 125, f10: 120, f11: 120, IO: 360, D: 180, d: 130, IO/d: 2.77, PO: 0.72.
Specimens studied. Holotype male. MEXICO . Oaxaca. Sierra Juárez . Santa Catarina Lachatao, “ Las Vigas ”, 17°11’17”N: 96°27’13.5”W, 2790 m., 27.VIII.2013, beating shrubs with dead, hanging leaves, J. A. Casasola González.
Etymology. The specific name refers to the similarity with P. casasolai n. sp., both species are sympatric, found in the same biotope, date and locality.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |