Nesticus stupkai Gertsch, 1984
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1145.96724 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:830628C2-76CD-4641-BFC6-144CD775ED6B |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/003F02A4-CD81-5C15-A6E9-C578CB406311 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Nesticus stupkai Gertsch, 1984 |
status |
|
Nesticus stupkai Gertsch, 1984 View in CoL View at ENA
Fig. 62A-I View Figure 62
Nesticus stupkai Gertsch, 1984: 31, figs 71-74, 106-108; Reeves 2000: 338.
Material examined.
Type material: Holotype: USA - Tennessee, Blount Co. • ♂ holotype; White Oak Sinks, Great Smoky Mountains National Park ; 21 Jul. 1937; A. Stupka leg; AMNH; New collections from near type locality: - Blount Co. • ♀; Great Smoky Mountains NP, White Oak Sinks, Blowhole; 21 Aug. 1992; M. Hedin leg. Non type material: - Blount Co. • 6♂, 9♀; Blowing Cave, NE Townsend, off Hwy 321; 22 Sep. 1992; M. Hedin, S. O’Kane leg.; • ♀; Great Smoky Mountains NP, Little River at Mile 40 of Hwy 73; 35.6688°N, - 83.6827°W; 22 Aug. 1992; M. Hedin leg.; - Loudon Co. • ♂, 4♀, 16 imm; Benjos Cave , TLN11; 30 Aug. 2014; M.L. Niemiller, C.D.R. Stephen, E.T. Carter leg.; MLN 14-044.17. GoogleMaps
Diagnosis.
See Diagnosis of Nesticus bishopi for details on shared male morphology. Females are likewise similar to N. bishopi , with a narrowing median septum with posterior bars that form an anchor shape, directed upwards and outwards, spermathecae lying lateral to these bars at approximately the same angle (compare Fig. 61A-H View Figure 61 . to Fig. 62D-I View Figure 62 ). Without knowledge of geographic origin, we cannot distinguish epigynal morphologies of these two species.
Females of Nesticus stupkai and N. bishopi can be distinguished from the closely related N. reclusus by the outwards oriented dorsal epigynal plates in the former (Figs 61A-H View Figure 61 , 62D-I View Figure 62 ), vs. the inwards oriented dorsal epigynal plates in the latter (Fig. 65A-F View Figure 65 ).
Variation.
Males and females from different populations share very similar genitalic morphologies (Fig. 62A-C View Figure 62 ).
Distribution and natural history.
With a distribution similar to Nesticus barrowsi , from cave entrances in karst windows along the northwestern edge of Great Smoky Mountains National Park (Fig. 53 View Figure 53 ), and nearby surface (boulderfield) habitats. We include a new important western record from Benjos Cave, southwest of Knoxville in the Tennessee River Valley.
As an example of natural history, specimens from Blowing Cave were collected from a cave entrance, while those from Little River were collected from beneath rockpiles directly adjacent to a stream.
Reeves (2000) reported Nesticus stupkai in sympatry with N. barrowsi at two cave locations in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, and we collected this taxon pair in near sympatry in the White Oak Sinks, with N. barrowsi found in the dark zone of caves, and N. stupkai found closer to cave entrances (twilight zone). Reeves (2000) also recorded N. stupkai from Myhr Cave. We have confirmed male N. reclusus from this location (Fig. 63A View Figure 63 ). This is either a case of sympatry or an original misidentification, as females of these species can be difficult to distinguish.
Remarks.
Nesticus bishopi plus N. stupkai together form a strongly supported nuclear clade (Figs 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 ). Within this clade however N. stupkai is not monophyletic on UCE trees, with the White Oak Sinks (type) population strongly supported as more closely related to a geographically distant N. bishopi clade than to the geographically adjacent Little River plus Blowing Cave N. stupkai clade (Figs 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 ).
One possibility is that the latter clade (Little River, Blowing Cave) is not Nesticus stupkai , but a separate lineage. We have closely compared males and females from the White Oak Sinks (type) population to males and females from Blowing Cave and detect no morphological differences (Fig. 62A-C View Figure 62 ). Despite paraphyly, and as an expectation to the species criteria used in this revision, we retain N. stupkai as a distinct species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Nesticus stupkai Gertsch, 1984
Hedin, Marshal & Milne, Marc A. 2023 |
Nesticus stupkai
Gertsch 1984 |