Indohya finitima Harvey & Burger, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5342.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A6D20DA1-1C12-454E-B422-D8457CF132FE |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8323931 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7BB10C00-6DFD-4EF1-9A2B-182BF477B164 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:7BB10C00-6DFD-4EF1-9A2B-182BF477B164 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Indohya finitima Harvey & Burger |
status |
sp. nov. |
Indohya finitima Harvey & Burger , n. sp.
( Figs. 6B View FIGURE 6 , 56 View FIGURE 56 , 57 View FIGURE 57 )
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:7BB10C00-6DFD-4EF1-9A2B-182BF477B164
Material examined. Holotype adult. AUSTRALIA: Western Australia: Irvine Island , bore ID27, 16°05′37.75″S, 123°33′18.66″E, 1 June–1 August 2011, troglofauna trap, 10 m depth, J. Alexander, S. Werner ( WAM T120197 ). GoogleMaps
Diagnosis. Indohya finitima belongs to a group of Indohya species that have 12 setae on the carapace and no eyes. It differs from I. anastomosa , I. aquila and I. humphreysi by the presence of 4 setae on tergite I (only 2 setae in I. anastomosa , I. aquila and I. humphreysi ). It differs from all of the others except I. arnoldstrongi by the rounded distal teeth of the fixed chelal finger (at least 2 distal teeth pointed in I. alexanderi , I. cockingi , I. cribbi , I. damocles , I. draconis , I. jessicae , I. lynbeazleyae , I. sagmata and I. scanloni ), and differs from I. finitima by at least some of the teeth of the fixed chelal finger being pointed, whereas all teeth are rounded in I. finitima .
It also differs from all other Indohya species for which sequence data are available by a synapomorphy in COI mtDNA: at base 59 there is a substitution to G.
Description (adult). Colour ( Fig. 56 View FIGURE 56 ): carapace and pedipalps red-brown.
Setae and cuticle: setae long, mostly straight and acicular; most cuticular surfaces smooth and glossy.
Chelicera: surface smooth; hand with 6 setae, movable finger with 1 sub-medial seta, all setae acuminate; galea present, long, slender and slightly curved; fixed finger with 14 teeth, larger teeth alternating with smaller teeth; movable finger with 7 small teeth, each approximately same size; with 2 dorsal and 1 ventral lyrifissures; lamina exterior absent; rallum with 7 blades, all blades with anterior spinules, basal blade shorter than others.
Pedipalp ( Fig. 57B View FIGURE 57 ): long and slender; trochanter smooth, 2.34 ×; femur slightly broadened distally, basal third lightly granulate, without dorsal tactile seta, with 3 stout retrolateral setae near base, 5.18 ×; patella broadened distally, smooth, pedicel not strongly pronounced but basal portion slimmer than distal portion, with several small lyrifissures situated basally on dorsal surface, 3.34 ×; chela ( Fig. 57C View FIGURE 57 ): hand ovoid, with prolateral and retrolateral faces lightly granulate, chela (with pedicel) 3.51 ×, chela (without pedicel) 3.36 ×, hand (without pedicel) 1.44 × longer than broad, movable finger 1.31 × longer than hand (without pedicel). Fixed finger with 8 trichobothria, eb, esb and isb in straight row at base of finger, ib situated dorsally at the end of the chelal hand, isb at the basal end of the fixed finger, ib situated on dorsum of chelal hand, it closer to et than to est, et slightly distal to it; movable finger with 4 trichobothria, sb closer to b than to st, st situated much closer to t than to sb; ratio sb–st/sb–b = 1.40, t acuminate. Both fingers straight in lateral view. Fixed finger smooth, movable finger with several prolateral and retrolateral granulations basally. Chelal teeth ( Figs. 57D, E View FIGURE 57 ) juxtadentate, fixed finger with 65, teeth 50, 53, 56-57, 62-65 slightly pointed, 1–49, 52, 55, 58–61 rounded, movable finger with 29, low, but discernible teeth. Venom apparatus present only in movable chelal finger, venom duct long, terminating in nodus ramosus between sb and st.
Cephalothorax: carapace ( Fig. 57A View FIGURE 57 ) sub-rectangular; smooth; anterior margin slightly convex; epistome absent; lateral margins slightly convex; 1.34 × longer than broad; with 12 setae arranged 4: 0: 4: 2: 2; without furrows; eyes absent. Manducatory process distally triangular, with 2 distal setae; pedipalpal coxa with 6 additional setae. Coxa I with anterior margin not modified; chaetotaxy of coxae I–IV: 4: 5: 4: 6.
Legs: femora I and II much longer than patellae I and II, respectively; femora I and II with basal swelling; femora I and II with primary slit sensillum directed transversely; junction between anterior femora and patellae perpendicular; junction between posterior femora and patellae slightly oblique; femora III and IV much smaller than patellae III and IV, respectively; femur + patella IV 3.87 × longer than broad; metatarsi shorter than tarsi; subterminal tarsal seta acuminate; claws smooth, arolium slightly shorter than claws; arolium not divided.
Abdomen: absent.
Dimensions (mm): adult holotype ( WAM T120197 ). Body length? (damaged). Pedipalp : trochanter 0.340 / 0.145 GoogleMaps , femur 0.880 / 0.170, patella 0.685 / 0.205, chela (with pedicel) 1.370 / 0.390, chela (without pedicel) 1.31, hand (without pedicel) 0.560, movable finger length 0.735. Carapace 0.610 / 0.455 GoogleMaps . Leg IV: femur + patella 0.625 / 0.180, tibia 0.450 / 0.075, metatarsus 0.150 / 0.055, tarsus 0.360 / 0.045.
Distribution and remarks. Indohya finitima has only been collected from subterranean ecosystems on Irvine Island which is situated in the western Kimberley region ( Fig. 6B View FIGURE 6 ). The site is situated within the Northern Kimberley bioregion. The holotype is damaged and its sex cannot be determined as the abdomen is missing ( Fig. 56 View FIGURE 56 ). Nevertheless, there is sufficient morphological and molecular data to demonstrate that it is distinct from all other Indohya species. The species was previously known by WAM identification code Indohya ‘PSE197’.
Conservation assessment. Indohya finitima has been collected from subterranean habitats on Irvine Island, where the surface formations are intact. The species does not appear to meet the status of threatened using the criteria developed by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (2012).
Etymology. The specific epithet refers to the close geographic and phylogenetic relationship this species shares with I. sachsei (finitimus, Latin, adjoining, bordering, near, related) ( Brown 1956).
WAM |
Western Australian Museum |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |