Lasioglossum primavera Sakagami & Maeta, 1990
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4044.4.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AC09A256-A83D-46B7-A71D-E84B5ABFD138 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6108243 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0204411B-FFDC-C852-41C5-F903FEECFB97 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Lasioglossum primavera Sakagami & Maeta, 1990 |
status |
|
Lasioglossum primavera Sakagami & Maeta, 1990 View in CoL
Figs. 3B, 3 View FIGURE 3. A, B E, 4A
Lasioglossum (Lasioglossum) primavera Sakagami & Maeta 1990: 52 View in CoL –59 [Holotype: ELKU, ♂, type locality = Mori (370 m), Koshoku, Nagano Pref., Japan]; Sakagami & Tadauchi 1995: 187 –189 [♀♂, in a comparative notes of the description of L. ebmerianum Sakagami & Tadauchi 1995 View in CoL ], 190 [♂, illustration]; Murao & Tadauchi 2011: 365 –366 [♀♂, diagnosis]. Lasioglossum View in CoL (subgenus?) primavera: Pesenko 2006: 162 View in CoL .
Diagnosis. The female of this species is similar to L. proximatum and L. sutshanicum from eastern Asia. It is separated from both species by the integument of the supraclypeus with very weak tessellation among punctures ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3. A, B E) and T1 medially to apically with sparse punctures (IS = 7 d in maximum; Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4. A, B, E, F ). In contrast, in L. proximatum and L. sutshanicum , the integument of the supraclypeus is distinctly tessellate among punctures ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3. A, B F) and T1 is medially to apically with denser PP (IS = 1.5 d in maximum; Fig. 4B View FIGURE 4. A, B, E, F ).
Specimens examined. (n = 45) [ South Korea] GW: Bougmyong-ri, Dongsan-myon, Chunchon-gun, 1♂, 24. iv. 1992 (O. Tadauchi, ELKU), 1♂, 26. iv. 1992 (O. Tadauchi, ELKU), 2♀, 22. v. 1992 (O. Tadauchi, ELKU); 1♂, Dongsang-myon, Chunchon-gun, 16. iv. 1994 (O. Tadauchi, ELKU). GG: Kwangnung, Pochon-gun, 1♂, 23. iv. 1992 (O. Tadauchi, ELKU), 2♀ 9♂, 24. iv. 1992 (T. Saigusa & O. Tadauchi, ELKU), 2♀, 19. v. 1992 (O. Tadauchi, ELKU), 1♀, 23. v. 1992 (O. Tadauchi, ELKU); 3♂, Apiary, Gwangju, 18. iv. 1997 (H.S. Lee, QIA). JB: Simwon valley, Sannae-myon, Namweon-gun, 1♀ 1♂, 13. v. 1991 (T. Saigusa & O. Tadauchi, ELKU), 5♀ 1♂, 29. iv. 1992 (T. Saigusa, ELKU). Seoul: 1♂, Mt. Bulam-san, Gongreungdong, Nowongu, 11. v. 2008 (H.S. Lee, QIA); 1♂, Mt. Gwanak-san, Sinlimdong, 4. v. 2013 (H.S. Lee, QIA). GN: 1♀, Shinwon-ri, Unmun, Chongdo-gun, 26–27. iv. 2003 (Y. Maeta, SULE); Samjeon-ri, Macheon-myon, Hamyang-gun, 2♀, 9. v. 1991 (T. Saigusa, ELKU), 1♀ 1♂, 11. v. 1991 (T. Saigusa, ELKU), 2♀, 1. iv. 1992 (O. Tadauchi, ELKU); 5♂, Tongdosa temple, Yangsan, 10. iv. 1997 (H.S. Lee, QIA).
Distribution. South Korea, Japan, China.
Flight period in South Korea. Female and male: April to May.
Flower records in South Korea. This species has been recorded from the following at least eight plant species in five families: Asteraceae : Cornus sp.; Taraxacum sp. Caprifoliaceae : Lonicera sp.; Weigela sp. Ericaceae : Rhododendron mucronulatum Turcz. Rosaceae : Crataegus spp.; Prunus sp. Theaceae : Camellia japonica L.
Comments. According to Pesenko (2006) the systematic position of this species is unclear. Surely, this species is different from both Lasioglossum (Lasioglossum) and L. (Leuchalictus) in lacking a ventral retrorse lobe of the male genitalia, which has been lost or reduced in multiple lineages of Lasioglossum , and the unique hair tuft on the male S6. Inclusion of this species in future molecular phylogenetic analyses is needed to correctly determine its systematic position.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Lasioglossum primavera Sakagami & Maeta, 1990
Murao, Ryuki, Lee, Heung-Sik & Tadauchi, Osamu 2015 |
Lasioglossum (Lasioglossum) primavera
Murao 2011: 365 |
Pesenko 2006: 162 |
Sakagami 1995: 187 |
Sakagami 1990: 52 |