Ablabesmyia cordeiroi Neubern, 2013
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3733.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EE758378-9459-4970-8D59-5258597A0E28 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5271160 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03816D3D-FFCB-FFCC-858B-A352BDCA9086 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Ablabesmyia cordeiroi Neubern |
status |
sp. nov. |
Ablabesmyia cordeiroi Neubern sp. n.
( Figs 14 View FIGURES 14 , 15 View FIGURES 15 )
Type material. Holotype: ♂, Brazil, Amazonas, Manaus, Cueiras park ZF02, 60°06`55``W – 02°35`22``S, 14.vii.2008, C.S.N. Oliveira — LEIA GoogleMaps . Paratypes: 2 ♂♂, same data as holotype— LEIA GoogleMaps ; 4 ♂♂, same data as holotype— DZUP GoogleMaps .
Diagnostic characters. Ablabesmyia cordeiroi sp. n. differs from other species by the combination of the following characters: femora with 2 bands, middle tibia with 3 bands, m-cu towards to f-cu, R 3 apex close to C, gonostylus with 6 apical teeth, tapered megaseta, grooved aedeagal blade, dorsal lobe club-shaped with fringe, anal point absent.
Etymology. Named after Dr. Danilo Pacheco Cordeiro, in recognition for his friendship and continuous support.
Male (n = 5, unless otherwise stated): Dimensions: Total length 3.37–3.76 mm. Wing length 1.40–1.56 mm. Total length/wing length 2.34–2.41. Wing length/length of profemur 2.19–2.23.
Coloration ( Figs 14A–F View FIGURES 14 , 15A View FIGURES 15 ): wings, thorax and abdomen follow figures 14A, 14B and 14F, respectively. Legs (Fig.): P I, P III —femora with 2 bands, tibiae with 3 bands; P II —femur with 3 bands, tibia with 3 bands. Ratio of bands, related tibiae and tarsomeres 1 follow table 12. Hypopygium: gonocoxite apex and gonostylus base brown.
Head: antenna with 14 flagellomeres; AR 1.66–1.73; apical flagellomere 106–118 µm and subapical seta 28– 31 µm long; temporals 40–44; postoculars 12; coronal triangle 277–308 µm long and base 91–101 µm; clypeus bearing 27–31 setae, 86–96 µm long and 100–111 µm wide; labrum with 3 setae, 87–97 µm long and 41–48 µm wide; tentorium 157–175 µm long; cibarial pump 292–305 µm long and orifice 80–83 µm from apex; palpomeres 1–5: 40–46; 68–75; 119–134; 149–166; 239–266 µm long; palpomere 3 with sensilla capitata 29–33 µm from base.
Wing ( Fig. 14A View FIGURES 14 ): width/lenght 0.28–0.29; VR 0.73; C 1.23–1.38 mm long; Sc 0.46–0.52 mm long; m-cu 25–28 µm long and 370–412 µm from arculus; fr 504–563 µm from arculus; R 3 apex close to C; brachiolum with 3 setae; squama with 40–42 setae.
Thorax ( Fig. 14B View FIGURES 14 ): antepronotals 7–8; humerals 5; prealars 17–23; supraalar 1; scutelars 33–35.
Legs ( Fig. 14C–E View FIGURES 14 ): P I –apex of tibia 43–44 µm wide and with apical pectinated spur 57–62 µm long, spur ratio 0.61–0.65; tarsomeres 1–2 with 1 or 2 pseudospurs 55–66 µm long. P II –apex of tibia 47–50 µm wide and with 2 apical pectinated spurs 33–38 and 23–29 µm long, spurs ratio 0.57–0.60 and 0.56–0.64 respectively; tarsomeres 1–3 with 1 or 2 pseudospurs 55–67 µm long. P III –apex of tibia 46–47 µm wide and with 2 apical pectinated spurs 61–68 and 38–45 µm long, spurs ratio 0.63–0.70 and 0.66–0.80 respectively; tarsomeres 1–3 with 2 pseudospurs 65–75 µm long. Lengths and proportions of leg segments table 13.
Hypopygium ( Fig. 15A–D View FIGURES 15 ): tergite IX with 2 central setae; anal point absent; phallapodeme 47–51 µm long; sternapodeme 143–146 µm long; gonocoxite 130–145 µm long and 104–115 µm wide; gonostylus 122–135 µm long, with 6 apical teeth; tapered megaseta; HR 1.07–1.08; HV 2.68–2.79. Aedeagal complex: grooved aedeagal blade 43–48 µm long and base 11–12 µm, 9/106 µm; dorsal lobe club-shaped with fringe, 19–22 µm long and base 7–8 µm, lateral lobe and basidorsal lobe present.
Female and immatures. Unknown.
DZUP |
Universidade Federal do Parana, Colecao de Entomologia Pe. Jesus Santiago Moure |
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |