Entoloma
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.391.1.1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038187A8-0F0B-3222-BE82-FCC4B7E3FB64 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Entoloma |
status |
|
Entoloma View in CoL View at ENA subgenus Trichopilus (Romagn.) Noordel.
Comments:—Here, we emphasize that Trichopilus appears to be a taxonomic group supported by phylogenetic analysis with four genes (in this study, excluding the species with ‘Cuboid’ basidiospores) and also previously with ITS sequences ( Karstedt & Capelari 2017). Based on morphology, species with 5–6 angled basidiospores and either tibiiform or lecithiform (ampulliform) cystidia (Romagnesi & Gilles 1978, 1979, Largent 1994, Aime et al. 2010, Noordeloos & Gates 2012) phylogenetically cluster in this clade ( Fig. 2-3), corresponding to the species placed in section Trichopilus ( Noordeloos 1981) .
The species previously classified into Trichopilus , that do not share the characters above, belong in other subgenera (sections) in distinct clades. For example, those taxa with fusoid cystidia and 5–6 angled basidiospores, such as Trichopilus vividus , are placed in subgenus Inocephalus and those with ‘Cuboid’ basidiospores, as Trichopilus luteolamellatus belong to subgenus Cubospora based on phylogeny and the shape of the basidiospores ( Figs. 2, 3).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.