Systaria insolita, Dankittipakul, Pakawin & Singtripop, Tippawan, 2011
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.207104 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6185351 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038287A8-FFFD-FFE8-DCAD-FB0DB4FEFD6B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Systaria insolita |
status |
sp. nov. |
Systaria insolita View in CoL sp. nov.
Figs 26–31 View FIGURES 26 – 31
Type material. Holotype: 3, THAILAND: Chaiyaphum Province: Tard Tone National Park, 300 m, 8 December 2006, leg. P. Dankittipakul ( MHNG, Sys-04).
Paratypes: THAILAND: Phitsanulok Province: 2Ƥ, Nakhon Thai District, Phu Hin Rong Kla National Park, 800 m, rotten log, 20 November 2002, leg. P. Dankittipakul ( MHNG, Sys-05).
Diagnosis. Males of S. insolita sp. nov. can be recognized by a peculiar shape of the embolus which is rather short and stout ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 26 – 31 ) instead of elongate and filiform as in other males of Systaria , and by the beak-shaped dorsal process on the RTA ( Figs 27–29 View FIGURES 26 – 31 ). Females can be recognized by a pair of hoods on epigynal atrium ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 26 – 31 ), and by the peculiar shape of the anterior bursae ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 26 – 31 ).
Etymology. The specific epithet is a Latin adjective (insolitus,-a, -um), referring to an unusual form of the embolus.
Description. Male (holotype): Total length 7.78. Prosoma 3.54 long, 2.42 wide. Opisthosoma 4.24 long, 2.02 wide. Leg formula: 4123; I 11.12 (2.90, 1.54, 2.80, 2.50, 1.38); II 9.38 (2.74, 1.28, 2.56, 1.80, 1.00); III 8.08 (2.22, 0.84, 1.86, 2.24, 0.92); IV 11.88 (3.36, 1.04, 3.16, 3.20, 1.12). Spination. Femora I d1-1-1, p1-1-1, r0-0-1; II d1-1- 1, p1-1-1, r1-0-1; III d1-1-1, p0-1-1, r1-0-1; IV d1-1-1, p0-1-1, r1-1-1. Tibiae: I v2-2 -2; II v2-2 -1; III d0-1-0, p1-1- 1, r2-2-2, v2-2 -2; IV d0-1-0, p1-1-0, r1-1-0, v2-2 -2. Metatarsi: I v1 -0-0; II v0-1-1; III p1-1-2, r1-1-1, v1 -0-1; IV p1-1-1, r2-2-2, v1-1 -1. Eye size and interdistances: AME 0.12, ALE 0.08, PME 0.08, PLE 0.06; AME–AME 0.16, AME–ALE 0.14, PME–PME 0.22, PME–PLE 0.16, ALE–PLE 0.12; MOA 0.28 long, anterior width 0.30, posterior width 0.28.
Palp ( Figs 26–29 View FIGURES 26 – 31 ). Ventral surface of tibia with small, elevated hump ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 26 – 31 ). RTA elongated; ventral process hook-shaped, directed anteriad ( Figs 27, 29 View FIGURES 26 – 31 ); dorsal process sharply pointed, directed posteriad ( Figs 26, 29 View FIGURES 26 – 31 ). Cymbial fold partially membranous. Cymbial ridge slightly elevated. Embolus triangular, its apex short and stout; embolic base membranous. Conductor spoon-shaped.
Female (paratype, MHNG, Sys-05): Total length 10.58. Prosoma 4.82 long, 3.40 wide. Opisthosoma 5.76 long, 3.12 wide. Leg formula: 4123; I 9.48 (2.88, 1.38, 2.60, 1.70, 0.92); II 8.78 (2.66, 1.28, 2.32, 1.64, 0.88); III 8.32 (2.90, 0.88, 1.82, 1.94, 0.78); IV 12.70 (3.60, 1.32, 2.86, 3.32, 1.60). Spination. Femora: I d1-1-1, p1-1-0, r0-1-1; II d1-1-1, p0-1-1, r0-1-2; III d1-1-1, p1-0-1, r1-2; IV d1-1-1, p1-0-1, r0-0-1. Tibiae: I v2-2 -0; II v0-2-0; III p1-1-0, r0- 1-1, v2-2 -2; IV p1-1-0, r1-1-0, v2-2 -2. Metatarsi: II v1-1 -0; III p1-1-1, r1-1-1, v2 -0-2; IV p1-1-2, r1-1-2, v2-2 -2. Eye size and interdistances: AME 0.14, ALE 0.12, PME 0.10, PLE 0.10; AME–AME 0.16, AME–ALE 0.14, PME–PME 0.22, PME–PLE 0.16, ALE–PLE 0.12; MOA 0.26 long, anterior width 0.38, posterior width 0.36.
Genitalia ( Figs 30–31 View FIGURES 26 – 31 ). Epigynal atrium deep, with pair of median hoods probably functioning as guiding ridges. Copulatory orifices situated on posterior margin of epigynal atrium. Anterior bursae sclerotized, elongated, widest posteriorly, distinctly narrowed anteriorly. Spermathecae elongate-oval. Fertilization ducts acuminated.
Natural history. Types of S. insolita sp. nov. were collected from deciduous forests. The females built retreats beneath bark of a large rotten pine tree.
Distribution. Northeastern Thailand (Fig. 43).
MHNG |
Museum d'Histoire Naturelle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |