Dasymutilla bonita Mickel, 1928
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.1487.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5790FDAC-C5EE-4ED3-AECE-33C0851E956E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5086596 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0382CB48-CB3C-C20D-CEF6-FCFCFE06C490 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Dasymutilla bonita Mickel |
status |
|
Dasymutilla bonita Mickel, 1928 . U. S. Nat. Mus. Bull. 143:208. Holotype female, Bonita , Graham County, Arizona, July 12, 1917 (J. Bequaert) [UMSP] (examined).
Dasymutilla poliothrix Mickel, 1928 . U. S. Nat. Mus. Bull. 143:285. Holotype male, Nogales , Arizona, July 24, 1903 (Oslar) [CUIC] (examined).
Diagnosis of Female ( Plate C2H View PLATE 2 ). A distinguishing character for this species is that flagellomere I is long, about 2X as long as wide, and about as long as II and III united. Also, neither the antennal scrobe nor gena are carinate, the pronotum is clothed with black setae, the mesosoma is longer than broad, and possesses a scutellar scale.
Diagnosis of Male ( Plate C2I View PLATE 2 ). The male is notable in having a median pit on sternum II, but lacks an apical fringe of setae on the pygidium. Also, the tegula of this species is impunctate, the metasoma has predominantly dense orange setae, and the apical metasomal terga are clothed with inconspicuous silver or grayish setae.
Distribution. USA (Arizona); Mexico (Guerrero, Jalisco, Nayarit, Sinaloa, Sonora).
Remarks. This is not a particularly common species. Approximately two dozen specimens of each sex have been examined.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Dasymutilla bonita Mickel
MANLEY, DONALD G. & PITTS, JAMES P. 2007 |
Dasymutilla bonita
Mickel 1928 |
Dasymutilla poliothrix
Mickel 1928 |