Pseudophorticus notatus ( Chaudoir, 1850 ) Zamorano & Erwin & Kavanaugh, 2019
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1649/0010-065X-73.1.121 |
|
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B27814CD-BC85-4D44-B43C-383001FDCF3C |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5411054 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03838783-2079-FFB1-4F9D-FECEFC06C21D |
|
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
|
scientific name |
Pseudophorticus notatus ( Chaudoir, 1850 ) |
| status |
comb. nov. |
Pseudophorticus notatus ( Chaudoir, 1850) View in CoL , new combination
Lachnophorus notatus Chaudoir 1850: 401 View in CoL .
Lectotype female. Designated herein by Zamorano / Erwin 2017 and so labeled. Chaudoir’ s description does not give a locality. However, the type matches specimens from Costa Rica.
Lachnophorus humeralis Bates 1883: 153 View in CoL . New synonymy.
Lectotype female: Panama, Bugaba (MCZ). Designated herein by Zamorano/Erwin 2017 and so labeled. There is an L. notatus View in CoL determination label by Jasinski on the lectotype in the MNHN. The specimen was labeled by D. H. Kavanaugh in 2016 as “???. notatus Chd. View in CoL ” and stands by the L. notatus Chaudoir View in CoL label.
Anchonoderus humeralis ( Bates, 1883) View in CoL . Liebherr 1988: 25 (new combination).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Pseudophorticus notatus ( Chaudoir, 1850 )
| Zamorano, Laura S., Erwin, Terry L. & Kavanaugh, David H. 2019 |
Anchonoderus humeralis ( Bates, 1883 )
| Liebherr, J. K. 1988: 25 |
Lachnophorus humeralis
| Bates, H. W. 1883: 153 |
Lachnophorus notatus
| Chaudoir, M. de 1850: 401 |