Amphithasus Bates, 1871
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1649/0010-065X-73.1.121 |
|
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B27814CD-BC85-4D44-B43C-383001FDCF3C |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03838783-207F-FFB7-4C5F-FA80FDA7C7C5 |
|
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
|
scientific name |
Amphithasus Bates, 1871 |
| status |
|
Amphithasus Bates, 1871 View in CoL
Amphithasus Bates 1871: 32 View in CoL . Amphitasus Bates View in CoL : Csiki 1931; Erwin 1991; Lorenz 1998; Ball and Bousquet 2000; Bousquet 2012.
Amphithasus elegans ( Dejean, 1831) View in CoL Anchomenus elegans Dejean 1831: 725 View in CoL .
This species was placed in “ Amphitasus View in CoL ” by Lorenz (1998). We have not seen the type (MNHN). However, Bates (1871), not Lorenz, is the one who first suggested A. elegans View in CoL belonged in Amphithasus View in CoL , as Bates wrote “It is probable that A. elegans, Dej. View in CoL (Sp., v, 725) belongs also to the genus.” referring to Amphithasus View in CoL . The holotype is from Cartagena, Colombia, but it was not found by DHK among lachnophorines in MNHN during his visit in 2016. We suggest it may be among the platynines rather
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
Amphithasus Bates, 1871
| Zamorano, Laura S., Erwin, Terry L. & Kavanaugh, David H. 2019 |
Amphithasus
| Bates, H. W. 1871: 32 |
Amphithasus elegans (
| Dejean, P. F. M. A. 1831: 725 |