Eburodacrys sulfurifera Gounelle, 1909

Botero, Juan Pablo, 2017, Review of the genus Eburodacrys White, 1853 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Cerambycinae), Zootaxa 4344 (3), pp. 493-521 : 507-508

Eburodacrys sulfurifera Gounelle, 1909

( Figs. 24–33 )

Eburodacrys sulfurifera Gounelle, 1909: 630 ; Zikán & Zikán, 1944: 8 (distr.); Zajciw, 1966: 4 (distr.); Silva, 1967: 34 (distr.); Zajciw, 1972: 50 (distr.); Napp & Martins, 1980: 91, fig. 57; Martins, 1997: 64; 1999: 357, fig. 243; Monné, 2005: 164 (cat.); Wappes et al., 2006: 9 (distr.); Galileo et al., 2008: 17, 95 (distr.); Monné et al., 2009: 8 (distr); Monné. et al., 2010: 239 (distr.); Monné et al., 2016:10 (distr.).

Eburodacrys amabilis Galileo & Martins, 2009: 145 , fig. 1; Morvan & Morati, 2011: 18, fig. 43 (distr.); Giuglaris, 2012: 61 (distr.) Syn. nov.

Geographical distribution. French Guiana, Brazil (Goiás, Ceará, Minas Gerais, Espírito Santo, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo), Bolivia (Santa Cruz). A new country record from Colombia (Meta) and new state records from Bahia, Mato Grosso, Pará and Rondônia ( Brazil) are added.

Type material examined. Holotype male of Eburodacrys amabilis Galileo & Martins, 2009 , FRENCH GUIANA (Kaw, km 40), 17.VI.2005, O. Morvan leg., “piège malaise” (MZSP). Photograph of syntype male of Eburodacrys sulfurifera Gounelle, 1909 , BRAZIL, Goiás: Jataí (through Bezark, 2017).

Specimens examined. COLOMBIA: Meta, Puerto Lopez (Remolinos, Centro Cafam Llanos, Cauchal, colecta manual nocturna, 200m), 27.IV.2010, M. Peña, M. Ibañes, E. Avendaño leg. ( MPUJ) . BRAZIL, Rondônia: Vilhena , 3 females, XI.1973, Alvarenga & Roppa leg. ( MNRJ) ; Pará: Jacareacanga , female, XII.1968, M. Alvarenga leg. ( MNRJ) ; Mato Grosso: Diamantino (Alto Rio Arinos ), 3 females, X.1983, B. Silva leg. ( MNRJ) ; Vera (12°46’S 55°36’W), 2 females, X.1973, Alvarenga & Roppa legs. ( MNRJ); Bahia : Encruzilhada (estrada Rio- Bahia, Km 965, motel da Divisa , 960 m), female, XI.1974, Seabra & Roppa leg. ( MNRJ) ; Itapetinga , male, XI.1969, F.M. Oliveira leg. ( MNRJ) ; Espírito Santo: ( Rio Bonito , 600 m), male, XI.1964 ( MNRJ) ; Barra de São Francisco ( Coorego de Itá ), male, XI.1956, W. Grossmann leg. ( MNRJ) ; Colatina , female, XI.1970, A. Silva leg. ( MNRJ) ; Linhares , 3 males and 1 female, XII.1969, no collector indicated ( MNRJ) ; ( Parque Sooretama ), 4 males, XI.1967, F.M. Oliveira leg. ( MNRJ) ; Rio de Janeiro: Itatiaia ( Parque Nacional de Itatiaia ), 2 males and 1 female, XII.1963, E. Gouvea leg. ( MNRJ) ; female, 30.I.1966, P.R. San Martin & M.A. Monné leg ( MNRJ) ; Resende ( Serrinha de Alambari ), female, I.2010, U. Caramaschi leg. ( MNRJ) ; Rio de Janeiro ( Floesta da Tijuca ), male, I.1961, C.A. campos Seabra leg. ( MNRJ) ; São Paulo : São Paulo ( Cantareira ), male, 1.I.1941 ( MNRJ) ; ( Jabaquara ), male, 7.XII.1942 ( MNRJ) .

Comments. Eburodacrys sulfurifera was described by Gounelle (1909) from Brazil (Goiás and Ceará); Eburodacrys amabilis was described by Galileo & Martins (2009) from French Guiana and compared and differentiated from the former by the lateroposterior eburneous callosities notched at anterior margin (not notched in E. sulfurifera ) and by the presence of a black apical elytral band (the authors did not mention the elytra apex in E. sulfurifera , but by the context it is possible to infer that it would be absent). A study of the type material, the original descriptions and the examination of more than 30 specimens allowed me to observe variability of the characters above mentioned ( Figs. 26–33 ).

The lateroposterior eburneous callosities can be notched or not, and there are specimens with different degrees of notching. Regarding the black band at the apex of the elytra, it is possible to see specimens with and without a notch and having or not having black band. It is interesting to point out that these variations are not related to geographical distribution. Thus, it is possible to find specimens with eburneous callosities notched or not and with or without a black apical elytral band through all the geographical distribution of the species.

Figures

FIGURES 24 – 33. Eburodacrys sulfurifera, dorsal view. 24, holotype of Eburodacrys sulfurifera, male, 25, holotype of Eburodacrys amabilis, 26, female, 27, male, 28, female, 29, female, 30, female, 31, male, 32, male, 33, female.