Teyl Main, 1975
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4674.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:20F916B5-8567-421E-9B2F-5DC134BE332A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5614485 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0383A23A-267C-FFA1-FF7E-B099644F1FE4 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Teyl Main, 1975 |
status |
|
Genus Teyl Main, 1975
Teyl Main, 1975: 74 . Type species by original designation Teyl luculentus Main, 1975 .
Merredinia Main, 1983: 931 . Type species by original designation Merredinia damsonoides Main, 1983 (synonymised by Harvey et al., 2018: 436).
Pseudoteyl Main, 1985: 753 . Type species by original designation Pseudoteyl vancouveri Main, 1985 (synonymised by Harvey et al., 2018: 437).
Diagnosis. Most species of Teyl and Namea can be distinguished from all other Anamini by the presence of a reflexed embolus arising on the lateral or proximal side of the pedipalpal bulb ( Figs 14–16 View FIGURES 14–16 ), combined with the absence of a megaspur on the male leg I tibia ( Figs 11–13 View FIGURES 4–13 ). However, a number of species of both Teyl (e.g., T. damsonoides ) and Namea (e.g., N. callemonda Raven, 1984 , N. dahmsi Raven, 1984 ) have a presumably autapomorphic morphology whereby the embolus is not reflexed, but rather positioned distally on the bulb; these species can be distinguished from similar Anamini by the absence of a leg I megaspur on males, or by the absence of incrassate tarsi on the leg I of males. Similarly, a number of species of Namea (e.g. N. calcaria Raven, 1984 , N. dicalcaria Raven 1984 ) have macrosetae on the male leg I tibia which are produced into a megaspur-like structure; these species can be distinguished from all other Anamini, except species of Teyloides Main, 1985 , by the presence of a reflexed embolus; and from Teyloides by the absence of coiled spermathecae in females.
The diagnostic separation of Teyl and Namea is currently problematic, due largely to the absence of a phylogenetic hypothesis for Namea , and the presence of a number of confounding diagnostic characters at the generic level (an issue discussed in detail by Raven 1984). At present, Teyl includes all of those species which occur in western and southern Australia, outside of the subtropical and tropical mesic zone of eastern Queensland and north-eastern New South Wales. Whether Namea , as currently circumscribed (sensu Raven 1984), represents one or more genera, and how it differs morphologically from Teyl s.s., is currently the subject of ongoing research.
Distribution. Species of Teyl occur throughout the semi-arid and arid zones of southern Australia, from Western Australia ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ) east to southern South Australia and western Victoria. The genus reaches its highest diversity in south-western Western Australia, although a relatively few species can be found as far north as the Murchison, Gascoyne and Pilbara bioregions in the western-central arid zone ( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 , 2 View FIGURE 2 ).
Included species. The genus Teyl includes seven described species, one of which is newly described in this study. Numerous undescribed species are also known from throughout western and southern Australia.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Teyl Main, 1975
Huey, Joel A., Rix, Michael G., Wilson, Jeremy D., Hillyer, Mia J. & Harvey, Mark S. 2019 |
Pseudoteyl
Harvey, M. S. & Hillyer, M. J. & Main, B. Y. & Moulds, T. A. & Raven, R. J. & Rix, M. G. & Vink, C. J. & Huey, J. A. 2018: 437 |
Main, B. Y. 1985: 753 |
Merredinia
Harvey, M. S. & Hillyer, M. J. & Main, B. Y. & Moulds, T. A. & Raven, R. J. & Rix, M. G. & Vink, C. J. & Huey, J. A. 2018: 436 |
Main, B. Y. 1983: 931 |
Teyl
Main, B. Y. 1975: 74 |