Lophopogon kingii Hooker (1896: 149)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.296.3.10 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13693973 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0383EE2B-FFF7-FFE7-95E9-FC9DFEECFB6E |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Lophopogon kingii Hooker (1896: 149) |
status |
|
Lophopogon kingii Hooker (1896: 149) View in CoL
Lectotype (designated here):— INDIA. Monghir , October 1894, Mokim 1408 ( K barcode K000943467 !, isolectotypes CAL barcodes CAL0000002378 About CAL !, CAL0000002379 About CAL !, CAL0000002380 About CAL !, DD No. 45080!, K barcode K000943468 !), Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 .
Notes:—In the protologue Hooker (1896) cited a single gathering “Behar; at Monghir, Herb. Hort. Calcutt”. Sur (2004) cited specimens kept in CAL and DD as isotypes but these must all be treated as syntypes (Arts. 9.5 and 40 Note 1 of the ICN, McNeill et al. 2012).
We traced six specimens at CAL (barcodes CAL0000002378, CAL0000002379, CAL0000002380), DD (No. 45080) and K (barcodes K000943467, K000943468), which can be considered original material according to Art. 9.3 of the ICN ( McNeill et al. 2012). The specimen housed at K (barcode K000943467) is the most complete, has drawings of floral dissected parts on the herbarium sheet and the original annotations by Hooker. So, it is designated here as lectotype for the name L. kingii Hook.f.
K |
Royal Botanic Gardens |
CAL |
Botanical Survey of India |
DD |
Forest Research Institute, Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Lophopogon kingii Hooker (1896: 149)
Tiwari, Arjun Prasad, Gavade, Sandip & Mujaffar, Shaikh 2017 |
Lophopogon kingii
Hooker, J. D. 1896: ) |