Calopompilus setaerotundus Waichert & Pitts
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3873.5.8 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4C4BA5C8-DC4E-4787-B47F-3D0A1580B8A1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6138128 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0384400B-FFDA-FFC8-FF49-EBE3FDCEFEA6 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Calopompilus setaerotundus Waichert & Pitts |
status |
sp. nov. |
Calopompilus setaerotundus Waichert & Pitts View in CoL , sp. nov.
( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 , 3A–C View FIGURE 3. A – C )
Diagnosis. Integument entirely black in female, fore leg ventrally pale, brown in male; antenna yellow in female, black in male; wing infuscate. Male densely setose; hypopygium clothed apically with long erect setae.
Description. Holotype, FEMALE. ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 A). Body length 15.6 mm. Fore wing 13.0 mm; maximum wing width 4.1 mm. Coloration. ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 A). Integument black; palpus brown; antenna yellow, scape and pedicel black; wing infuscate; veins brown; pubescence cuprum. Integument. Body pubescence sparse, short, appressed on entire body and wing ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 A). Erect setae long, sparse, present on head, apical margin of clypeus, propodeum, sterna, and last tergum. Punctation small, conspicuous.
Head. ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 C). Head wide; inner sides of eyes almost parallel, slightly convergent posteriorly; TFD 1.3 × FD, MID 0.7 × FD. Vertex convex. Ocelli in right triangle; lateral ocelli closer to each other than to compound eyes; POL 0.5 × OOL. Mandible slender, long, length 5.8 × its width at median portion of mandible; two apical teeth, basal most larger. Clypeus trapezoidal, wide, slightly convex medially, lateral margins folded downward; LC 0.5 × WC; apical margin polished, thin. Maxillary beard not present. Labrum exposed, trapezoidal, total length 0.7 × clypeus length. Antenna short, stout; length of fourth segment 2.5 × its width; ratio of first four antennal segments 20:6:21:23; WA3 0.4 × LA3; LA3 0.7 × UID.
Mesosoma . Pronotum short ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 A), width 4.4 × length on dorsal view, posterior margin slightly angulated medially; collar short, almost absent; mesonotum with one superior-distal fovea. Notaulice absent. Metapostnotum striated. Propodeum punctures conspicuous; propodeal disc coarsely setose, setae equally abundant along length, apical margin with thin line of dense setae. Fore wing long ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 A); maximum width 0.3 × its length; 2Cu cell rectangular in shape, length 1.7 × its width; 3Cu cell 1.7 × longer than 2Cu; second recurrent vein almost straight, meeting 3Cu 0.3 × distance from base to apex of cell. Front and mid tibial spines absent; hind tibia dorsal teeth present on one row, teeth scale-like, short; tibial brush complete, width almost constant. Tarsal claws dentate, mid tooth almost as long as apical tooth.
Metasoma. ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 A). Metasoma covered by short, appressed setae. Last tergum and sternum with long, thin setae; sting slightly curved laterally.
Allotype, MALE. Body length 10.9 mm. Fore wing 11.6 mm; maximum wing width 3.6 mm. Coloration. ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 B). Integument black with weak blue reflections; front leg brown, ventral face pale brown; palpus brown; antenna black dorsally, pale brown ventrally; mandible black, apex pale brown; integument with whitish line on inner margin of eye, below antennal insertion and above clypeus; small yellowish spot on outer margin of eye; wing infuscate; veins brown; pubescence black. Integument. Body pubescence abundant, long, semi-appressed on entire body and wing ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 B). Erect setae long, abundant, present on entire body. Punctation small, conspicuous.
Description and measurements as defined for female, except: Head. ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 D) Head wide; inner sides of eyes divergent posteriorly, convergent anteriorly. Anterior ocelli large; POL 0.7 × OOL. Mandible slender, long, length 7.8 × width at median portion of mandible, with two apical teeth. Clypeus convex medially; apical margin polished almost inconspicuous. Labrum exposed, total length 0.6 × clypeus length. Antenna elongate, stout; length of fourth segment 2.3 × its width; ratio of first four antennal segments 14:7:19:21; WA3 0.4 × LA3; LA3 0.5 × UID. Mesosoma . Pronotum short ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 B), width 4.2 × length on dorsal view, posterior margin slightly angulated medially; mesonotum with one superior-distal fovea; fovea striated. Metapostnotum weakly striated. Fore wing long ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 B); maximum width 0.3 × its length; 2Cu cell rectangular in shape, tCu1 vein curved, length 2.0 × its width; 3Cu cell 1.6 × longer than 2Cu. Front, mid, hind tibia spines absent; tibial brush complete, width almost constant. Front tarsal claws bifid; mid, fore tarsal claw dentate. Metasoma. ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 B). Metasoma covered by long, semi-appressed setae; T1 constricted distally, T2 wider, resembling node. Terga with long, thick setae; hypopygium with two lateral tubercles on posterior margin.
Genitalia ( Fig. 3A–C View FIGURE 3. A – C ). Parapenial lobe split; lobe digit-shaped, apex wider than base, base slightly constraint ( Fig. 3A, B View FIGURE 3. A – C ); parapenial lobe 0.8 × as long as paramere. Digitus wide, bilobed, length 0.8 × paramere length; ventral lobe with apex rounded, convex, dorsal margin of apex with rounded-short extension, rounded extension medially, slightly above half digitus length; dorsal lobe short, reaching base of paramere, bent laterally, dorsal margin with long erect setae. Aedeagus long, as long as digitus, spatula-shaped, apex bilobed; lobes rounded, touching each other ( Fig. 3A View FIGURE 3. A – C ). Paramere digit-shaped; short, total length 0.5 × total genitalia length; apex rounded with long setae; base truncate expansion on dorsal margin. Paramere setae thick, longer on apex ( Fig. 3A View FIGURE 3. A – C ). Subgenital plate wide, tongue-like with bifid apex, base constraint; apex rounded; setae abundant, long, thick along entire length, longer toward apex, setae with apex dilated ( Fig. 3C View FIGURE 3. A – C ).
Examined material. Holotype, ♀. HONDURAS: Cortés, Parque Nacional Cusuco, 5 Km N Buenos Aires, 15°29’N 88°13’W, Malaise trap in oak/pine cloud forest, R. Cave leg., 15.VII.1995 ( MZLU). Allotype, ♂. HONDURAS: Cortés, Parque Nacional Cusuco, 5 Km N Buenos Aires, 15°29’N 88°13’W, Malaise trap in oak/ pine cloud forest, R. Cave leg., 15.VII.1995 ( MZLU). Paratypes. HONDURAS: Cortés, Parque Nacional Cusuco, 5 Km N Buenos Aires, 15°29’N 88°13’W, Malaise trap in oak/pine cloud forest, R. Cave leg., 1♀ 1♂ 15.VII.1995 ( MZLU), 1♀ 1♂ 30.VI.1995 ( EMUS).
Distribution. Honduras.
Etymology. The specific epithet is derived from the Latin seta meaning “bristle” and rotundus meaning “rounded”. It refers to the setae rounded dilated on the apex of the genital plate present in males. This characteristic is unique to this species.
Variation. No significant variation was observed in the examined specimens.
Host. Unknown.
Remarks. Calopompilus setaerotundus sp. nov. belongs in the C. pyrrhomelas species-group, because it has a fore wing with a long anal lobe, the hind tibia bears distinct teeth, and the body has dense pubescence. Following Townes’ key (1957, pages 13-14) this species keys to C. feroculis (Banks) , a species found in the Southeastern USA. The female of C. setaerotundus differs from that of C. feroculis by having the antenna yellow (black in C.
feroculis ). Moreover, the propodeum is smooth in C. feroculis (striate in C. setaerotundus ). The male of C. setaerotundus differs from that of C. feroculis in that the male of C. feroculis lacks a whitish spot on the outer margin of the eye; also, it has the clypeus rugose, the vertex less convex or without the prominent/ elevated ocelli, and the fore tibia fully black. The male of C. setaerotundus has a whitish spot on the outer margin of the eye, the clypeus is polished, although it is covered by long pubescence, the vertex is extended and convex, and the venter face of the hind leg is pale brown.
MZLU |
Lund University |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |