Okanagana Distant, 1905

Cole, Jeffrey A., Chatfield-Taylor, Will, Smeds, Elliott A., Cooley, John R., Gonzalez, Valorie A. & Wong, Caressa, 2023, Phylogeny of North America’s largest cicada radiation redefines Tibicinoides and Okanagana (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Cicadidae: Tibicininae), Zootaxa 5346 (5), pp. 501-531 : 513-514

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5346.5.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C8CA09D0-51A8-4E4D-A1A2-FB9E82D557B7

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8407568

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038487EB-9871-FF04-03B6-3EB0FA3107D4

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Okanagana Distant, 1905
status

 

Okanagana Distant, 1905 View in CoL View at ENA

Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 (A. dorsal habitus, B. male genitalia, right lateral view, C. timbal, D. female genitalia, ventral view, E. female genitalia, right lateral view)

Type Species: Cicada View in CoL rimosa Say, 1830 View in CoL

Included Species: annulata Davis, 1935 View in CoL , arboraria Wymore, 1934 View in CoL , arctostaphylae Van Duzee, 1915 View in CoL , aurantiaca Davis, 1917b View in CoL , aurora Davis, 1936 View in CoL , balli Davis, 1919 View in CoL , bella Davis, 1919 View in CoL , canescens Van Duzee, 1915 View in CoL , cruentifera ( Uhler, 1892) View in CoL , ferrugomaculata Davis, 1936 View in CoL , formosa Davis, 1926 View in CoL , fratercula Davis, 1915 View in CoL , fumipennis Davis, 1932 View in CoL , georgi Heath & Sanborn, 2007 View in CoL , gibbera Davis, 1927 View in CoL , hirsuta View in CoL * Davis, 1915, luteobasalis Davis, 1935 View in CoL , magnifica Davis, 1919 View in CoL , mariposa View in CoL mariposa Davis, 1915 View in CoL , mariposa View in CoL oregonensis Davis, 1939, napa Davis, 1919 View in CoL , nigrodorsata Davis, 1923 View in CoL , noveboracensis ( Emmons, 1854) View in CoL , occidentalis View in CoL (Walker in Lord, 1866), opacipennis Davis, 1927 View in CoL , oregona Davis, 1916 View in CoL , orithyia Bliven, 1964 View in CoL , ornata Van Duzee, 1915 View in CoL , rhadine Bliven, 1964 View in CoL , rimosa View in CoL rimosa ( Say, 1830) View in CoL , rimosa View in CoL ohioensis Davis, 1942, rubrobasalis Davis, 1926 View in CoL stat. rev., salicicola Bliven, 1964 View in CoL , schaefferi Davis, 1915 View in CoL , sequoiae Bliven, 1964 View in CoL , sperata Van Duzee, 1935 View in CoL , sugdeni Davis, 1938 View in CoL , synodica View in CoL synodica ( Say, 1825) View in CoL , synodica View in CoL nigra Davis, 1944 View in CoL , tanneri Davis, 1935 View in CoL , triangulata Davis, 1915 View in CoL , tristis Van Duzee, 1915 View in CoL , vandykei Van Duzee, 1915 View in CoL , venusta Davis, 1935 View in CoL , villosa Davis, 1941 View in CoL , vocalis Bliven, 1964 View in CoL , wymorei Davis, 1935 View in CoL , yakimaensis Davis, 1939 View in CoL .

Etymology: The name is derived from the Syilx Okanagan people(s) or the Okanagan Valley of British Columbia. Feminine.

Distribution: Okanagana are found throughout the United States and Canada with a single species, O. aurantiaca , endemic to Baja California, México. Species diversity is highest in Southern California ( Davis 1917b; Sanborn & Phillips 2013).

Redescription: Males and females are similar to members of the genus Tibicinoides . Inter-species body size is highly variable with some intra-specific variation. Head: The width of the head and eyes is usually equal to subequal the width of the apical pronotal margin. The clypeus is variably pronounced. The center of the vertex has an epicranial suture; sulcate or not, marked or not. Thorax: The pronotal margins are subquadrate to apically constricted with a longitudinal sulcus of varying depth running along the midline. There are two bilateral fissures that run inwards towards the center of the pronotum at an anterior-posterior angle. The humeral and apical angles are distinct or not. The cruciform elevation is located directly anterior to the hind margin of the mesonotum. The anterior lateral sides of the mesonotum may show vestigial stridulatory grooves. The posterior edge of the metanotum is visible. Wings: Both fore and hind wings are hyaline, and the basal membranes are variable in color but typically orange. The fore wing length is 2.5–3 times the width, with 8 apical cells. The trapezoidal-shaped radial cell reaches the costal node halfway along length of costa, and the ratio of apical cell to ulnar cell length is approximately 1:1. The hind wing has 6 apical cells with a typical branched CuA vein ( Fig. 2A View FIGURE 2 ). The wing venation is usually dark, with species-specific exceptions. Legs: Metacoxa with a meracanthus with a distinct triangular shape, typically as long or longer than the coxa. Metatibiae with spines, all other tibiae without spines. Abdomen: Timbals completely exposed. Timbal membrane with 3–11 long ribs spaced with short ribs (e.g. Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ). In females there is no vertical gap between tergite VII and tergite VIII and epipleurite VII is usually longer in length compared to epipleurite VI ( Fig. 2D–E View FIGURE 2 ).

Male Genitalia: Sternite VII in males is variably shaped, covering the base of sternite VIII (=valve). Sternite VIII extends parallel to the length of the body, partially housing the uncus and aedeagus. The uncus has its dorsal and lateral margins variably shaped from parallel to with a bulge. From the dorsal aspect the tip of the uncus is bulbous or not, excavated or not: a species-specific feature. The uncus never has a hooked tip (as in Figs. 1C–D View FIGURE 1 , 3B View FIGURE 3 ) though in the lateral aspect there may be a slight point in some species.

Female Genitalia: Sternite VII is variably excavated on its posterior margin, forming a primary notch with a secondary notch in the center of the primary ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 ). Both excavations are seldom rounded in their entirety, often forming distinct angles between the primary and secondary notch. The secondary notch may be rounded or distinctly V-shaped (if clear). The sides of sternite VII form rounded apical prongs that vary in shape. Both traits are often species-specific.

Diagnosis: The visible posterior margin of the metanotum and the trapezoidal-shaped radial cell that reaches the costal node halfway along length of the costa identify the genus to Okanagana , Tibicinoides , Chlorocanta gen. nov., or Hewlettia gen. nov.. Males may be identified to genus by the uncovered timbals with more than two long ribs (e.g. Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ) and an uncus without a distinct ventroapical hook ( Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 ).

Most female Okanagana can be diagnosed by the absence of a vertical gap between tergite VII and tergite VIII, which gives females a streamlined appearance in the lateral aspect ( Fig. 2E View FIGURE 2 ) rather than the hump-backed look of female Tibicinoides ( Fig. 3E View FIGURE 3 ). There are some exceptions to this, which can be the result of rough handling during collecting. The diagnosis can be confirmed by looking at the relative lengths of epipleurite VI and VII and the excavation of sternite VII. In Okanagana females epipleurite VII is distinctly longer than VI when in Tibicinoides they are subequal in length ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 ). Sternite VII is variably excavated on its posterior margin, forming a primary notch with a secondary notch in the center of the primary ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 ). In Okanagana the primary and secondary notches are seldom completely rounded and often form a distinct angle: Tibicinoides females have both the primary and secondary notches rounded and never have distinct angles between the two. In Okanagana the notch may also be V-shaped, which is never seen in Tibicinoides . As with Tibicinoides , the best way to identify females is by gestalt, which becomes easier with increasing familiarity.

This paper describes two additional genera: Chlorocanta gen. nov. and Hewlettia gen. nov. Male Chlorocanta gen. nov. can be separated from Okanagana by the presence of an uncus without a hook ( Fig. 8B View FIGURE 8 ) but only two long timbal ribs on the timbal membrane ( Fig. 8E View FIGURE 8 ). Females of this genus can be diagnosed by their green color (yellowish when faded); a feature unshared by other Okanagana except O. aurantiaca , which possesses a black longitudinal dorsal stripe on the abdomen. Male and female Hewlettia gen. nov. can be distinguished entirely by the green and black patterning across the body and the presence of 5 rather than 6 apical cells on the hind wing ( Fig. 9A View FIGURE 9 ).

*We include hirsuta with Okanagana based on examination of a male specimen in the UCDC collection, which lacks HU. The uncus morphology was omitted in the original species description, which was based on a single female specimen ( Davis 1915). T. catalina , which does possess a HU and for which a male type was available, was initially described as a subspecies of hirsuta ( Davis 1936) , before being elevated to species level by Miller (1985).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Cicadidae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF