Neoseiulus barkeri Hughes
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.24349/acarologia/20204364 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FA20102C-186C-4F32-90CA-EFDD21E8DAE2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4526081 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0384D55D-E378-4746-FE28-66E5F9DBFBAC |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Neoseiulus barkeri Hughes |
status |
|
Neoseiulus barkeri Hughes View in CoL
Neoseiulus barkeri Hughes 1948: 142 View in CoL ; Chant & McMurtry 2003a: 35; Moraes et al. 1986:70; Moraes et al. 2004: 104; Chant & McMurtry 2007: 25; Beaulieu & Beard 2018: 471 View Cited Treatment .
Typhlodromus (Neoseiulus) barkeri, Nesbitt 1951: 31 .
Typhlodromus (Typhlodromus) barkeri, Chant 1959: 61 .
Typhlodromus (Amblyseius) barkeri, Hughes 1961: 222 .
Typhlodromus barkeri, Hirschmann 1962: 144 .
Amblyseius barkeri, Athias-Henriot 1961: 440 .
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) barkeri, van der Merwe 1968: 112 .
Amblyseius (Neoseiulus) barkeri, Karg 1993: 188 .
Amblyseius masiaca Blommers & Chazeau 1974: 308 (synonymy according to Ueckermann & Loots 1988).
Amblyseius mckenziei Schuster & Pritchard 1963: 268 (synonymy according to Ragusa & Athias-Henriot 1983).
Amblyseius mycophilus Karg 1970: 290 (synonymy according to Ragusa & Athias-Henriot 1983).
Amblyseius oahuensis Prasad 1968: 1518 (synonymy according to Ragusa & Athias-Henriot 1983).
Amblyseius picketti Specht 1968: 681 (synonymy according to Ragusa & Athias-Henriot 1983).
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) pieteri Schultz 1972: 17 (synonymy according to Ueckermann & Loots 1988).
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) usitatus van der Merwe 1965: 71 View in CoL (synonymy according to Ueckermann & Loots 1988).
This species belongs to the barkeri species group of the genus Neoseiulus View in CoL , as the spermathecal atrium is large and forked at junction with the major duct. It belongs to the barkeri species subgroup as the calyx is not markedly constricted at junction with the atrium, the atrium is deeply forked at the junction with the major duct without vacuolated area, and the major duct, atrium and calyx are of approximately the same width ( Chant and McMurtry 2003a).
Neoseiulus barkeri View in CoL has a worldwide distribution (see below and Moraes et al. 2004a; Demite et al. 2020). It is a well-known predator of T. urticae and also of thrips, and is released in greenhouses (strawberry, cucumber, eggplant) to control them. Various studies have shown its ability to control Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) ( Rodriguez-Reina et al. 1992) View in CoL , Thrips tabaci Lindeman ( Broodsgaard and Hansen 1992) and T. urticae in cucumber ( Fan and Petitt 1994b). Fan and Petitt (1994a) showed that augmentative releases of N. barkeri View in CoL provided control of Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Banks) on peppers. N. barkeri View in CoL constitutes a potential BCA in several crops especially vegetable greenhouses.
This is the first report of that species from Slovenia.
World distribution: Algeria, Argentina, Australia, Benin, Brazil, Burundi, Canary Islands, Cape Verde, Chile, China, Cyprus, Egypt, England, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guinea, Hawaii, India, Iran, Israel, Italy, Ivory Coast, Japan, Jordan, Kenya, La Réunion Island, Latvia, Madagascar Island, Malawi, Morocco, Mozambique, Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Portugal, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Syria, Tahiti Island, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, USA, West Bank, Yemen.
Specimens examined: A single ♀ during the two-year survey. Bukovica (altitude above sea level = aasl 49 m, lat. 45°54’06”N, long. 13°39’30”E), 1 ♀ on Cucumis sativus L. ( Cucurbitaceae ), 20/VI/2018.
Remarks: The description and measurements of the adult females collected agree with those provided by Ferragut et al. (2010) for specimens from Spain and by Kreiter et al. (2020) for specimens from La Réunion and various regions of the world.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Neoseiulus barkeri Hughes
Kreiter, Serge, Amiri, Karima, Douin, Martial, Bohinc, Tanja, Trdan, Stanislav & Tixier, Marie-Stéphane 2020 |
Amblyseius (Neoseiulus) barkeri, Karg 1993: 188
Karg W. 1993: 188 |
Amblyseius masiaca
Blommers L. & Chazeau J. 1974: 308 |
Amblyseius mycophilus
Karg W. 1970: 290 |
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) barkeri
van der Merwe G. G. 1968: 112 |
Amblyseius oahuensis
Prasad V. 1968: 1518 |
Amblyseius picketti
Specht H. B. 1968: 681 |
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) usitatus
van der Merwe G. G. 1965: 71 |
Amblyseius mckenziei
Schuster R. O. & Pritchard A. E. 1963: 268 |
Typhlodromus barkeri
Hirschmann W. 1962: 144 |
Typhlodromus (Amblyseius) barkeri
Hughes A. M. 1961: 222 |
Amblyseius barkeri
Athias-Henriot C. 1961: 440 |
Typhlodromus (Typhlodromus) barkeri
Chant D. A. 1959: 61 |
Neoseiulus barkeri
Beaulieu F. & Beard J. J. 2018: 471 |
Chant D. A. & McMurtry J. A. 2007: 25 |
Moraes G. J. de & McMurtry J. A. & Denmark H. A. & Campos C. B. 2004: 104 |
Chant D. A. & McMurtry J. A. 2003: 35 |
Nesbitt H. H. J. 1951: 31 |
Hughes A. M. 1948: 142 |