Ammostyphrus cerberus Reichardt, 1924
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.4272127 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4342003 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0385915E-FFDE-0964-6021-FB15CCBDFAEA |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Ammostyphrus cerberus Reichardt, 1924 |
status |
|
Ammostyphrus cerberus Reichardt, 1924 View in CoL
( Figs. 14 View Figs , 48 View Figs , 82 View Figs , 110 View Figs , 198–214 View Figs View Figs )
Ammostyphrus cerberus Reichardt, 1924: 165 View in CoL .
Ammostyphrus cerberus: REICHARDT (1941) View in CoL : 337, Fig. 174 View Figs ; KRYZHANOVSKIJ & REICHARDT (1976): 241, Fig. 469 View Figs ; MAZUR (1984): 103; MAZUR (1997): 266; MAZUR (2004): 90.
Type locality. Kazakhstan, Perovskiy uezd, Chirkeili.
Type material examined. HOLOTYPE: spec., ‘Perovskij u. / Peschannaya Pustina / Chirkeili / 23.iv.[19]09 [printed] // Type / Ammostyphrus / cerberus m. / A. Reichardt det. [printed-written] // Holotypus [red label, printed]’ ( ZIN).
Additional material examined. UZBEKISTAN: 1 ♁, 1 spec., Buchara , Kyzylkum, 27.iv.1978, A. Olexa lgt .; 1 spec., ditto, but 30.vi.1976 ; 2 spec., Karakum , Chiva [= Khiva] / 1.–5.v.1979, A. Olexa lgt .; 1 ♁, Buchara , Shafrikan, 29.iv.1979, A. Olexa lgt. ( TLAN) .
Redescription. Body length: PEL: 2.0– 2.25 mm; APW: 0.625–0.75 mm; PPW: 1.5–1.625 mm; EL: 1.45–1.625 mm; EW: 1.375 –1.875 mm.
Body ( Figs. 198–199 View Figs ) ovoid, strongly convex, cuticle dark brown with a stark bronze metallic luster; legs, antennae and mouthparts reddish-brown.
Antennal scape ( Fig. 201 View Figs ) slightly thickened, with several short setae; club rather large, oval, without visible articulation, with thick short sensilla becoming slightly sparser basally, basal fourth of surface glabrous; sensory structures of antennal club ( Fig. 14 View Figs ) in form of stipe-shaped vesicle situated under a large circular sensory area on internal distal margin of the ventral side of antennal club.
Mouthparts. Mandibles ( Fig. 82 View Figs ) stout, outer margin straight, strongly curved inwardly; acutely pointed, sub-apical tooth on left mandible moderately large, obtuse; labrum ( Fig. 48 View Figs ) sparsely punctate; labral pits present, with two setae; anterior margin medially with prominent convexity interrupting concavity; terminal labial palpomere thickened, its width about half its length; mentum ( Fig. 204 View Figs ) sub-trapezoid, anterior margin ( Fig. 110 View Figs ) shallowly emarginate, disc of mentum setose; cardo of maxilla with several moderately long setae; stipes triangular, with three moderately long setae; terminal maxillary palpomere thickened, its width about half its length; about three times as long as penultimate.
Clypeus ( Fig. 201 View Figs ) flat, rounded laterally, rectangular, almost smooth, only with scattered microscopic punctation; frontal stria ( Fig. 201 View Figs ) well impressed, carinate, somewhat curved outwardly, continued as well impressed and carinate supraorbital stria; frontal disc slightly convex; frontal disc almost smooth, with scattered fine punctures; eyes flattened, visible from above.
Pronotal sides ( Fig. 198 View Figs ) strongly convergent forwardly; apical angles blunt; marginal pronotal stria complete, well impressed and carinate; lateral pronotal stria carinate, posteriorly and anteriorly shortened, somewhat distant from lateral pronotal margin, on both ends curved inwardly; pronotal disc convex, almost smooth, only antero-lateral angles inside of the lateral pronotal stria with inconspicuous scattered shallow punctures; base of pronotal disc with a row of round punctures; pronotal hypomeron with short amber setae; scutellum small, but visible.
Elytral humeri gently prominent; epipleura almost smooth, only with scattered microscopic punctation; marginal epipleural stria complete; marginal elytral stria strongly impressed, carinate, continued as complete apical elytral stria. Humeral elytral stria distinctly impressed on basal third, occasionally doubled; inner subhumeral stria present medially, shortened; elytra with four dorsal striae 1–4, in fine punctures, increasing in length from first to fourth, fourth stria surpasses elytral half apically, basally connected with sutural elytral stria; sutural stria well impressed, apically connected with apical elytral stria. Elytral disc almost smooth, punctation confined to apical third, along sutural stria reaching about one-third of elytral length anteriorly, punctures separated by about their own to twice their diameter.
Propygidium partially covered by elytra, with dense shallow punctures; pygidium convex, about as long as broad, with coarser and denser elongate punctures than those of propygidium, forming longitudinal rugae.
Anterior margin of median portion of prosternum ( Fig. 203 View Figs ) rounded; pre-apical foveae absent; marginal prosternal stria absent anteriorly; prosternal process slightly compressed, setose, rounded dorsally; carinal prosternal striae absent (in some specimens vaguely present between procoxae, as in Chivaenius ); lateral prosternal striae well impressed, carinate, convergent anteriorly, vaguely united in front.
Anterior margin of mesoventrite almost straight, somewhat curved outwardly; discal marginal mesoventral stria laterally well impressed, carinate, somewhat weakened medially; disc of mesoventrite convex, with dense deep punctures separated about their own to twice their diameter, posteriorly growing in size; meso-metaventral sutural stria formed by a row of large punctures; intercoxal disc of metaventrite flat, almost smooth, only with microscopic punctation, along posterior margin with three rows of deep punctures; lateral metaventral stria ( Fig. 200 View Figs ) well impressed, carinate, curved outwardly, almost attaining meso-metepisternal suture. Lateral disc of metaventrite ( Fig. 200 View Figs ) slightly concave, with scattered shallow punctures, fringed with short setae; metepisternum on apical two-thirds with sparse shallow punctures fringed with short setae, basal third + fused metepimeron almost glabrous, only with several shallow punctures.
Intercoxal disc of first abdominal sternite almost completely striate laterally; anterior half of disc with coarse punctures separated by about their own diameter, posteriorly punctures replaced by very fine scattered microscopic punctation; along posterior margin row of larger punctures present; lateral disc of all visible abdominal sternites laterally setose.
Protibia ( Fig. 205 View Figs ) on outer margin with two large triangular teeth topped with large triangular denticle, followed by one low tooth topped with minuscule denticle, followed by another microscopic denticle; protarsal groove shallow; tarsi shortened, but not rudimentary; anterior protibial stria shortened apically; protibial spur short, growing out from apical protibial margin; outer part of posterior surface of protibia smooth; median part of posterior surface with irregular setae; posterior protibial stria vaguely impressed; inner margin of protibia with dense row of setae.
Mesotibia not particularly dilated, outer margin with two rows of stout short denticles growing in size in proximal direction; posterior surface with sparse brush of two – outer and median – rows of setae; posterior mesotibial stria reaching half length of mesotibia apically, next evanescent; anterior surface of mesotibia almost smooth, with microscopic wrinkles; anterior mesotibial stria shortened apically; apical margin of mesotibia anteriorly with numerous inner anterior denticles; mesotibial spur short, stout; claws of apical tarsomere longer than half its length.
Metatibia ( Figs. 206–207 View Figs ) slightly dilated and thickened, outer margin with two rows of short denticles, one row situated above the other, second row somewhat shifted from outer margin, observable only from ventral view; posterior surface of metatibia with rows of setae similar to those of mesotibia; anterior surface and apical margin of metatibia ( Fig. 207 View Figs ) similar to that of mesotibia; claws of apical tarsomere gently bent, longer that half its length.
Male genitalia. Eighth sternite ( Figs. 208–209 View Figs ) longitudinally separated medially, apically with inconspicuous velum and sparse short setae; eighth tergite and eighth sternite not fused laterally ( Fig. 210 View Figs ), spiculum gastrale ( Figs. 211–212 View Figs ) expanded on both ends. Basal piece of aedeagus ( Figs. 213–214 View Figs ) very short, ratio of its length: length of parameres approximately 1: 7; parameres ( Figs. 213–214 View Figs ) fused almost along basal three-fourths; apex with pseudopores; aedeagus strongly curved ventrad ( Fig. 214 View Figs ).
ZIN |
Russian Academy of Sciences, Zoological Institute, Zoological Museum |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ammostyphrus cerberus Reichardt, 1924
Lackner, Tomáš 2010 |
Ammostyphrus cerberus: REICHARDT (1941)
MAZUR S. 2004: 90 |
MAZUR S. 1997: 266 |
MAZUR S. 1984: 103 |
KRYZHANOVSKIJ O. L. & REICHARDT A. N. 1976: 241 |
REICHARDT A. 1941: 337 |
Ammostyphrus cerberus
REICHARDT A. 1924: 165 |