Gnathoncus rotundatus ( Kugelann, 1792 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.4272127 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4342005 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0385915E-FFEE-0954-6026-FEBDCFDBFC6A |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Gnathoncus rotundatus ( Kugelann, 1792 ) |
status |
|
Gnathoncus rotundatus ( Kugelann, 1792) View in CoL
( Figs. 36 View Figs , 55 View Figs , 90 View Figs , 119 View Figs , 360–378 View Figs View Figs )
Hister nanus: SCRIBA (1790) View in CoL : 73, nec PILLER & MITTERPACHER (1783): 34 (misidentification).
Hister rotundatus Kugelann, 1792: 304 View in CoL .
Saprinus deletus J. E. LeConte, 1844: 186 View in CoL . Synonymized by MARSEUL (1855): 503.
Saprinus rotundatus: J. E. LECONTE (1845) : 70; MARSEUL (1855): 348, 503; HORN (1873): 314; BLATCHEY (1910): 618, 619.
Gnathoncus rotundatus: SCHMIDT (1885a) View in CoL : 317; MAZUR & KASZAB (1980): 45, Figs. 22A View Figs ,I–J, 23A; MAZUR (1981a): 88, Figs. 111–114 View Figs ; MAZUR (1984): 105; DAVIES (1991): 138; LAPLANTE et al. (1991): 44; ÔHARA (1994): 215, 220, Figs. 130, 131, 133, 135 View Figs ; DOWNIE & ARNETT (1996): 612; MAZUR (1997): 215; BOUSQUET & LAPLANTE (1999): 144; YÉLAMOS (2002): 246, 248, Figs. 124A,B, 126A,B; MAZUR View Figs (2004): 92; BOUSQUET & LAPLANTE (2006): 87, 90, Figs. 64, 65 View Figs .
Gnathoncus ovulatus Casey, 1916: 256 View in CoL . Synonymized by MAZUR (1997): 215.
Gnathoncus nanus Reichardt, 1941: 159 , 161. Synonymized by HOFFMANN (1803): 87.
Gnathoncus nanus: MCGRATH & HATCH (1941) : 64; HINTON (1945): 322; STOCKMANN (1957): 67; HATCH (1962): 265; HALSTEAD (1963): 13; HANSEN (1968): 317; WITZGALL (1971): 166; MAZUR (1973): 27, Figs. 25–28 View Figs , 37 View Figs ; KRYZHA- NOVSKIJ & REICHARDT (1976): 114, 116, Figs. 125, 130, 135, 140 View Figs , 145 View Figs ; VIENNA (1980): 120, Fig. 47 View Figs .
Gnathoncus rotundatus var. pygidialis Ganglbauer, 1899 .
Gnathoncus rotundatus var. subsuturalis Reitter, 1896 .
Note. Larva was described by PERRIS (1877): 21. Sensory structures of the antennal club and spermatheca were
studied by DE MARZO & VIENNA (1982a,b).
Type locality. Poland, East Prussia, Ostróda.
Material examined. CZECH REPUBLIC: BOHEMIA: Čelákovice, vi.1955, 1 ♁ 1 ♀, A. Olexa lgt. JAPAN: HOKKAIDO: Shimohoro, Tsurui, Kushiro moor, 1.vi.1992, 1 spec., M. Ôhara lgt. KAZAKHSTAN: Jambol Akkul, 8.v.1979, 2 ♀♀, A. Olexa lgt. UKRAINE: Odessa, vi.1957, 1 ♁ 1 ♀, A. Olexa lgt. ( TLAN).
Redescription. Body length: PEL: 1.75–2.50 mm; APW: 0.625 –0.825 mm; PPW: 1.20–1.725 mm; EL: 1.175 –1.675 mm; EW: 1.375–2.00 mm.
Body ( Figs. 360–361 View Figs ) oval, moderately convex, slightly flattened from above, cuticle dark brown to black without metallic luster; legs, mouthparts and antennae rufous.
Antennal scape ( Fig. 363 View Figs ) not thickened, with very few short setae; club ( Fig. 362 View Figs ) comparatively large, oval, without visible articulation, entire surface covered in dense short sensilla, intermingled with sparse somewhat longer erect sensilla; sensory structures of antennal club ( Fig. 36 View Figs ) in form of two sensory areas on ventral side and five vesicles; one of them is larger than other four; vesicles arranged in two pairs on ventral and dorsal side respectively.
Mouthparts. Mandibles ( Fig. 90 View Figs ) with rounded outer margin curved inwardly, acutely pointed, subapical tooth on inner margin of left mandible very small; labrum ( Fig. 55 View Figs ) flattened, punctate, with very shallow median excavation; labral fold significantly less developed; labral pits very small, one short seta present in each pit; terminal labial palpomere elongated, its width about one-third its length; palpal organ present on both labial and maxillary palpi; mentum ( Fig. 365 View Figs ) sub-trapezoid, anterior angles slightly produced, anterior margin with a shallow medial notch ( Fig. 119 View Figs ), surface around it with two long setae, lateral margins with a single one row of much shorter sparse ramose setae, disc glabrous; cardo of maxilla with few short setae on lateral margin; stipes triangular, with three short setae; lacinia with lacinial hook; terminal labial palpomere elongated, its width about one-third its length, about three times as long as penultimate palpomere.
Clypeus ( Fig. 363 View Figs ) large, rectangular, rounded laterally, with sparse fine punctures, separated several times their own diameter; frontal and supraorbital striae absent; frontal disc ( Fig. 363 View Figs ) with sparse fine round punctures; eyes convex, well visible from above.
Pronotal sides ( Fig. 360 View Figs ) feebly convergent anteriorly, apical angles obtuse, marginal pronotal stria complete, thin, slightly carinate, somewhat weakened behind head; disc entirely covered with deep, round punctation, becoming coarser and denser laterally; pronotal base with ante-scutellar depression; pronotal hypomeron glabrous; scutellum very small.
Elytral epipleura with scattered punctures of various sizes; marginal epipleural stria double, both striae weakly impressed but complete; marginal elytral stria well impressed, continuous along elytral apex as apical elytral stria, stopping short of sutural elytral stria; humeral elytral stria impressed on basal fourth; inner subhumeral stria present medially, very short; elytral disc with four dorsal elytral striae 1–4, first the longest, almost complete, becoming very fine and almost invisible on apical half, second to fourth striae well impressed, reaching about elytral half; between fourth dorsal elytral and sutural striae a characteristic hooked appendix present; sutural elytral stria present usually only on basal fourth to basal sixth. Entire elytral disc with regular dense round punctation, becoming sparser anteriorly and especially around scutellum; punctures separated by about their own to twice their own diameter; around apical elytral stria with longitudinal rugae.
Propygidium transverse, about four times as broad as long, partly concealed by elytra, with dense and coarse punctures; pygidium with dense elliptic punctures, separated by about their own diameter, becoming sparser towards apex.
Anterior margin of median portion of prosternum ( Fig. 366 View Figs ) rounded; marginal prosternal stria present only laterally; prosternal process flattened, broad, dorso-laterally with sparse punctures, intermingled with alutaceous microsculpture; carinal prosternal striae carinate, parallel on basal two-thirds, thence strongly convergent anteriorly, vaguely united under a sharp angle terminating in shallow tiny prosternal apical fossa; lateral prosternal striae strongly convergent anteriorly, attaining carinal striae in middle of prosternal process.
Anterior margin of mesoventrite ( Fig. 367 View Figs ) moderately emarginate medially; discal marginal mesosternal stria well impressed, somewhat carinate; disc flattened, with round punctures separated about their own to three times their diameter; meso-metaventral suture indistinct, meso-metaventral sutural stria marked as a sinuate row of large punctures; intercoxal disc of metaventrite ( Fig. 368 View Figs ) laterally and along apical margin with deep round punctures of various sizes; in male longitudinally somewhat concave, with narrowly-defined longitudinal area along median line bordered with microscopic setae; surface mesad of it glabrous. Lateral metaventral stria well impressed, carinate, almost straight, reaching metacoxa; lateral disc of metaventrite ( Fig. 368 View Figs ) flattened, with round shallow large punctures fringed with microscopic setae; metepisternum + fused metepimeron ( Fig. 368 View Figs ) evenly covered with even coarser and denser punctation, punctures without setae.
Intercoxal disc of first abdominal sternite with lateral depressions, almost completely striate laterally; surface of disc with dense oblong punctation, punctures becoming sparser and finer medially.
Protibia ( Fig. 369 View Figs ) flattened and somewhat dilated, outer margin with three low teeth topped with short denticle (first tooth topped with double denticle) followed by three minuscule denticles; setae of outer row rather dense, regular and short; setae of median row similarly dense and regular, but even shorter than those of outer row; protarsal groove deep; anterior protibial stria ridge-like; two thin, rather long tarsal denticles present apically; protibial spur large, bent, growing out from apical protibial margin; apical margin of protibia posteriorly with two tiny apical denticles; outer part of posterior surface of protibia ( Fig. 369 View Figs ) finely imbricate, with a row of about 10 minute denticles; delimitation from median part of posterior surface vague, marked by a row of sparse minuscule setae; posterior protibial stria complete, with rather dense sclerotized setae that become thicker towards apical margin; inner margin with double row of short setae.
Mesotibia ( Fig. 370 View Figs ) slender, outer margin with a single row of thin denticles growing in size apically; setae of outer row sparse, regular, rather dense but short; setae of median row irregular, much shorter than those of outer row; posterior mesotibial stria complete; anterior surface of mesotibia ( Fig. 370 View Figs ) with dense row of well sclerotized short setae, with another similar row of much shorter and finer setae situated below it; anterior mesotibial stria complete, terminating in three tiny inner anterior denticles; mesotibial spur stout, short; apical margin with two tiny denticles; mesotarsus shorter than mesotibia; claws of apical tarsomere about one-third its length; metatibia basically similar to mesotibia, but denticles of outer margin much sparser than those of mesotibia; claws of apical tarsomere somewhat longer, about half its length.
Male genitalia. Eighth sternite ( Figs. 371–372 View Figs ) separated medially, vela with sparse microscopic setae ( Fig. 371 View Figs ); eighth tergite and eighth sternite not fused laterally ( Fig. 373 View Figs ). Ninth tergite ( Figs. 374–375 View Figs ) longitudinally divided medially; spiculum gastrale ( Fig. 376 View Figs ) expanded on both ends. Aedeagus ( Figs. 377–378 View Figs ) slender; basal piece of aedeagus short, ratio of its length: length of parameres 1: 5; parameres fused along their basal three-fourths; aedeagus curved ventrad ( Fig. 378 View Figs ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Gnathoncus rotundatus ( Kugelann, 1792 )
Lackner, Tomáš 2010 |
Gnathoncus nanus
REICHARDT A. 1941: 159 |
HOFFMANN J. J. 1803: 87 |
Gnathoncus nanus:
VIENNA P. 1980: 120 |
MAZUR S. 1973: 27 |
WITZGALL K. 1971: 166 |
HANSEN V. 1968: 317 |
HALSTEAD D. G. H. 1963: 13 |
HATCH M. H. 1962: 265 |
STOCKMANN S. 1957: 67 |
HINTON H. E. 1945: 322 |
MCGRATH R. M. & HATCH M. H. 1941: 64 |
Gnathoncus ovulatus
MAZUR S. 1997: 215 |
CASEY T. 1916: 256 |
Gnathoncus rotundatus:
BOUSQUET Y. & LAPLANTE S. 2006: 87 |
MAZUR S. 2004: 92 |
YELAMOS T. 2002: 246 |
BOUSQUET Y. & LAPLANTE S. 1999: 144 |
MAZUR S. 1997: 215 |
DOWNIE N. M. & ARNETT R. H. JR. 1996: 612 |
OHARA M. 1994: 215 |
DAVIES A. 1991: 138 |
LAPLANTE S. & BOUSQUET Y. & BELANGER P. & CHANTAL C. 1991: 44 |
MAZUR S. 1984: 105 |
MAZUR S. 1981: 88 |
MAZUR S. & KASZAB Z. 1980: 45 |
SCHMIDT J. 1885: 317 |
Saprinus rotundatus: J. E. LECONTE (1845)
BLATCHEY W. S. 1910: 618 |
HORN G. 1873: 314 |
MARSEUL S. A. 1855: 348 |
LECONTE J. E. 1845: 70 |
Saprinus deletus J. E. LeConte, 1844: 186
MARSEUL S. A. 1855: 503 |
LECONTE J. E. 1844: 186 |
Hister rotundatus
KUGELANN J. G. 1792: 304 |
Hister nanus:
SCRIBA L. 1790: 73 |
PILLER M. & MITTERPACHER L. 1783: 34 |