Larinia dubia, Ott, Ricardo & Rodrigues, Everton Nei Lopes, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4247.1.13 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7F0B828F-8B47-4E2E-85D7-9866A032CBD3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6000169 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038687E0-FF81-FFEB-FF1B-B89BFCE4F922 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Larinia dubia |
status |
sp. nov. |
Larinia dubia View in CoL new species Figs. 1–10 View FIGURES 1 – 10 , 22, 23 View FIGURES 20 – 25. 20, 21 , 26
Type material. Holotype male from Aceguá, 31°52'00"S; 54°09'00"W, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, V.2011, L. R. Podgaiski leg., deposited at MCN 52123 . Paratypes: female, Estação Ecológica de Aratinga, 29°26'52"S; 50°35'02"W, São Francisco de Paula , Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, 21.XII.2012, Equipe L. E. I. UFRGS leg. ( MCN 52121) ; female, Lavras do Sul, 30°48'46"S ; 53°53'42"W, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, V. 2012, L. R. Podgaiski leg. ( MCN 52122) ; male (MCN 52126).
Etymology. The species epithet is a Latin adjective meaning “dubious.” It refers to doubts among species, difficult to define.
Diagnosis. Male palps of L. dubia new species are similar to those of L. tucuman ( Figs. 20, 21 View FIGURES 20 – 25. 20, 21 ; see also Harrod et al. 1990: 251, figs. 14, 15) in having a triangular shaped embolus ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 10 ) and a small process distally on tegulum ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1 – 10 ), but differ from the last species by the shape of median apophysis with robust pointed processes with their tips distant from each other around the same length of this sclerite ( Figs. 22, 23 View FIGURES 20 – 25. 20, 21 ). Females of L. dubia new species can be easily separated from all American species by the rectangular-shaped scape, longer than wide ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 1 – 10 ), which resembles that of L. phthisica (L. Koch, 1871) from Australia (see Grasshoff, 1970: 224, fig. 8h; Framenau & Scharff, 2008: 240, fig. 30), but differs from it by having a longer scape, with a stronger posterior rim ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 1 – 10 ). The longitudinal abdominal pattern stripes ( Figs. 1, 2 View FIGURES 1 – 10 ) separate L. dubia new species from the sympatric species L. bivittata and L. tucuman . This abdominal pattern is similar to L. minor (Bryant, 1945) and L. lampa (see Harrod et al., 1990: 251, fig. 8 and 255, fig. 18); but it differs from both species by the rectangular scape.
Description. Appearance, male holotype; palp and measurements, male paratype (MCN 39126). Carapace yellow with brown median line with dark areas surrounding the cephalic area ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 10 ). Chelicerae, coxae and legs yellow. Labium yellow anteriorly, blackish at posterior border. Endites yellow with some blackish scattered pigmentation laterally ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 10 ). Sternum yellow, surrounded by a darker border and some lateral black spots, darker at posterior end ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 10 ). Abdomen dorsum whitish, with white longitudinal bands which becomes slightly darker posteriorly ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 10 ); venter grayish with a light central white spot, darker anteriorly and on the spinnerets ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 10 ). Palp: tegulum with distal pointed process (apical extension), median apophysis with broad prolateral process and triangular shaped posterior process ( Figs. 5–7 View FIGURES 1 – 10 , 22, 23 View FIGURES 20 – 25. 20, 21 ). Total length 3.64. Carapace 1.29 long, 0.93 wide. AME 0.11; PME 0.10; ALE and PLE 0.06 in diameter. AME-AME 0.11, PME-PME 0.05, ALE-PLE 0.01. Abdomen oval 1.6 long and 0.89 wide. First femur 1.82 long, patella and tibia 2.53, metatarsus 2.21, tarsus 0.73. Second patella and tibia 2.17 long, third 1.10, fourth 1.98.
Female. Paratypes. Appearance and measurement (MCN 52122); epigynum (MCN 52121). Color as in male, but with much darker pigmentation on endites, labium sternum and abdominal ventral area. Epigynum bearing a mesal longitudinal subrectangular scape ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 1 – 10 ) and circular spermathecae ( Figs. 9, 10 View FIGURES 1 – 10 ). Total length 4.70. Carapace 1.73 long, 1.27 wide. AME 0.10, PME 0.08, ALE and PLE 0.06 in diameter. AME-AME 0.08, PME-PME 0.04, ALE-PLE 0.01. Abdomen oval 3.15 long and 1.73 wide. First femur 1.78, patella and tibia 2.40, metatarsus 2.01, tarsus 0.74. Second patella and tibia 2.27, third 1.16, fourth 2.14.
Variation. Males (N=5); total length 2.77–3.38; carapace 1.20–1.44. Females (N=2); total length 3.64–4.75; carapace 1.29–1.68.
Other material examined. BRAZIL. Rio Grande do Sul: male, Tramandaí , 29°59'06"S ; 50°08'02"W, 31.V.1976, H. Bischoff leg. (MCN 4335); male, Guaíba , 30°06'50"S ; 51°19'30"W, 24–27.XII.1992, A. B. Bonaldo leg. (MCN 22646); male, Guaíba Country Club , Eldorado do Sul, 29°59'49.7"S ; 51°18'28.3"W, A. B. Bonaldo leg. (MCN 22687); male, Lavras do Sul, 30°48'46"S ; 53°53'42"W, XII.2011, Equipe L. E. I. UFRGS leg. (MCN 52124); male, Lavras do Sul, V.2011, L. R. Podgaiski leg. ( MCN 52126); male, Parque Estadual Tainhas , 28°53'06"S ; 50°21'28"W, Jaquirana, 21.XI.2012, Equipe L. E. I. UFRGS leg. (MCN 52125); male, IRGA, 29°57'03"S; 51°05'38"W, Cachoeirinha, 16.XI.2004, E. N. L. Rodrigues leg. (MCN 39126).
Natural History. All specimens collected by L. R. Podgaiski, Ronei Baldissera and Equipe L. E. I. (Camila F. Dias pers. comm.) and E. N. L. Rodrigues (Rodrigues et al., 2008; 2009) by the sweeping net in grasslands, shrubs, forest edges. This species was also collected by beating tray in shrubs and riparian forest edges ( Rodrigues et al., 2015).
Distribution. Known for state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.