Linothele pukachumpi Dupérré & Tapia, 2015
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/zoosystema2021v43a10 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2763DA07-4D8F-4CA2-BB63-E5BC26470296 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4721102 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0386CD35-FF88-FFB5-75B5-F9AD465B9624 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Linothele pukachumpi Dupérré & Tapia, 2015 |
status |
|
Linothele pukachumpi Dupérré & Tapia, 2015 View in CoL
Linothele pukachumpi Dupérré & Tapia, 2015: 356 View in CoL View Cited Treatment , figs 30-33.
TYPE MATERIAL. — Holotype. Ecuador • ♀; Cotopaxi Province, Otonga Biological Reserve ; 0°25’21.396”S, 79°30’38.519”W; 2225 m a.s.l.; 04-09.IX.2014; N. Dupérré, E. Tapia and C. Tapia leg.; QCAZ. GoogleMaps
Paratype. Ecuador • 1 ♀; same collecting data as for holotype; 26.V.2014; A. Tapia leg.; QCAZ GoogleMaps .
TYPE LOCALITY. — Otonga Biological Reserve, Ecuador.
DISTRIBUTION. — Only known from the type locality.
DIAGNOSIS. — “Females are diagnosed by their uniform red-brown colour […]. From L. longicauda , L. aequatorialis and L. cousini by the presence of yellowish setae on the carapace […]. Females can be further diagnosed by their elongated and apically tapering spermathecae, with a few elongated vesicles medially […].” see Dupérré & Tapia (2015: 356-357).
DESCRIPTION (FOLLOWING DUPÉRRÉ & TAPIA 2015)
Male
Unknown.
Female
CL = 11.0. CT = 10. MC = 25-30. Colouration: overall reddish brown, see Dupérré & Tapia (2015: fig. 30); maculae absent. Sternum, labium and maxillae: see Dupérré & Tapia (2015: fig. 31). Leg formula: 4123. Scopula divided. Leg tarsi pseudo-segmented. Spermathecae: “joined at base, elongated and tapering apically, with a few elongated vesicles medially, most on long stalk”, see Dupérré & Tapia (2015: figs 32, 33).
REMARKS
Dupérré & Tapia (2015) diagnosed Linothele pukachumpi as follows: “From L. longicauda , L. aequatorialis and L. cousini by the presence of yellowish setae on the carapace […]. Females can be further diagnosed by their elongated and apically tapering spermathecae, with a few elongated vesicles medially […].” Yellowish/golden setae on carapace, dorsal trochanter, or coxae are known at least from living specimens of L. curvitarsis , L. gaujoni , L. sericata , and L. spinosa sp. n. Furthermore, yellowish/golden setae can be observed in all species, except for the male of L. yanachanka , in the original descriptions by Dupérré & Tapia 2015. The golden shine visible in living specimens fades shortly after preparation in alcohol. The setae become dull and more greyish, likely due to shrinking of the cuticula; see Foelix et al. 2009. While the yellowish setae are an easy way to distinguish alive specimens of L. longicauda and L. pukachumpi , further characteristics to distinguish between preserved specimens of these species might become necessary.
NATURAL HISTORY According to Dupérré & Tapia (2015), specimens “[…] of L. pukachumpi were collected in a primary cloud forest at 2225m, they build webs of 50 × 40 cm on dirt talus along trails, the retreat is located in soil crevices.”
QCAZ |
Museo de Zoologia, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Ecuador |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Linothele pukachumpi Dupérré & Tapia, 2015
Drolshagen, Bastian & Bäckstam, Christian M. 2021 |