Ditaeniella parallela Walker, 1853
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.33910/2686-9519-2022-14-2-281-298 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1498EF7E-BC6B-427A-9CF3-C5F3E272492A |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03881204-FFD7-FF88-8641-FF4C2522FB4F |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Ditaeniella parallela Walker, 1853 |
status |
|
Ditaeniella parallela Walker, 1853 View in CoL
Figs. 9 View Figs , 16, 17, 18, 19 View Figs
Sciomyza parallela Walker 1853
Melina (Ditaenia) grisescens Meigen, 1830 ( Cresson, 1920: 49–50)
Pherbellia parallela ( Johnson 1925: 250) View in CoL Ditaeniella parallela ( Rozkošný 1987: 18) View in CoL Ditaeniella parallela Walker, 1853 View in CoL : redescription in Murphy et al. (2018: 56–58)
Material examined: see specimens listed in Murphy et al. (2018: 57–58) and Murphy (2020: 9).
New specimens examined: USA: Texas: Laguna Madre, 25 km SE Harlingen (26.0 ° N, 97.6 ° W), D. E. Hardy, 25.01.1945, 2♂ (with L. V. Knutson’s determination label “ Ph. humilis Loew ” and G.C. Steyskal’s determination label “ Ph. grisescens ”) ( ZIN); Brazos Co., College Station , 30.60 ° N, 96.35 ° W, 10.10.2015, V. Belov, 1♂ ( ZMUM) GoogleMaps .
Distribution. Widespread in USA and Canada, also known from Mexico and Dominican Republic.
Remarks. Cresson (1920) and Sack (1939) regarded D. parallela as a synonym of D. grisescens on the basis of non-genitalic characters; we also found no non-genitalic differences. Steyskal (1963) examined the genitalia of D. grisescens and D. parallela and published drawings of them, having found them to differ ( Figs. 7, 9 View Figs ), but he failed to explain which differences in his drawings were diagnostically important. Males of D. parallela differ from those of D. grisescens by the structure of their genitalia: in D. parallela , the sclerotised portion of the cercus forms a flat paired plate, broadened and upcurved apically ( Figs. 9 View Figs , 19 View Figs ); and the postgonites each bear only a single strong spine ( Fig. 18 View Figs ). Females of D. parallela are undistinguishable from those of D. grisescens .
As will be shown in Part III, the distance between COI sequences among Palaearctic specimens of Ditaeniella grisescens is much greater than that among Nearctic specimens. This suggests an Old-World origin of Ditaeniella . If so, D. parallela must have colonised North America via the Bering Land Bridge, which existed 30,000 –11,000 years BPE.
Ditaeniella patagonensis Macquart, 1851
See: Ditaeniella grisescens : Notes on synonymy of Ditaeniella patagonensis .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ditaeniella parallela Walker, 1853
Vikhrev, Nikita E. & Murphy, William L. 2022 |
Pherbellia parallela ( Johnson 1925: 250 )
Murphy, W. L. & Mathis, W. N. & Knutson, L. V. 2018: 56 |
Rozkosny, R. 1987: 18 |
Johnson, C. W. 1925: 250 |
Melina (Ditaenia) grisescens
Cresson, E. T. Jr. 1920: 49 |