Monohelea ema Felippe-Bauer & Trindade, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4358.1.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3403A972-99A2-4FC8-8917-8F3E0A42F903 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6033292 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03885039-3F00-FFA5-FF4F-FC91FC82F81C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Monohelea ema Felippe-Bauer & Trindade |
status |
sp. nov. |
Monohelea ema Felippe-Bauer & Trindade View in CoL sp. nov.
( Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 ; 4 A–G; 9 E–F)
Diagnosis. The only Neotropical species of Monohelea in which the males have hind femur with brown base, mid leg with distinct mesal brown bands, paramere with mesal hook-shaped process measuring 0.61X as long as distal portion that progressively narrows distally to rounded apex. Female unknown.
Male. Head: eyes widely separated ( Fig. 4 C View FIGURE 4 ). Antenna missing. Palpus ( Fig. 4 D View FIGURE 4 ) pale brown; 3rd segment nearly oval with small, shallow, sensory organ on apical 1/3; lengths of segments 20- 25- 25- 25- 43; palpal ratio 1.25.
Thorax. Brown; scutum damaged. Legs ( Fig. 4 F View FIGURE 4 ) yellow; fore leg missing, mid-, hind coxae and trochanters brown; mid femur with basal and mesal pale brown bands, hind femur with basal brown band, one brown stripe in middle, a subapical ventral brown spot; mid tibiae with a mesal and apical pale brown band; hind tibia missing. Tarsi: mid tarsomere 1 with 2 basal, 2 apical spines; mid tarsomeres 2–4 with 2-2-2 apical spines, basal spines absent; mid tarsomere 5 missing; mid tarsal ratio 2.22; claws missing. Wing ( Fig. 4 A View FIGURE 4 ) partially damaged; macrotrichia restricted to vein costa; microtrichia absent; 2nd radial cell nearly 2X longer than 1st; wing length nearly 0.90 mm, width 0.34 mm; costal ratio nearly 0.75. Halter stem pale; knob pale brown in distal 1/2, a pale brown spot laterally ( Fig 4 B View FIGURE 4 ).
Abdomen. Pale brown ( Fig. 4 E View FIGURE 4 ). Genitalia ( Figs. 4 G View FIGURE 4 ; 9 E–F): sternite IX spiculate except on basal portion, posterior margin with a short, convex, median lobe with 4 long setae; tergite IX tapering with a pair of apicolateral processes. Gonocoxite moderately stout, nearly 1.8 X longer than basal width; gonostylus curved in apical 1/2, 0.59 as long as gonocoxite, moderately pilose on basal 3/4. Parameres ( Fig. 9 E View FIGURE9 ) 1.36 X as long as aedeagus, broadly fused at trilobed base; each with a long, curved, sclerotized mesal hook-shaped process, 0.61X as long as distal portion of the paramere, that tapering gradually to blunt apex. Aedeagus ( Fig. 9 F View FIGURE9 ) triangular, composed of 2 pointed ventral plates, with slightly sclerotized dorsal structure, which arises in the middle way to aedeagus base, and produced beyond the apices of ventral plates, ending as an apical projection; basal arms slender, slightly expanded laterally.
Female. Unknown
Distribution. Brazil, Pará State.
Type. Holotype male, on microscope slide labeled “Fazenda Ema (01°24’37”S, 46°22’12”W), Viseu, Pará, BRASIL, 23–24.VI.2007, CDC light trap, forest, Guimarães, D. col. ( MPEG).
Etymology. This species is named after the type locality.
Taxonomic discussion. Characters for distinguishing Monohelea ema from the related species may be found in the discussion under the description of the M. cornuta .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |