Monohelea visinensis Felippe-Bauer & Trindade, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4358.1.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3403A972-99A2-4FC8-8917-8F3E0A42F903 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6033306 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03885039-3F0A-FFAE-FF4F-FAC3FCF1FD48 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Monohelea visinensis Felippe-Bauer & Trindade |
status |
sp. nov. |
Monohelea visinensis Felippe-Bauer & Trindade View in CoL sp. nov.
( Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 ; 8 A–E; 10 E–F)
Diagnosis. The only Neotropical species of Monohelea in which the males have brown legs, hind femur with two mesal yellowish bands, paramere with two pointed apical processes and a ventral, sclerotized oval structure, aedeagus with basal arms slender, slightly expanded laterally. Female unknown.
Male. Head: eyes widely separated. Antenna pale brown with pedicel darker; flagellomeres 1–9 with lengths 113- 35- 35- 33- 30- 30- 28- 30- 25, 38, 11-13 missing. Antennal ratio untold. Palpus ( Fig. 8 C View FIGURE 8 ) pale brown; 3rd segment compressed, nearly oval with large, moderately deep, sensory organ on distal 1/2; palpal ratio untold.
Thorax. Brown; scutum without definite pattern on slide mounted specimen; scutellum yellowish laterally, with 4 bristles. Legs ( Fig. 8 D View FIGURE 8 ) brown; coxae and trochanters brown; femora with two mesal yellowish bands; tibiofemoral joints yellowish; tibiae with subbasal and mesal yellowish bands; hind tibial comb with 6 bristles. Tarsi: pale; fore-, hind tarsomere 1 with one basal and one apical spine; midtarsomere 1 with 1 basal, 2 apical spines; apical spines of midtarsomeres 2–4: 1-1-1, basal spines absent; fore-, hind tarsomeres 2–4 missing; mid tarsal ratio 2.50; median claws small, paired, equal-sized, 0.4X as long as 5th tarsomeres. Wing ( Fig. 8 A View FIGURE 8 ): macrotrichia restricted to vein costa; microtrichia absent; 2nd radial cell damaged; wing length 0.81 mm, width 0.30 mm; costal ratio nearly 0.74. Halter stem pale; knob brown in distal 1/2 ( Fig. 8 B View FIGURE 8 ).
Abdomen. Brown. Genitalia ( Figs. 8 E View FIGURE 8 ; 10 E–F): sternite IX spiculate except on basal portion, posterior margin not defined; tergite IX tapering with a pair of apicolateral processes. Gonocoxite moderately stout, nearly 2X longer than basal width; gonostylus near straight 0.81 as long as gonocoxite, moderately pilose on basal 1/2. Parameres swollen ( Fig. 10 E View FIGURE 10 ) 1.08X as long as aedeagus, broadly fused at trilobed base; each with a ventral sclerotized oval structure bearing two sharp apical processes, one hook-shaped laterally directed and other aculeated anteroventraly directed. Aedeagus ( Fig. 10 F View FIGURE 10 ) triangular, composed of 2 pointed ventral plates, with slightly sclerotized dorsal structure, which arises in the middle way to aedeagus base and produced beyond the apices of ventral plates, ending as an apical projection; basal arms slender, slightly expanded laterally.
Female. Unknown
Distribution. Brazil, Pará State.
Type. Holotype male, on microscope slide labeled “Fazenda Ema (01°24’37”S, 46°22’12”W), Viseu, Pará, BRASIL, 23–24.VI.2007, CDC light trap, forest, Guimarães, D. col. ( MPEG).
Etymology. This species is named in tribute of the municipality of Viseu, where the specimen was collected.
Taxonomic discussion. Characters for distinguishing Monohelea visinensis from the related species may be found in the discussion under the description of the M. barbara .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |