Flemingia paniculata Wall. ex Benth. (1852: 245)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.351.1.3 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0388AD1C-FF91-8140-FF75-16E0FCFD9801 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Flemingia paniculata Wall. ex Benth. (1852: 245) |
status |
|
Flemingia paniculata Wall. ex Benth. (1852: 245) View in CoL . Type:— MYANMAR. Ataran river, Wall.Cat. 5759 (holotype K-
001122037!, isotype BM-000958663!)
Flemingia sarmentosa Craib (1927: 69) View in CoL . Type:— THAILAND. Maharat, elev. 360 m, 15 February 1912, A.F.G. Kerr 2380 (holotype ABD!, isotype BM-000958670!) syn. nov.
Note: — Wallich (1831) originally enumerated F. paniculata View in CoL in A Numerical List of Dried Specimens based on the specimen number Wall.Cat. 5759, collected from Ataran river, Myanmar ( Figure 5 View FIGURE 5 ), but without a description of the species. Thus, F. paniculata View in CoL was illegitimate. Later, Miquel (1852) not only validated this name with a full description of the species, but also annotated that F. paniculata View in CoL is most similar to F. strobilifera View in CoL by sharing an unifoliolate leaves and clearly distinguished by inflorescence differences. Nearly one century later, Craib (1927) described F. sarmentosa View in CoL as a new species on the basis of the specimen A.F.G. Kerr 2380 collected from Thailand ( Figure 6 View FIGURE 6 ). The author also mentioned that the species is most similar to F. paniculata View in CoL by sharing a simple leaf and a racemose inflorescence with flower not enclosed by large folded bracts, but the latter is only distinct from the former by the difference of calyx length. However, our recent examination of protologues and type specimens of these two species showed the calyx length of F. sarmentosa View in CoL is variable during its flower lifespan and not clearly different from F. paniculata View in CoL . Furthermore, other morphological characters of F. sarmentosa View in CoL are mostly identical to those found in F. paniculata View in CoL ( Table 2). Hence, the former is conspecific with the latter, and is treated here as a new synonym of the latter.
Flemingia sootepensis Craib (1911: 43) View in CoL . Lectotype (designated here):— THAILAND. Chieng Mai : Doi Sootep, 16 January 1910, A.F.G. Kerr 934 (BM-000958671!, isolectotypes BM-000958672!, E-00157794!, P-00709078!); 1 January 1905, C.C. Hosseus 309 (syntypes P-00709079!, M-0168856 !).
Note: —When Craib (1911) described this species from Doi Sootep, Chieng Mai, Thailand, he cited two specimens in the protologue, e.i. A.F.G. Kerr 934 at E (E-00157794), BM (BM-000958671, BM-000958672), P (P-00709078) ( Figure 7 View FIGURE 7 ) and C.C. Hosseus 309 at P (P-00709079), M (M-0168856) ( Figure 8 View FIGURE 8 ), without designating the holotype. A search of these syntypes at relevant herbaria revealed that the specimen A.F.G. Kerr 934 at E (E-00157794) has complete branches of open flowers and mature fruits, which match very well with the diagnostic characters of the species mentioned in the protologue, and selected here as the lectotype of the species ( Figure 7 View FIGURE 7 ). The remaining duplicates at BM and P are designated here as the isolectotype.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Flemingia paniculata Wall. ex Benth. (1852: 245)
Do, Truong Van, Xu, Bo & Gao, Xin-Fen 2018 |
Flemingia sarmentosa
Craib, W. G. 1927: ) |
Flemingia sootepensis
Craib, W. G. 1911: ) |