Pseudomethoca pergrata ( Cresson 1902 ) Cresson, 1902
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.278956 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6182634 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0389EC48-D12B-FFA2-0AFD-F8D1F866FF26 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pseudomethoca pergrata ( Cresson 1902 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Pseudomethoca pergrata ( Cresson 1902) , comb. nov.
Mutilla pergrata Cresson 1902: 7 (key), 21, Ƥ "Rio do Janeiro"; 1916: 83, Ƥ. Ephuta (Ephuta) pergrata: André 1902: 62 , Ƥ.
Ephuta pergrata: Nonveiller 1990: 88 , Ƥ (incertae sedis).
Diagnosis. FEMALE. The differences between the female of this species and Pseudomethoca pumila (Burmeister, 1855) are given in the diagnosis of the former species above. MALE unknown. Distribution. Brazil (Rio de Janeiro).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pseudomethoca pergrata ( Cresson 1902 )
Bergamaschi, Antonio C. B., Cambra, Roberto A. & Melo, Gabriel A. R. 2011 |
Ephuta pergrata:
Nonveiller 1990: 88 |
Mutilla pergrata
Cresson 1902: 7 |
Andre 1902: 62 |