Luthela taian, Xu & Yu & Liu & Li, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5091.1.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7E744DAE-E9E6-4FB5-9897-1CCF03D373BC |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5840645 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038A8789-FFB0-FFD7-16FE-5CF0C095F98E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Luthela taian |
status |
sp. nov. |
Luthela taian sp. nov.
( Figs 12A–G View FIGURE 12 , 13A–L View FIGURE 13 )
Holotype. Male (XUX-2014-143A, matured on 6 September 2014 at CBEE), Shandong Agricultural University, Taian City, Shandong Province, China, 36.155°N, 117.156°E, 131 m, collected on 17 July 2014, by F.X. Liu, C. Xu, and Z. T. Zhang, CBEE. GoogleMaps
Paratypes. 13 females (XUX-2014-133/134/135/136/137/138/140/141/141A/143/144/144A/144B/144C) and 3 males (XUX-2014-139, matured on 20 September 2014, XUX-2014-142 matured on 26 June 2015, XUX-2014- 142A matured on 24 August 2014 at CBEE), same data as for holotype GoogleMaps ; 2 females (XUX-2014-151/154) Confucius Cemetery , Qufu city, Shandong Province, China, 35.618°N, 116.991°E, 80 m, collected on 18 July 2014, by F.X. Liu, C. Xu, and Z. T. Zhang. All in CBEE GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis. Males of L. taian sp. nov. can be distinguished from those of L. badong sp. nov. by the conductor having two longer and thicker spines ( Fig. 12A, 12G View FIGURE 12 ); from those of L. dengfeng sp. nov. by the conductor with longer lower spines ( Fig. 12G View FIGURE 12 ); from the other Luthela species by the conductor lacking the middle spine ( Fig. 12D– G View FIGURE 12 ). Females of L. taian sp. nov. differ from those of L. badong sp. nov., L. luotianensis , and L. yuncheng sp. nov. by the middle receptacular clusters smaller than the lateral ones ( Fig. 13A–C, 13G–I View FIGURE 13 ); from those of L. schensiensis and L. yiyuan sp. nov. by the middle receptacular clusters with slender and longer stalks ( Fig. 13A–C View FIGURE 13 ); from those of L. handan sp. nov. by the middle receptacular clusters being separated from each other ( Fig. 13A View FIGURE 13 ).
Description. Male (Holotype). Carapace brown; opisthosoma light brown, with dark brown tergites; sternum narrow, much longer than wide; a few long pointed hairs running over ocular mound in longitudinal row; chelicerae robust with promargin of groove with 8–9 denticles of variable size; legs with strong hairs and spines; opisthosoma with 12 tergites, the second to fifth larger than others and the others small; 7 spinnerets. Measurements: BL 12.50, CL 6.80, CW 7.30, OL 6.00, OW 5.60; ALE> PLE> PME> AME; leg I 18.00 (5.10 + 2.40 + 3.50 + 4.50 + 2.60), leg II 17.70 (4.60 + 2.25 + 3.25 + 4.60 + 3.00), leg III 19.00 (4.20 + 2.30 + 3.40 + 5.60 + 3.50), leg IV 25.90 (5.90 + 2.80 + 4.70 + 8.00 + 4.50).
Palp: Prolateral paracymbium unpigmented and unsclerotized, numerous setae and spines at tip of paracymbium ( Fig. 12A–C View FIGURE 12 ). Contrategulum with 7–10 teeth along margin, and distal tooth with 4 serrations ( Fig. 12A, 12D View FIGURE 12 ). Marginal apophysis of tegulum with several serrations proximally and smooth distally, dorsal extension of terminal apophysis of tegulum with irregular serrations, and terminal apophysis smooth, triangle-shaped ( Fig. 12E–G View FIGURE 12 ). Conductor situated ventro-proximally on embolus, with two long spines, upper one fits to furrow of embolus, lower one pointed to contrategulum ( Fig. 12G View FIGURE 12 ). Embolus largely sclerotized, with a flat opening and several longitudinal ribs retrolaterally ( Fig. 12A, 12G View FIGURE 12 ).
Female (XUX-2014-136). Carapace and opisthosoma of the female similar to the male except for lighter colouration than the male; chelicerae robust with promargin of groove with 10 strong denticles of variable size; legs with strong hairs and spines; opisthosoma with 12 tergites, similar to male; 7 spinnerets. Measurements: BL 15.00, CL 6.85, CW 5.70, OL 7.10, OW 4.90; ALE> PLE> PME> AME; palp 11.35 (3.75 + 1.95 + 2.45 + 3.20), leg I 13.40 (4.30 + 2.30 + 2.60 + 2.70 + 1.50), leg II 12.70 (3.85 + 2.20 + 2.25 + 2.80 + 1.60), leg III 13.45 (3.65 + 2.30 + 2.35 + 3.20 + 1.95), leg IV 19.05 (4.25 + 2.70 + 3.60 + 5.60 + 2.90).
Genitalia: Posterior margin of genital sternite slightly incurved, two pairs of receptacular clusters, middle ones smaller than lateral ones with stalks, separated from each other basally, situated at anterior margin of bursa copulatrix, lateral ones situated at slightly dorsolateral position of bursa copulatrix with inconspicuous stalks ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 ).
Etymology. The species epithet, a noun in apposition, refers to the type locality.
Distribution. Shandong Province (Taishan, Qufu)
Remarks. Males and females vary in body size: males (N = 4): BL 12.50–16.60, CL 6.80–7.10, CW 6.50–7.30, OL 6.00–8.60, OW 5.60–6.00; females (N = 15): BL 12.50–20.50, CL 6.00–8.60, CW 4.50–7.20, OL 6.40–10.20, OW 4.80–8.35.
There was intraspecific variation in female genital morphology and molecular markers. For the female genitalia, the middle receptacular clusters were weakly sclerotized with long stalks ( Fig. 13A, 13B View FIGURE 13 ), or well sclerotized ( Fig. 13C–I View FIGURE 13 ).
Intraspecific genetic distance is between 0% and 0.6% based on the K2P substitution model and COI nucleotide sequences (N = 9). The GenBank accession code of the holotype (XUX-2014-143A) is MH172722 View Materials .
T |
Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |