Bougainvillia
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.184149 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4D98B605-5424-4A9A-AE3D-E38F2F96D1D6 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4669072 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038A8789-FFED-C146-FF1E-75B8265E7B9D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Bougainvillia |
status |
|
(fig. 2A–B)
Material examined. Stn. 3: 01.04.2008 —two 4 mm high monosiphonic, sterile stems, on concretions.
Description. Colonies small, ca. 4 mm high, with erect, monosiphonic, irregularly branched cauli. Perisarc covered with detritus, slightly corrugated at bases of branches, elsewhere smooth; pseudohydrotheca present, evenly covered with detritus. Branches short, each with a terminal hydranth; the latter with roundedconical hypostome encircled by single whorl of 11–13 filiform tentacles. Gonophores absent. Nematocysts (undischarged): microbasic euryteles (5.8–6.1) × (2.4–2.7) µm; desmonemes (3.8–4.1) × (2.4–2.7) µm.
Remarks. The present material belongs, without any doubt, to Bougainvillia Lesson, 1830 . However, the lack of gonophores makes it unidentifiable to species level. Several members of the genus have been reported from the Caribbean (see Vervoort 1968). Additionally, Calder (1988b) recorded B. muscus ( Allman, 1863) from Bermuda.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |