Olisthanellinella rotundula Reisinger, 1924
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2022.798.1671 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F136E044-62C8-4FB3-8160-7DAE663D9600 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6328792 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038A87DA-A761-FF82-0435-FE25FACF0938 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Olisthanellinella rotundula Reisinger, 1924 |
status |
|
Olisthanellinella rotundula Reisinger, 1924 View in CoL
Fig. 9 View Fig
Material examined
AUSTRIA • 3 specs, studied alive, one of which sagittally sectioned and one of which horizontally sectioned; Graz, Kanzelkügel ; 47°06′49″ N, 15°23′11″ E; 26 Aug. 2011; A.M. Houben and W. Proesmans leg.; forest soil; XIV.2.49–XIV.2.50; HU. GoogleMaps
Description and discussion
The body length of the studied specimens is about 0.8 mm. Habitus and internal organisation correspond to the original description ( Reisinger 1924). The most typical characteristics of this monospecific genus are: adenal rhabdites ( Fig. 9A View Fig : ar) occurring only in rostral tracks; dermal rhabdites absent; a bipartite bursa ( Fig. 9A–D View Fig : bu) with a muscular, sclerotised stalk ( Fig. 9B, D View Fig : bs) and a thin-walled proximal part; and the copulatory organ ( Fig. 9A View Fig : co) with a muscular ejaculatory duct ( Fig. 9B, D View Fig : de) and a large seminal receptacle ( Fig. 9C View Fig : rs) that opens into the oviduct ( Fig. 9C View Fig : od). The opening of the vitelloduct was never clearly observed. Neither of our sectioned specimens clearly show both male and female reproductive structures. Therefore, and because of (for now) intraspecific differences (see below), we refrain from designating a neotype.
Specimens described by Luther (1963) seem to be somewhat different from those described by Reisinger (1924) since they possess an egg-shaped bursa instead of a bipartite bursa and their oviduct functions as the seminal receptacle. Moreover, the specimens collected by Armonies (1987) were identified based on Luther’s (1963) description.As probably is the case for all protoplanellins, a thorough molecular analysis would help to solve which features are apomorphic/diagnostic for the taxon and help identification and delimitation of species. Therefore, we provisionally keep all within Olisthanellinella rotundula.
Previously known distribution
In the vicinity of Graz, Austria in moist forest soils ( Reisinger 1924); North-East Alps, Austria in moist forest soil ( An der Lan & Franz 1954); Oldenburg, Germany in humus of oak leaves (Reisinger in Luther 1963); Helsingfors, Finland in moss ( Luther 1963); Sylt, Germany, in salt meadows ( Armonies 1987).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |