Lepidocyrtus selvaticus Arbea & Ariza, 2007
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.184638 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5687730 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038C0943-FFC7-FFB3-FF21-F9866EC45707 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Lepidocyrtus selvaticus Arbea & Ariza, 2007 |
status |
|
Lepidocyrtus selvaticus Arbea & Ariza, 2007
Figs 28–29 View FIGURES 28 – 29 , Tab. 1 View TABLE 1
Material examined. I have examined specimens from three localities in Northeastern Spain (LOC101, LOC143, LOC144, Tab. 1 View TABLE 1 and Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ).
Diagnosis. Small Lepidocyrtus (maximum body length: 0.97 mm) with mesothorax not projecting over the head. Body yellowish ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 28 – 29 ). Antennae, legs and dorsal side of manubrium not scaled. Ant. IV with simple nonretractile apical bulb. Labium chaetotaxy M2EL1L2; ventral cephalic groove with 2+2 ciliated setae and 1+1 (posterior) smooth setae ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 28 – 29 ). Labrum 4/554; prelabral setae ciliated; labral setae smooth; inverted U-shaped labral apical intrusion. Head with 5+5 macrochaetae A. Interocular chaetotaxy with ciliated setae s, t, r, q, p, without scales. Dorsal macrochaetae formula R0R1R2STSo/10/0301+3, with supplementary macrochaetae R1s between R0 and R1. Abd. II with ciliated macrochaetae a2, m3 and m3e; seta a2p absent. Abd. IV trichobothrium T2 without accesory seta s; seta D1p ciliated and double in length than other setae of the trichobotrial complex; setae E1, De1 and E4p smooth mesochaetae. All setae associated with the trichobothria on abd. II–IV are acuminate and strongly ciliate. V-shaped trochanteral organ formed by 5 smooth setae. Inner edge of the unguis with basal pair teeth and one odd teeth; unguiculus with serrate outer edge. Manubrial plate with 2 internal and 2 external setae.
Ecology and distribution. The examined specimens came from two localities on the beach (few meters away from the sea), which were already described in the species original description (LOC144 and LOC143), and one non-coastal locality (LOC101) located 27 km inland. In the beach localities, specimens were collected over the low herbaceous vegetation growing in the sand. In the inland locality, specimens were collected also on herbaceous vegetation.
Discussion. All examined specimens have the morphological and chaetotaxic characters described by Arbea and Ariza (2007), but with some differences in the abdominal chaetotaxy (see: Arbea & Ariza 2007, Fig. 4 View FIGURES 2 – 10 ). In abd. II terga, the original description indicates the presence of a smooth mesochaeta between setae ll and a6, which is absent in the specimens examined by me; in abd. III terga, the presence of two microchaetae between setae d3 and p5 is indicated, whereas in my specimens there is only one (microchaeta d2); seta m7a is drawn as a smooth mesochaeta, while in my specimens it is an acuminate thin ciliated macrochaeta. Therefore, the abd. II–III chaetotaxy of my L. selvaticus specimens is the same as described for L. bilobatus and L. lusitanicus ( Figs 14–15 View FIGURES 14 – 15 ). With this diagnosis the description of L. selvaticus is extended for the following characters: interocular chaetotaxy, trocanteral organ, manubrial plate, and abd. IV total chaetotaxy. The abd. IV chaetotaxy of L. selvaticus is the same as described for L. lusitanicus ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 26 – 27 ), with the difference that seta Fe4 is smooth mesochaeta in all examined specimens.
L. selvaticus is a closely related species with L. lusitanicus and L. bilobatus sp. nov., from which it can be differentiated by the absence of labial seta R and by having smooth 1+1 posterior setae instead of ciliated of the cephalic groove ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 28 – 29 ). It can be also distinguished from L. bilobatus sp. nov. by having simple apical antennal bulb and abd. IV setae E1, De1 and E4p smooth mesochaetae.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |